AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ehara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ehara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, C. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.5009
AJR 2006; 186:580-581
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Percutaneous Sacroplasty for Osteoporotic Insufficiency Fractures

Shigeru Ehara

Iwate Medical University School of Medicine Morioka 020-8505, Japan

In a recent issue of the AJR, Dr. Butler and colleagues [1] reported the use of percutaneous sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fracture secondary to osteoporosis (four cases), radiation necrosis (one patient), and multiple myeloma (one patient).

This procedure may be used to treat an insufficiency fracture with either a delayed union or prolonged severe pain. However, as Butler et al. [1] pointed out, the prognosis for patients with a sacral insufficiency fracture due to osteoporosis is generally good and patients respond well to conservative therapy [2, 3]. The injection of polymethylmethacrylate cement into the fracture cleft may contribute to temporary pain relief, but the cement also inhibits osseous fracture union, which usually occurs only with conservative therapy.

Fractures with a poor clinical outcome using conservative therapy, including those caused by pseudoarthrosis or osteonecrosis and pathologic fractures, are good indications for this procedure, but I wonder when this procedure should be performed in the patient with an osteoporotic insufficiency fracture.


References
Top
References
References 
 

  1. Butler CL, Given CA II, Michel SJ, Tibbs PA. Percutaneous sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. AJR 2005; 184:1956 -1959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. De Smet AA, Neff JR. Pubic and sacral insufficiency fractures: clinical course and radiologic findings. AJR1985; 145:601 -606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Babayev M, Lachmann E, Nagler W. The controversy surrounding sacral insufficiency fractures: to ambulate or not to ambulate? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 79:404 -409[CrossRef][Medline]

Reply

Curtis A. Given, II and Carina L. Butler

University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center Lexington, KY 40536

Traditional management of sacral insufficiency fractures, including those related to osteoporosis, emphasizes pain control and bed rest [1, 2]. Prolonged immobilization of an elderly patient, those most frequently afflicted with osteoporosis, poses several potential risks and complications. Deep venous thrombosis is one of the most feared complications, occurring in as many as 61% of patients with pelvic fractures [1]. Early mobilization of patients with pelvic fractures, including sacral insufficiency fractures, decreases the risk of venous thrombosis and subsequently the risk of life-threatening pulmonary embolus [1]. Other risks associated with immobilization include pneumonia, urinary tract infections, pressure ulcers, and so on.

Preliminary results from sacroplasty procedures show effective pain relief in most patients—including those with osteoporotic fractures, thereby permitting earlier ambulation [2-4]. The therapeutic effect of sacroplasty is thought to be similar to that of vertebroplasty and the result of fracture stabilization, the thermal effects of the cement mixture, or both [2, 5].

We do not wish to attempt to quantify the financial burden of sacral insufficiency fractures on the health care system except to point out that Taillandier et al. [6] reported an average hospital stay of 45 days in 60 patients with pelvic insufficiency fractures. The average stay was even longer in the subset of patients with sacral insufficiency fractures. Sacroplasty offers earlier pain control and mobilization, with an expectant reduction in hospital stay.

We appreciate Dr. Ehara's comments about our article [3], and we agree that, as with vertebral compression fractures, the initial treatment for osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures remains conservative therapy. But how long is an elderly patient expected to remain on bed rest with intractable pain? Sacral insufficiency fractures may take as long as 12 months to heal [5]. The elderly osteoporotic patient already has a limited life expectancy and is more likely to develop the aforementioned complications. The effectiveness of sacroplasty in relieving pain and permitting earlier patient mobilization has been shown, and sacroplasty is associated with little risk of complication [2-5]. As a result, we think that the threshold to refer patients who are refractory to conservative management for sacroplasty will continue to decrease over time. Some clinicians no longer require failure of conservative management before performing vertebroplasty procedures [7], rendering it the initial treatment for some vertebral fractures. There may be a similar role for sacroplasty in the future, with it being offered as initial therapy for sacral insufficiency fractures.


References 
Top
References
References 
 

  1. Babayev M, Lachmann E, Nagler W. The controversy surrounding sacral insufficiency fractures: to ambulate or not to ambulate? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 79:404 -409[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Pommersheim W, Huang-Hellinger F, Baker M, Morris P. Sacroplasty: a treatment for sacral insufficiency fractures. AJNR2003; 24:1003 -1007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Butler CL, Given CA II, Michel SJ, Tibbs PA. Percutaneous sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. AJR 2005; 184:1956 -1959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Deen HG, Nottmeier EW. Balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures: report of three cases. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 18:e7
  5. Garant M. Sacroplasty: a new treatment for sacral insufficiency fracture. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002;13 : 1265-1267[Medline]
  6. Taillandier J, Langue F, Alemanni M, Taillandier-Heriche E. Mortality and functional outcomes of pelvic insufficiency fractures in older patients. Joint Bone Spine 2003;70 : 287-289[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Kallmes DF, Jenson ME. Percutaneous vertebroplasty. Radiology 2003;229 : 27-36[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ehara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ehara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, C. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS