|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
1 Both authors: Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Hospital Close, Infirmary Square-LE1 5WW, United Kingdom.
Received July 26, 2004;
accepted after revision February 3, 2005.
Address correspondence to W. J. Rennie
(wjrennie{at}yahoo.com).
Abstract
|
|
|---|
MATERIALS AND METHODS. MR signs of meniscal extrusion were evaluated retrospectively in 24 rugby and soccer players (40 knees) who are currently free of pain in the knee, impaired mobility, and joint swelling. The control group consisted of 23 consecutive active individuals (36 knees) with no history of knee problems. The criterion for extrusion of the meniscus was defined as a distance of 3 mm or more between the peripheral border of the meniscus and the edge of the tibial plateau measured on coronal images.
RESULTS. Forty-eight percent of the athletes' knees and 30% of the
control subjects' knees showed evidence of meniscal extrusion. Among the
athletes, a significant association between meniscal extrusion and joint
effusion (11 cases), meniscal tears (seven cases), and anterior cruciate
ligament (ACL) tear (four cases) was found (p
0.004). In the
control group, no significant association was found between meniscal extrusion
and joint effusion (three cases), meniscal tears (four cases), and ACL tears
(two cases) (p = 1.00). A significant association was not found
between degenerative change and meniscal extrusion in either the athletes
(p = 0.23) or the control subjects (p = 1.00). The most
commonly associated knee abnormality was joint effusion in 73% of knees with
meniscal extrusion in athletes.
CONCLUSION. Meniscal extrusion is a common finding on MRI of athletes' knees. Meniscal extrusion in association with meniscal tear and joint effusion is postulated as a significant injury in athletes and its recognition as such in this group is important because it may prompt orthopedic intervention.
Keywords: knee meniscal extrusion MRI sports medicine
|
|
|---|
Reports in the literature about meniscal subluxation focus on meniscal tears, meniscal root avulsion, and hypermobility of the anterior horn associated with meniscal extrusion [4, 5]. The terminology in the literature is varied, with "meniscal subluxation" and "meniscal extrusion" used interchangeably. In our study, we used only the term "meniscal extrusion" to refer to displacement of 3 mm or more of the meniscus from the central margin of the tibial plateau as measured in the coronal plane. Extrusion of the meniscus after trauma has also been reported [5]. In older patients with knee pain, reports have suggested an association between effusion, osteoarthritis, and meniscal extrusion [6].
This study was prompted by the observation of meniscal extrusion on an MRI examination of rugby players performed before contract signing and questions on its clinical significance by one of the authors and the orthopedic surgeons. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of meniscal extrusion in young athletes and an association between meniscal extrusion and common knee joint abnormalities.
|
|
|
|
|---|
The MR studies were performed on a 1.5-T unit (Signa Horizon LX, GE Healthcare). A knee coil was used in all the athletes and subjects. The examination protocol included sagittal and coronal T1-weighted spin-echo sequences (TR range/TE range, 500600/1520) and a sagittal T2-weighted gradient-echo sequence (TR range/TE, 450700/20; flip angle, 30°), with a 4-mm section thickness and a 0.4-mm gap. The field of view was 18 cm, with a matrix size of 256 x 256.
In the coronal plane, measurements were made using the technique described by Breitenseher et al. [6]. The criterion for meniscal extrusion was a distance of 3 mm or more between the peripheral border of the meniscus and the central margin of the tibial plateau as measured in the coronal plane (Fig. 1). A distance of less than 3 mm was not considered as meniscal extrusion. An average value from the three central images for the distance of each meniscus from the edge of the tibial plateau was calculated for the distances from the medial and lateral menisci to the edges of the tibial condyles.
An internal meniscal signal extending to the articular surface was considered a meniscal tear. Meniscal extrusion was correlated with degenerative changes, meniscal tears, joint effusion, and other knee joint injuries. Degenerative change was defined as subchondral sclerosis, marginal osteophytes, or cartilage loss in our study. Only cases of moderate or large joint effusion were considered in our study; cases of small physiologic joint effusion were not considered in our study. Only high-grade or transected anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears were considered as ACL tears in our study.
Statistical analyses of the measurements were obtained using STATA software (version 7, StataCorp), and a Fisher's exact test was used to assess the significance of the associations between meniscal extrusion and knee joint abnormalities. For analyses, the knees were treated as independent of each other.
|
|
|---|
In the athletes, a significant association between joint effusion and meniscal extrusion was found (p = 0.004). Among the knees with effusion, 79% (11 knees) shown meniscal extrusion, whereas only 21% (three knees) did not contain meniscal extrusion. A significant association was found between meniscal tears and meniscal extrusion (p = 0.01), with 87% of knees in athletes with meniscal extrusion and only 13% of knees of those without meniscal extrusion containing a meniscal tear. A significant association was found between ACL tear and subluxation (p = 0.04), with 20% (four knees) in athletes with meniscal extrusion containing ACL tears.
Seventy-eight percent of the control subjects' knees (18 knees) showed meniscal extrusion. No significant association was found between meniscal extrusion and joint effusion (Fig. 2), meniscal tear, or ACL tear (p = 1.00, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively). No significant association was found between subluxation and degenerative change or patellar tendinitis in either the athletes (p = 0.7378 and 0.1722, respectively) or the control subjects (p = 1.00 and 1.00, respectively). The results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
|
|
|
|
|---|
Studies have suggested that meniscal extrusion is not an abnormality itself in subjects with knee pain but instead is a secondary finding that is not rare and is indicative of other knee joint abnormalities, such as joint effusion and osteoarthritis [6, 8]. In our study, the lack of a significant association between meniscal extrusion and degenerative change or joint effusion in the control group suggests that this theory may not be so. Furthermore, as the knee passes through a range of motion, normal movement of the menisci is only in the anteroposterior plane and true radial displacement in the coronal plane does not occur [9]. All this suggests that meniscal extrusion may be an abnormal movement of the meniscus and could be a pathologic finding.
An important mechanism that contributes to the stability of the meniscus is its intrinsic structure. Circumferentially oriented collagen fibers in the meniscus provide significant resistance to hoop stresses. They counteract the compressive forces generated by the femur and tibia and the resultant tendency to radial meniscal displacement. A single cut or tear to the radial edge of the meniscus eliminates these hoop stresses and contributes to subluxation of the meniscus [10].
Meniscal tears with the elimination of hoop stresses and greater or more sustained compressive forces generated by athletes within the knee could explain the significant correlation found in our study between meniscal tears and subluxation in athletes. In the control population, a meniscal tear per se without the compressive forces may be insufficient to cause meniscal extrusion, as suggested by the poor correlation of meniscal tears and subluxation seen in our study. The lack of these forces, which may be generated in athletes playing a sport at a high level, could also explain the difference in correlation between ACL tears and meniscal extrusion in athletes and the control group (Table 3).
|
Meniscal extrusion has been reported in older subjects with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis, and data from reports suggest that meniscal extrusion precedes the development of degenerative joint disease [4, 10]. Laxity of the soft-tissue attachments, tears of the meniscus, and sufficient degenerative change within the meniscus leading to disruption of collagen fibers are believed to be contributing factors for meniscal extrusion in these subjects [11]. Another study of subjects with developing osteoarthritis suggested that it is after meniscal extrusion that unimpaired impaction of cartilage occurs and leads to the well-recognized changes of osteoarthritis in older patients [12].
The young age of individuals in our study could explain the lack of significant association between subluxation and degenerative changes in both the athletes and the control subjects. Follow-up studies need to be performed to determine whether uncorrected meniscal extrusion can lead to unimpaired cartilage impaction and early degenerative change in athletes, thereby shortening their careers.
Limitations of this study are the small numbers in the study group because of selection from only the local premier soccer and rugby league teams. Because meniscal extrusion was assessed on non-weight-bearing MR images, the true amount of meniscal extrusion may have been underestimated. The full extent of meniscal dynamics could not be assessed because of the constraints imposed by the bore of the magnet. The use of open bore magnets may help overcome these limitations. The significance of the type of peripheral meniscal tears (i.e., root tear, radial tear) and its association with meniscal extrusion were not assessed in this study and may warrant further analysis. Another limitation was the lack of a gold standard, such as results from arthroscopy. Further longitudinal studies are required to assess the association of meniscal extrusion and the onset of degenerative joint disease in athletes.
In conclusion, we suggest that meniscal extrusion is associated with meniscal tears and joint effusion in athletes. Its recognition in athletes may be significant.
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |