AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Danzer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Adzick, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Danzer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Adzick, N. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0152
AJR 2006; 187:W350-W356
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Diagnosis and Characterization of Fetal Sacrococcygeal Teratoma with Prenatal MRI

Enrico Danzer1, Anne M. Hubbard2, Holly L. Hedrick1, Mark P. Johnson1, R. Douglas Wilson1, Lori J. Howell1, Alan W. Flake1 and N. Scott Adzick1

1 The Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment, Department of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4399.
2 University of Nebraska Medical Center, 981045 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68199-1045.

Received January 30, 2005; accepted after revision April 11, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to A. M. Hubbard (amhubbard{at}unmc.edu).

WEB

This is a Web exclusive article.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether prenatal MRI provides additional information about fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma compared with prenatal sonography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-two pregnant women with fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma underwent prenatal MRI (mean gestational age, 23 weeks). The size, location, mass characteristics, and compressive effects of the tumors were determined and correlated with sonography and postnatal findings.

RESULTS. Based on the MRI findings, the following American Academy of Pediatrics, Surgical Section classifications were assigned: type I in six patients, type II in 12, and type III in four. No type IV tumors were found. The sacrococcygeal teratoma appeared entirely cystic in five fetuses, microcystic in one, mixed cystic and solid in 12, and solid in four. The diagnosis of sacrococcygeal teratoma was accurate in all cases assessed at our center using both MRI and sonography. Two additional patients initially referred with the diagnosis of sacrococcygeal teratoma had a different diagnosis at reevaluation at our institution (healthy, n = 1; myelomeningocele, n = 1). MRI was superior to sonography for detecting displacement of the colon (n = 11), urinary tract dilatation (n = 9), hip dislocation (n = 4), intraspinal extension (n = 2), and vaginal dilation (n = 1). In fetuses with sacrococcygeal teratoma types II and III, MRI better showed the cephalic extent of the tumor compared with sonography. MRI findings were confirmed at surgery or autopsy in all patients. Three fetuses with high output cardiac physiology underwent open fetal resection of the tumor at 21-, 24-, and 26-weeks' gestational age with two surviving.

CONCLUSION. Our results show that ultrafast fetal MRI is a useful adjunct to the prenatal evaluation of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Compared with sonography, MRI more accurately characterized the intrapelvic and abdominal extent of the tumors and provided more information on compression of adjacent organs. The additional anatomic resolution provided by MRI resulted in more accurate prenatal counseling and improved preoperative planning for surgical resection.

Keywords: fetal imaging • fetal intervention • fetus • prenatal MRI • sacrococcygeal teratoma


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Although rare, sacrococcygeal teratoma is the most common tumor of the fetus and the neonate, with a reported incidence of one in 35,000 to 40,000 live births [1-3]. It has been defined as either a neoplasm composed of tissues from all three germ layers or a neoplasm formed from multiple tissues foreign to the part and lacking organ specificity [4]. These tumors arise from totipotent somatic cells [5] that originate from the primitive knot (Hensen's node) or caudal cell mass and escape normal inductive influences.

The natural history of prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma differs from postnatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma. Malignant degeneration, the primary cause of death in postnatal sacrococcygeal teratoma, is rare in utero. The high mortality rate of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma is attributed to tumor mass and associated dystocia, preterm labor caused by secondary polyhydramnios, and development of hydrops and placentomegaly (secondary to high-output cardiac failure associated with arteriovenous shunting) [6-8].

Prenatal assessment of the fetus is critical for counseling the parents and planning surgical options. Also, with the development of in utero treatment for sacrococcygeal teratoma [9, 10], it is important to select appropriate candidates for fetal surgery. Because of acoustic shadowing by the fetal pelvic bones, sonography cannot always define the most cephalad extent of sacrococcygeal teratoma [11].

Prenatal MRI for evaluating uterine and fetal anatomy has improved with the development of ultrafast MRI techniques [12, 13]. Fetal MRI has been successfully performed with echo-planar and RARE imaging [13-16]. MRI offers superior anatomic resolution, regardless of fetal orientation, and it provides an image display that is more intuitively comprehensible to the patient and to many consulting physicians. Despite the increasing use of prenatal MRI, to our knowledge only a few small case series have been published comparing the advantages and disadvantages of prenatal sonography and MRI of sacrococcygeal teratoma [11, 17, 18]. This study compared the diagnostic utility of prenatal MRI and transabdominal sonography for evaluation of sacrococcygeal teratoma to determine whether MRI could provide additional valuable clinical information.


Figure 1
View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 26-weeks' gestation fetus with type I sacrococcygeal teratoma. Sagittal T2-weighted images show mixed solid and cystic lesion (arrowheads) arising from coccyx (double-headed arrow). No intrapelvic extension of tumor is seen. Urinary bladder (small arrow) is in normal position.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (192K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 22-weeks' gestation fetus with type II sacrococcygeal teratoma. Sagittal T2-weighted image shows large septate cystic mass (arrowheads) arising from coccyx (double-headed arrow) with small intrapelvic component. Urinary bladder (small arrow) is not displaced.

 

Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patient Population
From March 1998 to January 2003 21 patients were diagnosed with sacrococcygeal teratoma at our clinic. Two additional patients were referred from another institution with the diagnosis of sacrococcygeal teratoma, but neither was found to have sacrococcygeal teratoma at reevaluation (healthy, n = 1; myelomeningocele, n = 1). In addition, one patient referred for myelomeningocele was found by sonography and MRI at our center to have sacrococcygeal teratoma type III. This patient was added to the study, making the total number of patients 22. Prenatal evaluation included a repeat high-resolution fetal sonogram, fetal echocardiography, and MRI to assess the sacrococcygeal teratoma anatomy, placental size, and presence or absence of hydrops. Fetal echocardiography and Doppler flow measurements were obtained to assess high-output physiology. MRI was performed at a single institution by multiple radiologists as part of clinical evaluation of a fetus with abnormalities. The mean gestational age at MRI evaluation was 23 weeks (range, 19-33 weeks). After evaluation, all patients underwent nondirective counseling for management options. The options included (1) termination of pregnancy if the gestational age was less than 24 weeks; (2) standard postnatal care with continued weekly, biweekly, or triweekly sonography and echocardiography surveillance; and (3) fetal intervention if the fetus met intervention criteria. This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board, Committees for Protection of Human Subjects (IRB #2002-8-2912).

MRI
MRI was performed with a 1.5-T magnet (Vision, Siemens Medical Solutions) equipped with a phased-array body coil. The nonsedated mother was positioned either supine or in a partial left lateral decubitus position. The following imaging sequences were performed: RARE HASTE imaging (TR/effective TE, 1,100/62; flip angle, 130°; section thickness, 4-5 mm) in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes relative to the fetus; T1-weighted gradient-echo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) (TR/TE, 174.9/4.4; flip angle, 65°; section thickness, 4 mm) in the axial plane relative to the fetus; and echo-planar free induction decay imaging (effective TR/TE, 3,900/56; flip angle, 90°; section thickness, 4 mm) in the axial plane. For each sequence, 4-20 seconds was needed to acquire 20 anatomic images.

All MR studies were reviewed and interpreted by the same radiologist, who also knew the results of sonography or had the clinical information based on outside sonography. MRI results were compared with sonography reports and images. The presence, size, signal intensity characteristics, extent, and compressive effects of the sacrococcygeal teratoma were determined and correlated with findings from postnatal studies, including postmortem, surgical, or pathologic results. Hydrops was defined as the presence of skin edema and ascites or pericardial or pleural effusion. The presence of oligo- or polyhydramnios was determined by calculating the amniotic fluid index. The extent of the sacrococcygeal teratoma was classified according the American Academy of Pediatrics, Surgical Section classification [19]. Type I is primarily external and has only a minimal presacral component. Type II is primarily external but has a significant intrapelvic portion. Type III is partially external but is predominantly intrapelvic with abdominal extension. Type IV is located entirely within the pelvis and abdomen.


Figure 3
View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 29-weeks' gestation fetus with type III sacrococcygeal teratoma. Sagittal T2-weighted image shows oligohydramnios. Large mixed signal intensity is seen with predominately solid mass (arrowheads) extending into abdomen up to L3 level. Image shows superior and anterior displacement of urinary bladder (small arrow) and dilated fluid-filled vagina (large arrow) and uterus (double-headed arrow). Moderate ascites are seen.

 


Figure 4
View larger version (173K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 29-weeks' gestation fetus with type III sacrococcygeal teratoma. Coronal T2-weighted image shows small lungs (double-headed arrow) and dilation of renal collecting systems (small arrows). Renal cortex is heterogeneous with small cyst (arrowheads) present, which is consistent with renal dysplasia.

 


Figure 5
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C 29-weeks' gestation fetus with type III sacrococcygeal teratoma. Sagittal T1-weighted gradient-echo image shows displacement of high-intensity meconium-filled colon (arrowheads) by pelvic and abdominal mass (large arrows). Dilated fluid-filled vagina (double-headed arrow) and superior displacement of high-signal-intensity liver (small arrow) are seen.

 

Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In total, 22 fetuses with fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma were imaged. MR images of diagnostic quality were obtained in all patients. Images from all MR sequences were evaluated at the same time. The RARE sequence provided the best overall image quality and produced the least amount of artifact resulting from either motion or susceptibility effects. The image quality was decreased when the mother was obese or in cases of polyhydramnios, which allows increased fetal motion.


Figure 6
View larger version (200K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A 22-weeks' gestation fetus with sacrococcygeal teratoma. Oligohydramnios is seen. Image shows large, predominately solid, external mass (arrowheads) with large intrapelvic and intraabdominal component. Erosion of lower sacral spine (small arrow) and massive abdominal ascites are shown. Thoracic cavity is small (double-headed arrow). Severe skin and scalp edema (broad arrow) are consistent with hydrops.

 


Figure 7
View larger version (174K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B 22-weeks' gestation fetus with sacrococcygeal teratoma. Sagittal T2-weighted image through maternal uterus shows marked heterogeneity and enlargement of placenta (arrowheads) measuring 6 cm at greatest width. Next to placenta is extrapelvic portion of sacrococcygeal teratoma (double-headed arrow).

 
On MRI, sacrococcygeal teratomas (n = 22) appeared entirely cystic in five fetuses (macrocystic with a few septa in two, markedly septate in three), microcystic in one, mixed cystic and solid in 12, and completely solid in four. On the basis of prenatal MRI, the sacrococcygeal teratomas were classified as type I in six patients (Fig. 1), type II in 12 (Fig. 2), type III in four (Figs. 3A, 3B, and 3C), and type IV in none. The diagnostic features obtained at sonography agreed with the MRI findings in three type I, eight type II, and three type III patients. Discrepancy between prenatal MRI and sonography occurred in eight fetuses. Four fetuses with a type I sacrococcygeal teratoma on sonography were assessed as type II on MRI, three fetuses diagnosed with type II on sonography were type I sacrococcygeal teratomas on MRI, and one fetus diagnosed with type II on sonography was a type III sacrococcygeal teratoma on MRI.

The correct cephalic extent of the sacrococcygeal teratoma on intraoperative findings or on autopsy correlated positively in all patients with MRI. Intrapelvic mass effect—evident by displacement of the bladder, hydronephrosis, large tortuous ureters, and urinary ascites— was seen at MRI in nine of the 22 fetuses (41%), but this finding was seen in only three of these nine patients by sonography. Dysplastic changes of the kidneys were observed at MRI in five patients (unilateral, n = 2; bilateral, n = 3), but in only two at sonography, which might be related to the severe oligohydramnios seen in three of these five patients (Figs. 4A and 4B). Similarly, on MRI it was possible to estimate tumor compression of adjacent pelvic structures, which was impossible on sonography. Anterior displacement of the colon was shown on MRI in 11 (50%) fetuses. In three (two type with III and one with type II sacrococcygeal teratoma) of these 11 patients, the colon was significantly displaced against the anterior abdominal wall (Figs. 5A and 5B). A hip dislocation was visible at MRI in four of 22 (18.2%) fetuses (two with type II and two with type III sacrococcygeal teratoma) and diagnosed on sonography in only two. In two fetuses, one with a sacrococcygeal teratoma type II and the other with type III, the tumor extended into the spinal canal up to L3 and L1, respectively. The extension into the spinal canal was not visible on sonography in either case. One fetus with a mixed cystic and solid sacrococcygeal teratoma showed a large intraabdominal cystic mass, discrete from the tumor, between the tumor and the bladder. MRI showed the uterus connected to this cystic lesion indicating an obstructed vagina. Sonography was not able to determine the origin of the cystic mass.


Figure 8
View larger version (177K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A 20-weeks' gestation fetus with sacrococcygeal teratoma type II. Sagittal T2-weighted image shows mixed solid and cystic mass (arrowheads) arising from coccyx. Intrapelvic extension (small arrow) with anterior displacement of low-signal-intensity meconium-filled colon (double-headed arrow) is seen.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (173K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B 20-weeks' gestation fetus with sacrococcygeal teratoma type II. Sagittal T2-weighted image shows external mass (arrowheads). Dysplastic changes in renal cortex with multiple peripheral cortical cysts (double-headed arrow) are evident. No significant dilation of this renal collecting system is seen.

 
Three patients elected to terminate the pregnancy. Fetal demise occurred in four patients, three caused by cardiac failure and hydrops (placentomegaly, effusions, ascites, and edema) and one caused by in utero tumor rupture. Three fetuses in this series fulfilled our criteria (type I or II, high-output physiology, and early hydrops) to be considered for fetal surgical intervention and underwent fetal surgery (at 21-, 24-, and 26-weeks' gestational ages), with two survivors [20]. Four fetuses with mainly cystic masses underwent sonography-guided in utero aspiration of the cysts. Indications for cyst aspiration were maternal discomfort, preterm labor, and prevention of tumor rupture at delivery. Four deaths were caused by tumor rupture; in these cases, the neonates were premature, with a mean gestational age of 29 weeks (range, 26-32.3 weeks). Two tumors ruptured during preterm labor and two intraoperatively. The mean gestational age at delivery of the survivors (excluding open fetal surgery patients, n = 8) was 36 weeks (range, 33-38.5 weeks). All surviving fetuses were born by cesarean delivery and underwent standard postnatal resection on day of life 1 or 2 without further imaging studies. Pathologic examination performed for 11 of the fetuses followed by our institution revealed mature (n = 4), immature (n = 6), and mixed immature and mature (n = 1) teratomas.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Ultrafast MRI using sequences that acquire an image in less than 0.4 seconds allows fetal imaging without the necessity for fetal sedation or paralysis [11]. To date, several small case series have shown that prenatal MRI is useful in the assessment of sacrococcygeal teratoma [11, 17, 18]. However, the question remains whether MRI is equivalent, superior, or complementary to sonography for prenatal assessment of sacrococcygeal teratoma. To be generally accepted, a newly applied diagnostic device must fulfill a number of requirements. First, it must be safe and not expose the patient to unnecessary risks. Second, it must be able to diagnose the underlying problem. Third, it should provide additional useful information that is not provided by a currently established method. Finally, in the current fiscal environment, the new diagnostic procedure should be cost-effective. Our results suggest that MRI fulfills these criteria for diagnostic evaluation of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Multiple experimental and clinical studies support the safety of MRI for fetal imaging [16, 21-23]. Although the potential exists for teratogenic effect, we limit MRI to fetuses at more than 18 weeks' gestation and have seen no ill effects attributable to MRI. Our results clearly show that MRI is superior to sonography in assessing the intrapelvic and intraspinal extent of tumor and in discerning the presence and physiologic effects of compression of pelvic organs by the tumor. These advantages allow more accurate prognostic counseling for patients presenting with sacrococcygeal teratoma and improve pre- and perinatal management by providing accurate data for decisions regarding fetal surgery, tumor decompression, and timing of delivery.

Optimal management of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma requires accurate imaging of the precise intrapelvic and intraabdominal extent of tumor, the content of the tumor, and the physiologic effects of tumor compression on the pelvic organs or bone structure. MRI proved superior to sonography in all of these requirements. Our results show that sonography does not always precisely assess the intrapelvic extension of the tumor. The advantage of MRI is primarily related to the absence of acoustic shadowing by the fetal pelvic bones that interferes with sonography visualization. In our series, the cephalad extension of the tumor was misdiagnosed using sonography in eight of 22 (36%) fetuses. Sonography underestimated the pelvic and intraabdominal extent of tumors in five fetuses (type I rather than type II in four fetuses, type II rather than type III in one) and overestimated the extent of tumor in three fetuses (type II rather than type I).

MRI also enhanced the assessment of the content of sacrococcygeal teratoma. Fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma may be cystic, solid, or mixed in sonographic appearance and may contain characteristic echogenic patterns secondary to areas of tumor necrosis, cystic degeneration, internal hemorrhage, and calcification [8]. The prognosis of prenatally detected sacrococcygeal teratoma seems to be related not only to the size of the mass but also to its content. Fetuses with predominantly solid and highly vascularized masses have a poorer prognosis than fetuses with tumors that are mainly cystic and avascular in appearance. The solid, vascularized masses require closer surveillance for the evolution of high-output physiology [24]. Sonography seems to be sufficient for evaluating mainly cystic and extrapelvic sacral masses; however, when the tumor appears to be echogenic, it is more difficult for sonography to characterize the sacrococcygeal teratoma content. Echogenicity can result from a solid component or hemorrhage. Hemorrhage can be seen on MRI with T1-weighted or echo-planar images. This is particularly important in fetuses with evolving hydrops because high-output physiology may result from fetal anemia rather than from tumor-related vascular steal. In conjunction with Doppler sonography, which remains the most accurate way to measure tumor vascularity and physiologic effect on the cardiovascular stability of the fetus, the presence of hemorrhage on MRI in the tumor should prompt an evaluation of fetal anemia. Fetuses with large echogenic tumors on MRI need frequent monitoring using sonography and echocardiography for evolution of high cardiac output physiology to determine the need for intervention [20].

Tumor involvement or compression of adjacent organs is an important contributor to the morbidity of sacrococcygeal teratoma, and accurate prenatal assessment is important for the timing of intervention and comprehensive prenatal counseling. Urologic complications are the most common cause of morbidity from sacrococcygeal teratoma, occurring in at least 41% of our patients. Tumor compression of the bladder outlet caused urinary retention followed by secondary renal deterioration, oligohydramnios, and pulmonary hypoplasia in one fetus. Other published series have described severe urologic problems with prenatally detected sacrococcygeal teratoma [25-27]. The highest incidence of urologic complications in our series (67%) was seen in patients with type III tumors. Furthermore, damage to the innervation of the lower urinary tract in sacrococcygeal teratoma may be caused by compression or infiltration of sacral nerves by the tumor; intraspinal extension of the tumor; or trauma to the pelvic, splanchnic, or hypogastric nerves during tumor resection [28]. However, long-term urologic sequelae of our surviving patients with sacrococcygeal teratoma have not been well defined because most of the children are currently younger than 6 years. Renal failure may not develop acutely after long-term obstruction even in the presence of renal dysplasia. Renal failure may not occur until the end of the first decade of life. Accurate diagnosis and classification of sacrococcygeal teratoma during pregnancy and long-term follow-up studies are essential to evaluate the clinical impact of urologic complications seen in prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma.

Surgeons at our institution found that MR images helped them mentally visualize the content and extent of the sacrococcygeal teratoma before delivery. In most cases, neonatal surgery is required soon after cesarean delivery, and the anatomic details of tumor extent and involvement of adjacent structures may affect the surgical approach. No postnatal tumor imaging was done before surgery. In two fetuses, extension into the spinal canal was visible only on MRI. Patients with significant intrapelvic extension of the tumor may need a combined abdominoperineal approach to control the blood supply and achieve complete surgical resection. The colon is well visualized and distinguished from an intraabdominal sacrococcygeal teratoma because the meconium has high signal intensity on T1-weighted images, providing valuable information about atypical colon deviation or involvement before surgery. MRI provides an image of the fetus that is easier to understand than a sonography image for physicians and patients not familiar with sonography performance and interpretation. This may help avoid resection-related complications such as urologic functional abnormalities and fecal incontinence [4].

Our results show that ultrafast fetal MRI is a powerful addition to the prenatal evaluation of fetuses with sacrococcygeal teratoma. Based on our experience using prenatal MRI for evaluation of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma, we recommend that all fetuses with appearance of sacrococcygeal teratoma on sonography undergo MRI evaluation to assess exact tumor size, content, and intraabdominal extent to optimize pre-, peri-, and postnatal management.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Brace V, Grant SR, Brackley KJ, Kilby MD, Whittle MJ. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome in sacrococcygeal teratoma: a review of cases between 1992 and 1998. Prenat Diagn 2000;20 : 51-55[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Bale PM. Sacrococcygeal developmental abnormalities and tumors in children. Perspect Pediatr Pathol 1984;1 : 9-56[Medline]
  3. Mahour GH, Wolley MM, Trivedi SN, et al. Teratomas in infancy and childhood: experience with 81 cases. Surgery1974; 76:309 -319[Medline]
  4. Flake AW. The fetus with sacrococcygeal teratoma. In: Harrison MR, Evans MI, Adzick NS, Holzgreve W, eds. The unborn patient, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 2000:315 -323
  5. Mintz B, Cronmiller C, Custer R. Somatic cell origin of teratocarcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1978; 75:2839 -2846[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bond SJ, Harrison MR, Schmidt KG, et al. Death due to high-output cardiac failure in fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. J Pediatr Surg 1990; 25:1287 -1291[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Langer JC, Harrison MR, Schmidt KG, et al. Fetal hydrops and death from sacrococcygeal teratoma: rationale for fetal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160:1145 -1150[Medline]
  8. Flake AW. Fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Semin Pediatr Surg 1993; 2:113 -120[Medline]
  9. Adzick NS, Crombleholme TM, Morgan MA, Quinn TM. A rapidly growing fetal teratoma. Lancet 1997;349 : 358[Medline]
  10. Paek BW, Jennings RW, Harrison MR, et al. Radio-frequency ablation of human fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184:503 -507[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Kirkinen P, Partanen K, Merikanto J, et al. Ultrasonic and magnetic resonance imaging of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76:917 -922[Medline]
  12. Kubick-Huch RA, Wisser J, Stallmach T, Ladd ME, Meier A, Marincek B. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformations by ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 1998;18 : 1205-1208[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Levine D, Barnes PD, Sher S, et al. Fetal fast MR imaging: reproducibility, technical quality, and conspicuity of anatomy. Radiology 1998;206 : 549-554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Hubbard AM, Adzick NS, Crombleholme TM, et al. Congenital chest lesions: diagnostic and characterization with prenatal MR imaging. Radiology 1999;212 : 43-48[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hubbard AM, Adzick NS, Crombleholme TM, Haselgrove JC. Left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia: value of prenatal MR imaging in preparation for fetal surgery. Radiology 1997;203 : 636-640[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Hubbard AM, Harty MP. MRI for the assessment of the malformed fetus. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol2000; 14:629 -650
  17. Okamura M, Kurauchi O, Itakura A, et al. Fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma visualized by ultra-fast T2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;65 : 191-193[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Avni FE, Guibaud L, Robert Y, et al. MR imaging of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma: diagnosis and assessment. AJR2002; 178:179 -183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Altman PR, Randolph JG, Lilly JR. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: American Academy of Pediatrics Surgical Section Survey—1973. J Pediatr Surg 1974; 9:389 -398[Medline]
  20. Hedrick HL, Flake AW, Crombleholme TM, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: prenatal assessment, fetal intervention and outcome. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39:430 -438[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR, Gowland PA, Mansfield P. A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero using echo-planar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170 : 32-33[Medline]
  22. Myers C, Duncan K, Gowland P, Johnson IR, Baker PN. Failure to detect intrauterine growth restriction following in utero exposure to MRI. Br J Radiol 1998;71 : 549-551[Abstract]
  23. Wolff S, Crooks LE, Brown P, Howard R, Painter RB. Tests for DNA and chromosomal damage induced by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1980;136 : 707-710[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Westerburg B, Feldstein VA, Sandberg PL, et al. Sonographic prognostic factors in fetuses with sacrococcygeal teratoma. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35:322 -326[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Sheth S, Nussbaum AR, Sanders RC, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of sacrococcygeal teratoma: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1988;169 : 131-136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Reinberg Y, Long R, Mnivel JC, et al. Urological aspects of sacrococcygeal teratoma in children. J Urol1993; 150:948 -949[Medline]
  27. Boemers TM, van Gool JD, de Jong TP, et al. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in children with benign sacrococcygeal teratoma. J Urol 1994; 151:174 -176[Medline]
  28. Boemers TM. Urinary incontinence and vesicourethral dysfunction in pediatric surgical conditions. Semin Pediatr Surg2002; 11:91 -99[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
R. A. Barth and E. Rubesova
Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Anomalies of the Neck, Chest, and Abdomen
NeoReviews, August 1, 2007; 8(8): e313 - e335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Danzer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Adzick, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Danzer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Adzick, N. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS