AJR AJR Reprints & E-prints Available. Order Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gutman, F.
Right arrow Articles by Talbot, J.-N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gutman, F.
Right arrow Articles by Talbot, J.-N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0437
AJR 2006; 187:W618-W621
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Case Report

18F-Choline PET/CT for Initial Staging of Advanced Prostate Cancer

Fabrice Gutman1, Vanessa Aflalo-Hazan1, Khaldoun Kerrou1, Françoise Montravers1, Dany Grahek1 and Jean-Noël Talbot1

1 All authors: Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France 75020.

Received March 14, 2005; accepted after revision May 6, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to J.-N. Talbot (jean-noel.talbot{at}tnn.aphp.fr).

WEB

This is a Web exclusive article.

Keywords: cancer • PET/CT • prostate


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Among the radiopharmaceuticals for PET, carbone-11-labeled choline has been proposed for prostate cancer imaging for a few years; more recently 18F-choline (FCH) has become available and has the potential for widespread routine use, similar to that of 18F-FDG (FDG) in other malignancies. In this case report we illustrate how one PET examination with FCH performed in a clinical PET center without a local cyclotron can be at least as informative as the sum of several modern imaging techniques.


Case Report
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
A 70-year-old man with prostate cancer and suspicion of bone metastases was referred to our PET center for staging. The diagnosis of prostate cancer was established on prostate biopsy performed because of an increased prostate volume and high serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA; 24 ng/mL). The pathology results of endorectal prostate biopsies (six levels of biopsy) showed a moderately to poorly differentiated (Gleason tumor grade = 8) clear cell adenocarcinoma in all fragments but the right apices.

Because of lower back pain, the high PSA serum levels, and the poor differentiation of the tumor, complementary radiologic and nuclear medicine imaging techniques were performed, including bone scintigraphy, pelvic CT, and MRI of the spine. Pelvic CT showed no capsular penetration and no tumor extension out of the prostate bed. On the bone window, there was no detectable lesion, particularly in the lumbar spine. The hydroxymethylene diphosphonate-99mtechnetium (HDP-[99mTc]) bone scintigraphy (Fig. 1A) showed a moderate increased uptake in the lumbar spine (second and third lumbar vertebrae), several ribs, sternum, left shoulder, and right iliac wing, with no specific pattern of bone metastatic spread. Spine MRI, using plain T1-T2 and STIR sequences, showed a nonspecific intensity reduction of the T1 signal and increased T2 signal on the second and third lumbar vertebrae, which are suspicious of bone metastases in this clinical context (Fig. 2).


Figure 1
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 70-year-old man with prostate cancer and lower back pain who was referred for initial staging. Hydroxymethylene diphosphonate-99mtechnetium bone scintigraphy shows several foci of suspicious bone metastases.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Spine MRI of 70-year-old man with prostate cancer and lower back pain shows homogeneous intensity reduction of T1 signal and increased T2 signal on left part of second and third lumbar vertebrae, without cortical disruption or paravertebral invasion.

 
Because of the nonspecific appearance of bone lesions at bone scintigraphy and at MRI of the spine, this patient underwent, in our PET center, both FDG- and FCH-PET on a hybrid PET/CT machine (Gemini, Philips Medical Systems). The patient gave written informed consent to undergo PET with FCH.

The patient fasted 6 hours before FDG injection and his serum glucose level was 6.1 mmol/L. FDG-PET/CT images were acquired 1 hour after injection of 4 MBq/kg of FDG. Helical CT was acquired at the beginning of the PET/CT examination, with the following parameters: 40 mAs, 140 kV, and 5-mm section thickness. CT images were used for attenuation correction and fusion; no iodine contrast media were administered. Whole-body CT was performed in a craniocaudal direction. PET images were subsequently acquired with 12 bed positions of 3 minutes each, from the skull to the mid thigh. FDG-PET/CT (Fig. 1B) showed bone focal uptakes located in the spine (T2, T3, T12, L2, and L3) and iliac wings. No abnormal FDG uptake was seen in the prostate bed (Fig. 3A) or in the pelvic area.


Figure 2
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 70-year-old man with prostate cancer and lower back pain who was referred for initial staging. 18F-FDG PET image shows moderate increased uptake in spine and iliac wings.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A Transaxial slice of prostate gland of 70-year-old man with prostate cancer and lower back pain. CT image.

 
FCH-PET/CT images were acquired 15 minutes after injection of 2 MBq/kg of FCH (Iasocholine, Iason), with the same protocol as that for FDG-PET/CT. Physiologic uptake in the salivary glands, lungs, liver, kidneys, pancreas, and pituitary gland was seen. FCH-PET/CT (Fig. 1C) showed an increased prostate uptake, particularly in the right lobe, with at least three foci of increased uptake (standardized uptake value-maximum [SUVmax] = 4.9) (Fig. 3C). FCH-PET/CT also showed intense abnormal foci of bone uptake on skull, spine (C3, C4, T2, T3, T5, T12, L2, L3), ribs, ilium, and right shoulder images. Foci of bone uptake on FCH-PET/CT images were much more intense and extensive than on FDG-PET/CT (SUVmax = 7.7 vs 5.5) (Figs. 4A, 4B, and 4C). In most cases, the bone metastases discovered on FCH-PET were matched with abnormal bone sclerotic lesions on corresponding CT slices, whereas the previous diagnostic CT with injection of contrast media was considered negative.


Figure 3
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 70-year-old man with prostate cancer and lower back pain who was referred for initial staging. 18F-choline PET image shows diffuse bone involvement with intense bone foci.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C Transaxial slice of prostate gland of 70-year-old man with prostate cancer and lower back pain. 18F-choline PET image shows three foci of increased uptake on right lobe of prostate (arrow), which correspond to primary tumor.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A Bone metastases in 70-year-old man with prostate cancer and lower back pain. CT slices. In most cases, bone foci seen with FCH-PET match abnormal bone sclerotic lesions seen on corresponding CT slices (arrow on L3).

 

Figure 9
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B Bone metastases in 70-year-old man with prostate cancer and lower back pain. FDG-PET/CT images (SUVmax = 5.5) are less intense and extensive than FDH-PET/CT images (arrow on L3).

 

Figure 10
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C Bone metastases in 70-year-old man with prostate cancer and lower back pain. FCH-PET/CT images (SUVmax = 7.7) are more intense and extensive than FDG-PET/CT images (arrow on L3).

 


Figure 6
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B Transaxial slice of prostate gland of 70-year-old man with prostate cancer and lower back pain. 18F-FDG PET image, unlike 18F-choline PET, shows no abnormal uptake.

 


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Primary staging of prostate cancer is important for patient management, particularly in the most aggressive locally advanced tumors. Both the clinical stage of the disease and the probability of nonlocalized disease determine the choice of therapy. Lymph node metastases are found at the initial diagnosis in up to 25% of patients with prostate cancer, depending on the tumor stage and grade [1]. No consensus, however, exists on the strategy of diagnostic tests for pretreatment evaluation. Endorectal sonography, CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy are routinely used to define the extent of advanced disease. CT and MRI have low sensitivity for detection of lymph node metastases and adjacent soft-tissue involvement in patients whose lymph nodes are smaller than 10-15 mm [2]. For these patients, MRI with lymphotropic superparamagnetic nanoparticles is a promising technique for accurately diagnosing lymph node metastases [3]. Bone scintigraphy has a limited specificity.

FDG-PET is well documented in the imaging workup of various malignancies. FDG-PET is now recognized as a useful tool for the initial staging before surgery of several cancers, such as lung cancer, esophageal cancer, head and neck cancers, and locally advanced breast cancer. Yet, the limitations of FDG-PET are apparent in slow-growing tumors such as prostate carcinomas, because of their modest enhancement of glycolysis. Many primary prostate cancers show either relatively low FDG uptake [4] or no visible uptake, as in the present patient. This is also true for nodal and bone metastases. Yeh et al. [5] reported a low detection rate of 16% for detecting bone lesions with FDG-PET in prostate cancer compared with bone scintigraphy. This limited sensitivity for the staging of advanced prostate cancer with FDG-PET motivated efforts to develop new oncologic tracers for PET. Because tumor cells are also characterized by their ability to actively incorporate choline to produce phosphatidylcholine (a membrane constituent) to facilitate tumor cell duplication, several authors compared 11C-choline to FDG for diagnosis and staging of prostate carcinoma. Previous studies comparing 11C-choline to FDG in prostate cancers showed that 11C-choline has a better sensitivity for detecting metastases. The efficacy of radiolabeled 11C-choline for localizing primary or metastatic prostate cancer has been studied in more than 250 patients [1, 6-8]. However, the use of 11C-choline is limited only to PET centers that have onsite cyclotrons because of its short half-life (approximately 20 minutes). This drawback prompted the development of FCH, a radiopharmaceutical with a half-life of 110 minutes, for imaging prostate cancer and associated lymph node involvement [9]. FCH is more easily available in clinical PET centers and provides higher resolution images as a result of its shorter positron length path. FCH has greater urinary excretion than 11C-choline, but routinely performed dynamic pelvic acquisition overcomes this drawback as pathologic uptake begins 1 minute postinjection, before urinary excretion and bladder filling.

It is likely that FCH-PET/CT will be useful as an accurate and noninvasive staging tool, at least in selected groups of patients with high suspicion of regional or metastatic disease—prebiopsy serum PSA levels greater than 20 ng/mL, poorly differentiated tumors at needle biopsy (Gleasons tumor grades 8-10), or palpable locally advanced tumors.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Victor Izrael, Department of Oncology, Hôpital Tenon, for referring the patient to our center.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 

  1. de Jong IJ, Pruim J, Elsinga PH, et al. Preoperative staging of pelvic lymph nodes in prostate cancer by 11C-choline PET. J Nucl Med 2003; 44:331 -335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sonnad SS, Langlotz CP, Schwartz JS. Accuracy of MR imaging for staging prostate cancer: a meta-analysis to examine the effect of technologic change. Acad Radiol 2001;8 : 149-157[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF, et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:2491 -2499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Salminen E, Hogg A, Binns D, et al. Investigations with FDG-PET scanning in prostate cancer show limited value for clinical practice. Acta Oncol 2002;41 : 425-429[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Yeh SD, Imbriaco M, Larson SM, et al. Detection of bony metastases of androgen-independent prostate cancer by PET-FDG. Nucl Med Biol 1996; 23:693 -697[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Picchio M, Landoni C, Messa C, et al. Positive [11C]choline and negative [18F]FDG with positron emission tomography in recurrence of prostate cancer AJR 2002;179 : 482-484[Free Full Text]
  7. Price DT, Coleman RE, Liao RP, et al. Comparison of [18F]fluorocholine and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose for positron emission tomography of androgen dependent and androgen independent prostate cancer. J Urol 2002; 168:273 -280[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. de Jong IJ, Pruim J, Elsinga PH, et al. Visualization of prostate cancer with 11C-choline positron emission tomography. Eur Urol 2002; 42:18 -23[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. DeGrado TR, Coleman RE, Wang S, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled choline as an oncologic tracer for positron emission tomography: initial findings in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2001; 61:110 -117

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gutman, F.
Right arrow Articles by Talbot, J.-N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gutman, F.
Right arrow Articles by Talbot, J.-N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS