AJR Get Involved! Great Benefits! Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lim, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lim, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1932
AJR 2006; 187:W341-W349
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pictorial Essay

Imaging Features of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation

Hyo Soon Lim1, Yong Yeon Jeong1, Heoung Keun Kang1, Jae Kyu Kim2 and Jin Gyoon Park2

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School and Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 160 Ilsim-ri, Hwasun-eup, Hwasun-gun, Jeollanam-do 519-809, South Korea.
2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School and Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea.

Received December 20, 2004; accepted after revision August 8, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to Y. Y. Jeong (yjeong{at}chonnam.ac.kr).

WEB

This is a Web exclusive article.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Transcatheter Arterial...
Radiofrequency Ablation
Conclusion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to show the imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency thermal ablation on CT, MRI, and contrast-enhanced sonography and to describe the advantages and limitations of each imaging technique in evaluating the therapeutic effect on HCC.

CONCLUSION. CT is the standard imaging technique for monitoring the effectiveness of TACE and radiofrequency ablation. Contrast-enhanced sonography and MRI can complement CT in evaluating the therapeutic response.

Keywords: CT • hepatocellular carcinoma • liver disease • MRI • radiofrequency ablation • sonography • transcatheter arterial chemoembolization


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Transcatheter Arterial...
Radiofrequency Ablation
Conclusion
References
 
Although surgery remains the treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), several minimally invasive techniques have been used as alternatives to surgery for treating the disease. These include transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and percutaneous therapy, such as percutaneous ethanol injection therapy, percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy, and radiofrequency ablation therapy [1]. Although several therapeutic options have been advocated, the most widely used are TACE, radiofrequency ablation, or a combination of the two. After treatment, follow-up imaging studies, including CT, MRI, and contrast-enhanced sonography, have been used to assess the therapeutic efficacy. The purpose of this pictorial assay is to show the imaging features of HCC after TACE and radiofrequency ablation.


Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Transcatheter Arterial...
Radiofrequency Ablation
Conclusion
References
 
TACE, using iodized oil mixed with anticancer agents, has been widely used. Iodized oil is used as a vehicle to transport the anticancer drug, and the embolic material enhances the antitumor effect of the anticancer drug [2]. TACE causes acute ischemic damage to the HCC and results in coagulative necrosis because HCC is nourished only by the hepatic artery.

CT and MRI
CT is commonly used as the standard imaging technique for evaluating the therapeutic response in patients with HCC after TACE. The accumulation pattern of iodized oil observed on CT can be classified into four types: type I, homogeneous accumulation, with type Ia indicating accumulation around the tumor and type Ib indicating no accumulation around the tumor; type II, partial defect in the tumor; type III, faint accumulation; and type IV, no or slight accumulation [3] (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, and 1E). The pattern and distribution of iodized oil in the tumor are useful for assessing the therapeutic effects of TACE. A greater amount of accumulation of iodized oil within tumor indicates a greater area of necrosis. During follow-up, the focal defect or washout of iodized oil in the mass with the contrast-enhanced area suggests the presence of a viable tumor and that additional treatment is needed [4] (Figs. 2A, 2B, and 2C).


Figure 1
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A Four types (with type I broken down into two parts) of accumulation patterns of iodized oil on CT after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Greater amount of accumulation of iodized oil within tumor indicates greater area of necrosis. Type Ia, seen in 60-year-old man, has homogeneous accumulation, with accumulation also seen around tumor.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B Four types (with type I broken down into two parts) of accumulation patterns of iodized oil on CT after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Greater amount of accumulation of iodized oil within tumor indicates greater area of necrosis. Type Ib, seen in 59-year-old man, has homogeneous accumulation with accumulation not seen around tumor.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C Four types (with type I broken down into two parts) of accumulation patterns of iodized oil on CT after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Greater amount of accumulation of iodized oil within tumor indicates greater area of necrosis. Type II, seen in 73-year-old man, has partial defect in accumulation.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D Four types (with type I broken down into two parts) of accumulation patterns of iodized oil on CT after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Greater amount of accumulation of iodized oil within tumor indicates greater area of necrosis. Type III, seen in 65-year-old woman, has faint accumulation.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E Four types (with type I broken down into two parts) of accumulation patterns of iodized oil on CT after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Greater amount of accumulation of iodized oil within tumor indicates greater area of necrosis. Type IV, seen in 70-year-old man, has no or slight accumulation.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 56-year-old man with residual viable tumor that shows faint accumulation of iodized oil after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). On follow-up unenhanced CT scan 3 weeks after TACE, faint accumulation of iodized oil (arrow) within tumor is seen.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 56-year-old man with residual viable tumor that shows faint accumulation of iodized oil after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Arterial phase CT scan shows contrast enhancement (arrow) around faint accumulation of iodized oil, suggesting remaining viable tumor.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C 56-year-old man with residual viable tumor that shows faint accumulation of iodized oil after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Subsequent angiogram shows hypervascular mass (arrows) in hepatic dome. Because of this finding, TACE was repeated.

 
Necrotic tissue on contrast-enhanced CT and MRI does not show contrast enhancement, whereas enhancement is observed in residual tumor (Figs. 3A and 3B). It can be difficult to evaluate contrast enhancement in a tumor with partial retention of iodized oil on contrast-enhanced CT because of the beam-hardening artifacts produced by the high attenuation of iodized oil. The signal intensity of MRI is not influenced by the presence of iodized oil; therefore, a residual viable tumor is better defined by contrast-enhanced MRI [5] (Figs. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, and 4F). Even though MR images have much better contrast resolution, it is difficult to detect the small residual areas of viable cells seen microscopically in the capsule because the capsule appears as a hyper-intense ring in the early and late phases of dynamic enhancement [6].


Figure 9
View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 54-year-old man with residual viable tumor with defective accumulation of iodized oil after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). On unenhanced CT scan 3 weeks after TACE, defective accumulation of iodized oil (arrows) within tumor is seen.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 54-year-old man with residual viable tumor with defective accumulation of iodized oil after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Arterial phase CT scan shows contrast enhancement (arrows) within defective uptake of iodized oil, suggesting remaining viable tumor.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A 66-year-old woman with residual viable tumor after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. On unenhanced CT scan, dense intratumoral retention of iodized oil (arrow) is shown with beam-hardening artifact.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B 66-year-old woman with residual viable tumor after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. On arterial phase CT scan, contrast enhancement of tumor (arrow) is unclear.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C 66-year-old woman with residual viable tumor after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Axial T1-weighted gradient-echo (TR/TE, 120/4.2) MR image shows hyperintense lesion (arrow).

 

Figure 14
View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D 66-year-old woman with residual viable tumor after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Axial T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo (infinite/92) MR image shows heterogeneous hyperintense lesion. Necrotic lesions (arrowheads) have higher signal intensity than do viable lesions (arrow).

 

Figure 15
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4E 66-year-old woman with residual viable tumor after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. On gradient-echo (180/1.8) T1-weighted MR images after administration of gadolinium chelates, residual viable tumor (arrow) shows intense enhancement in arterial phase (E) and washout in delayed phase (F). Necrotic lesion (arrowheads) shows no enhancement in either phase.

 

Figure 16
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4F 66-year-old woman with residual viable tumor after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. On gradient-echo (180/1.8) T1-weighted MR images after administration of gadolinium chelates, residual viable tumor (arrow) shows intense enhancement in arterial phase (E) and washout in delayed phase (F). Necrotic lesion (arrowheads) shows no enhancement in either phase.

 

HCC after TACE has variable signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images. The hypointensity on T2-weighted images represents coagulation necrosis (Figs. 5A and 5B). Conversely, the hyperintensity corresponds to hemorrhage or residual tumor [6]. However, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish a viable tumor from necrotic areas on T1- and T2-weighted images.


Figure 17
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A 64-year-old man with complete necrosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Axial T1-weighted gradient-echo (TR/TE, 120/4.2) MR image shows hyperintense lesion (arrow).

 

Figure 18
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B 64-year-old man with complete necrosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Axial T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo (infinite/92) MR image shows hypointense lesion (arrow), which represents coagulation necrosis. Compact uptake of iodized oil is seen within tumor on CT (not shown).

 
Sonography
Contrast-enhanced sonography using a microbubble contrast agent may be useful for detecting residual or recurrent tumors in HCC after TACE [7]. The blood flow signals are detected within the residual viable tumor (Figs. 6A, 6B, and 6C); however, a reliable assessment of intratumoral blood flow may not be possible in many instances, particularly in small lesions or in lesions located deep within the liver parenchyma [6, 7].


Figure 19
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A 74-year-old man with incomplete necrosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). On follow-up unenhanced CT scan 3 weeks after TACE, defective accumulation of iodized oil (arrow) within tumor is seen.

 

Figure 20
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B 74-year-old man with incomplete necrosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Arterial phase CT scan shows contrast enhancement (arrow) within lesion.

 

Figure 21
View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6C 74-year-old man with incomplete necrosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Contrast-enhanced sonography clearly shows enhancement of lesion (arrows) irrespective of accumulation of iodized oil on CT.

 


Radiofrequency Ablation
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Transcatheter Arterial...
Radiofrequency Ablation
Conclusion
References
 
Radiofrequency ablation is designed to destroy tumors by heating tissue to temperatures exceeding 60°C. A radiofrequency current is emitted from an electrode that is inserted during either an open surgical or a percutaneous procedure with imaging guidance such as sonography or CT. Radiofrequency ablation, which results in coagulation tumor necrosis, has been introduced as a promising therapeutic technique in the treatment of small HCC [8, 9].

CT and MRI
Complete tumor necrosis is considered to have occurred when follow-up CT or MRI shows the absence of contrast enhancement within an ablated lesion or at its periphery [9] (Figs. 7A, 7B, 7C, and 7D). Any focal and nodular peripheral enhancement in the ablated lesion should be considered indicative of residual or recurrent tumor [10] (Figs. 8A and 8B).


Figure 22
View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A 70-year-old man with successful radiofrequency ablation. Arterial phase CT scan 1 day after radiofrequency ablation shows unenhanced oval ablated lesion (arrow).

 

Figure 23
View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B 70-year-old man with successful radiofrequency ablation. Axial T1-weighted gradient-echo (TR/TE, 180/1.8) MR image 2 months after radiofrequency ablation shows oval ablated lesion (arrow) with high signal intensity relative to surrounding liver parenchyma.

 

Figure 24
View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7C 70-year-old man with successful radiofrequency ablation. Axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo (7,500/90) MR image shows oval ablated lesion (arrow) with low signal intensity relative to surrounding liver parenchyma, representing coagulative necrosis. Note high-signal-intensity rim (arrowheads) representing reactive change.

 

Figure 25
View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7D 70-year-old man with successful radiofrequency ablation. On T1-weighted MR image after administration of gadolinium chelates, ablated lesion (arrow) shows lack of enhancement, although high signal intensity on unenhanced MR image interferes with proper evaluation of arterial phase enhancement.

 

Figure 26
View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8A 62-year-old man with residual tumor after radiofrequency ablation. On follow-up CT scan 2 months after radiofrequency ablation, arterial phase CT scan shows nodular enhancement (arrowheads) at anterior aspect of ablated lesion (arrow).

 

Figure 27
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8B 62-year-old man with residual tumor after radiofrequency ablation. Delayed phase CT scan shows washout of nodular enhancement (arrowhead) around ablated lesion (arrow). Nodule was thought to represent residual viable tumor and was treated with repeat radiofrequency ablation.

 
Occasionally, peripheral rim enhancement resulting from reactive hyperemia is seen at immediate follow-up imaging that is usually uniform in thickness and resolves at follow-up CT [9]. In successful treatment, long-term follow-up CT shows no change or a gradual decrease in the volume of the ablated lesion without contrast enhancement [10] (Figs. 9A and 9B).


Figure 28
View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9A 55-year-old man with successful radiofrequency ablation. Arterial phase CT scan 1 day after radiofrequency ablation shows oval-shaped ablated lesion (arrow) with surrounding hyperemia (arrowheads).

 

Figure 29
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9B 55-year-old man with successful radiofrequency ablation. On follow-up CT scan 8 months later, ablated lesion (arrow) shows no contrast enhancement and interval decrease in size.

 
Unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted MRI after radiofrequency ablation reveals markedly heterogeneous signal intensity within the ablated lesion. This variability in signal intensity throughout the ablated region is most likely caused by an uneven evolution of the necrotic area and the host response to thermal damage [11]. Therefore, for the evaluation of therapeutic response, the use of a contrast-enhanced study is recommended, and moderate hyperintensity on T2-weighted images associated with corresponding enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images offers optimal specificity for detecting residual viable tumor (Figs. 10A, 10B, and 10C).


Figure 30
View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10A 80-year-old man with residual viable tumor after radiofrequency ablation. Axial T1-weighted gradient-echo (TR/TE, 180/4.2) MR image 2 months after radiofrequency ablation shows hypointense lesion (arrow).

 

Figure 31
View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10B 80-year-old man with residual viable tumor after radiofrequency ablation. Axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo (500/91) MR image shows hyperintense lesion (arrow) that represents viable tumor. Bright signal intensity is seen in peripheral portion (arrowhead) of ablated lesion, representing necrosis.

 

Figure 32
View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10C 80-year-old man with residual viable tumor after radiofrequency ablation. On axial T1-weighted MR image after administration of gadolinium chelates, ablated lesion (arrow) shows peripheral area of enhancement (arrowheads), suggesting residual viable tumor.

 
Sonography
Contrast-enhanced sonography can be useful in detecting residual or recurrent tumors after radiofrequency ablation of HCC (Figs. 11A and 11B). Real-time guidance of the placement of the electrode is another useful feature of contrast-enhanced sonography. However, the technique has some limitations in assessing the therapeutic effect of radiofrequency ablation. Typically, well-differentiated HCC may not show distinct intratumoral enhancement on contrast-enhanced sonography, and HCC located in the hepatic dome is difficult to explore.


Figure 33
View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11A 73-year-old man with marginal recurrent tumor after radiofrequency ablation. Follow-up CT scan 8 months after radiofrequency ablation shows small enhancing nodule (arrowheads) at posterior aspect of ablated lesion (arrow), representing marginal recurrent tumor.

 

Figure 34
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11B 73-year-old man with marginal recurrent tumor after radiofrequency ablation. Contrast-enhanced sonography also shows focal flow signals (arrowheads) that represent recurrent tumor vessels within ablated area (arrow). Recurred tumor was treated with repeat radiofrequency ablation.

 


Conclusion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Transcatheter Arterial...
Radiofrequency Ablation
Conclusion
References
 
Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of HCC after TACE and radiofrequency ablation is primarily based on the findings of imaging studies. CT is the standard imaging technique for monitoring the effectiveness of TACE and radiofrequency ablation. Contrast-enhanced sonography and MRI can complement CT in the evaluation of the therapeutic response. To know the advantages and limitations of each imaging technique in the evaluation of the therapeutic effect of HCC is important in determining if the treated tumor is completely necrotic or requires additional treatment.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Bonnie Hami for her editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Transcatheter Arterial...
Radiofrequency Ablation
Conclusion
References
 

  1. Goldberg SN, Ahmed M. Minimally invasive image-guided therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol2002; 35[5 suppl2]:S115 -S129[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Nakamura H, Hashimoto T, Oi H, Sawada S. Transcatheter oily chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 1989;170 : 783-786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Nishimine K, Uchida H, Matsuo N, et al. Segmental transarterial chemoembolization with Lipiodol mixed with anticancer drugs for nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: follow-up CT and therapeutic results. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1994;33 [suppl]: S60-S68
  4. Takayasu K, Arii S, Matsuo N, et al. Comparison of CT findings with resected specimens after chemoembolization with iodized oil for hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR 2000;175 : 699-704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ito K, Honjo K, Fujita T, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: MRI and pathology. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19 : 198-203[Medline]
  6. Kubota K, Hisa N, Nishikawa T, et al. Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: comparison of Lipiodol-CT, power Doppler sonography, and dynamic MRI. Abdom Imaging 2001;26 : 184-190[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Cioni D, Lencioni R, Bartolozzi C. Therapeutic effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization on hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with contrast-enhanced harmonic power Doppler ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2000;10 : 1570-1575[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Dawson SL, Rittman WJ, Mueller PR, Rosenthal DI. Tissue ablation with radiofrequency using multiprobe arrays. Acad Radiol 1995;2 : 670-674[Medline]
  9. Kim SK, Lim HK, Kim YH, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radio-frequency ablation: spectrum of imaging findings. RadioGraphics 2003;23 : 107-121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lim HK, Choi D, Lee WJ, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: evaluation with follow-up multiphase helical CT. Radiology 2001;221 : 447-454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Mueller PR. Thermal ablation therapy for focal malignancy: a unified approach to underlying principles, techniques, and diagnostic imaging guidance. AJR2000; 174:323 -331[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. Siewert, J. Sosna, A. McNamara, V. Raptopoulos, and J. B. Kruskal
Quality Initiatives: Missed Lesions at Abdominal Oncologic CT: Lessons Learned from Quality Assurance
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 623 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lim, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lim, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS