AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rhiem, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schmutzler, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rhiem, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schmutzler, R. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.5041
AJR 2006; 186:E11-E12
© American Roentgen Ray Society

BRCA1-Associated Breast Carcinomas Frequently Present with Benign Sonographic Features

Kerstin Rhiem1, Uta Flucke2 and Rita K. Schmutzler3

1 University of Cologne Cologne, Germany
2 University of Bonn Bonn, Germany
3 University of Cologne Cologne, Germany

Hong et al. [1] recently reported a high predictive value of descriptors from the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon [2] of the American College of Radiology for discrimination of benign and malignant solid lesions of the breast. We here want to emphasize that BRCA1-associated breast carcinomas present with aberrant sonographic features that may lead to misinterpretation when applying the reported descriptors.

Within a multimodal screening program including annual mammogaphy and MRI, and semiannual sonography, we detected six primary and six contralateral breast carcinomas in 44 women carrying a BRCA1 mutation. The mean age of carriers was 37.8 and 41 years, respectively.

By sonography, two carcinomas of 0.8 and 2.2 cm were categorized as BI-RADS 4 and 5, seven lesions ranging from 0.6 to 1.9 cm were categorized as BI-RADS 3, and three lesions ranging from 0.35 to 1.2 cm were invisible (BI-RADS 1). By mammography, two carcinomas of 1.2 and 1.4 cm were categorized as BI-RADS 4 and 5, three lesions ranging from 1.2 to 1.9 cm were categorized as BI-RADS 3, and seven lesions ranging from 0.35 to 2.2 cm were invisible (BI-RADS 1). MRI detected nine carcinomas (BI-RADS 5). Histologically, two carcinomas were categorized as medullary and 10 as ductal invasive carcinomas. All were hormone receptor negative and high grade and all but three tumors were node negative.

By routine synopsis of all diagnostic findings, we discovered a strong correlation between histologic and sonographic morphology in BRCA1 carriers. In accordance with acknowledged literature, the two medullary carcinomas revealed sonographic characteristics indicative of fibroadenomas, i.e., round shape, circumscribed margins, homogeneous internal structure, hypoechoic echogenecity, enhanced sound transmission, and bilateral edge shadows leading to a BI-RADS 3 classification [3] (Figs. 1A and 1B). Interestingly, five additional ductal invasive carcinomas resembled the same benign sonographic morphology with round shape and homogeneous internal structure as the most prominent features (Figs. 2A and 2B). However, none of the tumors exhibited a thin pseudocapsule that is highly predictive of a benign diagnosis according to the Stavros lexicon [4]. Therefore, this criterion deserves further attention as a predictor in favor of a benign lesion in BRCA1 mutation carriers.


Figure 1
View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —Benign sonographic (A) morphology of medullary BRCA1-associated breast carcinoma (i.e., round shape, circumscribed margins, homogeneous internal structure, hypoechoic echogenicity, enhanced sound transmission, and bilateral edge) in patient with medullary BRCA1-associated breast carcinoma, pTc N0 M0, G3, estrogen and progesterone negative.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (209K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —Benign histologic (B) morphology of medullary BRCA1-associated breast carcinoma (i.e., round shape, circumscribed margins, homogeneous internal structure, hypoechoic echogenicity, enhanced sound transmission, and bilateral edge) in patient with medullary BRCA1-associated breast carcinoma, pTc N0 M0, G3, estrogen and progesterone negative.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —Sonographic (A) morphology in patient with ductal invasive BRCA1-associated breast carcinoma, pT1b N0 M0, G2, estrogen and progesterone receptor negative, resembling the same features as medullary breast carcinoma.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —Histologic (B) morphology in patient with ductal invasive BRCA1-associated breast carcinoma, pT1b N0 M0, G2, estrogen and progesterone receptor negative, resembling the same features as medullary breast carcinoma.

 
The benign sonographic appearance of ductal invasive carcinomas could be attributed to syncytial appearance and continuous pushing margins that are predominant features of BRCA1-associated breast carcinomas. Benign imaging features of BRCA1-associated tumors in mammography have already been described [5]. However, in our experience, seven tumors could not be visualized at all by mammography because of dense tissue (BI-RADS 1), whereas only three lesions escaped sonographic detection. By taking into consideration the specific appearance of BRCA1 carcinomas, we could increase sonographic sensitivity to 75% (BI-RADS 3-5 lesions), which equals the sensitivity of MRI, whereas the sensitivity of mammography remained low at 42%.

From these observations we conclude that sonography may be a valuable diagnostic tool in young BRCA1 mutation carriers with dense breast tissue and that newly emerged solid lesions suspicious of a fibroadenoma should be subjected to core needle biopsy in these women.


References
Top
References
 

  1. Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR 2005; 184:1260 -1265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS Atlas, 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
  3. Meyer JE, Amin E, Lindfors KK, Lipman JC, Stomper PC, Genest D. Medullary carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and US appearance. Radiology 1989;170 : 79-82[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Stavros T, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196 : 123-134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Tilanus-Linthorst M, Verhoog L, Obdeijn IM, et al. BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false-negative mammography. Int J Cancer 2002;102 : 91-95[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. T. Yang, B. Hennessy, K. Broglio, C. Mills, N. Sneige, W. G. Davis, V. Valero, K. K. Hunt, and M. Z. Gilcrease
Imaging Differences in Metaplastic and Invasive Ductal Carcinomas of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1288 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. Mesurolle, L. Kadoch, M. El-Khoury, A. Lisbona, N. Dendukuri, and W. D. Foulkes
Sonographic Features of Breast Carcinoma Presenting as Masses in BRCA Gene Mutation Carriers
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 817 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rhiem, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schmutzler, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rhiem, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schmutzler, R. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS