|
|
||||||||
Clinical Observations |
1 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC
27710.
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham,
NC.
Received November 17, 2004;
accepted after revision April 27, 2005.
Address correspondence to K. Singh
(kushsingh{at}hotmail.com).
Abstract
|
|
|---|
CONCLUSION. The Wrisberg variant of the discoid lateral meniscus is a rare condition with a highly suggestive clinical history. The musculoskeletal radiologist should consider this diagnosis whenever a discoid lateral meniscus is identified because making this elusive diagnosis may prove immensely useful for the orthopedic surgeon.
Keywords: bone knee meniscus MRI musculoskeletal imaging orthopedic surgery Wrisberg variant discoid lateral meniscus
|
|
|---|
Three subgroups of discoid menisci were described by Watanabe and Takeda [6] in 1974: complete, incomplete, and Wrisberg variant. Complete and incomplete discoid menisci vary in their degree of tibial plateau coverage. The least common subtype, the Wrisberg variant, lacks the normal posterior coronary ligament and capsular attachments. Instead, the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus is mobile, occasionally subluxing into the joint [7].
The prevalence of the Wrisberg variant of discoid lateral meniscus varies depending on the series reported, with Neuschwander et al. [1] describing an arthroscopically proven prevalence as low as 0.2%. In our experience, the prevalence of the Wrisberg variant of discoid lateral meniscus in the population is much lower than in most reports; this article presents the only two cases encountered over a period of several years.
The diagnosis of a discoid meniscus is strongly suggested by the patient's history, with symptoms that include knee pain, snapping, and locking in a child or adolescent. The Wrisberg variant is commonly described by patients as snapping of the posterior horn across the femoral condyle during flexion or extension that results in a snapping sensation. Despite the classic clinical history, MRI or arthroscopy is nevertheless required for a definitive diagnosis of the Wrisberg variant. However, the decision to operate is ultimately based on the presence of symptoms.
Although it is commonly described in the orthopedics literature, to our knowledge the Wrisberg variant of the discoid lateral meniscus is not mentioned in the radiology literature. This article describes the MRI appearance of this important yet often unrecognized process.
|
|
|---|
Arthroscopic criteria in general for the Wrisberg variant of discoid lateral meniscus include hypermobility of the menisci shown both by probing and flexion and extension during arthroscopy and by the absence of a fascicular attachment to the capsule as well as the absence of the normal coronary ligament attachment to the tibia.
|
|
|
All imaging was conducted on a 1.5-T closed magnet MR scanner (Signa, GE Healthcare). Imaging protocols included spin-echo fat-saturation proton density-weighted sagittal images (TR/TE, 2,000/20; slice thickness, 4 mm; interslice gap, 0.4 mm; field of view, 14-16 cm; matrix, 256 x 192) and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images with fat-saturation (4,000/75; slice thickness, 4 mm; interslice gap, 0.4 mm; field of view, 14-16 cm; matrix, 256 x 192) in all imaging planes.
|
|
|---|
Absence of the normal fascicles attaching the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus to the joint capsule is also seen (Figs. 1A, 1B, and 1C). As a result, a high T2 signal is interposed between the lateral meniscus and the joint capsule, simulating a peripheral tear or injury to the meniscal fascicles. In addition, the hypermobile posterior horn may abnormally sublux anteriorly within the joint (Figs. 2A and 2B).
|
|
|
|
|---|
MRI in the setting of knee pain in a child has become a viable alternative to invasive arthroscopy, serving as a road map for operative conditions and preventing unnecessary surgery in nonoperative conditions. Although they are uncommon, the findings of the Wrisberg variant of a discoid lateral meniscus should be sought whenever a discoid meniscus is identified on MRI of the knee. The implications of a Wrisberg variant being identified by the radiologist are important. The decision to operate, the surgical approach, and the technique may all be altered by a preoperative diagnosis of a Wrisberg variant of the discoid lateral meniscus.
The treatment of a discoid meniscus depends on its type and whether it is associated with a tear. If a discoid meniscus is discovered with no evidence of a tear, then its presence should be considered incidental and it should be left intact. If a tear is associated with a complete or incomplete discoid meniscus, then partial meniscectomy should be performed as a saucerization technique. The goal should be to resect enough tissue to result in a well-contoured 6-mm stable rim [8, 9]. The traditional treatment for a Wrisberg's ligament variant has been total meniscectomy. More recently, techniques have been developed to reduce the meniscus and repair it by providing a posterior attachment [10].
The two patients in our study presented in quite different ways. The first patient, who had a more classic presentation, was a 15-year-old boy with no history of trauma who presented with lateral knee pain and an audible click with flexion. The second patient was a 62-year-old woman, a much older age than is typical for presentation. However, the patient had been experiencing symptoms for several years and had undergone MRI in which the diagnosis of Wrisberg variant of discoid lateral meniscus was missed. This patient presented with lateral knee pain, joint line tenderness, and a positive McMurray's test. MRI performed 4 years before subsequent positive arthroscopy showed a discoid lateral meniscus with "high T2 signal/irregularity of posterior horn lateral meniscus, suspicious for tear." No surgery was performed at that time.
The MRI appearance of a Wrisberg variant discoid lateral meniscus is quite specific. A Wrisberg variant consists of a discoid lateral meniscus with absent normal fascicles and coronary ligaments that would normally attach the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus to the joint capsule and tibia. This deficiency is unique to the Wrisberg variant. Although fascicles of the lateral meniscus are normally seen, the coronary ligaments are usually not seen even in healthy patients and thus were not included in our MR criteria for a Wrisberg variant. On MRI, this deficiency of normal fascicles and coronary ligaments is manifested as high T2 signal interposed between the lateral meniscus and the joint capsule and simulating a peripheral tear or injury to the fascicles. Because the posterior horn is no longer attached to the capsule, the lateral meniscus may also sublux anteriorly. This finding was identified in the second patient reported in this article.
This study has several limitations. Because of the rarity of this condition, only two patients with both MRI and corroborative arthroscopy are described. A larger patient volume would help to confirm the MRI findings of Wrisberg variant of a discoid lateral meniscus presented in this article. In addition, only those two patients identified at arthroscopy by a single orthopedic surgeon at our institution were used in this article. Arthroscopy reports were not reviewed over the time period studied. Another limitation is that the body, posterior horn, and root attachments were not considered individually. Also, this was a retrospective study and has the inherent limitations of such a study.
Alternative MRI techniques may be used for further evaluation of affected patients, including MR arthrography and stress views (partial flexion). Each of these techniques may hold promise in making this infrequent condition more apparent to both radiologists and orthopedists.
In summary, the Wrisberg variant of a discoid lateral meniscus is a rare condition with a highly suggestive clinical history. The musculoskeletal radiologist should consider this diagnosis whenever a discoid lateral meniscus is identified because making this elusive diagnosis may prove immensely useful for the orthopedic surgeon.
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |