AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cademartiri, F.
Right arrow Articles by Krestin, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cademartiri, F.
Right arrow Articles by Krestin, G. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1406
AJR 2006; 187:W430-W433
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Higher Intracoronary Attenuation Improves Diagnostic Accuracy in MDCT Coronary Angiography

Filippo Cademartiri1,2,3, Nico R. Mollet1,2, Pedro A. Lemos2, Fransesco Saia2, Massimo Midiri4, Pim J. de Feyter1,2 and Gabriel P. Krestin1

1 Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
2 Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
3 Department of Radiology and Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma, Italy.
4 Department of Radiology, Policlinico "P. Giaccone," Palermo, Italy.

Received August 12, 2005; accepted after revision March 30, 2006.

 
Address correspondence to F. Cademartiri (filippocademartiri{at}hotmail.com).

WEB

This is a Web exclusive article.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the amount of intracoronary attenuation influences the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in the detection of clinically significant stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred twenty patients in sinus rhythm with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent MDCT of the heart and conventional coronary angiography were retrospectively selected. The population was divided into two groups depending on median (326 H) coronary vascular enhancement (i.e., low attenuation and high attenuation). The diagnostic accuracy of MDCT for the detection of clinically significant coronary artery lesions (≥ 50% lumen reduction) in both groups was compared with that of quantitative coronary angiography.

RESULTS. The sensitivity of MDCT was 90% and 93% for the low- and high-attenuation groups, respectively. The specificity was 95% and 97%.

CONCLUSION. Greater intracoronary attenuation leads to higher diagnostic accuracy in the detection of coronary artery stenosis with MDCT.

Keywords: cardiac imaging • cardiovascular disease • contrast media • CT coronary arteriography


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Clinically significant coronary artery stenosis can be reliably detected with MDCT coronary angiography [1-3]. The protocol for administration of contrast material has a prominent role in optimization of the diagnostic yield, because the attenuation achieved in the vessels can affect image quality, particularly of small coronary arteries [4-7]. Nevertheless, controversy exists about the benefits of high intravascular attenuation in terms of diagnostic accuracy [8]. To our knowledge, this information is not yet available in the field of noninvasive coronary imaging. The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography at different attenuation values in the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis at the level of the aortic root and at the origin of the coronary arteries in two groups of patients.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
We retrospectively included in the study 120 consecutively examined patients (105 men; mean age ± SD, 59 ± 11 years) with suspected or known (previous percutaneous coronary intervention or acute myocardial infarction) coronary artery disease who were already scheduled for conventional coronary angiography. All patients underwent both coronary angiography and MDCT of the coronary arteries (calcium score evaluation followed by MDCT coronary angiography) at our academic center. In all cases MDCT was performed < 1 week before coronary angiography. All patients gave informed consent for the investigation, and the study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. All patients had a stable heart rate with sinus rhythm and were able to hold their breath for 20 seconds. Patients who had undergone coronary surgery were not included in the study. A single oral dose of 100 mg of metoprolol was administered 1 hour before MDCT if the heart rate was 3 65 beats/min.

A calcium score scan was obtained with the following parameters: collimation, 16 x 1.5 mm; gantry rotation time, 420 milliseconds; feed/rotation, 6.0 mm; effective slice width, 3 mm; increment, 1.5 mm; effective tube current, 150 mAs at 120 kV. MDCT coronary angiography (Sensation 16, Siemens Medical Solutions) was performed after IV administration of 120 mL of iodinated contrast material (iodixanol, 320 mg I/mL at 4 mL/s, Visipaque, Amersham Health). The parameters were as follows: collimation, 16 x 0.75 mm; gantry rotation time, 420 milliseconds; feed/rotation, 3.0 mm; effective slice width, 1 mm; increment, 0.5 mm; 120 kV; 400-500 mAs. The temporal windows were set at -350 milliseconds, -400 milliseconds, and -450 milliseconds before the next R wave for ECG-gated retrospective reconstruction. The data set with the least residual motion was selected for evaluation.

For evaluation, coronary arteries were divided into segments according to the American Heart Association classification [9]. A single observer unaware of the MDCT results used a quantitative coronary angiography algorithm (CAAS II, Pie Medical) to classify all coronary segments as < 2 mm or 3 2 mm in diameter. Only segments with a reference diameter ≥ 2 mm were considered for comparison with MDCT. The severity of coronary stenosis was quantified in two orthogonal views. Stenosis was classified as significant if the mean reduction in lumen diameter was 3 50%.

Coronary calcium score was assessed with a dedicated software application (CaScore, Siemens). The overall Agatston score was recorded for each patient. Coronary vascular enhancement was evaluated as attenuation in Hounsfield units. It was measured in each patient by use of the mean of two regions of interest positioned at the origin of the right and left coronary arteries, respectively. The regions of interest were set as large as possible, but coronary walls, plaques, and calcifications were always avoided.

Two observers blinded to the results of conventional coronary angiography independently evaluated all MDCT coronary angiographic images using different postprocessing techniques (e.g., multiplanar reconstructions and maximum intensity projections). All branches of the coronary tree 3 2 mm in luminal diameter were evaluated for the presence of significant (3 50% diameter reduction) obstructive stenosis. Segments with stents were excluded from analysis. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

The study cohort was divided into two groups according to median average attenuation value (326 H) of the entire population (60 patients in the low-attenuation group and 60 patients in the high-attenuation group). Interval data were expressed as mean ± SD. Diagnostic accuracy was expressed as percentage and 95% CI. The differences in demographics were tested with an unpaired t test for parametric criteria and with a chi-square test for nonparametric criteria. The differences in diagnostic accuracy were tested with a nonparametric McNemar test. Significance was considered if p was < 0.05.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding age, sex, mean heart rate during the scan, body mass index, and Agatston calcium score (Table 1). Mean vascular attenuation for the overall population was 329 ± 54 H. After sorting the population into two groups, the resulting mean vascular attenuation values were 287 ± 29 H (range, 190-325 H) and 371 ± 39 H (range, 326-529 H) for the low-attenuation and high-attenuation groups, respectively (p < 0.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Patient Data

 

Overall, 1,310 coronary segments (mean, 10.9 segments/patient) ≥ 2 mm were available for comparison between MDCT coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography (Table 2). Of these, 656 (50%) of the segments were available in the group with low attenuation and 654 (50%) of the segments in the group with high attenuation. There were 219 significant coronary lesions available for analysis. Of these, 108 (49%, 1.8 lesions/patient) were in the group with low attenuation and 111 (51%, 1.85 lesions/patient) were in the group with high attenuation. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the detection of significant stenosis were 90%, 93%, 70%, and 98% for the low-attenuation group and 95%, 97%, 87%, and 99% for the high-attenuation group (p < 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Diagnostic Accuracy in Low-Attenuation Group Versus High-Attenuation Group

 

The main differences between the two groups were in number of false-positive segments (segments not significantly obstructed overestimated as significant lesions with MDCT coronary angiography). There were 41 false-positive segments (mean degree of stenosis at coronary angiography, 20.9%) in the low-attenuation group and 16 false-positive segments (mean degree of stenosis at coronary angiography, 6.3%) in the high-attenuation group. The number of false-negative segments (segments with significant luminal obstruction missed at MDCT coronary angiography) was 11 (mean degree of stenosis at coronary angiography, 62.3%) for the low-attenuation group and six (mean degree of stenosis at coronary angiography, 62.8%) for the high-attenuation group.

In the group with low vascular attenuation, the false-positive findings were distributed as follows: 23 in proximal segments (segments 1, 2, 5-7, 11) and 18 in distal segments (segments 3, 4, 8-10, 12-15). The false-negative findings were distributed as follows: five in proximal segments and six in distal segments. In the group with high vascular attenuation, the false-positive findings were distributed as follows: nine in proximal segments and six in distal segments. The false-negative findings were distributed as follows: two in proximal segments and four in distal segments.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
To our knowledge, no published data show the optimal intracoronary attenuation for the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography. In our clinical experience, higher intracoronary attenuation allows more reliable visualization of coronary arteries. Imaging of the coronary arteries is difficult because of the small size of the arteries; the presence of stenosis, obstruction, or both that reduce blood flow; and the variable amount of calcium obscuring the coronary lumen [4, 5, 10]. Higher intracoronary attenuation should allow better depiction of the vessel lumen in all of those situations [4-7].

The results of our study confirm this observation. When higher intracoronary attenuation is present, the overall diagnostic accuracy improves significantly. In the two groups of patients that we retrospectively enrolled, other parameters that could have affected diagnostic accuracy (e.g., coronary calcifications and heart rate) were not significantly different. This difference was found in evaluation of coronary arteries for the presence of significant coronary lesions (≥ 50% reduction in luminal diameter) with a per-segment approach that included all segments with a diameter ≥ 2 mm. More lesions (41 vs 16) were incorrectly diagnosed as significant in the group with lower intracoronary attenuation.

The increased number of false-positive findings when intracoronary attenuation is lower can be explained by a reduced contrast-to-noise ratio that results in reduced sharpness of vessel visualization (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D). In these patients the observers' scores were more "defensive" because of lack of confidence. In cases in which lesions were borderline (~= 50% reduction in luminal diameter) or when the presence of calcium prominently obscured the coronary artery lumen, the observers tended to evaluate the segment as a positive finding. This finding also was confirmed by the mean degree of stenosis observed at coronary angiography for the false-positive findings in the low-attenuation group (21%) and in the high-attenuation group (6%).


Figure 1
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 56-year-old man with stable angina. Example of coronary artery lesion in low-intravascular-attenuation group (260 H). Curved reconstructions performed on MDCT data set show significant stenosis (arrowhead) in middle portion of right coronary artery. Calcification is evident in these images.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 56-year-old man with stable angina. Example of coronary artery lesion in low-intravascular-attenuation group (260 H). Curved reconstructions performed on MDCT data set show significant stenosis (arrowhead) in middle portion of right coronary artery. Calcification is evident in these images.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 56-year-old man with stable angina. Example of coronary artery lesion in low-intravascular-attenuation group (260 H). Coronary angiogram shows reduction of lumen diameter (arrowhead) that does not reach 50%.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 61-year-old man with stable angina. Example of coronary artery lesion in high-intravascular-attenuation group (450 H). Curved reconstructions performed on MDCT data set show significant stenosis of middle portion of left anterior descending coronary artery (arrowhead).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 61-year-old man with stable angina. Example of coronary artery lesion in high-intravascular-attenuation group (450 H). Curved reconstructions performed on MDCT data set show significant stenosis of middle portion of left anterior descending coronary artery (arrowhead).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C 61-year-old man with stable angina. Example of coronary artery lesion in high-intravascular-attenuation group (450 H). Coronary angiograms corresponding to A and B confirm finding in left anterior descending coronary artery (arrowhead).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D 61-year-old man with stable angina. Example of coronary artery lesion in high-intravascular-attenuation group (450 H). Coronary angiograms corresponding to A and B confirm finding in left anterior descending coronary artery (arrowhead).

 

The main limitation of the study was that the population was enrolled retrospectively. However, the scan protocol was the same in the study population, and the two groups into which the population was divided were also homogeneous. Another limitation was related to the use of a 16-MDCT scanner. The introduction of 64-MDCT scanners may enhance diagnostic accuracy in the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis, especially in distal segments. It is reasonable to expect that the same concept of improved diagnostic accuracy with higher intracoronary attenuation can be applied to the next generation of MDCT scanners.

In conclusion, higher intracoronary attenuation significantly improves diagnostic accuracy in MDCT coronary angiography. On the basis of our results, we can recommend protocols with a high rate of administration (4-5 mL/s) of IV contrast material, a high iodine concentration (350-400 mg I/mL), or both when MDCT coronary angiography is performed to evaluate coronary artery stenosis.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PM, de Feyter PJ. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation2002; 106:2051 -2054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation2003; 107:664 -666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43 : 2265-2270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, van der Lugt A, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of iodine concentration on vascular attenuation. Radiology 2005;236 : 661-665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology 2004;233 : 817-823[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Awai K, Inoue M, Yagyu Y, et al. Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT. Radiology2004; 233:682 -688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate—pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology1998; 206:455 -464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Becker CR, Hong C, Knez A, et al. Optimal contrast application for cardiac 4-detector-row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2003; 38:690 -694[Medline]
  9. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation1975; 51:5 -40[Medline]
  10. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Lemos PA, et al. Impact of coronary calcium score on diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant coronary stenosis with multislice computed tomography angiography. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95:1225 -1227[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. J. Halpern
Triple-Rule-Out CT Angiography for Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain and Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome
Radiology, August 1, 2009; 252(2): 332 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
L HUSMANN, O GAEMPERLI, I VALENTA, T SCHEPIS, H SCHEFFEL, P STOLZMANN, S LESCHKA, L DESBIOLLES, B MARINCEK, H ALKADHI, et al.
Impact of vessel attenuation on quantitative coronary angiography with 64-slice CT
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2009; 82(980): 649 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I-C. Tsai, T. Lee, W.-L. Tsai, M.-C. Chen, M.-J. Wu, W.-L. Lee, and H.-J. Ting
Contrast Enhancement in Cardiac MDCT: Comparison of Iodixanol 320 Versus Iohexol 350
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): W47 - W53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cademartiri, F.
Right arrow Articles by Krestin, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cademartiri, F.
Right arrow Articles by Krestin, G. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS