AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roth, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cronin, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roth, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cronin, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1850
AJR 2006; 186:1116-1119
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Case Report

Dependent Venous Contrast Pooling and Layering: A Sign of Imminent Cardiogenic Shock

Chris Roth1, Michael Sneider1, Naama Bogot1, Michael Todd1 and Paul Cronin1

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health Systems and University of Michigan Hospitals, B1 132F Taubman Center, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., TC 2910, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

Received December 4, 2004; accepted after revision February 21, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to P. Cronin.

Keywords: cardiogenic shock • cardiovascular imaging • contrast material


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Reports
Discussion
References
 
Contrast-enhanced CT is widely used for assessment of a broad spectrum of thoracic and abdominal conditions. Findings of sudden cardiac arrest during CT examination have been reported [1]. Lack of flow during a fully arrested state causes pooling and layering of contrast material in the major dependent areas of the venous system, such as the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the major tributaries of the hepatic veins. We describe two cases of dependent venous contrast pooling shown on CT as early indicators of imminent circulatory failure and death.


Case Reports
Top
Introduction
Case Reports
Discussion
References
 
The first patient, a 63-year-old man, underwent successful aortic root, ascending aorta, and partial aortic arch replacement for an acute Stanford type A aortic dissection. He presented to clinic 3 months postoperatively with symptoms of weight loss, feeling increasingly ill, and dyspnea at rest and on exertion. He had clinical signs of heart failure, including peripheral edema, ascites, and bilateral pleural effusions.

CT aortography was performed. The aortic repair exhibited no evidence of a contrast leak on arterial phase imaging. At this point, the aortic dissection extended into the left common carotid artery origin and extended distally to the level of the left common iliac artery. CT showed thickening of the pericardium up to 10 mm, a tubular-appearing right ventricle, and a straightened interventricular septum. There were marked abdominal ascites and moderate bilateral pleural effusions. These findings were consistent with constrictive pericarditis with elevated right heart pressure to the point of near right heart failure (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D). Interestingly, this chronic decompensation manifested as IV contrast layering dependently in the superior vena cava (SVC) and right atrium. CT also showed a contrast-blood interface and pooling in the multiple abdominal and pelvic veins, including the IVC, dependent hepatic veins, right renal vein, lumbar veins, and iliac veins.


Figure 1
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —63-year-old man after type A aortic dissection repair. CT image at level of left main pulmonary artery shows type A aortic dissection repair (black asterisk), pericardial thickening and fluid (arrow), a blood-contrast level within superior vena cava (arrowhead), and bilateral pleural effusions (white asterisks).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —63-year-old man after type A aortic dissection repair. Note presence of pericardial thickening (arrow), straightened interventricular septum (arrowhead), and small right ventricle (black asterisk).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (162K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C —63-year-old man after type A aortic dissection repair. Dependent venous pooling of contrast material in dependent hepatic veins (arrows) and intrahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) (black asterisk).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D —63-year-old man after type A aortic dissection repair. Venous layering of contrast material and blood within lower abdominal IVC (arrowhead).

 
The patient was admitted to the general surgical floor that afternoon. Over the evening, because of increasing respiratory distress, the patient was intubated and transferred to the ICU. Emergent transesophageal echocardiography revealed a dilated and noncontractile right atrium; a small, poorly filled, and akinetic right ventricle; right ventricular pressure overload; and a hypokinetic left ventricle. There was also thrombus beneath the pericardium on the transesophageal echocardiogram. An ECG at that time did not show ST segment changes, and troponin levels were normal. Because the patient grew increasingly hypotensive and hypoxemic, he was taken to surgery the following morning for an urgent pericardectomy. Very dense pericardial tissue was evident on opening the chest cavity. Even after thick adhesions were dissected from the epicardium, there was minimal right ventricular function despite maximal inotropic support, and the patient died.

The second patient, an 87-year-old woman with a medical history significant for hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, presented to the emergency department with acute onset of dyspnea and hypoxemia. Bedside chest radiography showed a wide mediastinum, and subsequent emergent CT was performed to evaluate for possible acute aortic dissection. Although CT showed a normal aorta, there was striking reflux of contrast material into the IVC, hepatic and iliac veins, and the dependently positioned right renal vein (Figs. 2A and 2B). In addition, findings included dependent ground-glass opacities as a manifestation of pulmonary congestion and left heart failure (not shown). ECG T wave changes were compatible with anterolateral and inferior ischemia. An echocardiogram showed severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, an ejection fraction of 15%, and an akinetic apex. Cardiac enzymes indicated acute myocardial infarction. The patient died later that day.


Figure 5
View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —87-year-old woman with acute myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure. Reflux of contrast material into dependently positioned right renal vein (asterisk).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —87-year-old woman with acute myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure. Composite image of two CT series shows venous pooling and layering of contrast material within superior vena cava, right atrium of heart, inferior vena cava, and other dependent venous structures.

 


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Reports
Discussion
References
 
Contrast-enhanced CT findings of dependent venous contrast pooling and hypostasis have been described in cases of patients having acute cardiac arrest while undergoing CT [2] and in postmortem scans [3]. The patients presented here are unique in that both patients were alive at the time of scan, the dependent contrast pooling in the abdominal venous system was a sign of cardiac failure, and dependent contrast layering was a sign of imminent cardiogenic shock. Both patients died within 48 hr of the CT.

Reflux to the IVC and dilated hepatic veins are common manifestations of right heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation. Even more so, passive hepatic congestion with reticulated mosaic patterns on contrast-enhanced abdominal CT has been well documented and is commonly seen as a sign of right heart failure [4]. When cardiac function is so poor, in cases with dependent venous pooling, blood cannot be propelled against gravity.

In our series, contrast material refluxing retrogradely from an upper extremity injection into the IVC and resulting in a dependent contrast-blood level indicates even greater circulatory dysfunction than that of heart failure and hepatic venous opacification typical of hepatic congestion and indicates the development of cardiogenic shock.

Cardiogenic shock is a disorder of tissue hypoxia caused by decreased systemic cardiac output despite adequate intravascular volume. The incidence of cardiogenic shock has remained relatively constant during the last 20 years at approximately 7% [5]. The hospital mortality rate for patients with cardiogenic shock is between 55% and 70% [5]. Our cases illustrate that very different conditions—severe right heart dysfunction and severe left heart dysfunction—can manifest similarly as dependent venous contrast pooling in cases of grossly insufficient cardiac output. Treatments of such compromised cardiac output are largely dependent on the mechanism causing heart failure and must be instituted quickly to restore adequate cardiac output.

Constrictive pericarditis and ischemic cardiomyopathy are two common causes of diminished cardiac output [6]. Constrictive pericarditis is an infrequent complication of cardiac surgery [7] and is notoriously difficult to diagnose because of its largely nonspecific signs and symptoms of fatigue, dyspnea, sensation of abdominal fullness, and increased abdominal girth [7, 8]. Thickened pericardium on CT is a sensitive indicator of constrictive pericarditis, with the upper limit of normal pericardial thickness being 2 mm [7]. Dense adhesions and stiffness of the pericardium limit diastolic compliance, which manifests as diminished cardiac output with venous engorgement and stasis.

Ischemic cardiomyopathy and myocardial infarction distort the proper myocardial contraction sequence and motion, resulting in dangerously low cardiac output [5]. Cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction occurs in approximately 7% of infarct patients [5]. Because revascularization is associated with better outcomes than intensive medical therapy in patients with shock, early angioplasty or coronary bypass graft surgery may be lifesaving in patients presenting with dependent venous contrast pooling [5].

In summary, the findings of dependent venous pooling of contrast material and contrast-blood levels seen on contrast-enhanced CT carry a grave prognosis for the patient. This condition can be seen after serious myocardial infarction and in cases of severe diastolic dysfunction secondary to constrictive pericarditis. The managing physicians should be notified quickly to institute quick definitive therapy when these CT findings are present because they indicate cardiac failure and imminent severe cardiogenic shock.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Reports
Discussion
References
 

  1. Ko SF, Ng SH, Chen MC, Lee TY, Huang CC, Wan YL. Sudden cardiac arrest during computed tomography examination: clinical findings and "dense abdominal veins" on computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27 : 93-97[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Tsai PP, Chen JH, Huang JL, Shen WC. Dependent pooling: a contrast-enhanced sign of cardiac arrest during CT. AJR 2002; 178:1095 -1099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Shiotani S, Kohno M, Ohashi N, Yamazaki K, Itai Y. Postmortem intravascular high-density fluid level (hypostasis): CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26 : 892-893[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Moulton JS, Miller BL, Dodd GD III, Vu DN. Passive hepatic congestion in heart failure: CT abnormalities. AJR1988; 151:939 -942[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Goldberg RJ, Samad NA, Yarzebski J, Gurwitz J, Bigelow C, Gore JM. Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999;340 : 1162-1168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Alonso DR, Scheidt S, Post M, Killip T. Pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock: quantification of myocardial necrosis, clinical, pathologic and electrocardiographic correlations. Circulation1973; 48:588 -596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Mehta A, Mehta M, Jain AC. Constrictive pericarditis. Clin Cardiol 1999;22 : 334-344[Medline]
  8. Kushwaha SS, Fallon JT, Fuster V. Restrictive cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 1997;336 : 267-276[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roth, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cronin, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roth, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cronin, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS