|
|
||||||||
Graduate School of Medical Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto, Japan
WEBThis is a Web exclusive article.
We believe that the incidence of myocardial bridging on MDCT coronary angiography might differ according to diagnostic criteria, although Dr. Kantarci et al. [1] did not submit diagnostic criteria for myocardial bridging in detail. Ferreira et al. [3] reported that 75% of myocardial bridging cases are superficial bridgesthat is, not fully covered by myocardial fibers but by a thin layer of connective tissue, nerves, and fatty tissue. These superficial myocardial bridges may not be included in the study by Kantarci et al. because distinguishing between such a thin myocardial bridge and the coronary arterial wall is difficult due to the limited spatial resolution of MDCT coronary angiography.
Recently, we retrospectively reviewed the records and images of 92 patients who underwent MDCT coronary angiography on a 40-MDCT scanner and calculated the incidence of myocardial bridging. Our diagnostic criteria of myocardial bridging on MDCT were "a segment of coronary artery travels in myocardium and the thickness of the overlying soft tissue is more than 1.5 mm." Among the 92 patients, 22 cases (23.9%) of myocardial bridging were detected.
If the appropriate diagnostic criteria are selected, the incidence of myocardial bridging on MDCT may be higher than those in angiographic studies and similar to those in pathology studies. We are not disputing the results Dr. Kantarci and colleagues reported by [1], but rather, we suggest that a comparative study between pathologic and MDCT findings is needed to define the diagnostic criteria of myocardial bridging on MDCT.
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |