| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Clinical Observations |
1 Department of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts
General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., White 270C, Boston, MA 02114.
2 Department of Radiology, Emory University Hospital, Alanta, GA.
3 Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
4 St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA 02135.
5 Endocrine Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital,
Boston, MA.
Received November 11, 2004;
accepted after revision May 9, 2005.
J. M. A. Slattery and M. A. Blake contributed equally to the study and to
this article.
Abstract
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
CONCLUSION. Adrenocortical carcinoma has relative contrast retention on delayed contrast-enhanced CT. All tumors in this series had a relative percentage washout less than 40%, a finding consistent with malignant disease.
Keywords: adrenal gland • adrenocortical carcinoma • cancer • CT • contrast washout
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Five patients underwent radical adrenalectomy or nephrectomy with adrenalectomy. In one of these five cases, the initial biopsy findings were interpreted as probable ACC on the basis of tumor size, but a benign adrenocortical tumor could not be morphologically excluded, and the patient underwent adrenalectomy. In another case, the diagnosis of metastatic ACC was established on the basis of liver biopsy findings, but the patient underwent adrenalectomy 1 month later for control of bleeding from duodenal ulcers believed to be caused by steroid excess. In the other two of the seven cases, the diagnosis of ACC was established by fine-needle aspiration biopsy with cell block of the adrenal gland or by fine-needle aspiration biopsy and core biopsy of a paracaval lymph node.
Scanning Technique
In six of seven patients, imaging was performed with a 4-MDCT scanner
(LightSpeed QX/I, GE Healthcare). The other patient underwent imaging with a
nonhelical unit (HiSpeed Advantage, GE Healthcare). Scanning parameters were
as follows: 120-140 kVp, 200-300 mA, 1.0-second gantry rotation time, 7.5- to
15-mm table feed per gantry rotation, 1.5:1 pitch, and 2.5- to 5.0-mm slice
profile.
Unenhanced images were obtained before IV administration of contrast material. A power injector was used to administer 100-120 mL of 300 mg I/mL iodinated contrast material (Oxilan 300 [ioxilan], Cook Imaging) through an antecubital vein at a rate of 2.5 mL/s. Dynamic contrast-enhanced images were obtained after a scan delay of approximately 75 seconds. Delayed images were obtained after a mean delay of 9.1 minutes (range, 7-17 minutes) after contrast injection. Six of seven delayed scans were obtained 10 minutes or less after contrast injection (three at 7 minutes, one at 9 minutes, and one at 10 minutes). The other scan was obtained 17 minutes after injection. Scan delay times were calculated from the electronic alphanumeric information on the image.
Image Analysis
Images were reviewed on a digital picture-archiving diagnostic workstation
(Impax RS 3000 1K review station, AGFA Technical Imaging Systems). All images
were reviewed by two radiologists. The diameter of each adrenal mass was
measured on the slice with the largest surface area. The largest dimension was
used to represent the diameter of the lesion. The region of interest selected
for attenuation measurement was an ovoid or circular area that covered one
half to two thirds of the largest uniformly enhancing area within the adrenal
tumor without including adjacent retroperitoneal fat or inhomogeneous necrotic
regions. The region of interest covered a mean area of 2.8 cm2
(range, 1.9-4.3 cm2). Average attenuation measurements (mean of
two) were obtained on the unenhanced, enhanced, and delayed images. The data
recorded were entered into a Microsoft Excel worksheet. Mean values for the
unenhanced, enhanced, and delayed CT attenuation of uniformly enhancing foci
were calculated. Relative percentage washout (RPW) was calculated as follows:
 |
Relative percentage washout less than 40% on images with a scan delay of 17 minutes, and less than 50% on images with a scan delay of 7-10 minutes was considered a sign of malignancy. These values are consistent with previously published data [16, 17].
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
Unenhanced CT
The unenhanced attenuation values of the tumors ranged from 32 to 45 H
(mean, 39 H). No lesion contained areas of fat attenuation. All lesions
contained areas of necrosis.
Portal Venous Enhanced CT
Portal venous scanning was performed after a delay of 75 seconds for all
lesions. All tumors had uniformly enhancing foci suitable for contrast washout
analysis (Figs. 1A and
1B). Attenuation values on
enhanced portal venous phase CT scans ranged from 64 to 95 H (mean, 79 H).
|
|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Studies of the washout profiles of adrenal masses have shown that such profiles can aid in successful differentiation of adenoma from malignant lesions [13, 14, 17, 22]. Pena et al. [17] compared the decrease in attenuation values on dynamic CT scans with the values on scans obtained with a 10-minute delay (range, 5-15 minutes) and found that adenomas have a relative percentage washout greater than 50%, regardless of the fat content of the mass. Malignant tumors have a relative percentage washout less than 50%. Using this technique, Pena et al. calculated a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 100% in the diagnosis of adrenal adenoma. In a similar study Caoili and coworkers [16] compared enhancement washout values at 15 minutes with portal venous enhanced attenuation values.
ACC has been included in the nonadenoma population in some studies of washout characteristics of adrenal lesions. Two studies by Szolar and Kammerhuber [12, 23] described three and six ACCs. Although specific details regarding the washout characteristics of those tumors were not reported, one can infer that the washout characteristics of the lesions were similar to those of other nonadenoma lesions. In two studies by Caoili et al. [16, 22], one ACC was included in the nonadenoma population, but specific washout analysis for ACC was reported in only the more recent publication [22]. The lesion was a 3-cm highly differentiated ACC with a relative percentage washout of 53% on scans obtained with a 15-minute delay. Although these enhancement washout figures are similar to those of an adenoma, the authors conceded that this tumor may have been an atypical example of ACC.
Although to our knowledge no specific results on the washout characteristics of large adrenal adenomas have been reported, studies addressing the relative percentage washout of adrenal adenomas have shown lipid-rich adenomas measuring 6.0 cm and lipid-poor adenomas measuring 4.2 cm that have relative percentage washout characteristics similar to those of smaller adenomas [16]. A critical factor in such lesions, however, is that applying the size criterion alone may result in a presumptive diagnosis of malignancy.
The results of our study showed that ACC has relative contrast washout characteristics similar to those previously determined for adrenal metastatic lesions and that ACC can be differentiated from adrenal adenoma on this basis. In our series, the mean relative percentage washout was 21% (range, 14.4-32.1%). This result compares favorably with the 2-43% range of relative percentage washout of nonadenomas previously reported by Pena et al. [17].
Our study had several limitations. First, it was an observational review and comprised a small number of cases. ACC is a rare tumor, however, and single-institution numbers of lesions visualized with delayed CT are limited. Second, the tumors in our series were, for the most part, large and presented with symptoms. Large tumors are already viewed clinically as suspicious and are more likely to contain areas of cystic degeneration, necrosis, and hemorrhage, all of which can complicate diagnosis with CT and the calculation of enhancement washout values. Third, the scanning techniques used to examine the lesions were not uniform. This limitation was largely the result of the retrospective nature of the study and the rarity of ACC. Studies have been conducted with nonuniform scanning, particularly varied slice thickness, in addressing contrast washout of adrenal lesions [16]. In our study the delays after injection of contrast material were not uniform. In five cases scans were obtained fewer than 10 minutes after injection. On this basis it can be argued that relative percentage washout was falsely low in these patients. Previous studies, however, have shown that a delay range of 5-15 minutes can be used with high sensitivity and specificity for differentiation of benign from malignant disease [16, 17]. Furthermore, as Korobkin et al. [14] have suggested, even at 45 minutes, metastatic lesions wash out by only approximately 30% on average in comparisons of delayed and dynamic attenuation profiles. This finding suggests that early delayed scanning (< 10 minutes) does not produce falsely low relative percentage washout. It is likely that the low relative percentage washout calculated in these patients would have remained less than 50% even at 15 minutes and perhaps even at 45 minutes. The longest delay in our series was 17 minutes, and the corresponding relative percentage washout was still less than 40%. Finally, given the range of delay times (7-17 minutes) after injection in our study, the absolute percentage washout was not calculated, because, to our knowledge, no previous comparative studies have been conducted with a delay of less than 15 minutes for assessment of absolute percentage washout of adrenal lesions. Furthermore, absolute percentage washout can be calculated only if investigators know the unenhanced CT attenuation value, which often is unavailable in clinical practice.
In conclusion, prospective studies of smaller tumors are necessary to determine whether washout values are helpful in differentiating adenomas from small carcinomas. Although size remains a critical factor in the evaluation of adrenocortical neoplasms, analysis of contrast washout characteristics may be a useful diagnostic adjunct for characterizing these lesions, particularly when size is indeterminate.
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. T. Johnson, K. M. Horton, and E. K. Fishman Adrenal Mass Imaging with Multidetector CT: Pathologic Conditions, Pearls, and Pitfalls RadioGraphics, September 1, 2009; 29(5): 1333 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. W. L. Boland, M. A. Blake, P. F. Hahn, and W. W. Mayo-Smith Incidental Adrenal Lesions: Principles, Techniques, and Algorithms for Imaging Characterization Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 756 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Ilias, A. Sahdev, R. H Reznek, A. B Grossman, and K. Pacak The optimal imaging of adrenal tumours: a comparison of different methods Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 587 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
