AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sparrow, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sivananthan, M. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sparrow, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sivananthan, M. U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1264
AJR 2006; 187:W630-W635
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Myocardial T1 Mapping for Detection of Left Ventricular Myocardial Fibrosis in Chronic Aortic Regurgitation: Pilot Study

Patrick Sparrow1, Daniel R. Messroghli2, Scott Reid3, John P. Ridgway3, Gavin Bainbridge1 and Mohan U. Sivananthan1

1 Department of Radiology, British Heart Foundation Cardiac MRI Unit, General Infirmary at Leeds, Great George St., Rm. 170, D Fl., Jubilee Wing, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK.
2 Cardiac MRI Unit, Franz-Volhard-Klinik, Charité/Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
3 Department of Medical Physics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Received July 21, 2005; accepted after revision November 3, 2005.

 
Supported by a Royal College of Radiologists Priming Grant. D. R. Messroghli was supported by a Marie Curie fellowship grant by the European Commission.

Address correspondence to P. Sparrow (patsparrow{at}doctors.net.uk).

WEB

This is a Web exclusive article.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to identify diffuse myocardial fibrosis secondary to chronic aortic regurgitation by comparing the T1 relaxation times of left ventricular myocardium in a pilot patient group with a previously established normal range of times.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Eight patients with chronic aortic regurgitation and normal coronary arteries awaiting surgical valve replacement underwent a comprehensive MRI examination that included assessment of left ventricular function, severity of valvular regurgitation, and presence of overt myocardial scar evidenced by delayed enhancement. For each patient, myocardial T1 relaxation times determined with a modified Look-Locker technique before and after contrast administration were compared with values previously established for 15 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS. There was no statistical difference (p > 0.05) in slice-averaged myocardial T1 relaxation times either before or after gadolinium administration in the patient group compared with the normal range of times. Segmental averaged T1 relaxation times in segments with abnormal wall motion did, however, show statistically significant differences from healthy controls 10, 15, and 20 minutes after administration of gadolinium (510 vs 476 milliseconds, p = 0.001; 532 vs 501 milliseconds, p = 0.002; 560 vs 516 milliseconds, p = 0.001, respectively). Two of the aortic regurgitation patients also had focal areas of myocardial delayed enhancement.

CONCLUSION. Segment-based myocardial T1 mapping has the potential for showing differences between relaxation times in aortic regurgitation and in normal hearts, suggesting the existence of a diffuse myocardial fibrotic process.

Keywords: aortic regurgitation • cardiac imaging • left ventricle • MRI • myocardial fibrosis


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Aortic regurgitation is a relatively common clinical entity, having an overall prevalence of 4.9% [1]. The condition increases mortality, and 50% of severe aortic regurgitation patients experience heart failure within 10 years [2]. Regardless of the cause, a common feature of aortic regurgitation is failure of apposition of the aortic leaflets that produces a central jet of diastolic regurgitation. This anomaly has two physiologic consequences: increased left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume that leads to chronic volume overload and increased systolic wall stress and output that lead to increased systolic arterial pressure and chronic pressure overload.

It is accepted that the loading conditions associated with chronic aortic regurgitation lead to insidious myocardial fibrosis and that this condition precedes and may contribute to the development of heart failure [3, 4]. Current recommendations for surgical replacement of the valve depend on the degree of dilatation of the left ventricle and reduction in ejection fraction, because symptoms occur relatively late [5]. However, evidence of dilatation or dysfunction seen with standard imaging techniques such as echocardiography and angiography may imply the presence of fibrosis, and the presence of considerable preoperative fibrosis leads to suboptimal operative results [3].

Cardiac MRI can depict areas of overt scar or fibrosis after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine, particularly after myocardial infarction [6, 7]. These delayed enhancement-based techniques, however, are limited by issues of spatial resolution. This limitation is particularly true in disease processes that produce diffuse patchy rather than overt fibrosis. T1 mapping techniques are based on images produced with a standardized scale, that is, milliseconds rather than the arbitrary signal intensities used in standard MRI studies. The implication is that signal intensity within a pixel depends on the absolute longitudinal relaxation properties of the tissue voxel [8]. Calculation of the relaxation time of each pixel within a parametric image can help detect subtle differences in regional tissue characteristics, allowing for contrast resolution not related to arbitrary differences in signal intensity. The purpose of this study was to use high-resolution T1 mapping before and after contrast administration to investigate the feasibility of using MRI to detect areas of fibrosis in myocardium exposed to chronic aortic regurgitation and to compare the results with a previously established normal range.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Subjects
Ten patients consecutively referred to the local cardiothoracic surgical unit for aortic valve replacement were recruited. The pilot study had been approved by the local research ethics committee at our institution, and all patients gave written consent. All patients had a diagnosis of severe chronic aortic regurgitation, and angiography showed normal coronary arteries. Two patients were claustrophobic during scanning and did not complete the examination, leaving eight patients to complete the study (six men; mean age ± SD, 55.2 ± 9.5 years). All patients had aortic regurgitation of at least 3 months' duration and no history of myocardial infarction or intercurrent angina (Table 1). Exclusion criteria were the usual contraindications to MRI, acute renal failure causing volume overload, and severe congestive heart failure.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Patient Characteristics

 

The control group comprised 15 healthy volunteers (nine men; 33.1 ± 6.5 years old) as previously described [9]. All volunteers gave written informed consent; separate ethical approval had been given for this study. None of the volunteers had a history of cardiovascular or systemic disease, and none had symptoms at scanning. Tympanic temperature was recorded for patients and control subjects before scanning to exclude unsuspected pyrexia that could affect T1 relaxation time.

MRI
All examinations were performed on a 1.5-T scanner (Intera CV, Philips Medical Systems) with a Master gradient system (30 mT/m peak gradient amplitude, 150 m/T/s slew rate) and a five-element cardiac synergy surface coil. A four-lead vectorcardiogram was used for ECG gating.

A comprehensive cardiac MRI protocol was used in the assessment of each patient. LV function was assessed with contiguous multiple-slice short-axis cine images in a balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) pulse sequence. Severity of aortic regurgitation was quantified with a standard free-breathing T1-weighted gradient-echo phase velocity-encoded sequence. Three T2-weighted spectral presaturation with inversion recovery fat-saturation fast spin-echo slices (apical, middle, and basal) were acquired before the T1 mapping sequences to exclude the presence of regional active inflammation as a cause of abnormal findings. This sequence involves application of a slice-selective fat-saturation pulse between the preparatory inversion pulse pair and the readout used in a standard double inversion recovery black blood fast spin-echo sequence. This method results in suppression of signal from both fat and inflowing blood. Presence of delayed enhancement was visualized by use of a standard inversion recovery T1-weighted gradient-echo technique.

A modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence was used for generation of T1 relaxation time pixel maps of a single midventricular slice, as previously described [10]. This sequence essentially consisted of three inversion recovery-prepared ECG-synchronized Look-Locker trains executed within one breath-hold (16-20 seconds) over consecutive heartbeats. Each train was preceded by a specific inversion pulse (inversion times, 100, 200, and 350 milliseconds, respectively) followed by multiple single-shot readouts over several heartbeats with a balanced SSFP sequence combined with sensitivity-encoding parallel imaging [11]. A balanced SSFP sequence was used for readout because it offers superior signal-to-noise ratios and less modulation of the relaxation curve than conventional gradient-echo imaging [12]. Sensitivity encoding is a parallel imaging technique performed with a multiple-element array of parallel receiver coils. With use of a rectangular field of view, a series of back-folded images are acquired that are reconstructed as a single unfolded image by means of predetermined sensitivity maps for each coil element. These sensitivity maps are determined on a preceding low-resolution reference scan. Use of this technique leads to undersampling of k-space with subsequent increased speed of acquisition. This reduced acquisition time allows restriction of the acquisition window to less than 200 milliseconds during diastole, reducing cardiac motion artifact. All single-shot data acquisitions were performed at the same post-R wave trigger delay time in end diastole (determined by heart rate), so that each readout image for the differing inversion times was identical in anatomic location and phase of cardiac cycle. A total of 11 source data sets (three, three, and five from the respective inversion pulses) per midventricular slice were acquired. Each set of Look-Locker experiments was performed before and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after administration of 0.15 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Schering) by automatic injector (Spectris, Medrad) through a 20-gauge cannula in an antecubital vein at an injection rate of 5 mL/s with a 10-mL saline chaser. The exact scanning parameters were as follows: balanced SSFP sequence combined with sensitivity-encoding factor of 2; partial Fourier acquisition; TR/TE, 3.9/1.95; 50° flip angle; 380 x 342 mm field of view; 240 x 151 matrix; 1.58 x 2.26 mm pixel size; 8-mm slice thickness. The acquisition window for readout was 191 milliseconds.

Three patients with LV dysfunction (ejection fraction < 55% or resting regional wall motion abnormalities) underwent follow-up assessment of LV function 9 months postoperatively.

Image Analysis
Parametric T1 relaxation time pixel maps were generated from the modified Look-Locker sequence images off-line on a PC running customized software developed in-house on an IDL 6.0 platform (RSI). The program performed a nonlinear three-parameter curve fit on the source data sets, automatically calculated T1 time for each pixel, and constructed a parametric T1 map. Computation of each T1 map took approximately 7 minutes, and the resultant images were stored in DICOM format. The LV myocardium was later defined by standard manual tracing of the epicardial and endocardial contours with commercially available software (Mass 5.0, Medis) on a workstation (Figs. 1A and 1B). The mean T1 relaxation time of the myocardial slice was subsequently calculated by summation and averaging of the values for each myocardial pixel within the slice. Each slice was also divided into a standard six segments for a midventricular short-axis image, and T1 relaxation times for each segment were calculated [13]. These steps were followed for each time-scale acquisition before and after contrast administration. Mass 5.0 software was used for calculation of LV functional parameters (ejection fraction and mass), overt scar quantification on delayed enhancement, and calculation of aortic regurgitant fraction for each patient by drawing of manual contours around relevant regions of interest (LV epicardium and endocardium on SSFP cine images, areas of delayed enhancement on T1-weighted gradient-echo images, and aortic valve on phase velocity sequences). Delayed enhancement was defined as a region of increased signal intensity compared with normal nulled myocardium 20 minutes after injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Visual assessment of regional wall motion in a corresponding midventricular slice was performed to correlate significant differences in segmental relaxation times with localized areas of dysfunction. Wall motion was graded as follows: 1, normal; 2, mild to moderate hypokinesia; 3, severe hypokinesia; 4, akinesia; and 5, dyskinesia.


Figure 1
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 59-year-old woman (subject 6) with 12-month history of aortic regurgitation secondary to idiopathic aortic root dilatation. Short-axis parametric T1 maps acquired before (A) and 10 minutes after administration of gadolinium (B). Green and red lines represent epicardial and endocardial contours manually drawn for delineation of left ventricular myocardium. Pixel signal intensity is determined by individual pixel T1 relaxation times, hence darker image after gadolinium administration.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 59-year-old woman (subject 6) with 12-month history of aortic regurgitation secondary to idiopathic aortic root dilatation. Short-axis parametric T1 maps acquired before (A) and 10 minutes after administration of gadolinium (B). Green and red lines represent epicardial and endocardial contours manually drawn for delineation of left ventricular myocardium. Pixel signal intensity is determined by individual pixel T1 relaxation times, hence darker image after gadolinium administration.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 43-year-old man (subject 4) with 6-month history of aortic regurgitation secondary to idiopathic aortic root dilatation. ECG-gated breath-hold short-axis T1-weighted inversion recovery spoiled gradient-echo delayed enhancement image (TR/TE, 4.7/2; flip angle, 15°) shows focal area of delayed enhancement in mid lateral wall of left ventricle (arrow) suggestive of focal fibrosis.

 


Figure 4
View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 60-year-old man (subject 5) with 4-year history of aortic regurgitation of unknown cause. ECG-gated breath-hold short-axis T1-weighted inversion recovery spoiled gradient-echo delayed enhancement image (TR/TE, 4.6/1.8; flip angle, 15°) shows focal area of delayed enhancement in lateral wall of left ventricle (arrow) suggestive of focal fibrosis.

 
Statistical Analysis
An independent samples Student's t test was used to compare T1 relaxation times for each time point acquisition in the eight patients with the times in the 15 volunteers. This test was performed for both the mean slice and segmental T1 times. A p value of less than 0.05 was deemed significant. Correlation between LV ejection fraction (LVEF), mass index, aortic regurgitant fraction, and T1 times before and after contrast injection in the eight patients was also assessed with Pearson's correlation coefficient test. All statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 11.5 software.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Mean (± SD) scanning time was 59.3 ± 11.9 minutes. Mean aortic regurgitation fraction was 45.8% ± 19.1% (range, 24.1-70%). Mean LVEF and mass index in the aortic regurgitation group were 57.4% ± 8.5% (range, 44.3-67.8%) and 122.3 ± 37.9 g/m2 (range, 73.8-189.8 g/m2). Three patients had resting LV dysfunction defined by LVEF < 55% (Table 1). Segmental visual wall motion analysis showed that eight of a total of 48 segments had resting regional wall motion abnormalities (four mild to moderate and four severe hypokinesia, all occurring in the three patients with LVEF < 55%). Two patients had areas of focal delayed enhancement in the left ventricle measuring 1.0 and 1.2 g (Figs. 2 and 3). No patient had abnormal signal intensity suggestive of active edema or inflammation on T2-weighted spectral presaturation with inversion recovery images. Mean T1 relaxation times before and after contrast injection in the aortic regurgitation and control groups are summarized in Figure 4. With use of the mean T1 value for each slice, there was no statistical difference between the two groups at any time point. There also was no correlation between LVEF, LV mass index, or regurgitant fraction and T1 relaxation time (Pearson's correlation coefficients ranged from 0.1 to 0.6). However, when T1 relaxation times were analyzed on a segmental basis, there was a statistically significant difference between the T1 values 10, 15, and 20 minutes after contrast administration in segments with regional wall motion abnormalities compared with both control segments and segments in the aortic regurgitation group with normal motion (mean T1 relaxation time in abnormal wall motion vs normal control segments: 510 vs 476 milliseconds, p = 0.001; 532 vs 501 milliseconds, p = 0.002; 560 vs 516 milliseconds, p = 0.001; abnormal wall motion vs normal wall motion in the aortic regurgitation group: 510 vs 474 milliseconds, p = 0.05; 532 vs 500 milliseconds, p = 0.008; 560 vs 520 milliseconds, p = 0.023, respectively) (Fig. 5). Despite this statistically significant difference, the T1 values in the abnormal segments remained within the respective normal ranges, defined by mean ± 2 SD, and there was but a single moderate correlation, at 20 minutes, between degree of wall motion abnormality and T1 relaxation time (r =-0.64, p = 0.02).


Figure 5
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 Graph shows mean myocardial T1 relaxation time for each acquisition before and after gadolinium administration in group with aortic regurgitation (white) and control group of healthy persons (gray). Error bars represent 1 SD.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5 Graph shows mean myocardial T1 relaxation time in segments with abnormal wall motion in aortic regurgitation group (open boxes) compared with healthy controls (solid boxes). Asterisks denote statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Error bars for control group = 2 SD. Pre-Gd = before administration of gadolinium.

 
Two of the three patients (subjects 3 and 4) who underwent functional follow-up had persistent LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction postoperatively (LVEF preoperatively and postoperatively, 44.3% vs 40.1% and 53.7% vs 42.1%). Neither patient had new areas of delayed enhancement at follow-up. The LV function of the third patient (subject 6) returned to normal (47.8% vs 71.4%). Of the eight segments with preoperative wall motion abnormalities, six had persistent postoperative abnormalities and two returned to normal.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
We hypothesized that a high-resolution T1 mapping technique such as that used in this study may depict diffuse myocardial fibrosis. The implied clinical benefit was the availability of a noninvasive imaging technique that would depict evidence of myocardial decompensation before the onset of clinically significant ventricular dilatation or dysfunction and thus improve outcome after surgical valve replacement. The optimal timing of surgical replacement of the aortic valve in chronic aortic regurgitation is contentious, and any decisions on planning of surgery are balanced by the risks of the procedure and long-term complications associated with the valve prosthesis [14]. It is widely accepted that patients with symptoms, with or without LV dysfunction, have a mortality that is greater than 10% annually and thus need replacement of the dysfunctional valve [5]. In patients without symptoms, however, decisions about operative timing are based more on physical findings and results of chest radiography, serial echocardiography, or radionuclide assessment of LV volume and function. Progressive LV volume overload with increasing end-systolic (> 55 mm) or end-diastolic (> 75 mm) diameter with or without progression to LV dysfunction (LVEF < 50%) has been used as an important parameter indicating need for surgical intervention [15]. However, evidence suggests a reduced 10-year survival rate with ejection fractions < 50% in comparison with normal function (56% vs 70%), and accordingly surgery ideally should be performed before LV dysfunction has intervened [16].

T1 values are not specific for individual tissues, but each tissue has a normal range dependent on field strength. Deviations outside the normal range may indicate an ongoing pathologic state [17]. Specific in vivo measurement of T1 times with parametric maps has already found clinical application in neurologic imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis [18, 19]. Measurement of T1 relaxation times in the heart is technically demanding because of a number of factors. Cardiac motion limits image acquisition to time of least motion, that is, diastole. This restriction is compounded by the increased T1 relaxation times associated with modern high-field-strength systems. The ability of the high-resolution modified Look-Locker technique we used to overcome these limitations by providing high-resolution T1 measurements acquired within a single breath-hold has been confirmed [9, 10]. Less accurate T1 mapping techniques have been shown feasible in detection of changes in relaxation times associated with acute myocardial infarction, and excellent correlation with conventional delayed enhancement-based infarct imaging has been achieved [20]. It was reasonable to hypothesize that a chronic condition, such as aortic regurgitation, known to cause diffuse myocardial fibrosis would lead to a change in myocardial T1 relaxation properties, particularly after contrast administration.

Overall, this feasibility study did not show a significant difference in myocardial T1 relaxation times between the two groups. There was also no correlation between ejection or regurgitant fraction and myocardial T1 relaxation time. When segmental analysis was performed, however, differences did emerge in T1 times after contrast injection in eight segments with resting wall motion abnormalities. None of these segments had discernible delayed enhancement, and six had persistent wall motion abnormalities after successful valve replacement. Given the persistent dysfunction without overt delayed enhancement exhibited in these segments, it is presumed that myocardial fibrosis was present in a patchy rather than a diffuse global pattern (i.e., only in the segments with abnormal wall motion) and that the differences in T1 relaxation times are attributable to the presence of fibrosis. Accordingly, it is encouraging that a discernible difference in T1 relaxation times existed between these segments and segments exhibiting normal resting motion, although the values did lie within the normal range. An interesting feature of this difference was that the T1 relaxation times in these abnormal segments were longer than in normal control segments, which is the converse of what we expected—that is, shortened T1 times in segments with fibrosis due to increased extracellular distribution volumes of gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Results with animal-based models of chronic aortic regurgitation suggest that the extracellular matrix in areas of fibrosis does not contain excess collagen compared with normal tissue but contains increased levels of glucosamine and fibronectin [21]. Collagen is a polypeptide molecule, whereas fibronectin is a glycoprotein, and glucosamine is a polysaccharide-containing proteoglycan. Changes in T1 relaxation after administration of paramagnetic agents such as gadolinium are not a direct manifestation of the agent but reflect its effect on the behavior of hydrogen protons within the tissue. Glucosamine is hydrophilic. It is possible that the slightly increased T1 times in these segments may reflect subtle variations in the water exchange properties or spin-lattice energy transfer efficiency within the extracellular matrix.

A number of limiting factors of the study may explain the failure to show differences in T1 times in more than three patients. These limitations include both patient and technical considerations. The most obvious is the small number of patients, but the study was an initial feasibility study. Because we did not seek ethical approval within our study protocol for histologic confirmation of the presence of LV fibrosis by biopsy at surgery, we cannot state with certainty that any patient had incurred clinically significant myocardial fibrosis as a consequence of valvular disease. Only three patients in the cohort had LV dysfunction, and the presence of fibrosis in two of these can only be inferred. LV dysfunction has been shown to be reversible postoperatively as a result of correction of the high afterload associated with aortic regurgitation. The implication is that LV dysfunction may not invariably mean presence of myocardial fibrosis [22]. This situation was elegantly shown in our subject whose LVEF went from 47.8% before to 71.4% after valve replacement. Therefore it is not unreasonable to suggest that according to the available evidence, only two of the eight patients may have had clinically significant fibrosis.

A technical limitation was that only a single midventricular slice was sampled in each patient because of the limited acquisition times available for each Look-Locker train. Accordingly, as with endomyocardial biopsy techniques, pathologic abnormalities may have been present but in an anatomic location different from the area interrogated. This limitation is perhaps borne out by the finding of focal overt fibrosis on delayed enhancement imaging, on which total LV coverage was obtained. To our knowledge, delayed enhancement has not been described in the context of aortic regurgitation. It is reasonable to conclude, however, that the examples identified in our study represent areas of focal fibrosis as a consequence of chronic volume overload. Both patients had normal coronary arteries and no history of myocardial infarction, angina, or chest pain suggestive of an ischemic cause of the symptoms. Neither patient had a medical history of sarcoidosis, myocarditis, Löffler's syndrome, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, or any other condition that would account for such focal patterns of enhancement [23]. Neither patient had significant LV dysfunction, but patient 4 had severe (70%) regurgitation, and patient 5 had the longest known duration of regurgitation. Delayed enhancement is not specific to previous myocardial infarction and is believed to occur as the result of delayed washout of gadopentetate dimeglumine in areas of increased distribution volume [24, 25]. Focal areas of delayed enhancement have been described in relation to chronic pressure overload in aortic stenosis and in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In both instances the delayed enhancement was presumed to be secondary to focal myocardial fibrosis [26, 27]. However, given the small numbers involved in this study, other than the observation that the phenomenon occurs, no inferences can be drawn about pathophysiologic risk factors for development of delayed enhancement in chronic aortic regurgitation.

In summary, in a pilot cohort of patients with chronic aortic regurgitation, myocardial T1 mapping did not show a difference in T1 relaxation times suggestive of a diffuse fibrotic process. A segment-based analytic strategy, however, may yield regional differences within a slice that suggest fibrosis in areas of regional wall motion abnormality identified on functional cine images. Furthermore, focal areas of delayed enhancement suggestive of areas of overt fibrosis secondary to chronic volume and pressure overload may be seen in a minority of patients with chronic aortic insufficiency.


Acknowledgments
 
We wish to thank the Department of CardioThoracic Surgery, General Infirmary at Leeds, for assistance in completing this study.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Singh J, Evans J, Levy D, et al. Prevalence and clinical determinants of mitral, tricuspid and aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83:897 -902[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Dujardin KS, Enrique-Sarano M, Schaff HV, et al. Mortality and morbidity of aortic valve disease in clinical practice: a long term follow up study. Circulation 1999;99 : 1851-1857
  3. Schwarz F, Flameng W, Schaper J, et al. Myocardial structure and function in patients with aortic regurgitation and their relation to postoperative results. Am J Cardiol 1978;41 : 661-669[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Liu S-K, Magid N, Fox P, et al. Fibrosis, myocyte degeneration and heart failure in chronic experimental aortic regurgitation. Cardiology 1998;90 : 101-109[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Bonow RO, Carabello B, deLeon AC Jr, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of patients with Valvular Heart Disease). Circulation1998; 98:1949 -1984
  6. Choi KM, Kim RJ, Gubernikoff G, Vargas JD, Parker M, Judd RM. Transmural extent of acute myocardial infarction predicts long term improvement in contractile function. Circulation2001; 104:1101 -1107
  7. Wagner A, Marholdt H, Holly T, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003; 361:374 -379[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Kaldoudi E, Williams CR. Relaxation time measurements in NMR imaging. Part 1. Longitudinal relaxation time. Concepts Magn Reson 1993; 5:217 -242
  9. Messroghli D, Plein S, Higgins DM, et al. Human myocardium: single-breath-hold MR T1 mapping with high spatial resolution—reproducibility study. Radiology2006; 238:1004 -1012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Messroghli D, Radjenovic A, Kozerke S, Higgins D, Sivananthan MU, Ridgway JP. Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high resolution T1 mapping of the heart. Magn Reson Med2004; 52:141 -146[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Boesiger P. Cardiac real-time imaging using SENSE: SENSitivity encoding scheme. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43:177 -184[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Scheffler K, Hennig J. T(1) quantification with inversion recovery true FISP. Magn Reson Med 2001;45 : 720-723[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105 : 539-542
  14. Grunkemeier GL, Li HH, Naftel DC, Starr A, Rahimtoola SH. Long-term performance of heart valve prostheses. Curr Probl Cardiol 2000; 25:73 -154[Medline]
  15. Henry WL, Bonow RO, Rosing DR, Epstein SE. Observations on the optimum time for operative intervention for aortic regurgitation. Part II. Serial echocardiographic evaluation of asymptomatic patients. Circulation 1980;61 : 484-492
  16. Chaliki HP, Mohty D, Avierinos JF, et al. Outcomes after aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and markedly reduced left ventricular function. Circulation2002; 106:2687 -2693
  17. Damadian R. Tumor detection by nuclear magnetic resonance. Science 1971; 171:1151 -1153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Parry A, Clare S, Jenkinson M, Smith S, Palace J, Matthews PM. White matter and lesion T1 relaxation times increase in parallel and correlate with disability in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol2002; 249:1279 -1286[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Vaithianathar L, Tench CR. T1 relaxation time mapping of white matter tracts in multiple sclerosis defined by diffusion tensor imaging. J Neurol 2002;249 : 1272-1278[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Messroghli D, Niendorf T, Schulz-Menger J, Dietz R, Friedrich MG. T1 mapping in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003;5 : 353-359[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Borer JS, Truter S, Herrold EM, et al. Myocardial fibrosis in chronic aortic regurgitation: molecular and cellular responses to volume overload. Circulation 2002;105 : 1837-1842
  22. Bonow RO, Dodd JT, Maron BJ, et al. Long-term serial changes in left ventricular function and reversal of left ventricular dilatation after valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation. Circulation 1988;78 : 1108-1120
  23. Hunold P, Schlosser T, Vogt FM, et al. Myocardial late enhancement in contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI: distinction between infarction scar and non-infarction-related disorder. AJR2005; 184:1420 -1426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Arheden H, Saeed M, Higgins CB, et al. Measurement of the distribution volume of gadopentetate dimeglumine at echo-planar MR imaging to quantify myocardial infarction: comparison with 99m Tc-DTPA autoradiography in rats. Radiology 1999;211 : 698-708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Judd RM, Lugo-Olivieri CH, Arai M, et al. Physiological basis of myocardial contrast enhancement in fast magnetic resonance images of 2-day-old reperfused canine infarcts. Circulation1995; 92:1902 -1910
  26. Ochiai K, Ishibashi Y, Shimada T, Murakami Y, Inoue S, Sano K. Subendocardial enhancement in gadolinium-diethylene-triamine-pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83:1443 -1446[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Moon JC, McKenna WJ, McCrohan JA, Elliott PM, Smith GC, Pennell DJ. Toward clinical risk assessment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol2003; 41:1561 -1567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association.Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of diseases of the heart and great vessel, 9th ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown,1994 : 253-256

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
T. H. Marwick and M. Schwaiger
The Future of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure, Part 1: Tasks and Tools
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, July 1, 2008; 1(1): 58 - 69.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sparrow, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sivananthan, M. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sparrow, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sivananthan, M. U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS