AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blake, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blake, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.5028.1
AJR 2006; 186:1201
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Reply

Michael A. Blake

Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA

Ann T. Sweeney

St. Elizabeth's Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston, MA

Michael M. Maher and Peter R. Mueller

Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA

We thank Drs. Kashyap, Anand, and Kashyap for their letter highlighting the correct way to treat a patient with a known pheochromocytoma to avoid or treat a crisis. However, in the case discussed in our article [1], the final diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was only made with subsequent pathology. Indeed, when cardiology was consulted, the cause was still unclear. Although pheochromocytoma was considered, it was decided that given the patent's advanced age, congestive heart failure, and low ejection fraction, along with his relatively mild hypertension and tachycardia, to give a conservative (25 mg) metoprolol dose to which the patient fortunately responded.

Nonetheless, we agree completely with the correspondents' comments regarding standard treatment of patients with pheochromocytomas. Finally, we would like to emphasize that the letter was written to highlight that biopsy of an unsuspected pheochromocytoma can occur and that we avoided full discussion of treatment in this letter due to space constraints.


References
Top
References
 

  1. Dalal T Maher MM, Mueller PR. Extraadrenal pheochromocytoma: a rare cause of tachycardia and hypertension during percutaneous biopsy. AJR 2005; 185:554 -555[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blake, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blake, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS