AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larrison, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larrison, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1804
AJR 2006; 187:972-974
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Technical Innovation

Low-Cost Phantom for Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Training

Matthew Larrison1, Alex DiBona1 and David E. Hogg1

1 All authors: Radiology Department, University of Alabama Hospital, 619 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35249.

Received October 13, 2005; accepted after revision February 14, 2006.

 
Address correspondence to M. Larrison (mlarrison{at}uabmc.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. This article reports on the construction of a low-cost phantom to be used for training technologists, residents, and radiologists to perform stereotactic breast biopsy. The model is adaptable to a variety of biopsy devices and realistically simulates the aspects of stereotactic breast biopsy.

CONCLUSION. We believe our model provides an excellent alternative to more expensive commercial products.

Keywords: biopsy • breast • breast cancer • phantom • stereotactic breast biopsy


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Discussion
References
 
In our study, an eggplant served as a model for the breast. Similar models have used turkey breasts [1] and modeling clay [2], which are more difficult to work with for many reasons, including concerns about contamination and excessive preparation time. The radiographic appearance of the fibrous eggplant tissue closely resembles that of actual breast tissue. The eggplant fit easily into our biopsy device and could be repositioned without difficulty.

Except for the eggplant, all materials needed for preparation of the model were available in our department, including 10-mL syringe, 18-gauge spinal needle, barium sulfate tablet, water-soluble sonography transmission gel, and scissors. The entire procedure was accomplished in less than 15 minutes and required no special skill. We estimate our phantom can be produced for less than $20.

The preparation requires five steps. First, remove the plunger from the 10-mL syringe and add 3 mL of sonography gel. Second, using scissors, cut the barium tablet into particles small enough to pass through an 18-gauge needle; allow the particles to fall into the syringe. Third, mix the barium particles with the gel. Fourth, attach the 18-gauge spinal needle to the syringe, replace the plunger, and express the excess air. Fifth, make several passes through the eggplant, perpendicular to its long axis, while injecting the mixture.


Figure 1
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Phantom (eggplant) positioned in compression paddle.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Parallax targeting radiographic images of barium particles in eggplant.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 Parallax radiographic images with stereotactic sampling needle in place before sampling.

 


Figure 4
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 Magnification view of specimen radiograph shows barium particles (arrows), confirming lesion sampling.

 
The introduction of the gel mixture into the egg-plant provides multiple targets for biopsy training. The barium particles serve as an appropriate substitute for microcalcifications. The use of sonography gel reduces the amount of air introduced into the phantom. We used the MammoTest Select (Ethicon Endo-Surgery) with MammoVision Electronic Stereotaxy System (Fisher Imaging). The phantom was placed in the compression paddle with the track of barium oriented parallel to the image receptor (Fig. 1). A scout image was then obtained to ensure that an adequate sample was appropriately positioned. Parallax views were obtained next, and a specific lesion was targeted (Fig. 2). The biopsy needle was then positioned according to the coordinates provided by the MammoVision System, and images were obtained to confirm positioning (Fig. 3). Multiple samples were obtained using an 11-gauge Mammotome ST stereotactic probe (Ethicon Endo-Surgery). A mammogram of the specimen was used to confirm that the lesion was successfully biopsied (Fig. 4). Both localization and specimen imaging were performed using preexisting protocols (26 kV, 120 mA and 22 kV, 15 mA, respectively). Imaging results were adequate without manipulation of technique (kVp, mA), reflecting the favorable imaging characteristics of the phantom.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Discussion
References
 
Using the eggplant model, the practical aspects of performing stereotactic breast biopsy are achieved—visualization and localization of the target, retrieval, and confirmation of lesion sampling. The use of barium particles in the eggplant allowed for the adequate visualization and localization required for biopsy. The varied shapes and clusters of particles allowed for targeting of a specific group. With each targeted lesion, we were able to obtain several core samples of tissue. We were able to confirm the presence of the lesion (barium particles) by obtaining a mammographic image of the sample.

Our study had some limitations. We were only able to retrieve three to five cores from each biopsy site. As a result, if a lesion was not sampled in the first three to five cores, a new lesion would have to be targeted. Inaccurate initial sampling of the lesion and subsequent retargeting of a new lesion could, therefore, add time to the training process. The cores we obtained were smaller than those retrieved with actual breast tissue. After several passes, the eggplant tissue fragmented and only small pieces of tissue could be obtained from a single site; however, confirmation by radiography was still achieved. Complications that may be encountered during the actual procedure and some aspects of the procedure, such as anesthesia, were not simulated.

At our institution, radiologists actively participate in all aspects of the biopsy, including patient positioning and targeting of the lesion. Although we did not directly compare the biopsy success rates between residents who trained with the phantom and those who did not train with the phantom, previous studies have shown that success rates improve after completing several procedures [3]. Therefore, one would expect that performing multiple procedures with the phantom would allow operators to improve their accuracy and increase patient safety.

In summary, our eggplant model proved to be ideal for training residents in the performance of stereotactic breast biopsy. The availability and low cost of the model, combined with the ease of preparation and reproducibility, made the training process efficient and highly effective. The excellent imaging characteristics of the eggplant added to the realistic nature of the process. The advantages of using the eggplant as a model include the ability to perform several biopsies on the same phantom, the ability to place lesions at multiple depths, and the fact that the eggplant leaves very little residue on the biopsy needle. The ability to confirm lesion sampling is a distinct advantage of using the barium sulfate particles. The biopsy specimens closely simulated actual core biopsy specimens and provided instant feedback on the success of the procedure. We believe this training model provides an outstanding method of quickly and efficiently exposing trainees to the process of performing a stereotactic biopsy and substantially increases confidence and skill for performing this procedure on patients.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Barbara Ann Berry and Mark Lockhart for their invaluable help.


References
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Discussion
References
 

  1. Harvey JA, Morgan RE, Hamer MM, DeAngelis GA, Omary RA. Evaluation of a turkey-breast phantom for teaching freehand, US-guided core-needle breast biopsy. Acad Radiol 1997;8 : 565-569[CrossRef]
  2. Quinn AD, Smiddy PF, Duggan M, Murphy J, Molloy M. Technical report: A training phantom for stereotactic breast biopsies. Clin Radiol 1997; 52:149 -150[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Liberman L, Benton C, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, LaTrenta LR, Morris EA. Learning curve for stereotactic breast biopsy: how many cases are enough? AJR 2001; 176:721 -777[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larrison, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larrison, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS