AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1266
AJR 2006; 186:S261-S268
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis: Evaluation of Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety

Young Kon Kim1, Chong Soo Kim1, Gyong Ho Chung1, Young Min Han1, Sang Yong Lee1, Gong Yong Jin1 and Jeong Min Lee2

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chonbuk National University Hospital and Medical School, Jeonju, South Korea.
2 Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, 28, Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, South Korea.

Received August 11, 2004; accepted after revision January 28, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to J. M. Lee.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nineteen patients with 26 HCC nodules (range, 0.8-5 cm; mean, 1.96 cm) and decompensated liver cirrhosis (mean Child score, 10.7) were treated with radiofrequency ablation using cooled-tip electrodes and a 200-W generator. Radiofrequency ablation was performed under the guidance of sonography or CT. Procedure-related complications, therapeutic efficacy, each patient's survival, changes in blood test results—that is, serum aminotransferase and bilirubin—and changes in the Child score before and after ablation therapy were analyzed. To assess the therapeutic response of the tumor to radiofrequency ablation, we performed contrast-enhanced CT after the procedure and during follow-up.

RESULTS. Complete necrosis without marginal recurrence at the 6-month follow-up was attained in 23 lesions (88.5%). During follow-up (mean, 13.3 months), one patient experienced a remote tumor recurrence in the liver. The median survival time was 12.0 ± 1.7 months. Two patients died of liver failure—one at 2 months and one at 4 months after treatment. The other patients were followed for at least 6 months (range, 6-28 months; mean, 12 months). The first and second weeks after therapy, the serum aminotransferase and bilirubin levels were significantly higher than were pretreatment levels (p < 0.05). However, 3 weeks after therapy, those figures were nearly restored to the pretreatment levels. The mean Child scores 3 weeks after radiofrequency ablation (10.8) were similar to those before treatment (10.7).

CONCLUSION. Radiofrequency ablation can be used selectively for treatment of HCC in patients with decompensated cirrhosis but has the potential to aggravate the preexisting hepatic dysfunction.

Keywords: cirrhosis • decompensation • hepatocellular carcinoma • liver • radiofrequency ablation


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary malignant liver neoplasm, usually occurs in patients with underlying hepatitis B and C viral infection [1, 2]. Although surgical resection is the gold standard for treatment of HCC, only a limited number of HCC patients are surgical candidates because of their lack of hepatic reserve resulting from coexisting advanced cirrhosis, widespread intrahepatic involvement, and concomitant diseases [3-5]. Several nonsurgical alternative treatments are available for HCC patients who are not surgical candidates, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), acetic acid injection, and thermal ablative techniques using radiofrequency, laser, or microwaves [6-12]. Before a choice is made from among these therapeutic options for HCC, consideration of hepatic functional reserve is important to avoid the possibility of aggravating hepatic dysfunction by the treatment itself. In particular, the prognosis of patients with HCC who have decompensated liver cirrhosis is considered to be related more closely to their hepatic functional reserve than to the stage of the tumor [13-17].

Liver transplantation, which eradicates HCC and replaces damaged noncancerous hepatic parenchyma, is regarded as the best treatment for HCC in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis [16]. However, the shortage of donors and the high cost of liver transplantation limit its widespread use. Furthermore, the long and continually increasing waits for liver transplantation allow tumor progression and reduce patient survival [18]. Given this long wait, there is a reasonable clinical need in the meantime for minimally invasive methods to avoid progression of HCC in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. A few studies have shown that treatment by TACE before liver transplantation may impede tumor progression while the patient is on the waiting list and leads to a better outcome than does no presurgical treatment [18-20].

Radiofrequency ablation has gained wide acceptance as a minimally invasive treatment for the management of primary or secondary liver malignancies [21-23]. The benefits over surgery include reduced mortality, morbidity, and hospitalization. During the past 4 years, we have treated more than 200 HCC patients using radiofrequency ablation. On the basis of our successful preliminary results in these patients, we planned to determine the possible role of radiofrequency ablation as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with HCC and decompensated liver cirrhosis. In this study, we analyzed the therapeutic efficacy and complications of the procedure and the changes in liver function results before and after radiofrequency ablation in patients with HCC and severely decompensated liver cirrhosis, defined as a Child-Pugh-Turcotte score (i.e., Child score) of greater than 9 [24].


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
This study was approved by our institutional review board, and written consent was obtained from each patient or a family member at enrollment, after the procedure and potential complications from underlying advanced liver cirrhosis had been fully explained. We performed radiofrequency ablation on patients who, by consensus of the medical team, had the potential to survive more than 6 months.

Patients
Between January 2000 and February 2004, 19 consecutive patients with HCC and severely decompensated liver cirrhosis, as evidenced by a Child score of greater than 9, were treated with radiofrequency ablation [24, 25]. Seventeen were men, and two were women (age range, 38-68 years; mean, 56 years). The cause of liver cirrhosis in all patients was viral hepatitis B. The Child scores ranged from 10 to 12 (mean, 10.7) (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Patient Characteristics and Results

 

Patients who fulfilled the following criteria were included in the study: the presence of a single tumor nodule not more than 5 cm in diameter or not more than three tumor nodules less than 3.0 cm in diameter; the absence of extrahepatic metastasis, portal vein thrombosis, severe coagulation disorders, and hepatic encephalopathy; prothrombin activity greater than 40%; and a platelet count greater than 40,000/µL. In addition, all patients and their families desired treatment of the HCC for complete eradication or palliation, and the medical team judged the potential survival of each patient to be more than 6 months and chose radiofrequency ablation as a minimally invasive therapeutic option for that patient. In two patients, TACE had been performed previously for the treatment of hypervascular HCC, but newly growing HCC nodules had been detected during the 14- or 18-month follow-up examination. One patient underwent radiofrequency ablation twice within 8 months because of marginal HCC recurrence (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, and 1E). The Child score at the first ablation session was 9 (classified as Child B), whereas that at the second session was 10 (classified as Child C).


Figure 1
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —57-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma complicating Child C liver cirrhosis. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced T2-weighted turbo spin-echo image shows high-signal-intensity lesion (arrow).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —57-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma complicating Child C liver cirrhosis. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced T2-weighted turbo spin-echo image obtained 8 months after first radiofrequency ablation shows small area of high-signal-intensity marginal recurrence (arrow).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C —57-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma complicating Child C liver cirrhosis. On unenhanced CT scan obtained during radiofrequency ablation, 17-gauge single electrode with 3.0-cm exposed tip is seen within tumor.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D —57-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma complicating Child C liver cirrhosis. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained immediately after second radiofrequency ablation shows completely nonenhancing area (arrow) at site of treated nodule.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E —57-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma complicating Child C liver cirrhosis. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained 12 months after radiofrequency ablation shows decrease in size of nonenhancing area (arrow), without marginal recurrence.

 
Of the 19 patients with 26 HCC nodules, 13 had one HCC nodule, five had two HCC nodules, and one had three HCC nodules. The HCC nodules ranged from 0.8 to 5.0 cm in diameter (mean, 2.0 cm). Twelve lesions were 0.8-1.5 cm in diameter, eight were 1.6-2.5 cm, and six were 3.0-5.0 cm. All HCC tumors were of the nodular type, with the capsule showing hyperattenuation on the dynamic arterial phase, and they were considered to be hypervascular. The final diagnosis of 12 HCC nodules (diameter range, 1.0-3.5 cm; mean, 2.1 cm) in 10 patients was proven by core needle biopsy. For two patients with two liver lesions each, image-guided biopsy was performed on only one liver lesion per patient because the imaging findings of the two lesions were identical. In the remaining 14 HCC nodules (diameter range, 0.8-5.0 cm; mean, 1.8 cm) in nine patients without histologic confirmation, the diagnosis of HCC depended on the combined interpretation of sonography, CT, and MRI findings (including dynamic images and superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced images); characteristic angiographic findings; and an elevated serum {alpha}-fetoprotein level (200-400 ng/mL). Before ablation therapy, the following serum test results were checked in all patients: aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, albumin, creatinine, hemoglobin, platelet count, prothrombin time, and electrolytes.


Figure 6
View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —54-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma complicating Child C liver cirrhosis. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained before radiofrequency ablation shows slightly enhancing hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow) in liver segment V. Small amount of perihepatic ascites is seen.

 


Figure 7
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —54-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma complicating Child C liver cirrhosis. On unenhanced CT scan obtained during radiofrequency ablation, 17-gauge single electrode with 3.0-cm exposed tip is seen within tumor.

 


Figure 8
View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C —54-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma complicating Child C liver cirrhosis. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained immediately after radiofrequency ablation shows completely unenhanced area (arrow) at site of treated nodule.

 


Figure 9
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D —54-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma complicating Child C liver cirrhosis. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained 12 months after radiofrequency ablation shows decrease in size of nonenhancing area (arrow), without marginal recurrence. Perihepatic ascites is increased, compared with A.

 
The pretreatment workup included sonography, three-phase helical CT, and MRI (including gadolinium-enhanced dynamic imaging and superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced imaging). Three-phase helical CT (Somatom Plus 4, Siemens Medical Solutions) was performed on all patients. Images of the hepatic artery phase, portal phase, and equilibrium phase were obtained with delays of 30, 60, and 180 sec, respectively, after injection of 110-150 mL of iopromide (Ultravist 300, Schering) through the antecubital vein at a rate of 3 mL/sec. The scanning parameters were 120 kVp, 240 mA, a collimation of 5 mm, a table speed of 7 mm/sec, and a reconstruction interval of 5 mm. All except three patients underwent MRI with a 1.5-T superconducting imager (Magnetom Symphony, Siemens). Dynamic MRI was performed with IV administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Schering) at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight in nine patients and with gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance, Bracco) at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight in 10 patients. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced dynamic images were obtained using a 2D breath-hold T1-weighted fast low-angle shot sequence with the following parameters: a TR/TE of 120/4, a flip angle of 70°, a matrix of 120 x 256, a slice thickness of 7 mm, and a signal average of 1. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced dynamic images were obtained using 3D Fourier transform gradient-echo imaging (volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination) with the following parameters: 3.4/1.5, a flip angle of 12°, a bandwidth of 490 Hz/pixel, a matrix of 256 (read) x 120 (phase) x 64-72 (partition), an effective slice thickness of 2.3 mm, and a field of view of 32-35 cm. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced imaging was performed with AML-25 (Feridex, Advanced Magnetics) at a dose of 15 µmol of iron per kilogram of body weight and comprised two sequences: respiratory-triggered T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging and breath-hold T2*-weighted fast imaging with steady-state free precession. Respiratory-triggered T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging was performed using a TR range/TE of 3,300-5,500/85, an echo-train length of 5, a matrix of 120 x 256, a 7-mm slice thickness, and a signal average of 2. Breath-hold T2*-weighted fast imaging with steady-state free precession was performed using 180/12, a 30° flip angle, a matrix of 96 x 256, a 6-mm slice thickness, and a signal average of 1.


Figure 10
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —60-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma complicating Child C liver cirrhosis. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained before radiofrequency ablation shows slightly enhancing hepatocellular carcinoma (large arrow) in liver segment V. Small amount of perihepatic ascites and gallbladder stones (small striped arrow) are seen.

 


Figure 11
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —60-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma complicating Child C liver cirrhosis. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained immediately after radiofrequency ablation shows completely nonenhancing area (arrow) at site of treated nodule.

 


Figure 12
View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C —60-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma complicating Child C liver cirrhosis. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained 25 months after radiofrequency ablation shows decrease in size of nonenhancing area (arrow), without marginal recurrence. Perihepatic ascites and size of gallbladder stones are increased, compared with A. Atrophic liver changes have also progressed from those shown in A.

 
Radiofrequency Ablation Technique
Radiofrequency ablation was performed on patients after 12 hr of fasting, with a hospital stay of 2-7 days. During the pretreatment hospital stay, all study patients received conservative management for ascites control (i.e., IV infusion of albumin and diuretics) or for decreased coagulation function (i.e., element transfusion) caused by the decompensated cirrhosis. All patients had slight to moderate ascites, and in 10 patients with moderate ascites, as much perihepatic fluid was eliminated as possible before ablation therapy to ease the approach to the liver during lesion targeting. For three patients with a platelet count of less than 40,000/µL (range, 32,000-39,000/µL), platelets were transfused before the ablation and the platelet count was maintained at greater than 40,000/µL. All patients received 1g of cefazolin (Cefamezin, Dong-Ah) IV on the day of the procedure and at 24 hr after the procedure.

The procedure was performed under CT guidance on nine patients and under sonographic guidance on 10 patients. When the lesion was not visible on sonography or was in the hepatic dome, the electrode was introduced into the lesion under CT guidance (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D). For the CT-guided approach, a Somatom Plus-4 scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions) was used, and the scanning parameters were 110 kVp, 200 mA, a collimation of 5 mm, and a table speed of 7 mm/sec. On the basis of the pretreatment diagnostic-workup images, the most probable tumor location and the most appropriate route to that location were chosen. For sonographic guidance, a 3.5-MHz convex probe (Sequoia, Siemens Medical Solutions) was used. All procedures were performed by one or both of two board-certificated radiologists and one nurse. The two radiologists had 10 and 5 years' daily clinical experience in local ablation therapy of liver malignancy, including radiofrequency ablation, and in interpreting liver images, including postablation scans.

Grounding was achieved by attaching one steel-mesh pad to the thigh and one to the back. After the skin had been sterilized with iodine and alcohol, local anesthesia was administered by a subcutaneous injection of 1% lidocaine from the skin to the peritoneum, and the skin was pricked with a lancet. In all patients, internally cooled 17-gauge electrodes (Cool-Tip, Valleylab) with 3.0 cm of exposed tip delivered radiofrequency energy to the tumors. Once proper positioning of the electrode in the tumor area had been confirmed by CT or sonography, the electrodes were connected to a 500-KHz monopolar radiofrequency generator (CC-1, Valleylab) capable of producing 200 W. Tissue impedance was monitored by circuitry incorporated into the generator, and an impedance-controlled, automated pulsed-radiofrequency algorithm was used [26]. In 10 patients, radiofrequency therapy was performed under conscious sedation, and analgesia was achieved by IV administration of 1-2 mg of midazolam (Dormicum, Roche) and 50-100 g of fentanyl citrate (Fentanyl, Myengmun). For nine patients, 50-100 g of fentanyl citrate was used to control pain. Vital signs were monitored continuously during the procedure.

A peristaltic pump (Watson-Marlow) was used to infuse normal saline solution at 0°C into the lumen of the radiofrequency electrodes at a rate sufficient to maintain a tip temperature of 0-20°C. For tumor nodules smaller than 2.5 cm in diameter, a single electrode was positioned in the center of the tumor and radiofrequency was applied for 10-12 min, depending on the tumor size. For tumors larger than 2.5 cm, a multiple-overlap technique (two to four overlaps) using a single radiofrequency electrode was chosen. Radiofrequency was applied initially for 12 min and for subsequent ablations for 6-12 min, depending on the tumor size. In the case of six patients with two or three tumor nodules each, one therapy session was provided for five patients and two sessions at a 3-day interval were provided for the one patient with two HCC nodules. During withdrawal of the electrode, the entire electrode track was heated briefly to a temperature of 80°C by application of radiofrequency.

Assessment of Therapeutic Efficacy and Follow-up Studies
Within 6 hr after the procedure, contrast-enhanced helical CT was performed using the same protocol as for the pretreatment workup to evaluate the short-term effect of the therapy. The two experienced radiologists jointly assessed the therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation on posttreatment CT, comparing the findings with those of pretreatment CT or MRI. In each case, one of the two radiologists performed the radiofrequency ablation but the other did not. Tumor necrosis was considered complete when a nonenhancing area equal to or larger than the original tumor was seen [21-23]. If residual tumors remained on posttreatment CT, another ablation session was performed within 3 days. Thereafter, CT or MRI was performed every 3 months. The duration of imaging follow-up ranged from 6 to 28 months (mean, 13 months).

Immediately after treatment and during follow-up, all patients underwent blood tests including aminotransferase (alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase), alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, albumin, creatinine, platelet count, and prothrombin time to evaluate liver function and possible procedure-related complications. The follow-up interval for blood testing was 1-6 days during the first 3 weeks after radiofrequency ablation, depending on the severity of hepatic dysfunction. Thereafter, follow-up blood tests were performed in step with follow-up imaging studies.

Statistical Analysis
Mean and median patient survival times were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. To evaluate the influence of radiofrequency ablation on hepatic function, we compared the aminotransferase level, bilirubin level, and Child score before treatment with those during the first 3 weeks after treatment. The statistical analysis was based on the paired t test. A two-tailed p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The liver function and radiofrequency therapy results are summarized in Table 1. No technical failure occurred in any patient. Of the 26 HCC nodules treated by radiofrequency ablation in 19 patients, 23 (88.5%) in 16 patients showed complete necrosis without marginal recurrence on 6-month follow-up images. In two of the 16 patients with complete necrosis, additional ablation therapy for 12 min was performed 3 days after the first ablation because persistent residual tumor was seen on contrast-enhanced CT immediately after the first ablation. One of the remaining three patients, who had a 5-cm-diameter HCC, showed marginal tumor recurrence on 6-month follow-up images. The patient rejected our recommendation for additional radiofrequency ablation. The other two patients died because of hepatic failure—one at 2 months and one at 4 months after ablation therapy. In one of these two patients, the bilirubin level was markedly elevated immediately after radiofrequency ablation (from 4.5 to 17.0 mg/dL) and could not be restored to the pretreatment level.

During follow-up (mean, 13.3 ± 8.4 months), one patient showed multiple newly growing HCC nodules in the liver on the 15-month follow-up examination despite no marginal recurrence in the treated area. No patients had distant metastases. Twelve patients died, after survivals of 2-28 months after radiofrequency ablation. The mean and median survivals were 9.8 ± 2.0 months and 7.0 ± 1.2 months, respectively. The cause of death was hepatic failure in 10 patients and hepatic encephalopathy in two patients. The remaining seven patients, at 9-28 months after radiofrequency ablation therapy, were still alive (Figs. 3A, 3B, and 3C). The median and mean survival times of all patients were 12.0 ± 1.7 months and 15.3 ± 2.5 months, respectively.

Before treatment, the mean levels of serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin were 43.8 IU/L, 99.5 IU/L, and 3.0 mg/dL, respectively. The mean peak levels of serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin during the first week after treatment were 86.3 IU/L, 204.8 IU/L, and 5.9 mg/dL, respectively. The mean levels of serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin 2 weeks after treatment were 61.0 IU/L, 127.5 IU/L, and 3.9 mg/dL, respectively. The mean levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin were markedly less at 3 weeks after treatment (43.4 IU/L, 86.4 IU/L, and 3.8 mg/dL, respectively) than during the first 2 weeks after treatment (p > 0.05). The mean Child score at the third posttreatment week was 10.8, which was not significantly different from the pretreatment Child score of 10.7.

No acute major complications were related to the procedure. All patients had mild to moderate abdominal pain during the procedure. The five patients with HCC in the hepatic dome experienced shoulder pain related to diaphragmatic irritation. Most pain was controllable within 2 days with the use of analgesia. Four patients experienced mild fever during the first 2 days after treatment. No remarkable intraperitoneal or hepatic hemorrhage was observed. No peritoneal tumor seeding was observed during follow-up.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Radiofrequency ablation has gained wide acceptance as a safe procedure for the treatment of focal liver tumor [22, 27]. Despite the established safety record of the procedure, most previous studies have been limited mainly to the management of HCC in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis, because of the possibility that hepatic dysfunction might be aggravated by the treatment itself. Recently, liver transplantation has been considered the best treatment option for patients with HCC and decompensated liver cirrhosis. However, because of the steadily increasing waiting time, a noteworthy proportion of patients (> 20%) is excluded from transplantation because of tumor progression [28]. In view of this high dropout rate from the waiting list, a substantial need exists for ablation therapy, with its low risk of liver function deterioration.

In our study, which evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation in patients with severely decompensated liver cirrhosis (Child score > 9), radiofrequency ablation achieved complete necrosis in 23 (88.5%) of 26 lesions at 6 months, and only one patient showed multiple remote recurrences at the 15-month follow-up. Although not all of our study patients could be followed up long-term, this relatively high success rate for complete ablation of HCC is believed to result from the relatively small size of the tumors (mean diameter, 1.96 cm) and from their morphology—encapsulated and nodular. This result is similar to the therapeutic results of a previous study (90%) of radiofrequency ablation in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis and HCC nodules with a mean diameter of 2.3 cm [29].

In our study, 12 of the 19 patients died during the follow-up period, and their survival ranged from 2 to 28 months after completion of radiofrequency ablation (mean, 9.8 ± 2.0 months; median, 7.0 ± 1.2 months). Also, seven study patients were still alive 9-28 months after therapy (mean, 16.7 months); the overall median and mean patient survivals were 12.0 ± 1.7 months and 15.3 ± 2.5 months, respectively. The one patient whose pretreatment bilirubin level was 4.50 mg/dL died because of hepatic failure 2 months after ablation therapy. In retrospect, the high level of serum bilirubin and the relatively high Child score, compared with those of the other patients, might have contributed to aggravation of hepatic dysfunction and the subsequently poor outcome. These mean and median survival times were much longer than the reported median survival (2-5 months) of patient groups with severely advanced liver cirrhosis and HCC who received no specific treatment for HCC [30-32]. In addition, the 12-month cumulative survival of our study was not lower that that of a reported study of patients who were classified as Child class C (Child score range, 10-13; mean, 11) [25].

Our findings suggest that the use of radiofrequency ablation alone as a minimally invasive technique will not bring about irreversible hepatic dysfunction in most patients with decompensated cirrhosis (Child C). This premise is supported by the results of the blood tests in this study. When we compared the pretreatment serum levels of aminotransferase and bilirubin with the levels during the third posttreatment week, the third-week levels of aminotransferase were restored to the pretreatment levels and the bilirubin levels also were markedly decreased 3 weeks after treatment, except in one patient. These data were similar to those of a previous study [33], which showed a transient elevation of liver enzyme shortly after radiofrequency ablation. Also, the mean Child score at posttreatment week 3 was not significantly elevated, compared with that before treatment.

Ueno et al. [34] evaluated the prognosis of patients with HCC complicating Child B and C cirrhosis treated with various strategies. However, TACE—even superselective TACE— may not be recommended for patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis because of the possibility that nontumorous liver tissue will be damaged and liver function worsened [35, 36]. With PEI, a multisession procedure is needed in most patients, even those with the smallest HCC nodules [7]. Furthermore, in a single PEI procedure using a large amount of ethanol, variceal bleeding was reported as a major complication [7]. Considering these shortcomings of TACE and PEI, radiofrequency ablation still may be used in the management of patients with HCC complicating decompensated cirrhosis, even though transient hepatic dysfunction could result. Furthermore, thermal ablation itself has a role in bleeding control that may be a strong point in the treatment of patients with marked hepatic dysfunction and a resultant coagulation disorder. In our study, no hemorrhagic complications were found during the procedure or its follow-up, even in patients with decreased coagulation function.

A previous study reported the therapeutic results of PEI for patients with a single HCC 5 cm or less in diameter and with Child C liver cirrhosis [7]. The 12-month cumulative survival was higher in that study than in our study (64% vs 42%), but the 28-month cumulative survival in our study (23%) was relatively higher than the 24-month cumulative survival in that study (12%). However, because of the different patient populations and follow-up periods of the two studies, a precise comparison of survival benefit is difficult.

Our study had some limitations. First, not all lesions were histologically confirmed. Confirming all tumors histologically would have been difficult because of the latent bleeding tendency and high risk of peritoneal seeding due to decreased coagulation in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. However, we performed radiofrequency ablation of HCC nodules confirmed by elevated {alpha}-fetoprotein level and typical radiologic findings on CT or MRI. Another shortcoming of this study was that the population was too small to establish the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation in patients with HCC complicating Child C cirrhosis.

In conclusion, when used with caution, radiofrequency ablation can treat HCC effectively in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. We believe that radiofrequency ablation, by preventing tumor progression, can bridge the long wait for liver transplantation.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Tsukama H, Hijama T, Tanaka S, et al. Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic liver disease. N Engl J Med 1993;328 : 1797-1801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Akriviadis EA, Llovert JM, Efremidis SC, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 1998;85 : 1319-1331[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Nadig DE, Wade TP, Fairchild RB, Virgo KS, Johnson FE. Major hepatic resection. Arch Surg 1997;132 : 115-119[Abstract]
  4. Hoover H Jr. Surgical resection of primary hepatoma and hepatic metastases. Semin Intervent Radiol 1993;10 : 169-174
  5. Farmer DG, Rosove MH, Shaked A, Busuttil RW. Current treatment modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg1994; 219:236 -247[Medline]
  6. Bismuth H, Morino M, Sherlock D, et al. Primary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by arterial chemoembolization. Am J Surg 1992; 163:387 -394[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Livarghi T, Giogio A, Martin G, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis in 746 patients: long term results of percutaneous ethanol injection. Radiology 1995;17 : 101-108
  8. Ohnishi K, Ohyama M, Ito S, Fujita K. Ultrasound guided intratumor injection of acetic acid for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 1994;193 : 747-752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Goldberg SN, Galelle GS, Dawson SL, Rittman WJ, Mueller PF, Rosenthal DI. Tissue ablation with radiofrequency using multiprobe arrays. Acad Radiol 1995;2 : 670-674[Medline]
  10. Caspani B, Cecconi P, Bottelli R, et al. The interstitial photocoagulation with laser light of liver tumors [in Italian]. Radiol Med (Torino) 1997;94 : 346-354[Medline]
  11. Seki T, Wakabayashi M, Nakagawa T, et al. Ultrasonically guided percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 1994; 74:817 -825[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Murakami R, Yoshimatsu S, Yamashita Y, Matsukawa T, Takahashi M, Sagara K. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: value of percutaneous microwave coagulation. AJR 1995;164 : 1159-1164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Everson GT. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Rev Gastroenterol Disord2004; 4[suppl 1]:S31 -S38[Medline]
  14. Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Obata H, et al. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment: study of 850 patients. Cancer 1985;56 : 918-928[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Ringe B, Pichlmayr R, Wittekind C, Tusch G. Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: experience with liver resection and transplantation in 198 patients. World J Surg 1991;15 : 270-285[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Iwatsuki S, Gordon RD, Shaw BW Jr, Starzl TE. Role of liver transplantation in cancer therapy. Ann Surg1985; 202:401 -407[Medline]
  17. Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J, Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer Group. The Barcelona approach: diagnosis, staging, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl 2004;10 [2 suppl 1]:S115 -S120[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Roayaie S, Frischer JS, Emre SH, et al. Long-term results with multimodal adjuvant therapy and liver transplantation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 5 centimeters. Ann Surg 2002; 235:533 -539[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Venook AP, Ferrell LD, Roberts JP, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: results with preoperative chemoembolization. Liver Transpl Surg 1995;1 : 242-248[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Graziadei IW, Sandmueller H, Waldenberger P, et al. Chemoembolization followed by liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma impedes tumor progression while on the waiting list and leads to excellent outcome. Liver Transpl 2003;9 : 557-563[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Gazelle GS, Goldberg SN, Solbitati L, Livraghi T. Tumor ablation with radiofrequency energy. Radiology2000; 217:633 -646[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. McGahan JP, Dodd GD III. Radiofrequency ablation of the liver: current status. AJR 2001;176 : 3-16[Free Full Text]
  23. Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Lazzaroni S, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: radio-frequency ablation of medium and large lesions. Radiology 2000;214 : 761-768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Fontana RJ. Management of patients with decompensated HBV cirrhosis. Semin Liver Dis 2003;23 : 89-100[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Yao FY, Terrault NA, Freise C, Maslow L, Bass NM. Lamivudine treatment is beneficial in patients with severely decompensated cirrhosis and actively replicating hepatitis B infection awaiting liver transplantation: a comparative study using a matched, untreated cohort. Hepatology 2001;34 : 411-416[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Goldberg SN, Stein MC, Gazelle GS, Sheiman RG, Kruskal JB, Clouse ME. Percutaneous radiofrequency tissue ablation: optimization of pulsed-radiofrequency technique to increase coagulation necrosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10:907 -916[Medline]
  27. Livraghi T, Solbiati L, Meloni MF, et al. Treatment of focal liver tumors with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: complications encountered in a multicenter study. Radiology 2003;226 : 441-451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Yao FY, Bass NM, Nikolai B, et al. A follow-up analysis of the pattern and predictors of dropout from the waiting list for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for the current organ allocation policy. Liver Transpl2003; 9:684 -692[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Lazzaroni S, Meloni F, Solbiati L, Gazelle GS. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with radio-frequency ablation versus ethanol injection. Radiology 1999;210 : 655-661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. The Cancer of the Liver Italian program (CLIP) investigators. A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 435 patients. Hepatology 1998;28 : 751-755[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: The BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis1999; 19:329 -338[Medline]
  32. Cillo U, Bassanello M, Vitale A, et al. The critical issue of hepatocellular carcinoma prognostic classification: which is the best tool available? J Hepatol 2004;40 : 124-131[Medline]
  33. Rossi S, Buscarini E, Garbagnati F, et al. Percutaneous treatment of small hepatic tumors by an expandable RF needle electrode. AJR 1998; 170:1015 -1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Ueno S, Tanabe G, Nuruki K, et al. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with Child class B and C cirrhosis in relation to treatment: a multivariate analysis of 411 patients at a single center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002;9 : 469-477[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Ognuni T, et al. Liver parenchymal changes after transcatheter arterial embolization therapy for hepatoma: CT evaluation. Abdom Imaging 1993;18 : 352-356[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Khan KN, Nakata K, Kusumoto Y, et al. Evaluation of nontumorous tissue damage by transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 1991;51 : 5667-5671[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. C. Lucey
Radiofrequency ablation: the future is now.
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5 Suppl): S237 - S240.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS