AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bitar, R.
Right arrow Articles by Maggisano, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bitar, R.
Right arrow Articles by Maggisano, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1556
AJR 2006; 187:228-234
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

In Vivo Identification of Complicated Upper Thoracic Aorta and Arch Vessel Plaque by MR Direct Thrombus Imaging in Patients Investigated for Cerebrovascular Disease

Richard Bitar1,2, Alan R. Moody1,2, General Leung2, Alexander Kiss3, David Gladstone4, Demetrios J. Sahlas4 and Robert Maggisano5

1 Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2 Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., AG46, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5.
3 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
4 Department of Neurology and Regional Stroke Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
5 Division of Vascular Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Received September 1, 2005; accepted after revision October 25, 2005.

 
Richard Bitar is the recipient of a Canadian Heads of Academic Radiology (CHAR) resident grant and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) fellowship.

Address correspondence to A. R. Moody (alan.moody{at}sunnybrook.ca).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this article was to assess the feasibility of MR direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) to evaluate the prevalence and location of complicated upper thoracic aortic and arch vessel plaque in patients referred for evaluation of cerebrovascular disease.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Patients referred for investigation of cerebrovascular disease by MRI were enrolled. Reasons for referral included transient ischemic attack/amaurosis fugax, acute infarct, remote infarct, or asymptomatic carotid disease. Of the 348 patients initially scanned, 17 were excluded from the analysis. The final patient population included 331 patients (199 men, 132 women; mean age, 67.7 years). Patients were scanned using MRDTI, a 3D, T1-weighted, fat-suppressed spoiled gradient echo that exploits the T1 shortening effects of methemoglobin, directly visualizing hemorrhage/thrombus in the vessel wall, thus identifying complicated plaque. Complicated plaque was defined as a high signal within the atherosclerotic plaque at least twice the signal intensity of muscle.

RESULTS. Forty-three of 331 patients (13%) had complicated upper thoracic aortic atherosclerotic disease, arch vessel atherosclerotic disease, or both. The upper thoracic aorta was involved in 36 of 43 patients (83.7%), and the left subclavian artery was involved in 14 of 43 patients (32.6%). Both the right subclavian artery and the brachiocephalic artery were involved in one of 43 patients (2.3%). Complicated carotid plaque was seen in 25 of 43 patients (58.1%).

CONCLUSION. MRDTI can be applied in the detection of complicated plaque in the upper thoracic aorta and arch vessels. Complicated plaque was identified in 13% of the patient population. The upper thoracic aorta was the most common site involved. This technique could be useful for the screening of asymptomatic at-risk patients.

Keywords: cardiovascular imaging • hemorrhage • MR arteriography • MRI • peripheral vascular disease


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Atherosclerosis is a systemic disease that leads to raised plaques within the vessel wall of arteries such as the aorta, coronaries, and carotids [1]. Knowledge of a patient's atherosclerotic load is potentially clinically important. Atherosclerotic disease in the thoracic aorta has been linked to an increased risk of thromboembolic events (such as embolic stroke or ischemic bowel) and an increased risk of mortality and stroke [2, 3]. The Stroke Council and the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association (AHA)/American Stroke Association [4] have recommended that patients with cerebral ischemic symptoms have a comprehensive cardiovascular assessment. This statement underscores the need to investigate other vascular beds to account for the source of the symptoms experienced by a patient and to make a preoperative assessment of a patient's potential morbidity and mortality. For example, knowledge of a patient's atherosclerotic load may be important in coronary artery surgery because severe carotid artery and vertebral artery stenosis can increase the perioperative risk of stroke [5].

Atherosclerotic plaques that lead to morbidity and mortality are usually modestly stenotic, often not seen by angiography [6]. The AHA has developed a classification system for atherosclerotic plaques [7], with intraplaque hemorrhage and thrombosis as markers that define atherosclerotic plaques as complicated (AHA type VIb/c) and at an increased risk of causing symptoms [7]. A study by Kolodgie et al. [8] confirmed the association in the coronary arteries between intraplaque hemorrhage and plaque instability.

As hemoglobin within intraplaque hemorrhage matures, it goes through various states, one of which, methemoglobin, causes shortening of T1 relaxation and results in the high signal intensity seen in T1-weighted imaging [9]. By exploiting the T1 shortening effects of methemoglobin, MR direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) can directly visualize intraplaque hemorrhage and therefore complicated atherosclerotic plaques when directly compared with histology [10, 11]. MRDTI-detected complicated plaque is prevalent in symptomatic and, to a lesser extent, in asymptomatic carotid arteries [12]. Detection of methemoglobin within complicated plaques should be feasible in other vascular beds, raising the prospect of surveying the vascular system to identify high-risk vessels before they become symptomatic.

The purpose of this study was to apply MRDTI to the carotids, upper thoracic aorta, and arch vessels to assess the feasibility of detecting AHA type VIb/c plaque as part of systemic atherosclerotic disease in patients referred for evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. We wanted to compare the prevalence and location of complicated plaque with the known prevalence of stenoocclusive atherosclerotic disease in the upper thoracic aorta and arch vessels.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The hospital's institutional research ethics board approved the study. No informed consent was required for this prospective study because these examinations were requested for clinical reasons.

Patients
From September 1, 2003, to February 28, 2005, patients referred for investigation of cerebrovascular disease by MRI were enrolled. Reasons for referral included transient ischemic attack (TIA)/amaurosis fugax, acute infarct, remote infarct, or asymptomatic carotid disease.

MR Direct Thrombus Imaging Sequence
Patients were scanned using a 1.5-T GE Twin Speed MR scanner (GE Healthcare) and an eight-channel neurovascular phased-array coil (USA Instruments). The MRDTI sequence used a free-breathing 3D T1-weighted fat-suppressed spoiled gradient echo (TR/TE, 6.7/1.7; flip angle, 15°) with 2-mm thickness; field of view, 300 mm2; matrix size, 3202; effective pixel size, 0.94 mm x 0.94 mm x 1 mm (interpolated); and 3 averages. Fat suppression was achieved using SPECIAL (Spectral Inversion at Lipids), a GE Healthcare proprietary technique. Scanning time was 04:13 minutes.

The field of view included the upper thoracic aorta (defined in this study as the aortic arch and the upper portion of the descending thoracic aorta); the arch vessels (the brachiocephalic and the right and left subclavian arteries); and the carotid arteries.

Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography
Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) was performed as part of the clinical imaging protocol. The sequence was a 3D spoiled gradient echo (TR/TE, 4.2/1.1; flip angle, 40°) with 3-mm thickness; field of view, 300 mm2; matrix size, 320 x 224; effective pixel size, 0.9 mm x 1.3 mm x 1.5 mm (interpolated); and 1 average. An IV contrast agent (Omniscan Egadodiamide, 0.1 mmol/kg, Nycomed Amersham) was injected at a rate of 2 mL/s. Stenosis levels were classified as wall irregularities, less than 50% stenosis, greater than 50% stenosis, or occluded artery.

Image Analysis
Images were reviewed by a radiologist with a specific interest in vascular MRI. For the MRDTI sequence, analysis involved examination of the carotid system for complicated plaque, defined as high signal within the atherosclerotic plaque at least twice the signal intensity of muscle [11], followed by the upper portions of the thoracic aorta and the arch vessels. The location of complicated plaque was recorded and then categorized as located in the upper thoracic aorta (pre-left subclavian artery, post-left subclavian artery, or both); the brachiocephalic artery; or the right subclavian, left subclavian artery, or both. CEMRA was qualitatively assessed for vessel occlusion, stenosis, vessel wall irregularities, or all three.

Statistical Analysis
A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p values were reported for all significant findings (SAS version 9.1).


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patient Demographics
Three-hundred forty-eight patients were recruited. The upper thoracic aorta was not imaged in nine patients, and the images were degraded by respiratory motion in eight patients. These 17 patients were excluded. Therefore, 331 patients were included in the final analysis (199 men, 132 women; mean age, 67.7 ± 14.12 years; range, 24-95 years). Table 1 summarizes the patient demographics and some clinical data.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Patient Demographics

 

Prevalence and Distribution of Complicated Plaque
Of the 331 patients, 43 (13%) had complicated upper thoracic aorta plaque, arch vessel plaque, or both. The upper thoracic aorta was involved in 36 of 331 patients (10.9%) (Fig. 1). Aortic involvement was mostly distal to the left subclavian (36/43 patients, 83.7%), three patients (3/36, 8.3%) had both pre- and post-left subclavian disease, and three patients (3/36, 8.3%) had combined complicated left subclavian and upper thoracic aorta atherosclerotic plaque.


Figure 1
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 93-year-old man investigated for symptomatic disease (remote right infarct). Coronal MR direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) shows complicated plaque in aortic arch (arrows).

 
The left subclavian artery contained complicated plaque in 14 patients (14/331, 4.2%) (Fig. 2A), the right subclavian was involved in one patient (1/331, 0.3%), and the brachiocephalic artery was also involved in one patient (1/331, 0.3%) (Fig. 3A).


Figure 2
View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 84-year-old woman investigated for right anterior circulation transient ischemic attacks using coronal MR direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI). Complicated atherosclerotic plaque is seen in left subclavian artery (arrow).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 75-year-old man investigated for anterior circulation transient ischemic attack symptoms. Coronal MR direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) showed complicated atherosclerotic plaque in this patient's brachiocephalic artery (arrow).

 
CEMRA showed varying levels of stenosis at the corresponding site of the complicated plaque (Fig. 2B). Most of the stenoses were wall irregularities (36/43, 83.7%). Five patients had stenosis less than 50% (5/43, 11.6%), and one patient each had a stenosis greater than 50% (1/43, 2.3%) and an occluded artery (1/43, 2.3%). No intracranial sources for infarcts were noted in these patients.


Figure 3
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 84-year-old woman investigated for right anterior circulation transient ischemic attacks using coronal MR direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI). Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) shows total occlusion at origin of left subclavian artery (arrow).

 
Relationship Between Complicated Upper Thoracic Aorta and Arch Vessel Plaque and Complicated Carotid Plaque
Patients with complicated carotid plaque— Of the 331 patients, 89 (26.9%) were found to have complicated plaque in the carotids. Twenty-five of these 89 (28.1%) patients had complicated arch vessel and upper thoracic aorta plaques (Fig. 3B and Fig. 4). Once the multivariate logistic regression was performed, patients with complicated plaque in the upper thoracic aorta and arch vessels were more likely to have complicated carotid plaque than patients without (odds ratio = 4.7; 95% CI = 2.04-10.6; p = 0.0003).


Figure 5
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 75-year-old man investigated for anterior circulation transient ischemic attack symptoms. Axial reformat of coronal MRDTI through carotid arteries. Bilateral complicated carotid plaques are noted (arrows).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 Distribution of complicated carotid plaque and either upper thoracic aorta disease, arch vessel disease, or both. Relevant percentages are included.

 

Patients without complicated carotid plaque—Of the 242 patients with no complicated carotid plaque, 18 had upper thoracic aorta and/or arch vessel disease (18/242, 7.4%). Fifteen of the 18 patients (83.3%) were symptomatic for cerebrovascular disease (TIA/amaurosis fugax, infarct). Ten of these patients (10/18, 55.6%) had complicated upper thoracic plaque but distal to the left subclavian artery; therefore, potential emboli from this plaque could not account for their symptoms (Fig. 4). The remaining five patients all had symptoms consistent with an anterior circulation TIA. Only one of these patients (1/5, 20%) had complicated plaque proximal to the left subclavian artery; therefore, this complicated proximal aortic plaque could have accounted for this patient's symptomatology. The others had complicated plaque in the left subclavian artery.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
We have successfully applied MRDTI to the carotid arteries, upper thoracic aorta, and arch vessels in patients investigated for cerebrovascular disease, identifying multiple AHA type VIb/c lesions reflecting systemic complicated atherosclerotic disease. Complicated plaque in the upper thoracic aorta and arch vessels was identified in 13% of this patient population. The upper thoracic aorta distal to the left subclavian artery was the most common site involved.

Application of MRDTI to identify complicated plaque in the thoracic aorta and arch vessels represents a novel use of this sequence previously shown to identify complicated plaque in the carotid arteries when compared with histology [10-12]. To our knowledge, no studies have directly visualized complicated plaque in vivo using MRI in the arch vessels, and only one other study has reported in vivo visualization of AHA type VIb/c plaque in the descending thoracic aorta [13].

Using this technique, we have reported the prevalence of complicated atherosclerotic plaque in both the carotid arteries and the upper thoracic aorta and arch vessels. Previous studies using digital subtraction angiography have shown that subclavian and carotid artery disease commonly coexist [14]. In this study, 25 of 89 patients (28.1%) with complicated carotid disease had complicated aortic plaque, arch vessel plaque, or both, and of those, 11 patients (11/89, 12.4%) had complicated subclavian artery atherosclerotic disease. Five of these 11 patients (5/89, 5.6%) had carotid stenosis greater than 70% and were potential surgical candidates. This finding has clinical implications because perioperative stroke is increased in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy if severe subclavian artery disease is present related to the compromise of the posterior circulation [15].

MRDTI is a simple, quick, noninvasive method for imaging complicated atherosclerotic plaque, easily added to standard MRI investigations of patients with cerebrovascular disease. As a 3D sequence, MRDTI inherently has a better signal-to-noise ratio than the 2D sequences commonly used in MRI studies of atherosclerotic disease [13, 16, 17]. The combination of the high signal generated by methemoglobin and suppression of the flowing blood signal by repeated radiofrequency pulses provides excellent contrast to identify complicated plaque. This aids in the detection of minimally or nonstenosing plaque. Because 3D data are acquired, multiplanar reformation allows visualization of complicated structures such as the aortic arch. Despite the 3D acquisition, few studies were degraded by physiologic motion (8/348, 2.3%).

MRDTI evaluation of the upper thoracic aorta and arch vessels provides early detection of complicated but minimally stenosing asymptomatic disease. Recent studies have suggested that asymptomatic and symptomatic peripheral arterial disease appear to have equivalent ischemic risk [18, 19]. The Prevention of Atherothrombotic Disease Network has published a "call to action" [20] that includes the recommendation to initiate a screening program for detecting asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease in high-risk patients. MRDTI is able to detect complicated plaque and may allow identification of high-risk disease in at-risk asymptomatic patients.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) historically was the technique of choice to image the thoracic aorta [19, 21]. One of the first in vivo human studies evaluated atherosclerotic plaques in the descending thoracic aorta [13], in which the accuracy of MRI versus TEE to identify the composition, size, and extent of different types of atherosclerotic plaques was compared in 10 patients. A total of 25 thoracic aortic plaques were identified, and three were defined as complicated plaques with hemorrhage/thrombus (AHA type VIb/c). The authors attributed this low number of complicated plaques to their technique, which may not have been sensitive enough to detect this type of complicated plaque [13]. Our ability to detect complicated plaque might be explained by the optimized parameters exploiting the T1-shortening effects of methemoglobin, the benefits of 3D over 2D acquisition, and the use of a gradient echo sequence, previously shown to be better at detecting intraplaque hemorrhage when compared with fast spin-echo sequences [17].

Other studies have also used MRI for detection of asymptomatic atherosclerotic disease of the human aorta. In 102 patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease, Taniguchi et al. [16] detected descending thoracic atherosclerotic plaque in 61% of their patients. Jaffer et al. [22] used MRI to detect subclinical aortic atherosclerosis in 318 patients from the offspring cohort of the Framingham Heart Study. Forty percent of their patients had subclinical aortic atherosclerosis, with 6.3% located in the thoracic aorta and 38.8% in the abdominal aorta. Neither of these studies evaluated the type of plaque. The difference in prevalence of thoracic aortic plaque reported in these two studies is high, ranging from 6.3% to 61%. Our reported prevalence lies within this range (36/331, 10.9%), although the total burden of atherosclerotic disease is likely higher because we only imaged AHA type VIb/c plaque. These variations in prevalence could also be attributed to the different patient populations in the studies.

Some previous studies have used MRI to visualize vessel wall disease directly; other studies have used MR angiography (MRA) to detect stenoocclusive atherosclerosis. In a study of 100 patients with known or clinically suspected cervical vascular disease undergoing 3D gadolinium-enhanced MRA, Ersoy et al. [15] found stenotic disease of the subclavian artery in 57% of their patients, with a predilection for the left side (68%).

Atherosclerotic disease was also found in the brachiocephalic, carotid, and vertebral arteries. In the study reported here, 32.6% (14/43) of the patients with complicated upper thoracic aorta disease, arch vessel disease, or both had complicated atherosclerotic disease in the subclavian arteries, also with a predilection for the left side (13/14, 92.9%). The lower prevalence again likely reflects the detection of AHA type VIb/c disease only.

The presence of combined aortic and carotid atherosclerotic disease has been previously shown using TEE [23, 24]. In a study of 89 patients with acute ischemic strokes, Guo et al. [23] evaluated the distribution of aortic arch and intra/extracranial cerebral atherosclerosis. They found that the incidence of carotid plaques was significantly higher among patients who had aortic arch atherosclerosis compared with those who did not (71.2% vs 21.6%). In our study, we found that patients with complicated plaque in the upper thoracic aorta, the arch vessels, or both also had more complicated carotid plaque compared with those who did not (58% [25/43] vs 22.2% [64/288]) (Fig. 4B). Demopoulos et al. [24] evaluated 45 patients with carotid stenosis greater than or equal to 50% and stroke or TIAs within 6 weeks, matching these patients for age, sex, and hypertension with controls. They found protruding aortic arch atheromas in 38% of the patients with carotid disease. In our study, we also found that patients with complicated plaque in the carotid arteries were more likely to have complicated plaque in the upper thoracic aorta, arch vessels, or both (28.1% [25/89]). We have found the prevalence of AHA type VIb/c plaque is approximately 30-60% of the reported total atherosclerotic burden from the previous studies, representing the unrecognized high-risk lesions not characterized by alternative techniques.

Thirty-six patients had complicated upper thoracic aorta plaque, 91.7% of which (33/36 patients) were distal to the left subclavian artery, the region where type B aortic dissections originate. An association between atherosclerotic plaques and the site of thoracic aortic dissection has previously only been shown in a small number of patients [25]. However, AHA type VIb/c atherosclerotic plaque could perhaps represent the earliest stage of intramural hematoma (IMH), which could subsequently develop into a dissection. IMH is a variant of aortic dissection that can result either from bleeding of the vasa vasorum in the media or from a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer causing hematoma formation in the aortic wall [26, 27]. We do not believe that the vessel wall high signal seen in these patients represents advanced IMH, which typically is associated with sudden onset and severe excruciating chest or back pain [25, 28, 29].

Mural thrombosis is commonly found on the surface of advanced atherosclerotic lesions and aneurysms, especially in the aorta [30-32]. Its incidence and pathogenesis remains unclear, but it has been identified in nonaneurysmal aortas, although the reported incidence is extremely low (0.45%) [33]. Differentiation between intraplaque hemorrhage and atherosclerotic surface thrombosis is problematic [11, 33, 34] because it is difficult to localize the high signal seen in the vessel wall at this resolution [34, 35]. However, both of these represent subtypes of AHA type VI disease [8] and are detected by MRDTI.

Our study does have some limitations. Correlation of our technique with other imaging such as TEE may have been useful to better delineate the exact location of the high signal seen in the vessel walls. The coverage of the aorta was limited to the aortic arch and the upper descending thoracic aorta, so atherosclerotic disease in the aortic root and lower descending thoracic aorta was not fully evaluated, potentially missing important atherosclerotic disease. Follow-up of patients with type VIb/c atherosclerotic disease would provide information regarding the clinical relevance of detecting such disease (to see if they developed complications from their high-risk disease). Also, some of the high signal seen by MRDTI may be false-positive results; however, the MRDTI technique has been previously shown to have a low rate of false-positivity, with a positive predictive value of 93% [11].

The MRDTI technique should benefit from respiratory and pulsatile motion compensation using methods such as breath-holding, respiratory gating, ECG gating, and navigator pulses. This should improve evaluation of complicated plaque in the aortic root/ascending thoracic aorta, important because these aortic segments have been implicated in coronary artery disease and cerebral thromboembolism [36, 37]. Higher spatial resolution should also allow better delineation of the location of the high signal, allowing differentiation among intraplaque hemorrhage, intramural hematoma, and mural thrombosis [35]. This could have clinical significance, as recent a report by Ganaha et al. [38] suggests that intramural hematoma caused by a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer has a worse clinical prognosis than one caused by bleeding from the vasa vasorum. Natural history studies would define the role of this technique in the screening of high-risk patients with asymptomatic disease.

In conclusion, MRDTI is a quick and simple technique to detect complicated plaque in the upper thoracic aorta and arch vessels. Complicated plaque was identified in 13% of the patient population in this study, and the upper thoracic aorta was the most common site involved. This technique could be useful for screening asymptomatic at-risk patients. Identification of these at-risk patients before they become symptomatic could be important because it will allow opportunities for medical intervention to halt and potentially reverse the disease process.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank the MRI technologists at our institution.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature 2002; 420:868 -874[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Solberg LA, Strong JP. Risk factors and atherosclerotic lesions. A review of autopsy studies. Arteriosclerosis1983; 3:187 -198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Witteman JC, Kannel WB, Wolf PA, et al. Aortic calcified plaques and cardiovascular disease (the Framingham Study). Am J Cardiol 1990; 66:1060 -1064[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Adams RJ, Chimowitz MI, Alpert JS, et al. American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Coronary risk evaluation in patients with transient ischemic attack and ischemic stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the Stroke Council and the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2003; 34:2310 -2322[Free Full Text]
  5. Kablak-Ziembicka A, Tracz W, Przewlocki T, Pieniazek P, Sokolowski A, Konieczynska M. Association of increased carotid intima-media thickness with the extent of coronary artery disease. Heart2004; 90:1286 -1290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Fuster V, Stein B, Ambrose JA, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Chesebro JH. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture and thrombosis. Evolving concepts. Circulation 1990;82 [suppl 3]:II47 -59[Medline]
  7. Stary HC. Natural history and histological classification of atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol2000; 20:1177 -1178[Free Full Text]
  8. Kolodgie FD, Gold HK, Burke AP, et al. Intraplaque hemorrhage and progression of coronary atheroma. N Engl J Med2003; 349:2316 -2325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bradley WG Jr. MR appearance of hemorrhage in the brain. Radiology 1993;189 : 15-26[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Moody AR, Allder S, Lennox G, Gladman J, Fentem P. Direct magnetic resonance imaging of carotid artery thrombus in acute stroke. Lancet 1999; 353:122 -123[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Moody AR, Murphy RE, Morgan PS, et al. Characterisation of complicated carotid plaque with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) in patients with cerebral ischemia. Circulation 2003;107 : 3047-3052[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Murphy RE, Moody AR, Morgan PS, et al. Prevalence of complicated carotid atheroma as detected by magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis and previous acute cerebral ischemia. Circulation 2003;107 : 3053-3058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Fayad ZA, Nahar T, Fallon JT, et al. In vivo magnetic resonance evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques in the human thoracic aorta: a comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 2000;101 : 2503-2509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Chan AW. Expanding roles of the cardiovascular specialists in panvascular disease prevention and treatment. Can J Cardiol 2004; 20:535 -544[Medline]
  15. Ersoy H, Watts R, Sanelli P, et al. Atherosclerotic disease distribution in carotid and vertebrobasilar arteries: clinical experience in 100 patients undergoing fluoro-triggered 3D Gd-MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17:545 -558[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Taniguchi H, Momiyama Y, Fayad ZA, et al. In vivo magnetic resonance evaluation of associations between aortic atherosclerosis and both risk factors and coronary artery disease in patients referred for coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2004;148 : 137-143[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Cappendijk VC, Cleutjens KB, Heeneman S, et al. In vivo detection of hemorrhage in human atherosclerotic plaques with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20 : 105-110[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Hooi JD, Stoffers HE, Kester AD, et al. Risk factors and cardiovascular diseases associated with asymptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease. The Limburg PAOD study. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Scand J Prim Health Care 1998;16 : 177-182[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Leng GC, Lee AJ, Fowkes FG, et al. Incidence, natural history and cardiovascular events in symptomatic and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the general population. Int J Epidemiol1996; 25:1172 -1181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Belch JJ, Topol EJ, Agnelli G, et al. Prevention of Atherothrombotic Disease Network. Critical issues in peripheral arterial disease detection and management: a call to action. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163:884 -892[Free Full Text]
  21. Khoury Z, Gottlieb S, Stern S, Keren A. Frequency and distribution of atherosclerotic plaques in the thoracic aorta as determined by transesophageal echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1997;79 : 23-27[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Jaffer FA, O'Donnell CJ, Larson MG, et al. Age and sex distribution of subclinical aortic atherosclerosis: a magnetic resonance imaging examination of the Framingham Heart Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002; 22:849 -854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Guo Y, Jiang X, Chen S, Zhang S, Zhao H, Wu Y. Aortic arch and intra-/extracranial cerebral arterial atherosclerosis in patients suffering acute ischemic strokes. Chin Med J 2003;116 : 1840-1844[Medline]
  24. Demopoulos LA, Tunick PA, Bernstein NE, Perez JL, Kronzon I. Protruding atheromas of the aortic arch in symptomatic patients with carotid artery disease. Am Heart J 1995;129 : 40-44[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Evangelista A, Mukherjee D, Mehta RH, et al. International Registry of Aortic Dissection (IRAD) Investigators. Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta: a mystery in evolution. Circulation2005; 111:1063 -1070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Nienaber CA, von Kodolitsch Y, Petersen B, et al. Intramural hemorrhage of the thoracic aorta. Diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Circulation 1995;92 : 1465-1472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Macura KJ, Szarf G, Fishman EK, Bluemke DA. Role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of acute aortic syndromes. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2003;24 : 232-254[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Coady MA, Rizzo JA. Elefteriades JA. Pathologic variants of thoracic aortic dissections. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers and intramural hematomas. Cardiol Clin 1999;17 : 637-657[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Blanchard DG, Sawhney NS. Aortic intramural hematoma: current diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2004; 6:99 -104
  30. Pan X, Rapp JH, Harris HW, et al. Identification of aortic thrombus by magnetic resonance imaging. J Vasc Surg1989; 9:801 -805[Medline]
  31. Castrucci M, Mellone R, Vanzulli A, et al. Mural thrombi in abdominal aortic aneurysms: MR imaging characterization—useful before endovascular treatment? Radiology 2005;197 : 135-139
  32. Nienaber CA, von Kodolitsch Y, Nicolas V, et al. The diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection by noninvasive imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:1 -9[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Botnar RM, Perez AS, Witte S, Wiethoff AJ, Laredo J, Hamilton J. In vivo molecular imaging of acute and subacute thrombosis using a fibrin-binding magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent. Circulation2004; 103:2023 -2039
  34. Reber PU, Patel AG, Stauffer E, Muller MF, Do DD, Kniemeyer HW. Mural aortic thrombi: an important cause of peripheral embolization. J Vasc Surg 1999;30 : 1084-1089[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Kampschulte A, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, et al. Differentiation of intraplaque versus juxtaluminal hemorrhage/thrombus in advanced human carotid atherosclerotic lesions by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2004;110 : 3239-3244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Amarenco P, Cohen A, Tzourio C, et al. Atherosclerotic disease of the aortic arch and the risk of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:1474 -1479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Fazio GP, Redberg RF, Winslow T, Schiller NB. Transesophageal echocardiographically detected atherosclerotic aortic plaque is a marker for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol1993; 21:144 -150[Abstract]
  38. Ganaha F, Miller DC, Sugimoto K, et al. Prognosis of aortic intramural hematoma with and without penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer: a clinical and radiological analysis. Circulation2002; 106:342 -348[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bitar, R.
Right arrow Articles by Maggisano, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bitar, R.
Right arrow Articles by Maggisano, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS