AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME/SAM Credit
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in AJR
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maldjian, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chew, F. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maldjian, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chew, F. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.2224
AJR 2006; 186:S215-S218
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Imaging of Pulmonary Embolism: Self–Assessment Module

Pierre D. Maldjian1 and Felix S. Chew2

1 Department of Radiology, University Hospital, UMDNJ-NJ Medical School, 150 Bergen St., UH C-320, Newark, NJ 07103-2406.
2 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Received December 27, 2005; accepted after revision December 27, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to P. D. Maldjian.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
REQUIRED READING
RECOMMENDED READING
INSTRUCTIONS
References
 
The educational objectives for this self-assessment module on imaging of pulmonary embolism are for the participant to exercise, self-assess, and improve his or her understanding of the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism using CT angiography; gain familiarity with nonembolic conditions that may be found in patients who are studied with CT angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism; and gain familiarity with the phenomenon of paradoxical embolism, its manifestations on CT angiography, and its radiologic differential diagnosis.

Keywords: cardiopulmonary imaging • CT angiography • embolism • lung • MDCT


INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
REQUIRED READING
RECOMMENDED READING
INSTRUCTIONS
References
 
This self-assessment module on imaging of pulmonary embolism has an educational component and a self-assessment component. The educational component consists of three required articles that the participant should read and two additional articles that are recommended. The self-assessment component consists of six multiple-choice questions with solutions. All of these materials are available on the ARRS Web site (www.arrs.org). To claim CME and SAM credit, each participant must enter his or her responses to the questions online.


EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
Top
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
REQUIRED READING
RECOMMENDED READING
INSTRUCTIONS
References
 
By completing this educational activity, the participant will:

  1. Exercise, self-assess, and improve his or her understanding of the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism using CT angiography.
  2. Gain familiarity with nonembolic conditions that may be found in patients who are studied with CT angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism.
  3. Gain familiarity with the phenomenon of paradoxical embolism, its manifestations on CT angiography, and its radiologic differential diagnosis.


REQUIRED READING
Top
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
REQUIRED READING
RECOMMENDED READING
INSTRUCTIONS
References
 
(available online at www.arrs.org)

  1. Maldjian PD, Anis A, Saric M. Radiological reasoning: pulmonary embolism—thinking beyond the clots. AJR 2006;186 :S219-S223[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Patel S, Kazerooni EA. Helical CT for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism. AJR 2005;185 :135-149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kavanagh EC, O'Hare A, Hargaden G, Murray JG. Risk of pulmonary embolism after negative MDCT pulmonary angiography findings. AJR 2004;182 :499-504[Abstract/Free Full Text]


RECOMMENDED READING
Top
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
REQUIRED READING
RECOMMENDED READING
INSTRUCTIONS
References
 

  1. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH, et al. Clinical validity of a negative CT scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293 :2012-2017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Goldhaber SZ. Multislice computed tomography for pulmonary embolism: a technological marvel. N Engl J Med2005 ;352 :1812-1814[Free Full Text]


INSTRUCTIONS
Top
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
REQUIRED READING
RECOMMENDED READING
INSTRUCTIONS
References
 

  1. Complete the required reading.
  2. Visit www.arrs.org and select the Journals/Integrative Imaging link on the left-hand side of the home page.
  3. Using your member login, order the online SAM as directed.
  4. Follow the online instructions for entering your responses to the self-assessment questions and complete the test by answering the questions online.


QUESTION 1

In the setting of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism studied by MDCT pulmonary angiography, which statement is correctly implied by a negative predictive value of 99%?

  1. 99% of patients with pulmonary embolism will have a positive study.
  2. 1% of patients with pulmonary embolism will have a negative study.
  3. 99% of patients without pulmonary embolism will have a negative study.
  4. 1% of patients with a negative study will have pulmonary embolism.

QUESTION 2

Which of the following is the LEAST common positive finding on negative MDCT angiograms in the setting of suspected pulmonary embolism?

  1. Congestive cardiac failure.
  2. Pulmonary consolidation.
  3. Emphysema.
  4. Pleural effusion.

QUESTION 3

Which one of the following abnormalities is not consistent with a presumptive diagnosis of paradoxical embolism?

  1. Pulmonary arteriovenous malformation.
  2. Venous thrombus.
  3. Atrial septal defect.
  4. Atrial fibrillation.

 


QUESTION 4

Concerning patent foramen ovale (PFO), which one of the following statements is true?

  1. PFO is rare, with a prevalence of less than 10%.
  2. PFO is the most common congenital abnormality associated with paradoxical embolism.
  3. PFO commonly results in bidirectional shunting through the atrial septum.
  4. Right-to-left shunting through a PFO indicates pulmonary arterial hypertension.

QUESTION 5

A CT pulmonary angiogram shows early enhancement of the thoracic aorta with decreased attenuation of the pulmonary arteries. Assuming that the IV contrast material was properly administered, which one of the following abnormalities is most consistent with these findings?

  1. Patent foramen ovale.
  2. Pulmonary arteriovenous malformation.
  3. Massive pulmonary embolism.
  4. Right ventricular dysfunction.

QUESTION 6

Concerning pulmonary embolism in individuals with patent foramen ovale (PFO), which one of the following statements is false?

  1. Pulmonary embolism results in increased shunting through a PFO.
  2. The risk of mortality is not affected by the presence of the PFO.
  3. These patients are at increased risk for ischemic stroke.
  4. PFO can impair the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism on CT pulmonary angiography.

 

Solution to Question 1
The percentage of patients who have an MDCT angiogram that is positive for pulmonary embolism among those patients who actually have pulmonary embolism is called the sensitivity, not the negative predictive value. Most research studies of helical CT angiography have found a sensitivity for the detection of pulmonary emboli of 85% or greater [1]; with MDCT, the sensitivity appears to be greater. Option A is not the best response. The percentage of patients with pulmonary embolism who have a negative study is called the false-negative rate, not the negative predictive value. The false-negative rate depends on both the sensitivity of the test and the prevalence of the disease. Option B is not the best response. The percentage of patients without the disease who have a negative test is called the specificity. Most research studies have found a specificity of 90% or greater for CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism [1]. Option C is not the best response. The negative predictive value of a test is the probability that patients with a negative test will not have the disease. Thus, in this context, a negative predictive value of 99% implies that among patients with a negative test, 99% will not have the disease and 1% will have the disease. The negative predictive value of MDCT for the development of subsequent clinically significant pulmonary embolism is about 99%, implying that about 1% of patients with an MDCT study negative for pulmonary embolism will subsequently develop clinically significant pulmonary embolism [2, 3]. Option D is the best response.

Solution to Question 2
In a study of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism who had MDCT angiograms that were negative for pulmonary embolism, emphysema was found in 21% of cases, pulmonary consolidation in 18%, pleural effusion in 12%, and congestive cardiac failure in only 1% [2]. Option A is the best response.

Solution to Question 3
Paradoxical embolism is defined as venous thrombosis producing systemic embolism from clots passing through a right-to-left shunt. Definitive diagnosis can be made if thrombus is visualized within the right-to-left shunt (such as thrombus within a PFO or atrial septal defect). Because such direct observation is rare, in most cases the diagnosis of paradoxical embolism is presumptive and relies on the presence of the following: systemic embolism without an apparent source in the left heart or proximal arterial tree (no evidence of atrial fibrillation or severe atherosclerosis of the thoracic aorta); venous thrombus or pulmonary emboli as an embolic source; right-to-left shunting through an abnormal communication between the right and left circulations (such as a PFO, atrial septal defect, or pulmonary arteriovenous malformation) [4, 5]. A pulmonary arteriovenous malformation is an abnormal communication between a pulmonary artery and a pulmonary vein. This produces a right-to-left shunt and can be responsible for paradoxical embolism [4]. Option A is not the best response. Venous thrombus is usually the source for paradoxical emboli. Option B is not the best response. An atrial septal defect is an abnormal communication that would allow emboli from the venous circulation (right atrium) to pass into the systemic circulation (left atrium). Option C is not the best response. Atrial fibrillation results in formation of thrombi within the left atrium. Systemic embolism associated with atrial fibrillation usually originates from a source in the left heart and does not represent paradoxical embolism [4]. Option D is the best response.

Solution to Question 4
A PFO is a communication between the atria that extends from an opening in the septum secundum on the right atrial side (the foramen ovale) to an opening in the septum primum on the left atrial side (the ostium secundum). The ostium secundum is slightly superior to the foramen ovale so the communication takes the shape of a short tunnel through the atrial septum. In the fetus, blood flow passes from the right atrium to the left atrium via the PFO to bypass the nonfunctioning lungs. In the neonate, ventilation of the lungs results in pulmonary vasodilation and reduction of right-sided cardiac pressure. Hence, when left atrial pressure exceeds right atrial pressure, the septum primum (on the left side of the septum) acts as a flap valve and presses against the septum secundum (on the right side of the septum), physiologically closing the foramen ovale. In most individuals the septum primum fuses with the septum secundum, permanently closing the defect. Failure of fusion results in a PFO, which represents a potential communication across the atrial septum [6]. A PFO is a common abnormality. Echocardiographic and autopsy studies have shown a prevalence of about 25% [6, 7]. Option A is not the best response. Paradoxical embolism requires the presence of a communication between the right and left circulations. This is usually a PFO, atrial septal defect, or pulmonary arteriovenous malformation. Of these, PFO is the most common congenital abnormality associated with paradoxical embolism [4]. Option B is the best response. The septum secundum acts as a flap valve and closes the PFO when left atrial pressure exceeds right atrial pressure. Thus, left-to-right shunting through a PFO does not usually occur. Option C is not the best response. Although pulmonary arterial hypertension increases the amount of right-to-left shunting through a PFO, common maneuvers such as inspiration, cough, or Valsalva can produce transient elevation of right atrial pressure sufficient to allow right-to-left shunting resulting in paradoxical emboli [8]. Thus, pulmonary hypertension is not a prerequisite for right-to-left shunting through a PFO. Option D is not the best response.

Solution to Question 5
On CT pulmonary angiography, decreased enhancement of the pulmonary arteries with early enhancement of the thoracic aorta can occur secondary to intracardiac shunting via a PFO or atrial septal defect. Deep inspiration at the beginning of the CT scan can cause increased right-to-left shunting through the atrial septal conduit, allowing contrast material to pass directly from the right atrium to the left atrium and bypass the pulmonary circulation [9]. Option A is the best response. Although a pulmonary arteriovenous malformation can theoretically decrease the circulation time of contrast material through the pulmonary vasculature, the pulmonary arteries should enhance normally. Option B is not the best response. Massive pulmonary embolism can result in decreased attenuation of the pulmonary vessels as a result of intraluminal clots. However, this does not result in early opacification of the thoracic aorta. Option C is not the best response. Right ventricular dysfunction can occur from pulmonary embolism due to pressure overload. This can result in decreased cardiac output from the right ventricle. This would prolong the circulation time of contrast material through the pulmonary vessels and would not cause early enhancement of the thoracic aorta. Option D is not the best response.

Solution to Question 6
Pulmonary embolism can result in elevated right-sided cardiac pressures. With a coexistent PFO, the amount of right-to-left shunting and the risk of paradoxical embolism are increased [10]. Because the question asks for identification of the false statement, Option A is not the best response. In a study by Konstantinides et al. [5] in patients with acute major pulmonary embolism, right-to-left shunting through a PFO was shown to be an independent predictor of adverse outcome. Patients with pulmonary embolism and PFO had a significantly higher mortality rate than those without a PFO (33% vs 14%, respectively) [5]. Option B is the false statement and represents the best response. In that same study, Konstantinides et al. also found that patients with acute major pulmonary embolism and PFO also had a significantly higher incidence of ischemic stroke compared with patients without PFO (13% vs 2.2%, respectively) [5]. Because the question asks for identification of the false statement, Option C is not the best response. On CT pulmonary angiography, PFO can result in decreased enhancement of the pulmonary arteries with early enhancement of the thoracic aorta. This is caused by augmentation of right-to-left shunting through the defect from deep inspiration. This can lead to insufficient attenuation of the pulmonary arteries and impair detection of pulmonary emboli [9]. Because the question asks for identification of the false statement, Option D is not the best response.


References
Top
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
REQUIRED READING
RECOMMENDED READING
INSTRUCTIONS
References
 

  1. Patel S, Kazerooni EA. Helical CT for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism. AJR 2005;185 : 135-149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kavanagh EC, O'Hare A, Hargaden G, Murray JG. Risk of pulmonary embolism after negative MDCT pulmonary angiography findings. AJR 2004; 182:499 -504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH, et al. Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293 : 2012-2017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ward R, Jones D, Haponik EF. Paradoxical embolism: an underrecognized problem. Chest 1995;108 : 549-558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Kasper W, Olschewski M, Blumel L, Just H. Patent foramen ovale is an important predictor of adverse outcome in patients with major pulmonary embolism. Circulation1998; 97:1946 -1951[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Gill EA. Definitions and pathophysiology of the patent foramen ovale: broad overview. Cardiol Clin 2005;23 : 1-6[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Meissner I, Whisnant JP, Khandheria BK, et al. Prevalence of potential risk factors for stroke assessed by transesophageal echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography: the SPARC study. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74:862 -869[Medline]
  8. Wu LA, Malouf JF, Dearani JA, et al. Patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke: current understanding and management options. Arch Intern Med 2004;164 : 950-956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Henk CB, Grampp S, Linnau KF, et al. Suspected pulmonary embolism: enhancement of pulmonary arteries at deep-inspiration CT angiography—influence of patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect. Radiology 2003;226 : 749-755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kasper W, Geibel A, Tiede N, Just H. Patent foramen ovale in patients with haemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism. Lancet 1992; 340:561 -564[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related articles in AJR:

Radiological Reasoning: Pulmonary Embolism—Thinking Beyond the Clots
Pierre D. Maldjian, Ather Anis, and Muhamed Saric
AJR 2006 186: S219-S223. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME/SAM Credit
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in AJR
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maldjian, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chew, F. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maldjian, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chew, F. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS