AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirooka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Onji, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirooka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Onji, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1252
AJR 2006; 186:S255-S260
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Virtual Sonographic Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Visualized on CT but Not on Conventional Sonography

Masashi Hirooka1, Hidehito Iuchi1, Teru Kumagi1, Shuichiro Shigematsu1, Atsushi Hiraoka1, Takahide Uehara1, Kiyotaka Kurose1, Norio Horiike1 and Morikazu Onji1

1 All authors: Third Department of Internal Medicine, Ehime University, Sigenobutyo Sizukawa, Ehime, Japan.

Received August 6, 2004; accepted after revision March 24, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to M. Hirooka.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Some nodules cannot be visualized clearly on conventional sonography but can be visualized on CT. In the present study, we evaluated the usefulness of real-time percutaneous ablation therapy under virtual sonographic guidance for these nodules.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In vitro experiments were performed with gelatin gel to evaluate the accuracy of virtual sonography. We also studied 50 patients with 58 hepatocellular carcinoma nodules, of whom 18 patients (21 nodules) underwent radiofrequency ablation by virtual sonography. This was the initial treatment for seven of these patients and an additional treatment for 11 patients. Thirty-two patients (37 nodules) received radiofrequency ablation without virtual imaging. The patients receiving standard radiofrequency ablation were retrospectively selected as the historical control group under the same conditions as the study group.

RESULTS. The in vitro gelatin gel study revealed that all punctures had been performed accurately. In both the initial-treatment group and the additional-treatment group, the mean number of treatments with virtual sonography was significantly lower than that without virtual sonography (p = 0.003 for both groups). The rates of local recurrence and complications did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION. In the treatment of nodules not depicted on sonography, radiofrequency ablation assisted by virtual sonography is an efficacious alternative.

Keywords: abdominal imaging • ablation • cancer • liver disease • MDCT • radiofrequency


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Percutaneous ethanol injection [1-4], microwave coagulation therapy [5], and radiofrequency ablation [6-11] are widely performed as a percutaneous local treatment for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Most of these treatments have been performed under real-time sonographic guidance [3, 4, 9, 10]. Sonographic targeting requires adequate visualization. However, some nodules cannot be detected clearly on conventional sonography, such as nodules in the hepatic dome, lesions deep in relation to the body surface, lesions on the liver surface, and lesions smaller than 1 cm. In addition, determination of the residual viable portion of the HCC on conventional sonography after treatment with transcatheter arterial embolization, percutaneous ethanol injection, microwave coagulation therapy, or radiofrequency ablation has also been difficult. In these cases, clinicians must mentally reconstruct a 3D model of the body from multiple 2D horizontal CT images, creating the equivalent of a sonographic image, and puncture the nodule using this conventional sonographic image for guidance. Mental reconstruction is the most important and difficult task in conventional sonography. The target site imaged by conventional sonography often differs from the site determined by CT.

MDCT offers the ability to scan large longitudinal volumes rapidly and can scan volumes over a large range within a short time with thin slices [12, 13]. MDCT images are then used to reconstruct 3D images. Multiplanar reconstructed images resemble conventional sonographic images. Using a computer system, slices are animated continuously, and the user becomes immersed in and interacts with a purely virtual, nonreal environment. We confirmed that the virtual sonographic images produced by MDCT data were equal to, and sometimes more clearly interpretable than, those of conventional sonography. In addition, we confirmed that HCC nodules depicted by virtual sonography but not by conventional sonography could be treated adequately [14]. In the present study, we evaluated the usefulness of real-time percutaneous ablation therapy under guidance using virtual sonography for HCC not visualized on sonography but visualized on CT.


Figure 1
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —Puncture procedure used for virtual sonography in gelatin gel. MDCT image of gelatin gel shows small ball of contrast medium (arrow) and 4-French catheters (arrowheads) placed in phantom in such a way as to imitate tumor and vessels.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —Puncture procedure used for virtual sonography in gelatin gel. Virtual sonographic image is then reconstructed. Arrow indicates contrast medium; arrowheads indicate catheters.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C —Puncture procedure used for virtual sonography in gelatin gel. Conventional sonographic image is depicted in same slice as that shown by virtual sonography. Arrowheads indicate catheters.

 


Figure 4
View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D —Puncture procedure used for virtual sonography in gelatin gel. Image confirms that puncture is appropriate.

 

Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Virtual Sonography
For synthesis of 3D images and generation of virtual sonographic images, Virtual Place Advance software (Medical Imaging Laboratory; www.milab.jp) was used. This has been described in detail in a previous communication from our laboratory [14]. In short, this system runs smoothly on a PC with Windows 2000 (Microsoft), a Xeon 2.0-GHz dual processor (Intel), 2.0 GB of random-access memory, and a graphic card with Quadro4 900XGL (NVIDIA Corp.). First, a 3D image was synthesized by CT (LightSpeed Ultra 16, GE Healthcare). The scanning parameters were a 0.625-mm collimation x 16.6 mm/sec (pitch of 1.75) table speed, 300-400 mA, 120 kV, and a 512 x 512 matrix. Then, a virtual sonographic image of the CT scan was generated. Multiplanar images were reconstructed using MDCT data, and slices were displayed in a fan shape to resemble conventional sonographic images [14].

In Vitro Experience
To evaluate the accuracy of the puncture using the virtual sonographic images, we conducted an in vitro experiment using a 16 x 9 cm piece of gelatin gel. In the gel, a target lesion modeled on the HCC nodule was made by injecting 1 mL of iomeprol contrast medium (Iomeron 300, Eisai) just before the gelatin became hard. The target lesions were placed at different depths (2.7, 3.1, 3.5, 6.4, 7.0, and 7.6 cm). A 4.0-French catheter modeled on a vessel was placed around the target (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D), and CT of the gelatin gel was then performed. A 1-cm piece of the 4.0-French catheter was placed on the surface of the gelatin gel, and a virtual sonographic image was then reconstructed through the piece. The conventional sonographic probe was placed on the site where the piece was placed, enabling sonographic images identical to the virtual sonographic images to be obtained. A 21-gauge needle was used to puncture the gelatin gel through the spot where the sonographic B-mode image was identical to the virtual sonographic image. After puncture of the gel, the distance from the target to the needle tip was measured by CT. Six target nodules were made, and each was punctured 24 times.

Clinical Experience
Patients—We examined 18 patients (14 men and 4 women; age range, 59-89 years; mean, 69.3 ± 8.07 [SD] years) with 21 HCC nodules, who had been admitted to the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Ehime University School of Medicine, Japan, between February 2004 and June 2004. All patients had liver cirrhosis. The pathogenesis of liver cirrhosis was hepatitis B in three patients and hepatitis C in 15. According to the Child-Pugh classification, 13 had class A and 5 had class B cirrhosis. The mean maximum diameter of the HCC nodules was 14.0 ± 7.81 mm (range, 5-35 mm). Of the 21 nodules, eight were in the anterior segment, eight in the posterior segment, two in the lateral segment, and three in the medial segment. HCC was diagnosed using imaging analysis, including helical dynamic CT, CT hepatic arteriography, CT during portography, and iodized oil (Lipiodol, Andre Guerbet)-enhanced CT. The patients with HCC nodules were confirmed to have elevated levels of {alpha}-fetoprotein or des-{gamma}-carboxy-prothrombin. All HCC nodules were visualized on helical dynamic CT, CT hepatic arteriography, CT during portography, or iodized oil-enhanced CT but could not be visualized clearly on conventional sonography. Of the 21 nodules, seven had not been previously treated (initial-treatment group). The remaining 14 nodules were residual viable lesions that developed after previous treatment (additional-treatment group), with one nodule a local recurrence and the other 13 the result of an inadequate safety margin taken during initial surgery. These 14 nodules could not be distinguished from viable lesions and necrotic areas after one cycle of radiofrequency ablation.

Thirty-two patients (37 nodules; 26 men and 6 women; age range, 59-80 years; mean, 68.6 ± 5.28 years) treated between January 2002 and January 2004 without the use of virtual sonography were selected as historical control data. All these nodules were visualized on helical dynamic CT, CT hepatic arteriography, CT during portography, or iodized oil-enhanced CT but could not be visualized clearly on conventional sonography. The patients had elevated levels of {alpha}-fetoprotein or des-{gamma}-carboxy-prothrombin. All patients had liver cirrhosis, the pathogenesis of which was hepatitis B in six patients and hepatitis C in 26. According to the Child-Pugh classification, 24 had class A and 8 had class B cirrhosis. The mean maximum diameter of the HCC nodules was 15.7 ± 8.01 mm (range, 6-40 mm), and 16 nodules were in the anterior segment, 14 in the posterior segment, four in the lateral segment, and three in the medial segment. Of the 37 nodules, eight had not been previously treated (initial-treatment group). The remaining 29 nodules were residual viable lesions after previous treatment (additional-treatment group). Of these 29 nodules, three were local recurrences, whereas the other 26 were the result of an inadequate safety margin taken during previous surgery, and thus all required additional treatment. However, it is difficult to distinguish by only sonography those HCC nodules that were previously treated with one cycle of radiofrequency ablation from those that were not treated. The following parameters were compared between the virtual sonographic radiofrequency ablation group and the standard radiofrequency ablation group: sex, age, cause, Child-Pugh class, tumor size, session number, and local recurrence rate. Additional treatment was performed until an adequate safety margin was achieved. Patients with severe coagulation disorders (prothrombin activity < 40%, platelet count < 30,000/mL), severe cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class C), extrahepatic malignancy, or tumor thrombus in the main, left, or right portal trunk were excluded from this study. Patients were asked to provide written informed consent to enter the study, which was approved by the ethics committee of Ehime University.

Treatment—Before treatment, 15 mg of pentazocine hydrochloride and 25 mg of hydroxyzine hydrochloride were administered intramuscularly. Local anesthesia was induced by 5 mL of 1% lidocaine injected through the skin into the peritoneum along a predetermined puncture line. We inserted a 20-cm-long 17-gauge radiofrequency electrode equipped with a 2- or 3-cm-long exposed metallic tip (Cool-tip, Valleylab). First, abdominal CT was performed and the location of the cancer nodule was ascertained (Fig. 2A). Then, a virtual sonogram of the CT scan was prepared from the data of the computer (Fig. 2B). Finally, a conventional sonographic image of the virtual sonographic image was prepared. The location of the cancer nodules on the conventional sonographic image was confirmed, and they were treated by radiofrequency ablation (Fig. 2C). By measuring the distance between the HCC nodule and the vessel (hepatic or portal vein) or the surface of the liver on virtual sonography, we surmised the site of the HCC nodule on conventional sonography. If the lung was obstructing the view of the nodule, 500 mL of saline was injected into the right pleural cavity.


Figure 5
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —72-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Construction of virtual image of hepatocellular nodule. CT scan shows hepatocellular nodule (arrowheads).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —72-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Construction of virtual image of hepatocellular nodule. Virtual sonographic image shows same nodule (white arrowheads).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C —72-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Construction of virtual image of hepatocellular nodule. Conventional sonographic image of B. Black arrowhead indicates cancer nodule; black and white arrows indicate previously treated areas.

 
Estimation of Therapeutic Effect
Dynamic CT was performed between 3 and 5 days after treatment. The necrotic area of the HCC nodule and surrounding liver parenchyma was seen to be hypoattenuating during the late phases of dynamic CT. If the necrotic area depicted on posttreatment dynamic CT was larger than the viable area depicted on pretreatment dynamic CT, the therapy was considered successful [15]. If the size of the necrotic area was almost identical to that of the tumor, additional treatment was performed. Dynamic CT scans were repeated every 3 months thereafter. {alpha}-Fetoprotein and des-{gamma}-carboxy-prothrombin assays were performed before treatment, 1 month after treatment, and every month subsequently.

Statistical Analysis
The data are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test for unpaired data, contingency table analysis, and the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to represent statistical significance.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In Vitro Experience
In the in vitro experiment using gelatin gel, the puncture was performed 24 times, and six target lesions were made. The mean distance between the surface of the gelatin gel and the lesion was 5.1 ± 2.2 cm (measured by CT). The lesions were divided into two groups according to their depth from the surface of the gelatin gel: a deep group (> 5 cm deep; mean, 7.0 ± 0.60 cm), and a surface group (< 5 cm deep; mean, 3.1 ± 0.40 cm). The mean diameter of the target lesions made by contrast medium was 1.53 ± 0.25 mm, and the mean distance between the surface of the target and the tip of the needle was 1.20 ± 0.78 mm (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D). The mean distance was 0.92 ± 0.67 mm for the surface group and 1.5 ± 0.80 mm for the deep group. Although this difference was statistically significant, punctures tended to be more accurate in the surface group (p = 0.06). These results confirmed that the punctures assisted by virtual sonography in the phantom model were accurate.

Clinical Experience
The shape of the liver, the vascular arrangement, and the surrounding organs indicated that the slices identified by CT and sonography were identical. We could construct virtual sonographic images identical to conventional sonographic images for all lesions. No significant difference in clinical profiles was found between virtual sonographic radiofrequency ablation and standard radiofrequency ablation in either the initial-treatment group or the additional-treatment group (Table 1). In the initial-treatment group, the mean number of virtual sonographic radiofrequency ablation treatments was significantly lower (1.3 ± 0.49) than that of standard radiofrequency ablation treatments (2.5 ± 0.76, Table 2). In the additional-treatment group, the mean number of virtual sonographic radiofrequency ablation treatments was also significantly lower (1.2 ± 0.42) than that of standard radiofrequency ablation treatments (2.0 ± 1.1, Table 2). The local recurrence rate did not differ significantly between the two initial-treatment and additional-treatment groups (Table 2). Typical cases are presented in Figures 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 4A, 4B, 4C, and 4D. The patient represented in Figures 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, and 3E had an HCC nodule that was too small to be visualized on conventional sonography in the initial treatment. This lesion was depicted on virtual sonography and was shown to be near the hepatic vein. Thus, only one puncture produced an adequate necrotic area. The patient represented in Figures 4A, 4B, 4C, and 4D received additional treatment. The nodule that was treated under virtual sonographic guidance was near the necrotic area produced by previous radiofrequency ablation treatment, and its visualization was affected by pulsation of the heart. Thus, this nodule could not be detected clearly on conventional sonography but could be detected on virtual sonography. Thus, one more radiofrequency ablation treatment was performed, and after only one session an adequate necrotic area was obtained.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Characteristics of Patients Treated with Virtual Sonographic Radiofrequency Ablation and Standard Radiofrequency Ablation

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Comparison of Virtual Sonographic Radiofrequency Ablation with Standard Radiofrequency Ablation

 

Figure 8
View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —61-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma (maximum diameter, 6 mm) in superior anterior segment who received initial treatment. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained before treatment shows low-attenuation area (arrow).

 

Figure 9
View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —61-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma (maximum diameter, 6 mm) in superior anterior segment who received initial treatment. Reconstructed virtual sonographic image shows branches of portal vein (black arrow) and hepatic vein (black arrowheads), in addition to low-attenuation area (white arrow) seen in A.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C —61-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma (maximum diameter, 6 mm) in superior anterior segment who received initial treatment. Nodule was not visualized clearly on conventional sonography; thus, same slice as in B is revisualized on conventional sonography and nodule is punctured. Arrow indicates portal vein; arrowheads indicate hepatic vein.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D —61-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma (maximum diameter, 6 mm) in superior anterior segment who received initial treatment. After puncture, CT scan shows that needle accurately hits target nodule.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3E —61-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma (maximum diameter, 6 mm) in superior anterior segment who received initial treatment. After treatment, dynamic CT scan reveals completely necrotic area.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A —71-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma who received additional treatment. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained before treatment showed high-attenuation area in lateral segment (black arrow). This nodule was adjacent to necrotic area (white arrows), which had previously undergone percutaneous ethanol injection.

 

Figure 14
View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B —71-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma who received additional treatment. Necrotic area is seen before treatment (white arrows), but pulsation of heart prevents clear visualization of nodule.

 

Figure 15
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C —71-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma who received additional treatment. Reconstructed virtual sonographic image shows necrotic area as hypoattenuating (white arrows) and target nodule as hyperattenuating (black arrow). Puncture is performed at area of hyperattenuation.

 

Figure 16
View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D —71-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma who received additional treatment. After treatment, dynamic CT scan reveals completely necrotic area.

 

For radiofrequency ablation using virtual sonography, mild complications of pain and fever were noted, but no severe complications occurred. Neither {alpha}-fetoprotein nor des-{gamma}-carboxy-prothrombin was elevated in this group, and no local recurrence took place.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The sonographic B-mode method is most suitable for detecting nodules, and thus most nonsurgical treatment for HCC has been performed under guidance by sonography [7-10]. With the progression of cirrhosis, echo signals in the liver become heterogeneous, thereby preventing identification of the target HCC nodule on conventional sonography. With conventional sonography, it has also been difficult to determine the residual viable portion of HCC after treatment with transcatheter arterial embolization, percutaneous ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation, or combinations thereof, because of the similar appearances of necrosis and viable tumor tissue. However, sonographic targeting for these therapies requires adequate visualization of the lesions. If the lesion is not visualized on sonography but is visualized on CT, the nodule can be depicted on virtual sonography. Thus, with use of virtual sonography, HCC nodules not visualized clearly on conventional sonography can be treated.

Previously, the puncture was performed in these cases under CT guidance [16], CO2 hepatic arteriography [17], or contrast-enhanced sonography [18-20]. Although it is possible to treat these cases under CT guidance, CT must be performed several times during therapy by conventional means. On the other hand, we performed CT only one time in patients who were treated under virtual sonographic guidance. This CT was performed before the start of therapy. In fact, several reports have described treatment performed by guided contrast-enhanced sonography [18-20]. Such imaging can reveal an enhanced residual lesion that was not visualized with the conventional sonographic B-mode method. However, identifying the safety margin may be difficult in some cases, as has been reported [21-23]. Thus, treatment guided by contrast-enhanced sonography may not serve the purpose in difficult cases. Moreover, HCC nodules on the liver surface or in deep tissue may not be depicted on contrast-enhanced sonography.

We previously reported that virtual sonographic images reconstructed by MDCT were effective in the treatment of HCC [14]. HCC nodules that are not visualized on conventional sonography but are visualized on dynamic CT can be visualized on virtual sonography. In the present study, slices made by virtual sonography were visualized again on conventional sonography, and then the site of the target nodule on virtual sonography was punctured. First, a phantom including modeled tumors that were not depicted by sonography and modeled vessels, was produced. Referring to the virtual sonographic images, we performed the punctures on the phantom. These punctures were shown to be accurate, prompting us to believe that these images could be used in the clinical setting. Thus, we punctured the HCC nodules in the patients and found that with only one puncture, the needle had advanced with almost 100% accuracy to all target nodules, indicating that this method had good efficacy. The virtual sonographic image revealed an adequate site for puncture, and thus virtual sonographic radiofrequency ablation was performed significantly fewer times than was standard radiofrequency ablation in the initial-treatment (p = 0.003) and additional-treatment (p = 0.003) groups. Consequently, the length of hospital stay, number of CT examinations required to estimate therapeutic efficacy, and cost are expected to decrease with use of this procedure.

No local recurrence was seen in the virtual sonographic radiofrequency ablation group. Furthermore, no major complications were noted in any patients, indicating that this treatment is safe. In conclusion, in the treatment of nodules not depicted on sonography, puncture assisted by virtual sonography appears efficacious and safe.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Teruhito Mochizuki, Seishi Kumano, Toyoaki Haraikawa, and Satoshi Yamauchi (Department of Radiology, Ehime University School of Medicine) for their cooperation.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Ebara M, Ohto M, Sugiura N, et al. Percutaneous ethanol injection for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: study of 95 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1990;5 : 616-626[Medline]
  2. Akamatsu K, Miyauchi S, Ohkubo K, Maruyama M. Development and evaluation of a needle for percutaneous ethanol injection therapy. Radiology 1993;186 : 284-286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Shiina S, Yasuda H, Muto H, et al. Percutaneous ethanol injection in the treatment of liver neoplasms. AJR1987; 149:949 -952[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Solmi L, Muratori R, Bertoni F, et al. Echo-guided percutaneous ethanol injection in small hepatocellular carcinoma: personal experience. Hepatogastroenterology 1993;40 : 505-508[Medline]
  5. Seki T, Wakabayashi M, Nakagawa T, et al. Ultrasonically guided percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 1994; 74:817 -825[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Rossi S, Di Stasi M, Buscarini E, et al. Percutaneous RF interstitial thermal ablation in the treatment of hepatic cancer. AJR 1996; 167:759 -768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Livraghi T, Goldberg N, Lazzaroni S, Meloni F, Solbiati L, Gazelle GS. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with radio-frequency ablation versus ethanol injection. Radiology 1999;210 : 655-661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Curley SA, Izzo F, Ellis LM, Nicolas VJ, Vallone P. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in 110 patients with cirrhosis. Ann Surg 2000;232 : 381-391[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Francica G, Marone G. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by radio frequency hyperthermia with a `cooled-tip needle': a preliminary clinical experience. Eur J Ultrasound 1999; 9:145 -153[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Giorgio A, Tarantino L, de Stefano G, et al. Percutaneous sonographically guided saline-enhanced radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR 2003;181 : 479-484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Horiike N, Iuchi H, Ninomiya T, et al. Influencing factors for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radiofrequency ablation. Oncol Rep 2002; 9:1059 -1062[Medline]
  12. Hu H. Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. Med Phys 1999; 26:5 -18[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Taguchi K, Aradate H. Algorithm for image reconstruction in multi-slice helical CT. Med Phys 1998;25 : 550-561[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Hirooka M, Iuchi H, Kurose K, Kumagi T, Horiike N, Onji M. Abdominal virtual ultrasonographic images reconstructed by multi-detector row helical computed tomography. Eur J Radiol2005; 52:312 -317[CrossRef]
  15. Ebara M, Kita K, Sugiura N, et al. Therapeutic effect of percutaneous ethanol injection on small hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with CT. Radiology 1995;195 : 371-377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Sato M, Watanabe Y, Tokui K, Kawachi K, Sugata S, Ikezoe J. CT-guided treatment of ultrasonically invisible hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95 : 2102-2106[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Numata K, Tanaka K, Kiba T, et al. Nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: improved percutaneous ethanol injection therapy guided by CO2-enhanced sonography. AJR2001; 177:789 -798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Numata K, Isozaki T, Ozawa Y, et al. Percutaneous ablation therapy guided by contrast-enhanced sonography for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR 2003;180 : 143-149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Minami Y, Kudo M, Kawasaki T, Chung H, Ogawa C, Shiozaki H. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation guided by contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography with artificial pleural effusion for hepatocellular carcinoma in the hepatic dome. AJR 2004;182 : 1224-1226[Free Full Text]
  20. Shirato K, Morimoto M, Tomita N, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: therapeutic experience with percutaneous ethanol injection under real-time contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography with the contrast agent Levovist. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21 : 1015-1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ding H, Kudo M, Onda H, et al. Evaluation of posttreatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic US: comparison with dynamic CT. Radiology2001; 221:721 -730[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Cioni D, Lencioni R, Rossi S, et al. Radiofrequency thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: using contrast-enhanced harmonic power Doppler sonography to assess treatment outcome. AJR2001; 177:783 -788[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Wen YL, Kudo M, Zheng RQ, et al. Characterization of hepatic tumors: value of contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic angio. AJR 2004; 182:1019 -1026[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Minami, H. Chung, M. Kudo, S. Kitai, S. Takahashi, T. Inoue, K. Ueshima, and H. Shiozaki
Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Value of Virtual CT Sonography with Magnetic Navigation
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W335 - W341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
F. Tatsugami, M. Matsuki, G. Nakai, M. Tanikake, S. Yoshikawa, I. Narabayashi, K. Miyaji, A. Asai, S. Fujiwara, Y. Hongo, et al.
Hepatic Computed Tomography for Simultaneous Depiction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Intrahepatic Portal Veins, and Hepatic Veins in Real-time Virtual Sonography: Initial Experience
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2007; 26(8): 1065 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. C. Lucey
Radiofrequency ablation: the future is now.
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5 Suppl): S237 - S240.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirooka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Onji, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirooka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Onji, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS