AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hong, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hong, S. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1659
AJR 2006; 186:1025-1028
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Sonographic Screening for Thyroid Cancer in Females Undergoing Breast Sonography

Jeong Seon Park1, Ki Keun Oh1, Eun-Kyung Kim1, Hang-Seok Chang2 and Soon Won Hong3

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, 146-92 Dogok-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul 135-720, Korea.
2 Department of Surgery, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Kangnam-gu, Seoul 135-720, Korea.
3 Department of Pathology, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Kangnam-gu, Seoul 135-720, Korea.

Received October 25, 2004; accepted after revision February 28, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to K. K. Oh (kbrrdoh{at}yumc.yonsei.ac.kr).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our prospective study was to evaluate incidental thyroid cancer diagnosed by screening sonography in a population who underwent breast sonography and the differences in the incidences of thyroid cancer between those with and those without breast cancer.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Between January 2003 and March 2004, we examined thyroid glands during routine diagnostic or follow-up breast sonography. A total of 5,549 females underwent breast and thyroid screening sonography (n = 4,864) or sonography for diagnosis or follow-up of breast cancer (n = 685). When a thyroid lesion was suspicious for malignancy, sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration was performed. We compared the cases of pathologically proven thyroid cancer in two groups: a cancer group, including patients with breast cancer, and a noncancer group, including patients with negative or benign breast disease.

RESULTS. Among the 5,549 cases, 42 (0.76%) were diagnosed as thyroid cancer; all were papillary carcinomas. Pathologically proven thyroid cancers were identified in 13 (1.9%) of the 685 breast cancer patients and in 29 (0.6%) of the 4,864 non-breast-cancer patients. The diameters of the 13 thyroid masses were 0.1-3.0 cm; the mean diameters in the cancer and noncancer groups were 9.9 and 8.6 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION. The incidence of thyroid cancer was significantly higher in the group with breast cancer than in the group who did not have breast cancer. The results of routine concurrent sonographic breast and thyroid examinations were helpful in detecting small thyroid tumors in both patient groups.

Keywords: breast cancer • oncologic imaging • sonography • thyroid cancer • thyroid gland


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Thyroid cancer constitutes approximately 1% of malignancies worldwide, and its incidence is increasing in many countries [1-3]. The traditional screening method for thyroid cancer is palpation, but many have reported that physical examinations can detect only thyroid nodules with a diameter exceeding 1.5 cm [4, 5]. Moreover, studies on improved resolution of high-frequency sonography have identified nonpalpable small thyroid nodules [6, 7]. A small number of studies have described the screening of thyroid cancer in high-risk individuals, but little information is available on sonographic screening in this context [4-6].

Although the precise relationship between thyroid cancer and breast cancer is unknown, many researchers have reported an increased incidence of thyroid cancer in patients with breast cancer and they have suggested possible roles of genetic, hormonal, or radiation effects [8-11]. However, to our knowledge, there is no report to date about prospective sonographic screening of thyroid cancers with a large number of patients. Therefore, we evaluated the incidence of incidentally diagnosed thyroid cancer that was detected on screening sonography in a population who underwent breast sonography, and we compared the incidences of thyroid cancer in those with and those without breast cancer.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
This study was approved by the institutional review board of Yonsei University, Yongdong Severance Hospital, and all patients gave informed consent in writing for thyroid sonography.

Between January 2003 and March 2004, we prospectively examined thyroid glands in women in the standard manner, while screening or during diagnostic or follow-up breast sonography, using 10- to 12-MHz probes of HDI 5000 or 3000 scanners (Philips Medical Systems). Two radiologists, with at least 6 years' experience with breast and thyroid sonography performed the examinations.

We excluded male breast cancers and patients who had a diagnosis of thyroid cancer before the initial breast sonography examination. A total of 5,549 females (age range, 13-83 years; mean age, 48.4 years) enrolled in this study consecutively: 4,864 for screening and 685 for diagnosis or follow-up of breast cancer. All patients with breast cancer underwent follow-up breast sonography after mastectomy, every 6 months for the first 2-3 years after mastectomy, and annually thereafter.

When the thyroid nodules had one or more suspicious sonographic findings of malignancy, such as hypoechogenicity, ill-defined margin, irregular shape, taller-than-wider orientation, or microcalcifications, we performed sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration with 21- to 23-gauge needles. Pathologically proven thyroid cancers were allocated to one of two groups: the cancer group, including pathologically proven breast cancers; and the noncancer group, including negative or benign breast disease. We compared the characteristics of the thyroid nodules in the two patient groups—that is, the size and presence of extracapsular invasion of thyroid cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Statistical comparisons of the differences between the two groups were determined using Student's t and Mann-Whitney tests with SPSS software (version 11.5, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) for Windows (Microsoft).


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration was performed on 526 nodules that measured about 0.4-2.8 cm on the sonograms (mean, 0.9 cm) in 440 patients (7.9%). The cytology results revealed 55 malignancies (12.5% of patients), with 42 (0.76%) of the 5,549 cases diagnosed as thyroid cancer after thyroidectomy, all of which were papillary carcinoma (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Demographic Characteristics of Cancer Group and Noncancer Group with Thyroid Cancer and Characteristics of Thyroid Tumor

 

The diameters of the thyroid tumor were 0.1-3.0 cm (mean, 8.9 mm), and microcarcinomas with diameters less than 1 cm were noted in 26 cases (61.9%). Pathologically proven thyroid cancers occurred in 13 (1.9%) of the 685 breast cancer patients (Figs. 1A and 1B) and in 29 (0.6%) of the 4,864 patients without breast cancer (Figs. 2A and 2B).


Figure 1
View larger version (197K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —58-year-old woman with breast cancer. Breast sonogram shows 1.5-cm irregular hypoechoic mass (arrow).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —58-year-old woman with breast cancer. Simultaneously obtained thyroid sonogram shows 5-mm hypoechoic nodule (arrow). Case was diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma of breast and papillary carcinoma of thyroid gland.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —48-year-old woman with incidentally detected thyroid cancer. Negative finding on breast sonogram.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —48-year-old woman with incidentally detected thyroid cancer. Simultaneously obtained thyroid sonogram shows 2.2-cm irregular-shaped, hypoechoic nodule (arrow) with internal heterogeneity, which was diagnosed as papillary carcinoma.

 
Six (46.2%) of the 13 cases were sonographically detected as having concurrent breast and thyroid cancers. The remaining thyroid cancers in the cancer group were diagnosed after 6-14 months (mean, 9.4 months) of follow-up.

The mean diameters of the thyroid tumors in the cancer and noncancer groups were 9.9 and 8.6 mm, respectively. Extracapsular invasion of the thyroid cancer was noted in three (23.1%) and 10 (34.5%) cases in the cancer and noncancer groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two patient groups in the size of the tumors or the presence of extracapsular invasion (p > 0.05). A significant correlation was found between tumor size and extracapsular invasion (p < 0.05).

In the cancer and noncancer groups, respectively, two (15.4%) and 13 (44.8%) patients with thyroid cancer had central node metastasis; of these, one each had lateral neck node metastasis. The rate of lymph node metastasis was significantly higher in the noncancer group (p < 0.05), but no significant relationship was found between tumor size and lymph node metastasis in either group (p > 0.05).

None of the patients with thyroid cancer showed distant metastasis.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Studies have shown the rate of incidental thyroid cancer to be steadily increasing in many countries [1-3]. However, there is a distinct difference between the prevalence of occult and clinical thyroid cancers. Moreover, the prevalence of occult thyroid cancer was noticeably higher (5-35%) in autopsy series than that of clinically apparent cancer (1.4-6.1/100,000) [3, 12].

Careful palpation has been widely used as a screening method for thyroid cancer. However, previous reports have revealed that physical examination can detect only thyroid nodules with a diameter exceeding 1.5 cm. Sonographic screening is now possible because of the advent of advanced high-resolution-high-frequency probes, and this technique can detect small thyroid cancers [4-6]. Miki et al. [5] reported that tumors in a screening group were significantly smaller and the incidence of regional lymph node metastasis in the screening group was significantly lower than in the outpatient group.

The thyroid sonography examinations were performed without difficulty, using the same probe as that for the breast sonography. The overall incidence of thyroid cancer was 0.76%, which is higher than that in other mass screening studies (0.2%) [4, 5]; the previously reported low-incidence data may be due to the lack of lower screening sensitivity.

The cancer group had a higher incidence of thyroid cancer (1.9%) than the noncancer group (0.6%) (p < 0.05), and 46% of the thyroid cancers in the cancer group were diagnosed as concurrent thyroid and breast cancers. Previous studies have reported the increased occurrence of thyroid cancer in patients with breast cancer, and vice versa, and although the precise relationship between the two remains unknown, many possibilities have been investigated [8, 11, 13, 14]. Genetic and hormonal factors may play roles in this concurrence. Exposure to ionized radiation is a known risk factor of thyroid and breast cancers, but the adverse effect of radiation therapy used for the primary cancer remains controversial [8]. Weiss and Rossing [15] suggested the increased incidence of secondary malignancy might be due to increased medical surveillance after diagnosis of the primary cancer.

Thyroid cancers are a variable group of malignant disorders, ranging from indolent papillary to fatal anaplastic carcinomas. Papillary and follicular carcinomas account for 90% of all cases of thyroid cancer [3]; however, in our cases, all thyroid cancers were papillary carcinomas. Most thyroid cancers are differentiated carcinomas and are associated with a good long-term prognosis, especially in the low-risk group—that is, young patients with small, well-differentiated intrathyroidal tumors and no evidence of nodal or distant spread, which have a cancer-specific mortality of less than 1-2% [3, 16, 17]. In terms of prognosis, there is some debate about the optimal treatment of small thyroid cancer [18, 19], although it should be considered that even an occult carcinoma is sometimes associated with distant metastasis [17, 19].

In our study, the mean size of the thyroid cancer was 8.9 mm, with microcarcinomas accounting for 61.9% of the thyroid cancers, and the incidental thyroid cancers were detected by sonography rather than with the use of another traditional screening method.

In conclusion, the incidence of thyroid cancer was higher in the cancer than in the noncancer group. The results of routine concurrent sonographic breast and thyroid examinations were helpful for the detection of small thyroid tumors in both groups. However, additional studies are needed to determine the cost effectiveness and survival benefit of thyroid cancer screening in the breast cancer population.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L, Young J. Cancer incidence in five continents, vol.VII . Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1997: Scientific Publication no. 143
  2. Liu S, Semenciw R, Ugnat AM, Mao Y. Increasing thyroid cancer incidence in Canada, 1970-1996: time trends and age-period-cohort effects. Br J Cancer 2001;85 : 1335-1339[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Pettersson B, Adami HO, Wilander E, Coleman MP. Trends in thyroid cancer incidence in Sweden, 1958-1981, by histopathologic type. Int J Cancer 1991; 48:28 -33[Medline]
  4. Eden K, Mahon S, Helfand M. Screening high-risk populations for thyroid cancer. Med Pediatr Oncol 2001;36 : 583-591[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Miki H, Inoue H, Komaki K, Uyama T, Morimoto T, Monden Y. Value of mass screening for thyroid cancer. World J Surg1998; 22:99 -102[Medline]
  6. Ezzat S, Sarti DA, Cain DR, Braunstein GD. Thyroid incidentalomas: prevalence by palpation and ultrasonography. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154:1838 -1840[Abstract]
  7. Lee HK, Hur MH, Ahn SM. Diagnosis of occult thyroid carcinoma by ultrasonography. Yonsei Med J 2003;44 : 1040-1044[Medline]
  8. Li CI, Rossing MA, Voigt LF, Daling JR. Multiple primary breast and thyroid cancers: role of age at diagnosis and cancer treatments (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2000;11 : 805-811[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Tanaka H, Tsukuma H, Koyama H, Kinoshita Y, Kinoshita N, Oshima A. Second primary cancers following breast cancer in the Japanese female population. Jpn J Cancer Res 2001;92 : 1-8[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Chen AY, Levy L, Goepfert H, Brown BW, Spitz MR, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R. The development of breast carcinoma in women with thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 2001;82 : 225-231
  11. Rubino C, de Vathaire F, Shamsaldin A, Labbe M, Le MG. Radiation dose, chemotherapy, hormonal treatment and risk of second cancer after breast cancer treatment. Br J Cancer 2003;89 : 840-846[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Harach HR, Franssila KO, Wasenius VM. Occult papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: a normal finding in Finland—a systemic autopsy study. Cancer 1985; 56:531 -538[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. McTiernan A, Weiss NS, Darling JR. Incidence of thyroid cancer in women in relation to known or suspected risk factors for breast cancer. Cancer Res 1987;47 : 292-295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Huang J, Walker R, Groome PG, Shelly W, Mackillop WJ. Risk of thyroid carcinoma in a female population after radiotherapy for breast carcinoma. Cancer 2001;92 : 1411-1418[Medline]
  15. Weiss NS, Rossing MA. Healthy screening bias in epidemiologic studies of cancer incidence. Epidemiology1996; 7:319 -322[Medline]
  16. Vini L, Harmer C. Management of thyroid cancer. Lancet Oncol 2002; 3:407 -414[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Hay ID, Grant CS, van Heerden JA, Goellner JR, Ebersold JR, Bergstralh EJ. Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a study of 535 cases observed in 50-year period. Surgery 1992;112 : 1139-1146[Medline]
  18. Ringel MD, Landerson PW. Controversies in the follow-up and management of well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2004; 11:97 -116[Abstract]
  19. Noguchi S, Yamashita H, Murakami LN, Nakayama I, Toda M, Kawamoto H. Small carcinomas of thyroid: a long-term follow-up of 867 patients. Arch Surg 1996;131 : 187-191[Abstract]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
Y. Erbil, U. Barbaros, A. Salmaslioglu, O. Mete, H. Issever, S. Ozarmagan, D. Yilmazbayhan, and S. Tezelman
Effect of Thyroid Gland Volume in Preoperative Detection of Suspected Malignant Thyroid Nodules in a Multinodular Goiter
Arch Surg, June 1, 2008; 143(6): 558 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I. Mihmanli and F. Kantarci
Concurrent Routine Breast and Thyroid Sonography for Detection of Thyroid Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): W448 - W448.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. K. Oh, J. S. Park, and E.-K. Kim
Reply
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): W449 - W450.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hong, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hong, S. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS