AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Branstetter, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Branstetter, B. F., IV
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1285
AJR 2006; 187:W235
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Physiologic 18F-FDG Uptake in the Serratus Anterior Muscle: A Potential False-Positive on PET Resolved with PET/CT

Barton F. Branstetter, IV

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh, PA 15213

Physiologic uptake of 18F-FDG can be easily confused with abnormality on PET. PET/CT has better accuracy than PET, but physiologic 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT may still be confusing when it is asymmetric [1, 2].

A 52-year-old man with a history of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma presented for routine follow-up with combined PET/CT. His treatment regimen had included primary tumor resection, bilateral neck dissections, chemotherapy, and external beam radiation. On the PET images, a focal area of increased 18F-FDG uptake was noted (Fig. 5A). This focus was initially interpreted as an axillary lymph node on the PET images alone, but after fusion images were evaluated, the uptake was shown to be associated with a muscle running from the upper tip of the scapular wing to the lateral aspect of the first two ribs (Fig. 5B). The scan was then interpreted as negative for residual or recurrent tumor. No causative motions, such as shoulder twitch, were noted in the patient.


Figure 1
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A 52-year-old man with history of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Axial PET image from combined PET/CT scan shows focus of increased uptake (arrow) near right axilla.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B 52-year-old man with history of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Corresponding axial enhanced CT image shows muscle responsible for physiologic uptake: second digitation of serratus anterior (arrow). First digitation is marked with arrowhead.

 
The serratus anterior muscle arises on the medial aspect of the scapula and attaches to the first eight ribs by interdigitating with the intercostal muscles. Its function is to keep the scapula close to the posterior chest wall (i.e., to prevent scapular winging). The first two digitations of the serratus anterior arise from the superomedial tip of the scapula and are anatomically distinct from the remainder of the muscle [3]. These two muscular slips insert on the lateral aspect of the first and second ribs.

Physiologic muscular uptake of 18F-FDG is a frequent finding on PET and PET/CT. A thorough knowledge of muscular anatomy is necessary to avoid confusing physiologic uptake with abnormality.


References
Top
References
 

  1. Branstetter BF IV, Blodgett TM, Zimmer LA, et al. Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? Radiology 2005;235 : 580-586[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Blodgett TM, Fukui MB, Snyderman CH, et al. Combined PET-CT in the head and neck. 1 Physiologic, altered physiologic, and artifactual FDG uptake. RadioGraphics 2005;25 : 897-912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Gray H. Anatomy, descriptive and surgical. Philadelphia: Courage Books, 1901:381 -382

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Branstetter, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Branstetter, B. F., IV
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS