AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doria, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Babyn, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doria, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Babyn, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1138
AJR 2006; 186:1165-1171
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Quantification of Synovium Microcirculation in Experimental Arthritis

Andrea S. Doria1,2, Michael Noseworthy2,3,4, Wendy Oakden3, Rahim Moineddin5, Tammy Rayner1, Vivian Tassos1, Doreen Engelberts1, Kenneth Pritzker6, Marianne Rogers6, Roland Jong6 and Paul Babyn1,2

1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
2 Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
3 The Brain-Body Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
4 Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics and Applied Radiation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
5 Department of Public Health, Family and Community Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
6 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Received July 28, 2004; accepted after revision March 8, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to A. S. Doria.

Andrea S. Doria is supported in part by a postdoctoral fellowship award received from The Hospital for Sick Children Research Training Centre.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to analyze MRI contrast-enhancement patterns in arthritic and nonarthritic knees and the relationship of those patterns with clinical, laboratory, and histologic synovium markers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was performed in nine arthritic and three nonarthritic knees of juvenile rabbits. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model of signal intensity-time data was implemented to generate parametric maps of signal slope, maximal percentage of signal change, capillary permeability, leakage space volume, and time-to-peak. MRI values were compared with clinical, laboratory, and histologic markers for evaluation of synovial changes during the progression of arthritis.

RESULTS. Parametric maps of capillary permeability and signal slope depicted significant differences between arthritic and nonarthritic knees. Arthritic knees showed increased capillary permeability (p = 0.006) and signal slope (p = 0.01) with time after onset of disease as opposed to nonarthritic knees (permeability, p = 0.65; slope, p = 0.56). Significant correlations were found between temporal changes in capillary permeability (p = 0.002), signal slope (p = 0.003), and serum concentrations of amyloid A. No relationship was noted between any MRI parameters and histologic scores. The discriminative power of MRI indexes varied according to the stage of arthritis: time-to-peak was most accurate for differentiation of presence versus absence of arthritis in early arthritis (day 1, p = 0.0002), and signal slope was most accurate in midterm arthritis (day 14, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION. In vivo capillary permeability and signal slope have distinctive dynamic MRI properties. The accuracy of MRI parameters for diagnostic evaluation of experimental arthritis differs according to the stage of disease.

Keywords: animal studies • contrast media • dynamic MRI • pediatric imaging • musculoskeletal imaging • rabbit


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Rheumatoid arthritis is an inflammatory disease characterized by extensive neovascularization of the synovial tissue leading to synovitis, pannus formation, and eventually, cartilage destruction [1]. Angiogenesis plays a pivotal role in this process [2], providing a novel target for therapeutic approaches in rheumatoid arthritis [3]. The application of new antiangiogenic therapies may be assisted by the identification of optimal imaging tools to assess vascular changes at different time points across the progression of disease.

MRI has been used experimentally to characterize and quantify microvasculature, providing information about tissue microvessel structure and function [4, 5]. On dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), small molecular contrast material administered IV quickly equilibrates between blood and most compartments of the extracellular space. Analysis of the synovium enhancement curves can estimate the physiologic properties of the synovial microvasculature including perfusion, blood/plasma volume, and transendothelial permeability of the contrast agent using T1-weighted images obtained over the course of several minutes. Although previous studies have established the capability of DCE-MRI to distinguish malignant from benign tissues in many tumors [6, 7], limited data are available in the literature about the ability of DCE-MRI to assess the degree of synovial inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis as related to time points from disease onset.

The rabbit antigen-induced arthritis model used in this study resembles human rheumatoid arthritis in several aspects, including histopathology and response to therapeutic agents [8]. The animals used in the current study were skeletally immature animals to mimic changes in growing joints of children with arthritis.

Because the antiangiogenic compounds entering clinical trials are aimed at different points in the angiogenesis cascade, the choice of optimal DCE-MRI parameters for diagnosing physiologic changes at different time points becomes essential. The goals of this study were to determine whether measurements of DCE-MRI parameters in antigen-induced arthritis are different in arthritic (albumin-injected) and control (noninjected) knees over time; to define the MRI parameter that best discriminates between presence and absence of knee arthritis at different time points in progression of disease in an animal model; and to evaluate whether measurements of MRI parameters correlate with clinical, laboratory, and histologic synovium markers.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The study was approved by the animal care committee of the Hospital for Sick Children, and all committee procedures were followed.

Animal Model
Arthritis was induced by intraarticular injection of an antigen (bovine serum albumin, Sigma Chemical Co.) into one of the knees of nine presensitized juvenile (10-week-old, 2.2-2.8 kg) male New Zealand white rabbits (experimental day 0) as described previously [9]. Only animals with a positive skin test (indurated erythema > 1.0 cm) were eligible for induction of arthritis. Injected knees were randomly selected among the rabbits. Three rabbits did not undergo any injection (control group). Only one knee underwent dynamic MRI scanning, and the same joint was scanned during all time points. Animals were sacrificed after the final DCE-MRI scan at day 28 after induction of arthritis. Two of the nine rabbits in the study died unexpectedly from unrelated disease, one at day 7 and the other at day 21 after induction of arthritis. MRI data from these rabbits were included in the statistical analysis, taking into consideration adjustments for time points. None of the animals' joints developed septic arthritis during the experiment. This was confirmed by negative cultures of the synovial tissue obtained immediately after euthanasia.

MRI Data Acquisition
MRI was performed on a 1.5-T Signa LX MRI unit (GE Healthcare) with a 3-inch surface coil applying the equilibrium method [10]. Before imaging, a 25-gauge catheter was inserted into the rabbit's ear vein. A T1 map, modified for spiral k-space acquisition, was obtained before administration of the contrast agent [11, 12]. For dynamic scanning, the anesthetized animals underwent a sagittal T1-weighted half-echo 2D spoiled gradient-recalled single-slice sequence (TR/TE, 8.5/3; phase-encoding steps, 128; thickness, 3 mm; field of view, 7 cm; bandwidth, 31.25 kHz; matrix, 256 x 128; number of excitations, 2; flip angle, 30°; scanning time, 4 min 32 sec) during a bolus injection of 0.3 mmol/L/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Berlex Canada). The contrast agent was injected 10 sec after initiation of image acquisition at a rate of 1 mL/sec using an automated MRI-compatible power injector. A total of 250 images were acquired during the DCE-MRI scan, with a temporal resolution of 1.088 sec per image. A single sagittal slice was chosen from a coronal localizer through the central portion of the knee joint.

This imaging protocol was repeated at six consecutive time points: days 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 after induction of arthritis. Images were subsequently transferred offline to a Pentium III (Intel Corp.) PC for processing.

MRI Data Analysis
Contrast enhancement was quantified using a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model of signal intensity-time data [13]. Investigation of undesirable movement effects and unsuccessful injection of gadolinium chelate that could have potentially occurred during imaging acquisition was performed by cinematic depiction of gray-scale images in a movie loop. If any movement effect was detected, that particular examination was excluded from the analysis.

Color-encoded parametric images derived from the pharmacokinetic model were displayed and used to define 2-cm2 regions of interest (ROIs) (Fig. 1). A single ROI was placed on the suprapatellar region of the rabbits' knees. This region undergoes significant swelling in early arthritis. Enhancing synovial tissues of the suprapatellar bursa of the knee were manually segmented from contrast-enhanced images by a single operator. This operator was blinded to all clinical information and therefore to whether a given knee belonged to a rabbit from the control group or the study group. Parametric maps at the pixel level, implementing the Tofts' model [14], and a least-squares minimization procedure, using a Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm [15], were calculated using Matlab, version 6.5 (The Mathworks). The analysis produced parametric maps of signal slope (dS/dt = incremental rate of enhancement after the arrival of the contrast bolus), maximal percentage of signal change ({Delta}S = peak concentration of contrast agent in both the intravascular and extravascular-extracellular space), capillary permeability to the contrast agent (KPS{rho}), volume of the extravascular leakage space (VE), and time-to-peak (TTP) as defined elsewhere [14].


Figure 1
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 —Sagittal dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of albumin-injected knee showing unenhanced (A, F, K) and contrast-enhanced (B-D, G-I, L-N) images obtained on days 0 (before induction, A-D), 1 (after induction, F-I), and 28 (after induction, K-N) of arthritis. G, (day 1 of arthritis), Evidence of synovial inflammation with joint effusion and synovial enhancement (arrows) noted in suprapatellar (long arrow) and posterior recess (short arrow) of knee. Although level of synovial inflammation decreased in interval between days 1 and 28 of arthritis, persistent synovial reaction is identified (arrowheads, L) in chronic stage of arthritis. D, I, and N, Regions-of-interest used to delineate the perisynovial region to derive time-intensity curves for that joint on days 0 (E), 1 (J) and 28 (O) of arthritis. Note the increased signal slope seen in the acute stage of arthritis (day 1, J) as compared with the slopes obtained on days 0 (E) and 28 (O) of arthritis.

 
Clinical Measurements
Before each MRI procedure, the laterolateral (LL) and anteroposterior (AP) diameters of the knee joints were measured at three standardized locations (at the level of the upper patellar bone surface, 3 cm above this, and at the level of the tibial tuberosity) using a caliper (Interapid, Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co.) with the knees flexed to 60°. Each measurement was repeated three times, and the mean value was used for further analysis.

Laboratory Measurements
Measurements of the serum concentration of amyloid A were obtained at each time point with a solid-phase sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as previously described [16]. We used commercial kits (Phase Serum Amyloid A Assay, Tridelta Development).

Histologic Methods and Grading
After the animals were euthanized, synovial sections were removed from the suprapatellar, infrapatellar, lateral, and posterior recesses of the knee; fixed in buffered formalin; and processed and stained with H and E for histologic evaluation. Histologic sections were selected based on their relative anatomic location within the complete data set. Evaluation of histologic sections was performed using an optical microscope and an ocular micrometer with 40-power objective and 10-power ocular lenses. The grading system included six histologic parameters of synovial inflammation, of which three represented acute synovitis (polymorphonuclear cell infiltration, synovial surface integrity, and vascular proliferation) and three were evidence of chronic synovitis (synovial cell hyperplasia, lymphocyte cell infiltration, and fibrosis). This grading system was devised in our institution (Mount Sinai Hospital) based on a scale reported elsewhere [17].

Each of the histologic features was scored on a scale of none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3). Synovial samples of suprapatellar, infrapatellar, lateral, and posterior recesses of the knee were scored separately according to the aforementioned scoring system. A single score was given for each location of that knee. The scores for the entire joint, however, were obtained on the basis of the most severe findings noted on the synovial sections available for each knee. Synovial vascularity was graded by means of a semiquantitative score that ranged from 0 (none) to 3 (highly vascularized). Because vascularity was separated out as a feature of the acute synovitis score, acute synovitis and vascularity scores were not independent of each other. A final acute score was obtained by adding up the three scores pertaining to acute inflammation, which yielded a maximum score of 9. Similarly, a final chronic score was also obtained by summation of the three scores pertaining to chronic inflammation, yielding a score out of 9. Therefore the overall score incorporating scores of acute and chronic inflammation ranged from 0 to 18.

Statistical Analysis
We compared baseline clinical measurements of arthritic and nonarthritic knees and the rabbits' weights recorded before and after injection using a two-tailed paired Student's t test. Results of this study account for the repeated-measures nature of the data. Measurements of the five MRI parameters were compared with clinical, laboratory, and histologic markers over time by repeated-measures analysis of variance and the statistical significance of their associations and trends was computed using Pearson's correlation coefficients and linear regression, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were compared by using a nonparametric method as described elsewhere [18]. For different MRI parameters, the corresponding AUCs were compared by chi-square tests. The injection or noninjection of albumin to knee joints set cutoff values for creation of AUCs. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS, version 8.2 (SAS Institute).


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Six (8.8%) of 68 procedures failed, three (4.4%) of which were due to extravasation of contrast agent out of the catheter. Three other procedures failed because of unexpected movements of the rabbit's knee during image acquisition. Therefore, a total of 62 knee MRI examinations were analyzed.

The baseline clinical characteristics of rabbits from different knee categories (albumin injected or noninjected) were similar with regard to animal weight (p = 0.59), serum levels of amyloid A (p = 0.92), and clinical measurements (AP diameter, p = 0.91; LL diameter, p = 0.28).

All rabbit knees injected with antigen developed clinical signs of arthritis in the early course of disease and had a histologic diagnosis of arthritis at day 28 after injection of the antigen. The AP diameters of arthritic knees were significantly different before injection (mean ± SD, 34.03 ± 3.99 mm) compared with day 1 after antigen injection (40 ± 4.07 mm) (p = 0.006). The AP diameters of the noninjected knees were not different before injection (33.83 ± 3.82 mm) or on day 1 after antigen injection (35.48 ± 2.49 mm) (p = 0.69). Although the longitudinal design of this study did not enable a direct clinical-histologic correlation in early arthritis, results from a pilot experiment (unpublished data) showed that increases in the AP diameters of knees and in the serum concentration of amyloid A in the early course of arthritis correlated well (> 0.7) with histologic scores of acute synovitis. This pilot experiment compared clinical and laboratory data with histologic synovial scores at different time points.

DCE-MRI contrast-enhancement curves showed that the only MRI parameters that changed significantly with time in albumin-injected knees were dS/dt (p = 0.01) and KPS{rho} (p = 0.006). No significant differences were observed in noninjected knees (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Overview of Differences Between Arthritic and Nonarthritic Knees

 

In arthritic knees, experimental maxima for dS/dt, KPS{rho}, serum amyloid A, and clinical measurements were obtained in early arthritis (day 1 after induction of arthritis) with a secondary peak noted in midterm arthritis (day 14) (Table 1). The mean clinical and laboratory measurements varied significantly across time in albumin-injected knees (AP diameter, p = 0.01; serum amyloid A, p = 0.01 by repeated-measures analysis of variance). Although two peaks have also been noted for serum concentration of amyloid A at days 1 and 14 of arthritis, measurements obtained in rabbits with an albumin-injected knee were significantly higher than measurements obtained in animals with noninjected knees only in early arthritis (day 1 after induction, p = 0.0004; day 14, p = 0.35 by two-tailed paired Student's t test).

Moderate but significant positive correlations were noted with both dS/dt (r = 0.62, p = 0.003) (Fig. 2A) and KPS{rho} (r = 0.63, p = 0.002) (Fig. 2B) when regressed with serum temporal concentrations of amyloid A. Borderline negative correlations were observed for TTP (r = –0.42, p = 0.049). No significant correlations were found between clinical measurements (AP or LL diameters) and any of the MRI parameters. Further, no relationship was noted between any of the MRI parameters and synovial histologic scores.


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —Linear regression scattergrams in albumin-injected knees. Scattergram shows correlation between serum levels of amyloid A and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI-derived signal slope (dS/dt) (r = 0.62, p = 0.003).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —Linear regression scattergrams in albumin-injected knees. Scattergram shows correlation between serum levels of amyloid A and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI-derived capillary permeability (KPS{rho}) (r = 0.63, p = 0.002).

 
Analysis of AUC data shows that on day 1 after induction of arthritis, TTP was the only accurate MRI parameter useful in the discrimination of knee inflammatory status. The AUC of TTP (Az, 0.875) was significantly larger than the AUC of other parameters (p = 0.0002). VE was the least accurate parameter (Fig. 3A). On day 14 after induction of arthritis, the AUCs fitted for dS/dt (Az, 0.944) and KPS{rho} (Az, 0.944) were significantly larger than the AUCs of other MRI parameters (p = 0.001) (Fig. 3B), indicating that these DCE-MRI parameters possess the greatest sensitivity and specificity for differentiation between the presence or absence of arthritis of knee joints. Whereas the TTP index held the highest accuracy for discrimination of the inflammatory status of the joint in early arthritis, it showed the lowest accuracy for this purpose in midterm arthritis (day 14).


Figure 4
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —Areas under the curve of individual MRI parameters used for discrimination of inflammatory status of joint on days 1 (A) and 14 (B) of arthritis. Line graphs show differences in areas under the curve for five different MRI parameters in early arthritis (difference of areas under the curve between time-to-peak (TTP) and other parameters on day 1, p = 0.0002 (A) and between signal slope (dS/dt), capillary permeability (KPS{rho} and other parameters on day 14, p = 0.001, B). The areas under the curve of time-to-peak, maximal signal change ({Delta}S), signal slope, capillary permeability and leakage space volume (VE) were 0.875, 0.727, 0.656, 0.625, 0.586 on day 1 (A) and 0.667, 0.694, 0.944, 0.944 and 0.889 on day 14 (B), respectively. Dashed line = time-to-peak, crossed line = signal slope, thick solid line = capillary permeability, dotted line = maximal signal change, thin solid line = leakage space volume.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —Areas under the curve of individual MRI parameters used for discrimination of inflammatory status of joint on days 1 (A) and 14 (B) of arthritis. Line graphs show differences in areas under the curve for five different MRI parameters in early arthritis (difference of areas under the curve between time-to-peak (TTP) and other parameters on day 1, p = 0.0002 (A) and between signal slope (dS/dt), capillary permeability (KPS{rho} and other parameters on day 14, p = 0.001, B). The areas under the curve of time-to-peak, maximal signal change ({Delta}S), signal slope, capillary permeability and leakage space volume (VE) were 0.875, 0.727, 0.656, 0.625, 0.586 on day 1 (A) and 0.667, 0.694, 0.944, 0.944 and 0.889 on day 14 (B), respectively. Dashed line = time-to-peak, crossed line = signal slope, thick solid line = capillary permeability, dotted line = maximal signal change, thin solid line = leakage space volume.

 

Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The results of our study show that early arthritis (day 1 after induction) reveals faster and higher levels of MRI contrast enhancement throughout the arthritic synovium compared with the levels observed in midterm and chronic arthritis. Albumin-injected joints revealed a more rapid enhancement and elimination of the contrast agent than noninjected knees as quantified by the incremental rate of the time-signal intensity curve (signal slope, dS/dt) and capillary permeability (KPS{rho}). This phenomenon may be explained by transendothelial macromolecular extravasation of vesiculovacuolar organelles containing gadolinium, which are known structural components of microvascular hyperpermeability in inflamed tissues [19-21]. Although normal synovial tissues may also lead to increased enhancement, arthritic tissues hold the distinctive characteristic of vascular leakiness, which is more pronounced in abnormal tissues because of the presence of vesiculovacuolar organelles [22]. These abnormal tissues tend to enhance early with a rapid and large increase in signal intensity compared with that of the normal surrounding tissues [23].

Although the dS/dt index can be influenced by exogenous factors (cardiac output, contrast agent, and so on) [10], which makes it less reliable, in our study this parameter helped to distinguish between normal and rheumatoid synovium [24]. The differential KPS{rho} shown between arthritic and nonarthritic joints is consistent with results obtained by others in studies comparing MRI patterns of angiogenic-related musculoskeletal processes (e.g., fibrosarcomas) with normal tissue [25].

The findings of this study show that the time point of maximum signal enhancement for permeability and slope in albumin-injected knees, day 1 after induction of arthritis, is coincident with the peak serum amyloid A concentration and with the maximum AP and LL joint diameters. In our study, a second, smaller peak in the serum concentration of amyloid A was noted on day 14 after induction of arthritis. The presence of a small, second rise in the serum concentration of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in midterm arthritis is suggested, but is not conclusive, in a study conducted by Hunneyball et al. [26] in a rabbit model of arthritis.

Serum amyloid A proved to be more sensitive than ESR to quantify the presence of inflammatory activity in our animal model in a previous pilot study (unpublished data). As a result, we hypothesized that the amplitude of changes is even higher for serum amyloid A than for C-reactive protein (CRP). Our data also show that there is a positive correlation between dS/dt, KPS{rho}, and serum amyloid A concentration measurements. Similar correlations have also been established between dS/dt and cervical cancer recurrence [10].

Regions of high vascular permeability would be characterized by low blood flow and hypoxia reflecting clinical and laboratory (ESR) inflammatory-angiogenic conditions of the joints [27]. However, few previous studies have convincingly shown a relationship between the dS/dt and clinically derived inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis [3]. This is due to challenges in obtaining effectively timed MRI data such that a calculable time/effect course of disease after therapy can be depicted.

We hypothesized that the amplitude of laboratory findings of inflammation in early arthritis would be significantly higher than the degree of periarticular soft-tissue swelling, which would result in a significant correlation between laboratory and MRI measurements but not between clinical and MRI measurements. Nevertheless, although the degree of joint soft-tissue swelling in acute arthritis (day 1 after induction of arthritis) was minimal, it enabled differentiation from measurements obtained before induction of arthritis. This hypothesis is supported by the study by Hunneyball et al. [26] that showed a higher magnitude of inflammatory changes detected by laboratory measurements (CRP, 120 x increase in postinduction measurements compared with preinduction measurements) than by joint width measurements (8 x increase).

In contrast with results from previous studies that showed the rate of synovial membrane enhancement correlates with histologic features of acute inflammation [28, 29], we did not observe any relationship between the MRI parametric curves and the degree of inflammation on histology. There is controversy in the literature regarding the potential associations that may exist between histology and DCE-MRI findings in angiogenic-related pathologic processes. Whereas some studies have shown a positive correlation between tumor enhancement and microvascular density on histomorphometric assessment [30-32], other studies have shown no correlation [33-35]. Although we have used a semiquantitative scoring system rather than a histomorphometric procedure to quantify synovial vascularity, we postulate that microvascular density cannot be assumed to be the only determinant factor of tissue enhancement.

Histomorphometric parameters may reflect anatomic information at a static single time point and may not provide sufficient information on the dynamic microcirculation function of the tissue [10]. Moreover, the design of this study favored the imaging assessment since the same animal was evaluated over time, which tended to reduce the interrabbit variability of measurements. Nevertheless, histologic sections obtained at 28 days of arthritis would not be expected to correlate with DCE-MRI parameters acquired in the acute stage of arthritis when angiogenesis and inflammation are at their peak.

Our study shows that the diagnostic performance of MRI parameters varies across the time course of arthritis. We showed that the maximal signal-enhancement change in the synovium, which intuitively could be considered as a diagnostic criterion for presence of synovial inflammation, is not the best pharmacokinetic feature to differentiate arthritic and nonarthritic synovial tissue. This result is in keeping with information obtained in studies of breast tumors [36]. Furthermore, significant differences in the accuracy of TTP and dS/dt parameters used to discriminate between presence and absence of arthritis were detected. TTP allowed the most accurate discrimination between presence and absence of early arthritis and presented with a graded deterioration in diagnostic performance throughout disease progression. However, dS/dt was most discriminative of the inflammatory status of the joint in midterm disease (day 14 after arthritis induction).

Although our rate of procedure failure is within acceptable limits compared with rates reported by experienced personnel in the literature (5-7%) [37], our study has limitations. The time-intensity curves were directly influenced by the size and shape of the ROIs, and this latter parameter was dependent on the positioning of the joint, which could not be perfectly reproduced in the six examinations for each animal. The area of the ROI, however, was kept constant for the analysis of each examination. One characteristic of our rabbit model is that although soft-tissue swelling is noted in the acute phase of arthritis [38, 39], it does not produce significant joint effusion in the synovial recesses of the knee [40]. As a result, the ROIs drawn in this study encompassed the perisynovial tissues of the knee based on the anatomic location of the suprapatellar bursa, but we were unable to satisfactorily visualize the synovium membrane that overlies the bursas of the knee while drawing ROIs.

This process of averaging measurements for synovium and perisynovial soft tissues may have underestimated our results. More significant differences are expected to be noted in experiments where joint effusion is prominent, which would facilitate the isolation of the synovium from the adjacent tissues for definition of ROIs. This would certainly decrease the effect of averaging on MRI measurements. Note is made that the use of a micromolecular contrast medium to distinguish tissues with regard to their permeability to the contrast agent enables the contrast agent to be readily transported across the vascular wall, leaking out of normal and out of abnormal vessel walls. As a result, what we have measured in this study were dynamic MRI properties in periarticular soft tissues of the knee.

Although the results of this study were obtained from data extraction of average enhancement curves and ignored the heterogeneity of synovial vascular characteristics, recently Hayes et al. [41] showed that the average kinetic parameter estimate is a close approximation of parameter values obtained from individual pixels. Finally, the histopathologic-MRI correlations were performed by matching partial-mount histologic specimens selected through a standardized anatomic protocol, which may have represented only samples of the synovium, with MRI-derived maps of single-sliced MRI sections. Thus, a direct comparison between geometrically oriented ROIs of the MRI scans and the corresponding histologic sections is not warranted.

In conclusion, the findings of this study indicate that microvascular permeability (KPS{rho}) and signal-enhancement slope (dS/dt) are distinctive DCE-MRI properties with clinical impact that merits further assessment. Our results show that the accuracy of MRI parameters for diagnostic evaluation of experimental arthritis differs according to the stage of disease. Our results also suggest that TTP may best discriminate arthritic from nonarthritic joints in early disease. However, if a patient has midterm arthritis, dS/dt should be evaluated. Although values of KPS{rho} are different in inflamed and normal joints in early experimental arthritis, this parameter may not be accurate enough to discriminate the inflammatory status of the joint.

Dynamic MRI may allow rational selection of timing for treatment, which would reduce the duration of scanning—a factor that is especially important for the pediatric population—and could be beneficial for planning therapeutic strategies. In addition, with the proper imaging protocol, this technique may be helpful in assessing therapeutic efficacy, which would contribute to the development of new antiangiogenic drugs for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Further investigation, however, is required to evaluate the therapeutic effect of different categories of antiangiogenic drugs on the patterns of dynamic MRI contrast enhancement and to determine whether the results of this experimental study are directly translatable to patients with rheumatoid arthritis.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Geraldine Kent for help with preparation of albumin solution, Maria Mendes for literature search and discussion of synovial histologic scores, Anguo Zhong for collaboration as an animal care technologist in part of the study, Marvin Estrada and Vicky L. Hannam for animal injections, and Niels Celeghin for analysis of data.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Harris ED Jr. Rheumatoid arthritis: pathophysiology and implications for therapy. N Engl J Med1990; 322:1277 -1289[Medline]
  2. Szekanecz Z, Szegedi G, Koch AE. Angiogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis: pathogenic and clinical significance. J Invest Med 1998; 46:27 -41[Medline]
  3. Kalden-Nemeth D, Grebmeier J, Antoni C, Manger B, Wolf F, Kalden JR. NMR monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving anti-TNF-{alpha} monoclonal antibody therapy. Rheumatol Int1997; 16:249 -255[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Neeman M, Provenzale JM, Dewhirst MW. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in the evaluation of tumor angiogenesis. Semin Radiat Oncol 2001; 11:70 -82[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Bhujwalla ZM, Artemov D, Glockner J. Tumor angiogenesis, vascularization, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10 : 92-103[Medline]
  6. Taylor JS, Tofts PS, Port R, et al. MR imaging of tumor microcirculation: promise for the new millennium. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:903 -907[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Yuh WT. An exciting and challenging role for the advanced contrast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10 : 221-222[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Jason HE. Chronic arthritis in rabbits. Methods Enzymol 1988; 162:379 -385[Medline]
  9. Cooke TDV. Antigen-induced arthritis, polyarthritis, and tenosynovitis. In: Greenwald RA, Diamond HS, eds. CRC handbook of animal models for rheumatoid diseases, vol.1 Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1988:53 -79
  10. Mayr NA, Hawighorst H, Yuh WT, Essig M, Magnotta VA, Knopp MV. MR microcirculation assessment in cervical cancer: correlations with histomorphological tumor markers and clinical outcome. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:267 -276[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Noseworthy MD, Stanisz GJ, Kim JK, Stainsby JA, Wright GA. Tracking oxygen effects on MR signal in blood and skeletal muscle during hyperoxia exposure. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9 : 814-820[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Choyke PL, Dwyer AJ, Knopp MV. Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17:509 -520[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7 : 91-101[Medline]
  14. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusible tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:223 -232[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Noseworthy M, Bray TM. Zinc deficiency exacerbates loss in blood-brain barrier integrity induced by hyperoxia measured by dynamic MRI. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 2000;223 : 175-182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. McDonald TL, Weber A, Smith JW. A monoclonal antibody sandwich immunoassay for serum amyloid A (SAA) protein. J Immunol Methods 1991; 144:149 -155[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Oehler S, Neureiter D, Meyer-Scholten C, Aigner T. Subtyping of osteoarthritic synoviopathy. Clin Exp Rheumatol2002; 20:633 -640[Medline]
  18. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the area under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44 : 837-845[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Dvorak AM, Kohn S, Morgan ES, et al. The vesiculo-vacuolar organelle (VVO): a distinct endothelial cell structure that provides a transcellular pathway for macromolecular extravasation. J Leukoc Biol 1996; 59:100 -115[Abstract]
  20. Noseworthy MD, Ackerley C, Qi X, Wright GA. Correlating subcellular contrast agent location from dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) and analytical electron microscopy. Acad Radiol 2002; 9[suppl]:S514 -S518
  21. Ackerley CA, Noseworthy MD, Tilups A, Wright GA, Becker LE. Detection and localization of Gd-DTPA following dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) using cryo field emission electron microscopy (FESEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS). Microsc Microanal 2002;8 : 456-457
  22. Knopp MV, Giesel FL, Marcos H, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 12:301 -308[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Padhani AR, Gapinski CJ, Macvicar DA, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation with morphology and tumour stage, histological grade and PSA. Clin Radiol2000; 55:99 -109[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Levick JR. Hypoxia and acidosis in chronic inflammatory arthritis: relation to vascular supply and dynamic effusion pressure. J Rheumatol 1990; 17:579 -582[Medline]
  25. Ogan MD, Schmiedl U, Moseley ME, Grodd W, Paajanen H, Brasch RC. Albumin labeled with Gd-DTPA: an intravascular contrast-enhancing agent for magnetic resonance blood pool imaging—preparation and characterization. Invest Radiol 1987;22 : 665-671[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Hunneyball IM, Spowage M, Crossley MJ, Rowe IF, Baltz ML. Acute phase protein changes in antigen-induced mono-articular arthritis in rabbits and mice. Clin Exp Immunol 1986;65 : 311-318[Medline]
  27. Jain RK. Determinants of tumor blood flow: a review. Cancer Res 1988;48 : 2641-2658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Tamai K, Yamato M, Yamaguchi T, Ohno W. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1994;37 : 1151-1157[Medline]
  29. Gaffney K, Cookson J, Blake D, Coumbe A, Blades S. Quantification of rheumatoid synovitis by magnetic resonance. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38:1610 -1617[Medline]
  30. Hawighorst H, Weikel W, Knapstein PG, et al. Angiogenic activity of cervical carcinoma: assessment by functional magnetic resonance imaging-based parameters and a histomorphological approach in correlation with disease outcome. Clin Cancer Res 1998;4 : 2305-2312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Tynninen O, Aronen HJ, Ruhala M, et al. MRI enhancement and microvascular density in gliomas: correlation with tumor cell proliferation. Invest Radiol 1999;34 : 427-434[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Buade L, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology1996; 200:639 -649[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Hulka CA, Edmister WB, Smith BL, et al. Dynamic echo-planar imaging of the breast: experience in diagnosing breast carcinoma and correlation with tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1997;205 : 837-842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Daldrup H, Shames DM, Wendland M, et al. Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with histologic tumor grade: comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media. AJR1998; 171:941 -949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Postema S, Pattynama P, van Rijswijk C, et al. Cervical carcinoma: can dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging help predict tumor aggressiveness? Radiology 1999;210 : 217-220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Knopp MV, Weiss E, Sinn HP, et al. Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:260 -266[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Brasch RC, Li KC, Husband JE, et al. In vivo monitoring of tumor angiogenesis with MR imaging. Acad Radiol2000; 7:812 -823[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Ceponis A, Waris E, Monkkonen J, et al. Effects of low-dose, noncytotoxic, intraarticular liposomal clodronate on development of erosions and proteoglycan loss in established antigen-induced arthritis in rabbits. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44 : 1908-1916[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Storgard CM, Stupack DG, Jonczyk A, Goodman SL, Fox RI, Cheresh DA. Decreased angiogenesis and arthritic disease in rabbits treated with an alpha-v-beta-3-antagonist. J Clin Invest1999; 103:47 -54[Medline]
  40. Washburn LR, Cole BC, Gelman MI, Ward JR. Chronic arthritis of rabbits induced by mycoplasmas: clinical, microbiologic, and histologic features. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23 : 825-836[Medline]
  41. Hayes C, Padhani AR, Leach MO. Assessing changes in tumor vascular function using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed 2002;15 : 154-163[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Miller, E. Uleryk, and A. S. Doria
Evidence-Based Outcomes of Studies Addressing Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2009; 192(5): 1209 - 1218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doria, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Babyn, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doria, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Babyn, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS