|
|
||||||||
Hacettepe University School of Medicine Sihhiye Ankara, 06100 Turkey
We read the study of Dr. Feuchtner et al. [1] with great interest. The study showed the usefulness of 16-MDCT angiography for evaluation of the radial artery prior to coronary artery bypass grafting procedures.
We also published our experience with 4-MDCT on 16 patients in January 2005 [2]. We have been using this technique since 2003 for the preoperative evaluation of radial arteries. We used 4 x 1 mm collimation; pitch, 1.75; gantry rotation time, 0.5 sec; and table speed, 1.4 cm/sec. We currently use 16-MDCT for this purpose and so far have scanned 10 patients. Our protocol uses 16 x 0.75 mm collimation; pitch, 1.5; gantry rotation time, 0.5 sec; and table speed, 3.5 cm/sec. In both scanners, we inject 300 mg/mL of iodinated contrast material with an injection rate of 4-5mL/sec. We prefer not to use a fixed delay because most patients have cardiac disease and cardiac output may vary significantly. With this method, we detect the arrival of contrast material to the brachial artery in real time using bolus tracking and start the acquisition manually [3]. After using 16-MDCT, we reduced contrast dose from 120 mL (with 4-MDCT) to 80-100 mL (with 16-MDCT). Apart from slightly better visualization of palmar arteries, we could not detect a significant difference between the image quality of 4- and 16-MDCT.
The major advantages of MDCT angiography are its noninvasiveness and its ability to detect calcific plaque, which can be difficult to diagnose by conventional angiography.
Radial artery MDCT angiography has become a standard procedure in our institution for preoperative evaluation for a potential bypass graft. Although 16-MDCT is preferred for this purpose, 4-MDCT can provide satisfactory images.
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |