The following table or figure may be downloaded to PowerPoint for personal use in teaching and presentations. This feature is available to all subscribers to the journal.
You MUST read and follow the guidelines at Request to Reproduce AJR Content if you are distributing or using AJR content beyond academic use (limited distribution, non-revenue producing, or educational purposes).
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.
Fig. 17A —Graphs show correlation and degree of agreement between 2D
echocardiography and 3D echocardiography compared with currently perceived
gold standard of cardiac MRI. Note considerable improvement in both
correlation and agreement to MRI provided by live 3D imaging compared with 2D
imaging. (Reprinted with permission from Circulation
[47]). Graphs show correlation
and degree of agreement between 2D echocardiography and live 3D
echocardiography (A) and between each echocardiography technique and
cardiac MRI (B) for determining left ventricular (LV) mass.
