AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishida, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nishida, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1971
AJR 2006; 186:1155-1157
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Case Report

Selective Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration of Gastric Varix with Preservation of Major Portacaval Shunt

Norifumi Nishida1, Teruhisa Ninoi1, Toshiaki Kitayama1, Masahiro Tokunaga1, Yukimasa Sakai1, Masao Hamuro1, Kenji Nakamura1, Yuichi Inoue1 and Ryusaku Yamada1

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3, Asahimachi, Abeno-bu, Osaka, Japan 545-8585.

Received December 28, 2004; accepted after revision February 22, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to N. Nishida (norifumin{at}med.osakacu.ac.jp).

Keywords: angiography • CT • embolization • interventional radiology • splenoportography • stomach


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (B-RTO) has been performed instead of endoscopic and surgical treatment in the management of gastric varix. The procedure is indicated for gastric varix with a major portacaval shunt, such as a gastrorenal shunt or a shunt involving the left inferior phrenic vein, and usually obliterates the gastric varix and the connecting major portacaval shunt. B-RTO is safe, feasible, and effective in the treatment of patients with gastric varix; however, aggravation of esophageal varix is an important complication caused by increasing portal pressure [1-3]. We report the first case, to our knowledge, of selective B-RTO with preservation of the major portacaval shunt. MDCT during splenic and superior mesenteric arterial portography was useful for confirming the morphologic features and developing a precise therapeutic plan.


Case Report
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
A 76-year-old man with Child class B cirrhosis of the liver caused by hepatitis C virus infection was admitted for management of gastric varix. Although the patient did not have gastric bleeding, the presence of a gastric varix in danger of rupture, located at the gastric fornix and cardia, was confirmed during endoscopy. Endoscopic sonography showed a gastric varix (diameter, 9.5 mm) with high flow (15.6 cm/sec) that was considered difficult to manage with an endoscopic procedure. No esophageal varix was found at endoscopic examination.

Before the procedure, MDCT (Aquilion Multi scanner, Toshiba) was performed to evaluate the gastric varix and connecting collateral pathways. Iopamidol 370 (100 mL) (Iopamiron, Schering Japan) was injected into an antecubital vein at an injection rate of 5 mL/sec. Scan acquisition was performed 50 sec after initiation of the injection of contrast material. The coronal partial maximum intensity projection reconstructed images clearly revealed a gastric varix around the gastric fornix and cardia, a dilated short gastric vein, the left gastric vein, and a gastrorenal shunt (Fig. 1A). The intrahepatic portion of the portal vein was narrowed. B-RTO was thought to be technically feasible, but we feared portal pressure elevation after occlusion of a major portacaval shunt could result in severe effects of portal hypertension, such as aggravation of an esophageal varix or ascites.


Figure 1
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —76-year-old man with Child class B cirrhosis of the liver. Coronal partial maximum intensity projection MDCT image obtained after injection of contrast medium through peripheral vein shows gastric varix (large arrowheads), dilated gastrorenal shunt (small arrowheads) draining into left renal vein, dilated short gastric vein (large arrow), and dilated left gastric vein (small arrows). It was difficult to evaluate communicating patterns of veins and gastric varix.

 
Because the coronal partial maximum intensity projection reconstructed image seemed to show a short gastric vein as the only afferent vein of the gastric varix and the left gastric vein as directly contiguous with the gastrorenal shunt, MDCT during arterial portography via the splenic and superior mesenteric arteries and splenic and superior mesenteric arterial portography were scheduled for further investigation of the hemodynamics and morphologic features of the gastric varix. MDCT scans during arterial portography were obtained after injection of 90 mL of diluted contrast medium (approximately 120 mg iodine per milliliter) at an injection rate of 3 mL/sec through the catheter placed in the proximal superior mesenteric artery or splenic artery. Scan acquisition was performed 25 sec after initiation of the contrast injection for MDCT during superior mesenteric arterial portography and 20 sec after initiation of the injection for MDCT during splenic arterial portography. Splenic arterial portography showed a short gastric vein and a gastrorenal shunt. Superior mesenteric arterial portography showed the left gastric vein and a gastrorenal shunt. Neither form of arterial portography showed the precise location of the gastric varix or the relation between the gastric varix and connecting veins. MDCT during arterial portography, however, showed in detail the location of the gastric varix and the connecting veins. MDCT during splenic arterial portography enhanced the splenic vein, the short gastric vein, the gastric varix, which protruded from the gastric wall, and the gastrorenal shunt (Fig. 1B). MDCT during superior mesenteric arterial portography showed enhancement of the left gastric vein and the gastrorenal shunt but not of the gastric varix. These findings suggested the short gastric vein was the only afferent vein of the gastric varix and that the left gastric vein was directly contiguous with the gastrorenal shunt but did not contribute to the varix (Fig. 1C). We planned obliteration of the gastric varix and the short gastric vein, but not of the left gastric vein or gastrorenal shunt, by the retrograde transvenous technique with balloon occlusion of the selective draining vein of the gastric varix.


Figure 2
View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —76-year-old man with Child class B cirrhosis of the liver. Coronal partial maximum intensity projection MDCT image obtained during splenic arterial portography shows enhancement of splenic vein, dilated short gastric vein (arrow), and gastric varix (arrowhead), which protrudes from gastric wall.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C —76-year-old man with Child class B cirrhosis of the liver. Coronal partial maximum intensity projection MDCT image obtained during superior mesenteric arterial portography shows enhancement of dilated left gastric vein (arrow) and gastrorenal shunt (arrowhead) without enhancement of the gastric varix.

 


Figure 4
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D —76-year-old man with Child class B cirrhosis of the liver. Retrograde venogram obtained during balloon occlusion of draining vein immediately behind gastric varix via left adrenal vein shows gastric varix (arrowheads) and short gastric vein (arrow).

 


Figure 5
View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E —76-year-old man with Child class B cirrhosis of the liver. Coronal partial maximum intensity projection of MDCT image obtained with contrast injection through peripheral vein 3 months after selective ballon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration shows no enhancement of gastric varix but enhancement of left gastric vein (arrows) and gastrorenal shunt (arrowheads), indicating patency.

 
A 6-French balloon catheter (20-mm balloon) (MOIYAN, Miyano) was passed through the left renal vein into the left adrenal vein from the right femoral vein under local anesthesia. Retrograde venography with balloon inflation from the left adrenal vein showed the gastrorenal shunt, the left gastric vein, the gastric varix, and the short gastric vein. To avoid embolization of the gastrorenal shunt and the left gastric vein, the balloon catheter was further advanced selectively into the draining vein immediately behind the gastric varix. The sclerosing agent was a 5% ethanolamine oleate-iopamidol mixture consisting of 10% ethanolamine oleate (Oldamin, Takeda Pharmaceutical) and the same dose of nonionic contrast medium (350 mg of iodine, iopamidol). After retrograde venography (Fig. 1D), the sclerosing agent was injected slowly through the balloon catheter and wedged into the draining vein immediately behind the gastric varix with balloon inflation under fluoroscopic monitoring. The gastric varix was completely filled after a total of 23 mL of 5% ethanolamine oleate-iopamidol mixture had been injected. The next day, after confirmation of clot formation in the draining vein and the gastric varix with a test contrast medium injection, the balloon was deflated, and the catheter was withdrawn. Before injection of 5% ethanolamine oleate-iopamidol mixture, 4,000 units of human haptoglobin (Green Cross), 1 unit of which binds 1 mg of hemoglobin, was administered IV to prevent hemolysis and renal failure [4], which can be induced by ethanolamine oleate.

Lack of flow in the gastric varix was confirmed at endoscopic sonographic examination 1 week after the procedure. Reduction of the gastric varix was confirmed at endoscopic examination 3 months later. Enhanced MDCT performed 3 months after the endoscopic examination showed no enhancement of the gastric varix but showed enhancement of the left gastric vein and the gastrorenal shunt (Fig. 1E). There were no complications during the procedure. The patient's hepatic function and blood cell counts were not significantly changed after the procedure. No aggravation of an esophageal varix was found at endoscopic examination 1 year after the B-RTO procedure.


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
B-RTO is effective in coagulation of gastric varices because the sclerosant is injected directly into the gastric varix through a draining vein while blood flow in the varix is stopped by retrograde balloon occlusion [1-3]. Because sufficient filling and stagnation of sclerosant in the entire variceal complex are essential for successful B-RTO, not only the gastric varix but also the draining vein usually are obliterated, even when the draining vein is a major shunt. Consequently, a very high initial success rate is achieved; however, aggravation of an esophageal varix due to increased portal pressure is an important complication, reported in 10% to 66% [1-3] of procedures. Because B-RTO embolizes the portacaval shunt flow that acts to reduce portal hypertension, portal pressure elevation is inevitable after treatment. The ideal procedure would obliterate only the gastric varix and its minimal complex while preserving as much of the portacaval shunt as is possible. We were successful in managing gastric varix using B-RTO while preserving the gastrorenal shunt, which to our knowledge has never been reported.

Before B-RTO, it is important to recognize whether a dilated draining vein is present and to assess the anatomic features of the gastric varix [5]. Because MDCT with contrast injection from a peripheral vein is reliable for revealing a gastric varix and the draining veins around the gastric fornix [5, 6], one can easily identify not only a gastrorenal shunt, which is the most common draining vein of a gastric varix, but also shunts involving other collateral veins, such as the inferior phrenic, hemiazygos, and pericardial veins, that occasionally become draining veins. Anatomic classification of gastric varix and therapeutic strategies and techniques based on communicating afferent and draining veins have been described [7, 8]. Although it has been schematically reported [7], our patient's anatomic pattern (dilated short gastric vein [the only afferent vein of the gastric varix], dilated left gastric vein not contributing to the varix, and both veins flowing into the gastrorenal shunt) to our knowledge has not previously been clearly visualized. MDCT during arterial portography via the splenic and superior mesenteric arteries provided more precise information for recognizing this anatomic variation than did conventional arterial portography and MDCT with contrast injection through a peripheral vein. MDCT during splenic arterial portography was especially good for evaluating the circulation of the splenic venous system, including short and retrogastric veins arising from the splenic vein. MDCT during superior mesenteric arterial portography was especially good for evaluating circulation in the left gastric veins, usually arising from confluence of the portal vein and the superior mesenteric vein. Comparing the two types of MDCT images precisely depicted complete anatomic information about the portal venous system. The findings were helpful for developing the therapeutic plan of selective B-RTO with preservation of the gastrorenal shunt.

Although our report concerns only one patient, and further examination is needed, selective B-RTO may be an effective means of preventing recurrent variceal bleeding. MDCT during arterial portography may be worthwhile for evaluating the flow patterns of the afferent and draining veins of gastric varices before selective variceal obliteration.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 

  1. Koito K, Namieno T, Nagakawa T, et al. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices with gastrorenal or gastrocaval collaterals. AJR 1996;167 : 1317-1320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hirota S, Matsumoto S, Tomita M, et al. Retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices. Radiology1999; 211:349 -356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ninoi T, Nishida N, Kaminou T, et al. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices with gastrorenal shunt: long-term follow-up in 78 patients. AJR 2005;184 : 1340-1346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hashizume M, Kitano S, Yamaga H, et al. Haptoglobin to protect against renal damage from ethanolamine oleate sclerosant. Lancet 1988; 2:340 -341[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Matsumoto A, Kitamoto M, Imamura M, et al. Three-dimensional portography using multislice helical CT is clinically useful for management of gastric fundic varices. AJR 2001;176 : 899-905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Nishida N, Ninoi T, Kitayama T, et al. Dual balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varix draining into the left adrenal vein and left inferior phrenic vein. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2004; 27:560 -562[Medline]
  7. Kiyosue H, Mori H, Matsumito S, et al. Transcatheter obliteration of gastric varices. Part 1. Anatomic classification. RadioGraphics 2003;23 : 911-920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kiyosue H, Mori H, Matsumito S, et al. Transcatheter obliteration of gastric varices. Part 2. Strategy and techniques based on hemodynamic features. RadioGraphics 2003;23 : 921-937[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishida, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nishida, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS