AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fan, Z.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Yin, S.-S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fan, Z.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Yin, S.-S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0943
AJR 2006; 186:1512-1519
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Evaluation of Primary Malignancies of the Liver Using Contrast-Enhanced Sonography: Correlation With Pathology

Zhi-Hui Fan, Min-Hua Chen, Ying Dai, Yan-Bin Wang, Kun Yan, Wei Wu, Wei Yang and Shan-Shan Yin

Department of Ultrasound, School of Oncology, Peking University, 52 Fu-cheng Rd., Beijing 100036, People's Republic of China.

Received June 3, 2005; accepted after revision August 22, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to M.-H. Chen (minhuachen{at}vip.sina.com).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Our purpose was to investigate the correlation of contrast-enhanced sonographic patterns with the histopathology of primary malignancies of the liver.

MATERIAL AND METHODS. Of the 318 contrast-enhanced sonographic examinations performed between April and September 2004, 95 patients with 117 lesions confirmed by surgery or biopsy pathology were reviewed in this study. We analyzed the enhancement time and patterns according to the types and degrees of pathologic differentiation.

RESULTS. All 65 moderately to poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) enhanced in the arterial phase, and 96.9% (63 lesions) of them quickly washed out in the portal venous phase. All 32 well-differentiated HCCs enhanced in the arterial phase, and 50.0% (16 lesions) washed out slowly during the late phase. The washout time of the two differentiated types was significantly different (p < 0.05). Seventy-five percent of the clear cell carcinomas (12/16) enhanced in the arterial phase, 25% (4/16) did not enhance until the portal venous phase, and 31.3% (5/16) of the clear cell carcinomas washed out slowly during the late phase. The enhancement and washout times of clear cell carcinomas were significantly different than those of moderately to poorly differentiated HCCs (p < 0.05). All four intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas presented the same patterns as moderately to poorly differentiated HCCs: enhanced in the arterial phase and quickly washed out in the portal venous phase. Among the 72 lesions enhanced homogeneously, 46 lesions (63.9%) were smaller than 3 cm. Thirty-seven lesions (82.2%) of the 45 lesions that enhanced heterogeneously were larger than 3 cm (including the four cholangiocarcinomas). Larger lesions were mainly less differentiated. There were significant differences in tumor sizes in regard to cellular differentiations and types.

CONCLUSION. Our study showed that the enhancement manifestations of primary malignancies of the liver are related to pathologic types and grades. Contrast-enhanced sonograms may provide the histopathologic information for malignant tumors of the liver.

Keywords: contrast agents • primary malignancies of the liver • sonography


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Primary malignancy of the liver is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. It is frequently associated with cirrhosis and the most frequent cause of death in these patients. With early diagnosis, liver transplantation, surgery, or percutaneous treatment may cure a primary malignancy of the liver [1]. The histopathologic grades and types are a well-established prognostic factor [1, 2]. It is therefore important to diagnose earlier and to confirm the type and cellular differentiation before treatment. For many years, we mainly depended on fine-needle biopsy and core-needle biopsy to obtain a pathologic diagnosis. There are also some reports that have correlated CT and MRI with the histopathologic analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [3, 4]. Using a new-generation sonography contrast agent and imaging techniques can greatly improve the diagnostic accuracy of primary malignancies of the liver [5-7]. In this study, we reviewed the enhancement characteristics of primary malignancies of the liver with different histopathologic grades and types using new contrast-enhanced sonographic technology.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
From April 2004 to September 2004, 318 patients with focal liver lesions detected by enhanced CT, MRI, or conventional sonography were referred for contrast-enhanced sonograms in our hospital. Among them, 95 patients with 117 lesions underwent surgery or biopsy immediately or within 2 weeks after the contrast-enhanced sonographic examination. These patients were enrolled in the study (21 women and 74 men; age range, 35-80 years, mean age, 58.4 years).

The pathologic results of 117 primary malignancies of the liver were 65 moderately to poorly differentiated HCCs in 57 patients including one fibrolamellar HCC; 32 well-differentiated HCCs in 23 patients; 16 clear cell carcinomas in 11 patients; and 4 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas in 4 patients. Three patients had lesions of different differentiations or types. Twenty-two patients had two lesions.

Two pathologists with more than 20 years of experience made the histopathology diagnosis blind to the results of the contrast-enhanced sonograms. The study was approved by our institutional review board.

Imaging Technique
SonoVue (Bracco Diagnostics), the contrast agent used in this study, consists of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) microbubbles surrounded by phospholipids. The average diameter of a microbubble is 2.5 µm. Contrast-enhanced sonograms were performed using the Technos MPX DU8 (Esaote) or Aplio (Toshiba) sonographic system with specific imaging techniques.

First, the liver was scanned with a conventional sonogram to select an appropriate section. The sizes, boundaries, and echogenicity of focal liver lesions were recorded. After adequate fundamental scanning, the specific mode of contrast-enhanced sonogram began. The acoustic power used was lowered to a mechanical index of less than 0.1. SonoVue was injected IV as a bolus of 2.4 mL through the antecubital vein followed by a 5-mL saline flush. The perfusion and echogenicity of the lesions were continuously observed until sufficient dynamic information about the lesions was obtained, and then the entire liver was scanned. The echogenicity of the lesions in three different phases—arterial (< 25 sec), portal (25-90 sec), and late phase (> 90 sec)was compared. Lesions with higher, similar, or lower echogenicity compared with that of the adjacent liver parenchyma were defined as hyperechoic, isoechoic, or hypoechoic, respectively. When the lesion began to appear hyperechoic after injection, it was defined as enhancing. The enhanced lesion becoming hypoechoic was defined as washout.

For those patients with two lesions, an appropriate section was selected to display both lesions. If not, a second injection was used to observe the other lesion. The interval between the two injections was at least 10 min.

The entire scanning process was recorded onto high-resolution VHS videotapes for later analysis. Three physicians with at least 10 years of sonographic experience evaluated all the cases.

Statistical Analysis
SPSS 10.0 was used for statistical analysis. One-way analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare the enhancement and washout time of the four groups. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the relationship between the tumor echogenicity in three phases and the pathologic grade and type, enhanced manifestation and lesion size, and histopathology and lesion size, respectively. The level of statistical significance was set at p <0.05.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Table 1 lists the enhancement and washout time of different primary malignancies of the liver. The differences of enhancement and washout time between moderately to poorly and well-differentiated HCCs were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences of enhancement and washout time between clear cell carcinomas and moderately to poorly differentiated HCCs (p < 0.05). The difference of the washout time between well-differentiated HCCs and clear cell carcinomas was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Figure 1 shows the washout time of different groups in a scatterplot.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Enhancement and Washout Time of 117 Lesions

 

Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 —Scatterplot of washout time of different groups. HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma.

 

Table 2 shows the results of the comparison of tumor echogenicity in the three different phases and the cellular differentiation and type. In the arterial phase, all HCCs except four clear cell carcinomas enhanced quickly and appeared hyperechoic. In the portal venous phase, 96.9% of moderately to poorly differentiated HCCs (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D), 50% of well-differentiated HCCs, 68.7% of clear cell carcinomas, and 100% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas washed out quickly and became hypoechoic with respect to the surrounding liver. Significant differences were found in tumor echogenicity according to differentiation in the portal venous phase (p < 0.05). Appearing isoechoic in the portal venous phase were 16/32 (50%) of well-differentiated HCCs (Figs. 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D) and 2/65 (3.1%) of moderately to poorly differentiated HCCs. For the clear cell carcinomas, 31.3% slowly washed out in the late phase (Figs. 4A, 4B, 4C and 4D).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Echogenicity of 117 Lesions in Three Phases

 

Figure 2
View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —53-year-old man with history of hepatitis B for past 2 years. Baseline sonographic image shows focal hyperechoic lesion in right hepatic lobe (arrow).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —53-year-old man with history of hepatitis B for past 2 years. Arterial phase image obtained at 13 sec shows homogeneous enhancement of lesion.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C —53-year-old man with history of hepatitis B for past 2 years. Portal venous phase image obtained at 42 sec. Lesion is hypoechoic with respect to surrounding liver.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D —53-year-old man with history of hepatitis B for past 2 years. Lesion was confirmed as moderately to poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma by biopsy histopathology with 20-gauge automatic cutting needle (H and E, x 200).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —41-year-old woman with history of hepatitis B for past 10 years. Baseline sonographic image shows hypoechoic lesion in right lobe (arrow).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —41-year-old woman with history of hepatitis B for past 10 years. Arterial phase image obtained at 13 sec shows homogeneous enhancement of lesion.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C —41-year-old woman with history of hepatitis B for past 10 years. Late phase image obtained at 457 sec. The lesion shows washout; hypoechoic with respect to surrounding liver (arrow).

 

Figure 9
View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D —41-year-old woman with history of hepatitis B for past 10 years. Pathologic diagnosis of tissue punctured from lesion with 21-gauge manual aspiration needle was well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (H and E, x 200).

 

Figure 10
View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A —55-year-old man with history of hepatitis B for past 20 years. Baseline sonographic image shows hypoechoic lesion with unclear border in right lobe (arrow).

 

Figure 11
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B —55-year-old man with history of hepatitis B for past 20 years. Portal venous phase image obtained at 42 sec. Lesion begins to enhance.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C —55-year-old man with history of hepatitis B for past 20 years. Late phase image obtained at 133 sec. Lesion shows slight washout and is hypoechoic with respect to surrounding liver (arrow).

 

Figure 13
View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D —55-year-old man with history of hepatitis B for past 20 years. Pathologic diagnosis of tissue punctured from lesion with 21-gauge manual aspiration needle was clear cell carcinoma (H and E, x 200).

 

The enhancement patterns had a correlation to tumor sizes ({chi}2 = 21.87, p = 0.00). Among the 117 lesions, 72 lesions enhanced homogeneously with 46 lesions (63.9%) smaller than 3 cm. Forty-five lesions enhanced heterogeneously with 37 lesions (82.2%) larger than 3 cm (including the four intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas).

Table 3 shows the result of tumor size and histopathology. There were significant differences in tumor size in regard to pathologic types and cellular differentiations ({chi}2 =9.657, p = 0.0348): 64.6% (42/65) of moderately to poorly differentiated HCCs were larger than 3 cm, 56.3% (18/32) of well-differentiated HCCs were smaller than 3 cm, and 75% (12/16) of clear cell carcinomas were smaller than 3 cm.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3: Result of Tumor Size and Histopathology of 117 Lesions

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The histopathologic grades and types of primary malignancies of the liver affect the choice of initial treatment and are well-established prognostic factors. For instance, surgery is not the treatment of first choice for less-differentiated HCCs because it is associated with the development of synchronous intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastases and with a higher recurrence rate. In contrast, transarterial chemoembolization has little effect on well-differentiated HCCs because such tumors lack arterial neovascularization [8-11]. Different histopathologic grades and types have different blood supplies [12, 13] that affect the growth, infiltration, and metastasis of primary malignancies of the liver.

Until now, fine-needle biopsy and core-needle biopsy were the most commonly used methods to obtain a pathologic diagnosis before treatment. However, with the new sonographic contrast agents that enter directly into the tumor capillary [14] together with specific imaging technologies, we are now able to visualize enhancement characteristics of the tumor microcirculation dynamically with sonography. Our study showed that the perfusion patterns of HCCs were not only useful for definitive diagnosis but also made it possible to provide histopathologic information noninvasively.

The characteristic manifestation of moderately to poorly differentiated HCCs in contrast-enhanced sonography is quick enhancement in the arterial phase and fast washout in the portal venous phase, which is similar to enhanced CT and MRI [15, 16]. Moderately to poorly differentiated HCCs are nourished mainly by the hepatic artery, and the contrast agent quickly enters the tumor. Conversely, the liver parenchyma is supplied mainly by the portal vein and enhances relatively late. Because the contrast agent in a tumor quickly washes out, liver parenchyma just begins to enhance, so the tumor appears hypoechoic with respect to the surrounding liver. This is observed from the portal to the late phase. There were two moderately to poorly differentiated lesions that did not wash out until the late phase in our study. Sugihara et al. [17] reported that the proportion of the moderately differentiated lesions in the tumor tends to increase as the tumor increases in size. The two lesions may contain well-differentiated tissues that cause the contrast agents to wash out slowly.

Half of the well-differentiated HCCs washed out slowly during the late phase. The average washout time was significantly different than that of the moderately to poorly differentiated HCCs. This was in accordance with a previous report [18]. Well-differentiated HCCs are mainly fed by the portal vein or by both the hepatic artery and the portal vein [19]. Microbubbles continuously infusing the tumor through the portal vein may be the pathologic basis of "slow washout." Furthermore, well-differentiated HCCs consist of a trabecular pattern of cell cords and abundant sinusoids that may cause stagnation and slow clearing of microbubbles. Conversely, less differentiated HCCs contain fewer sinusoids and are mainly fed by the hepatic artery, which could cause the different washout time compared with well-differentiated HCCs.

Clear cell carcinoma, accounting for 10% of HCCs, is characterized by a lot of glycogen and/or fat in cellular plasm. Approximately 37% of minute early-stage HCCs are accompanied by fat or clear cell degeneration [20], so most tumor cells of this type are better differentiated. There are few studies on clear cell carcinoma in the field of imaging. Tu and Zhou [21] reported that approximately 52.9% of clear cell carcinomas smaller than 3 cm displayed hypodensity, whereas the others displayed heterogeneous enhancement in the arterial phase on CT. The cause of nonenhancement was not clear. In our study, four clear cell carcinomas enhanced in the portal venous phase and not in the arterial phase. Two of them enhanced heterogeneously. A small amount of portal vein blood signals were detected only on one lesion before contrast-enhanced sonography. The results suggested that this kind of primary malignancy of the liver might have less of a blood supply than the well-differentiated HCCs. Five clear cell carcinomas that were seen to wash out slowly in the late phase were diagnosed as well differentiated pathologically. This may result in different perfusion patterns during contrast-enhanced sonography.

Cholangiocarcinoma is hypovascular and is characterized by a large number of fibrous connective tissues forming sclerotic glandular structures. Massive necrosis usually occurs in the center of the tumor because of ischemia. Chen et al. [22] reported that cholangiocarcinomas are predominantly supplied by the hepatic artery, and digital subtraction angiography showed abnormally distributed blood vessels in the lesions, some of them accompanied by an arteriovenous fistula. Enhanced CT showed slight or moderate enhancement in the peripheral area of the tumor, whereas no enhancement was seen in the center in the early arterial phase. In the late phase, central enhancement became gradually obvious [23, 24]. On contrast-enhanced sonography, the four cholangiocarcinomas in our study presented slight enhancement around the periphery of the tumors in the arterial phase, and the center of the tumors did not enhance at all. The enhanced pattern was similar to that of dynamic CT. Compared with the delayed enhancement on CT in the late phase, contrast-enhanced sonography showed quick washout in the portal venous phase. Valls et al. [24] reported that the hyperenhancing pattern of cholangiocarcinomas in the late phase on CT seems to be related to the large amount of interstitial space in the fibrous stroma of the tumor. Slow diffusion of contrast medium from the vascular to the interstitial space may account for the delayed and prolonged enhancement of the tumor on images obtained 10-15 min after injection. SonoVue is a blood pool agent and microbubbles do not enter the interstitial space, which may explain the different manifestation in the late phase between contrast-enhanced sonography and enhanced CT. Moreover, the arteriovenous fistula may have been another reason for the quick washout during contrast-enhanced sonography.

One patient with fibrolamellar HCC participated in our study. Contrast-enhanced sonography showed quick enhancement in the arterial phase and washout in the portal venous phase that was similar to the pattern of moderately to poorly differentiated HCCs. The pathologic characteristics were massive fibrous tissues, hemorrhage, and necrosis within the tumor. Abnormal vessels of septum distribution were seen. The representation of dynamic CT and MRI of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma is heterogeneous enhancement in the arterial phase. In the portal venous phase, it gradually enhances homogeneously, which is helpful to discriminate it from focal nodular hyperplasia [25, 26]. Because of the small representation of fibrolamellar HCC in our study, further investigation is necessary to evaluate its enhancement characteristics.

Our study showed significant correlation between tumor size and the degree of differentiation. Most large tumors were less-differentiated; small tumors were shown to be well differentiated or clear cell carcinoma. Tumor size is one of the prognostic factors of HCC. DNA analysis suggests that lesions greater than 3 cm in HCC may have different biologic activity than smaller lesions [27]. Most small HCCs at the early stage are well differentiated. As the tumor increases in size, foci of the less-differentiated malignant tissue arise in the well-differentiated tissue and increase until they replace the well-differentiated tumor tissue [17]. Our study also showed that inhomogeneous enhancement mainly occurred in tumors larger than 3 cm, which usually contain more necrosis and liquefaction tissues than tumors smaller than 3 cm.

Our study had its limitations. First, it only included primary hepatic malignancies with a pathologic diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of this method in characterizing primary hepatic malignancies were not achieved. Second, there still was overlap in enhancement patterns among the groups. Further study including evaluation of lesion vascularity and other enhancement characteristics may be helpful for differentiation. The small number of cholangiocarcinomas was another limitation. Further investigations including a larger number of lesions combined with surgical pathology are necessary.

In conclusion, our study investigated the enhancement patterns according to histopathologic grades and types of primary malignancies of the liver. It may be useful for the differential diagnosis of primary malignancies of the liver histologically. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy is an imperfect procedure; contrast-enhanced sonography may therefore be helpful in addition to biopsy in some patients.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Ji-You Li for invaluable assistance in the preparation of this article.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Nicolau C, Catala V, Vilana R, et al. Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma using SonoVue, a second generation ultrasound contrast agent: correlation with cellular differentiation. Eur Radiol2004; 14:1092 -1099[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Tanaka M, Nakashima O, Wada Y, Kage M, Kojiro M. Pathomorphological study of Kupffer cells in hepatocellular carcinoma and hyperplastic nodular lesions in the liver. Hepatology 1996;24 : 807-812[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. 3. Amano S, Ebara M, Yajima T, et al. Assessment of cancer cell differentiation in small hepatocellular carcinoma by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Gastroenterol Hepatol2003; 18:273 -279[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Ebara M, Fukuda H, Kojima Y, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: relationship of signal intensity to histopathologic findings and metal content of the tumor and surrounding hepatic parenchyma. Radiology 1999;210 : 81-88[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Dietrich CF. Characterisation of focal liver lesions with contrast enhanced ultrasonography. Eur J Radiol2004; 51[suppl]:S9 -S17[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Leen E, Angerson WJ, Yarmenitis S, et al. Multi-centre clinical study evaluating the efficacy of SonoVue (BR1), a new ultrasound contrast agent in Doppler investigation of focal hepatic lesions. Eur J Radiol 2002; 41:200 -206[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Quaia E, Degobbis F, Tona G, Mosconi E, Bertolotto M, Pozzi Mucelli R. Differential patterns of contrast enhancement in different focal liver lesions after injection of the microbubble US contrast agent SonoVue. Radiol Med (Torino) 2004;107 : 155-165[Medline]
  8. Ferrari FS, Stella A, Gambacorta D, et al. Treatment of large hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison between techniques and long term results. Radiol Med (Torino) 2004;108 : 356-371[Medline]
  9. Palma LD. Diagnostic imaging and interventional therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Radiol1998; 71:808 -818[Abstract]
  10. Kitamura H, Kawasaki S, Nakajima K, Ota H. Correlation between microbubble contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography and immunostaining for Kupffer cells in assessing the histopathologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma: preliminary results. J Clin Ultrasound2002; 30:465 -471[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Pacella CM, Bizzarri G, Cecconi P, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results of combined treatment with laser thermal ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Radiology2001; 219:669 -678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Kameyama T, et al. Benign and malignant nodules in cirrhotic livers: distinction based on blood supply. Radiology 1991;178 : 493-497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Breedis C, Young G. The blood supply of neoplasms in the liver. Am J Pathol 1954;30 : 969-977[Medline]
  14. Brannigan M, Burns PN, Wilson SR. Blood flow patterns in focal liver lesions at microbubble-enhanced US. RadioGraphics 2004;24 : 921-935[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ito K, Choji T, Nakada T, Nakanishi T, Kurokawa F, Okita K. Multislice dynamic MRI of hepatic tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:390 -396[Medline]
  16. Noguchi Y, Murakami T, Kim T, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of dynamic MR imaging with dynamic double arterial phase helical CT. AJR 2003;180 : 455-460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Sugihara S, Nakashima O, Kojiro M, Majima Y, Tanaka M, Tanikawa K. The morphologic transition in hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of the individual histologic features disclosed by ultra-sound-guided fine-needle biopsy with those of autopsy. Cancer1992; 70:1488 -1492[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. 18. Chen MH, Dai Y, Yan K, et al. Early diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis using contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Chin J Ultrasonogr 2005;14 : 116-120
  19. Kudo M, Tomita S, Kashida H, et al. Tumor hemodynamics in hepatic nodules associated with liver cirrhosis: relationship between cancer progression and tumor hemodynamic change. Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 1991; 88:1554 -1565[Medline]
  20. Kutami R, Nakashima Y, Nakashima O, Shiota K, Kojiro M. Pathomorphologic study on the mechanism of fatty change in small hepatocellular carcinoma of humans. J Hepatol2000; 33:282 -289[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Tu BW, Zhou KR. Study of the pathological basis of nonenhanced small HCCs on dynamic CT scan. J Clin Radiol2001; 20:361 -364
  22. Chen YX, Du DZH, Chen JY, Li T, Zhou GY. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: DSA and pathology. J Pract Radiol2003; 19:606 -607
  23. 23. Kim TK, Choi BI, Han JK, Jang HJ, Cho SG, Han MC. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma of the liver: two-phase spiral CT findings. Radiology 1997;204 : 539-543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Valls C, Guma A, Puig I, et al. Intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: CT evaluation. Abdom Imaging2000; 25:490 -496[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Ichikawa T, Federle MP, Grazioli L, Marsh W. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: pre- and posttherapy evaluation with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 2000;217 : 145-151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Winston CB, Schwartz LH, Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Panicek DM. Hepatocellular carcinoma: MR imaging findings in cirrhotic livers and noncirrhotic livers. Radiology 1999;210 : 75-79[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Cong WM, Wu MC. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: DNA content and biological characteristics. Chin Med J1989; 102:783 -785[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L.-P. Liu, B.-W. Dong, X.-L. Yu, P. Liang, D.-K. Zhang, and L.-C. An
Focal Hypoechoic Tumors of Fatty Liver: Characterization of Conventional and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2009; 28(9): 1133 - 1142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Quaia, M. D'Onofrio, P. Cabassa, F. Vecchiato, S. Caffarri, F. Pittiani, K. M. Wittkowski, and M. A. Cova
Diagnostic Value of Hepatocellular Nodule Vascularity After Microbubble Injection for Characterizing Malignancy in Patients with Cirrhosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1474 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H.-J. Jang, T. K. Kim, P. N. Burns, and S. R. Wilson
Enhancement Patterns of Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Contrast-enhanced US: Comparison with Histologic Differentiation
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 898 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fan, Z.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Yin, S.-S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fan, Z.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Yin, S.-S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS