The following table or figure may be downloaded to PowerPoint for personal use in teaching and presentations. This feature is available to all subscribers to the journal.
You MUST read and follow the guidelines at Request to Reproduce AJR Content if you are distributing or using AJR content beyond academic use (limited distribution, non-revenue producing, or educational purposes).
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 1A Risk-to-benefit ratios for study participants.
Risk-to-benefit ratio (log units) histograms for male (A) and female
(B) never-smokers, ex-smokers, and current smokers associated with four
annual screening examinations with MDCT (MD) and single-detector (SD)
(low-dose thick-collimation plus one full-dose thin-collimation package)
scanners in the Italung-CT Trial. Three different levels of expected
benefitnamely, 10%, 20%, and 30% reduction of lung cancer
mortalityare considered. Assuming 10% reduction of mortality,
risk-benefit ratio is over the unitthat is, the number of
radiation-induced deaths overcomes the estimated number of lives saved, for
male (1.13) and female (1.66) never-smokers examined with the single-detector
scanner. At the same level of screening efficacy, the ratio is between 1 and
0.1 and close to the critic value of 0.5, implying only two lives saved for
one radiation-induced death, for male (0.53) or female (0.78) never-smokers
examined with an MDCT scanner, for female former smokers examined with a
single-detector (0.87) or MDCT (0.41) scanner, and for male former smokers
examined with a single-detector scanner (0.53). Assuming 20% or 30% screening
efficacy, the ratio is around or below 0.1 for male and female current smokers
examined with either a single-detector or MDCT scanner.