AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Munden, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Munden, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Munden, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Munden, R. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.2049
AJR 2007; 188:275-279
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Sonography of Pediatric Small-Bowel Intussusception: Differentiating Surgical from Nonsurgical Cases

Martha M. Munden1, John F. Bruzzi2, Brian D. Coley3 and Reginald F. Munden2

1 Edward B. Singleton Diagnostic Imaging Services, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030-2399.
2 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Box 57, Houston, TX 77030.
3 Department of Radiology, Columbus Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205.

Received November 23, 2005; accepted after revision February 1, 2006.

 
Address correspondence to R. F. Munden.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are clinical or sonographic findings that can be used to differentiate benign self-limited small-bowel intussusception from pathologic small-bowel intussusception that necessitates surgical intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective search was performed of abdominal sonograms obtained at two institutions between January 1996 and June 2005. Sonographic findings were correlated with medical and surgical records.

RESULTS. A total of 35 cases of isolated small-bowel intussusception were found. Thirteen (37%) of these cases necessitated surgical intervention, and 22 (63%) of the cases were benign and self-limiting. Patients with self-limiting intussusception were younger than patients with intussusception necessitating surgical intervention (mean, 4.2 vs 7.5 years; p = 0.0327). Abdominal sonograms depicted ascites and small-bowel obstruction significantly more frequently in patients with small-bowel intussusception necessitating surgery (n = 7 [54%] for each finding) than in patients with self-limiting intussusception (n =2 [9%], n =0) (p = 0.006 and p = 0.0003, respectively). At sonography, patients who later underwent surgical intervention had small-bowel intussusception of significantly greater length (mean, 7.3 cm) than those treated conservatively (mean length, 1.9 cm) (p < 0.0001). Intussusception length greater than 3.5 cm was considered a sensitive and specific independent predictor of the need for surgery (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 100%).

CONCLUSION. When small-bowel intussusception is detected in infants and children undergoing abdominal sonography, intussusception length greater than 3.5 cm is a strong independent predictor of the need for surgical intervention.

Keywords: abdomen • pediatric imaging • small-bowel intussusception • sonography


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Idiopathic ileocolic intussusception is a medical emergency that has the classic presentation of acute onset of intermittent, cramping abdominal pain occurring between periods of lethargy, often associated with hematochezia. Early reduction by imaging-guided enema (air or water-soluble contrast material) or by surgery is indicated to prevent irreversible bowel infarction. Isolated small-bowel intussusception is less common than idiopathic ileocolic intussusception and often is asymptomatic [1]. It can, however, manifest with vague symptoms of irritability, failure to thrive, diarrhea, gastrointestinal bleeding, abdominal distention, or nonspecific abdominal pain [2-4] and may even be incidentally detected in the course of CT or sonography performed for other reasons. Persistent small-bowel intussusception that necessitates surgery often has an associated focal lead point, such as Meckel's diverticulum, intraluminal polyp, duplication cyst, or lymphoma, or is associated with an underlying condition such as cystic fibrosis, celiac disease, or Henoch-Schönlein purpura [5]. Not all cases of small-bowel intussusception must be reduced by surgical means. Many cases of intussusception encountered incidentally at sonography or CT are idiopathic and reduce spontaneously within minutes of detection. For intussusception lasting longer than the initial sonographic examination, however, it is difficult to predict the need for further evaluation or intervention on clinical grounds alone. Lvoff et al. [6] found that small-bowel intussusception detected incidentally on CT of adult patients was likely to be self-limiting if less than 3.5 cm long. We undertook this study to ascertain clinical and sonographic findings that can be used to differentiate transient, self-limited small-bowel intussusception from nontransient small-bowel intussusception, which may necessitate surgical intervention.


Figure 1
View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 14-year-old girl with intermittent abdominal pain of several months' duration. Longitudinal sonogram shows small-bowel intussusception (arrows) measuring 14 cm in longest dimension. At surgery, lead point was found to be polyp. Diagnosis was Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. I = intussusceptum.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 13-month-old girl with 5-day history of vomiting and diarrhea. Transverse sonogram of left lower quadrant shows dilated, fluid-filled loops of small bowel (black arrows) and ascites (white arrow). At surgery, Meckel's diverticulum was found to be lead point.

 

Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In a computer-aided search of the database records of Texas Children's Hospital and Columbus Children's Hospital, all reports containing the word "intussusception" were retrieved among records of patients undergoing abdominal sonography between January 1996 and June 2005. Only patients with isolated small-bowel intussusception were included. Patients with ileocolic intussusception and intussusception associated with feeding tubes were excluded. The following clinical data were obtained from medical records: age, sex, reason for examination, nature of symptoms before sonography, underlying medical or surgical conditions, subsequent clinical course, and findings at surgical intervention. Symptoms were defined as acute if they occurred within 48 hours before presentation and as chronic if they had lasted longer than 48 hours. In addition, all sonograms from each examination were reviewed at each institution by two pediatric radiologists using PACS workstations (iSite, Stentor, GE Healthcare). The following sonographic parameters were documented: presence of small-bowel intussusception; length of intussusception in centimeters (measured with electronic calipers along the greatest longitudinal axis of the intussusception) (Fig. 1); presence of sonographic features of small-bowel obstruction (dilated, fluid-filled loops of small bowel greater than 3 cm in diameter proximal to the level of intussusception with collapsed distal loops); and presence of ascites (Fig. 2). Group 1 was defined as all patients who later underwent surgical reduction of intussusception. Group 2 was defined as all patients with transient self-limiting intussusception that did not necessitate surgical intervention. The study was approved by institutional review boards.

Statistical analysis included descriptive analyses of age, sex, time to resolution (self-limiting or surgical), length of intussusception, and frequency of ascites or small-bowel obstruction. The statistical significance of differences between group 1 and group 2 were calculated with statistical software (GraphPad Instat, GraphPad Software). Student's t test was used for continuous variables and the Fisher's exact test for contingency analysis. A significance level of 5% was used in all cases.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Thirty-five cases of small-bowel intussusception were diagnosed with sonography between January 1996 and June 2005. The patients with small-bowel intussusception were 21 girls and 14 boys with a mean age of 5.4 years (range, 6 weeks-18 years). Indications for the examinations included symptoms referable to the abdomen (abdominal pain [n = 17], vomiting [n = 8], lethargy or failure to thrive [n = 7], lower gastrointestinal bleeding [n = 6], weight loss [n = 3], fever [n = 2], diarrhea [n = 2], hematemesis [n = 1], and constipation [n = 1]). Four patients had no symptoms, and abdominal sonography was performed for other reasons (evaluation of an inguinal hernia [n = 1], suspected patent urachus [n = 1], surveillance after resection of Wilms' tumor [n = 1], and assessment before liver transplantation [n = 1]). Three patients had Henoch-Schönlein purpura and were undergoing assessment of abdominal pain (n = 2) or lower gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 1).

The clinical characteristics of the two groups of patients are summarized in Table 1. Thirteen (37%) of the patients with small-bowel intussusception needed surgical intervention, and 22 patients (63%) were treated conservatively. Patients in group 1 (eight girls, five boys) were older (mean age, 7.5 years; range, 6 weeks-18 years) than those in group 2 (13 girls, nine boys; mean age, 4.2 years; range, 18 months-10 years) (p = 0.0327). More patients in group 1 (n = 5 [38%]) than in group 2 (n = 3 [14%]) had acute symptoms, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.116). There were no other distinguishing clinical features between the two groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Characteristics and Clinical Presentation of Patients with Small-Bowel Intussusception Detected with Abdominal Sonography

 

Among the 13 patients who underwent surgical reduction, presumed lead points for the intussusception were found at laparotomy in nine (69%) of the patients. The lead points included Meckel's diverticulum (n = 4), intraluminal polyps (n = 3), and enlarged lymph nodes (n = 2). In the other four patients, no obvious cause was found. Necrotic bowel was found at surgery in two patients (Fig. 3), and one of these patients died.


Figure 3
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 18-year-old girl with midepigastric pain for 4 months who presented with acute severe abdominal pain. Transverse midline sonogram shows small-bowel intussusception (arrows). Maximum longitudinal measurement was 14 cm. At surgery, 140 cm of necrotic small bowel was removed. There was no identifiable lead point.

 
Twenty-two cases of small-bowel intussusception resolved without surgical intervention. Most (n = 13 [59%]) of these cases reduced spontaneously within seconds to minutes of being detected during the sonographic examination (Fig. 4). In nine (41%) of the patients, however, intussusception lasted longer, persisting after the initial sonographic examination had terminated. Spontaneous reduction of intussusception in these nine patients was confirmed at subsequent evaluation with sonography (n = 5), CT (n = 2), or small-bowel follow-through (n = 1). In one case follow-up imaging was not performed. Time to follow-up imaging was as follows: sonography, 39 minutes and 1, 4, 14, and 24 hours; CT, 7 and 60 days; and small-bowel follow-through, 9 hours. The patient who did not undergo follow-up imaging had chronic lethargy and no abdominal pain, and the intussusception was presumed to be self-limiting. The patient was well in subsequent clinical follow-up.


Figure 4
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 18-month-old girl undergoing evaluation for patent urachus. Transverse sonogram shows incidentally found small-bowel intussusception (arrows) that resolved spontaneously by end of examination. Maximum longitudinal measurement was 1.4 cm.

 

The sonographic findings for the two groups are detailed in Table 2. Mesenteric lymphadenopathy was detected in three (14%) of the patients in group 2. No focal lead points were seen sonographically in any of the other patients in group 1 or group 2. Both the presence of ascites and the finding of small-bowel obstruction on sonography were significantly more frequent in group 1 (n = 7 [54%] for each finding) than in group 2 (n = 2 [9%]; n = 0) (p = 0.006 and p = 0.0003, respectively), but neither finding was consistently present in all patients with intussusception that necessitated surgery. Length of small-bowel intussusception, however, was consistently and significantly greater in group 2 (mean length, 7.3 cm; 95% CI, 4.8-9.7 cm) than in group 1 (mean length, 1.9 cm; 95% CI, 1.7-2.2 cm) (p < 0.0001) and was found to be the strongest independent predictor of the need for surgical intervention. All transient and self-limiting intussusceptions were 3.5 cm long or shorter. All but one of the intussusceptions reduced surgically were longer than 3.5 cm. The exception was a 2.5-cm intussusception in a 3.5-year-old patient who underwent surgery because of clinical suspicion of sepsis. The intussusception was easily reduced at surgery, and no lead point was found. When small-bowel intussusception was detected with abdominal sonography, intussusception length greater than 3.5 cm was a sensitive and specific predictor of the need for surgical intervention, independent of other clinical and sonographic findings (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 100%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Sonographic Findings in Patients with Small-Bowel Intussusception

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Transient, self-limiting small-bowel intussusception is not rare in the pediatric population, accounting for as many as 17% of all cases of intussusception [1]. More than one half of cases of transient small-bowel intussusception are asymptomatic and are often detected incidentally in the course of CT or sonography performed for other reasons. When present, symptoms are often subacute and nonspecific, consisting of a spectrum of clinical findings such as irritability, abdominal distention, abdominal pain, vomiting, fever, gastrointestinal bleeding, and palpable abdominal mass [1, 7]. Underlying gastrointestinal abnormalities or focal lead points causing small-bowel intussusception are rarely detected sonographically, but these findings include Meckel's diverticulum, duplication cyst, small-bowel polyp, lymphoma, and jejunal feeding tubes. More diffuse pathologic findings are lymphoid hyperplasia secondary to celiac disease, cystic fibrosis, Henoch-Schönlein purpura, and gastroenteritis [8-13]. Although rarely detected sonographically, lead points were found at surgery in eight (42%) of 19 surgical cases in the series described by Ko et al. [7] and in nine (69%) of our 13 cases. Most cases of small-bowel intussusception are idiopathic and are thought to be due to benign lymph node hyperplasia, abnormal bowel-wall motility, bowel-wall thickening, or impaction of secretions.

Our findings suggest that surgery is indicated in the care of patients who have symptoms and small-bowel intussusception longer than 3.5 cm detected on abdominal sonography. In the care of patients with incidentally detected small-bowel intussusception, nonspecific symptoms, and no identifiable predisposing condition, however, there is much diagnostic uncertainty over correct management. Many of these patients can be treated conservatively. For cases in which intussusception does not spontaneously resolve during the sonographic examination, Kornecki et al. [1] advocate repetition of sonography within 45 minutes. On the other hand, to reduce the risk of small-bowel ischemia and infarction, early surgical intervention is important for patients with intussusception that is not self-limiting. It is therefore important at the initial diagnostic examination to be able to predict which cases of intussusception are benign and self-limiting and which necessitate aggressive management.

In our patients, we found that length of intussusception was the most useful independent predictor of the need for surgical intervention. None of the intussusceptions longer than 3.5 cm had reduced spontaneously by the follow-up examination. These patients had recurrent or intractable symptoms and were ultimately treated with surgery. Lead points were found in nine (69%) of the patients who underwent laparotomy. None of these points had been detected with sonography. Conversely, all but one of the cases of intussusception 3.5 cm or shorter at initial sonographic examination resolved spontaneously. Most (n = 13 [59%]) of these cases reduced spontaneously within minutes of being detected during the sonographic examination. In nine (41%) of the patients, intussusception lasted longer than the initial sonographic examination. The follow-up period after initial imaging varied from 39 minutes to no follow-up. All of these cases of intussusception were eventually determined to have resolved. This finding suggests that intussusception length less than 3.5 cm is predictive of a benign course and that these patients need only clinical follow-up for confirmation of an asymptomatic condition.

Our results reflect those of a similar study [6] of the predictive usefulness of length of small-bowel intussusception in an adult population in which length was measured on CT images. In that study, the authors found that a length of 3.5 cm could be used to differentiate benign self-limiting intussusception from intussusception necessitating surgery. Sonography may be a more appropriate imaging technique for measuring the length of intussusception in a pediatric population. Sonography is often the first imaging examination to be performed, particularly for pediatric patients, and can depict intussusception in real time in the longitudinal axis. Sonography also is better suited to evaluation of changes in the bowel wall, such as mucosal edema, bowel-wall motion, and the presence of blood flow [2, 4].

The sonographic features of small-bowel intussusception are similar to those of ileocolic intussusception, including a doughnut sign of alternating hypoechoic and hyperechoic rings and a crescent-in-doughnut sign of a hyperechoic crescent layered around a central mass [2, 14]. Focal lead points such as Meckel's diverticulum, duplication cysts, and jejunal feeding tubes are sometimes well depicted on sonography [15]. Sonography, however, has low sensitivity for certain causes of intussusception, such as intraluminal polyps, and is not always reliable for differentiation of benign lymphoid hyperplasia and lymphoma [5, 15]. As far as we are aware, there have been no prospective studies of the relative diagnostic accuracy rates of CT and sonography in the detection of focal lead points causing small-bowel intussusception.

In our study, demographic and clinical features were less useful than length in prediction of the eventual outcome of small-bowel intussusception. Patients who had small-bowel intussusception necessitating surgery tended to be older than those with self-limiting conditions, but there was significant overlap. Therefore, age was not found to be clinically useful in individual cases. On sonographic examination, the presence ascites was detected more frequently in the surgical group than in the self-limiting intussusception group, but this finding was not consistent. Similarly, small-bowel obstruction occurred only in patients who needed surgery, but this finding probably reflected the fact that small-bowel obstruction is a more acute clinical situation that necessitates intervention more immediately than conservative management. When present, small-bowel obstruction was always associated with intussusception longer than 3.5 cm, and the absence of small-bowel obstruction did not preclude surgery. When all factors were considered, intussusception length greater than 3.5 cm measured on abdominal sonography was the most important independent predictor of the need for surgical reduction of small-bowel intussusception.

Limitations of this study mainly arose from the retrospective nature of the review. Factors such as varying surgical teams and changing surgical practices over time were not fully accounted for. In addition, sonography is a relatively operator-dependent tool, and foreshortening of small-bowel intussusception on sonograms may have introduced a degree of error into the calculations of length. Intussusception was not measured at surgery in patients who underwent surgical reduction, and there was no other corroborating evidence of the length of intussusception. However, the sonograms represented cases seen routinely in two busy pediatric hospitals, and the measurements of length are applicable to those commonly obtained in routine clinical practice. In all cases, the sonograms were examined by an experienced pediatric radiologist, and the most reliable image was chosen for measurement. Any error in calculation due to foreshortening was unlikely to have affected the overall conclusion that the presence of a longer small-bowel intussusception is more likely to indicate the need for surgical intervention.

In conclusion, when small-bowel intussusception is detected in infants and children undergoing abdominal sonography, intussusception length greater than 3.5 cm is a strong independent predictor of the need for surgical intervention.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Kornecki A, Daneman A, Navarro O, et al. Spontaneous reduction of intussusception: clinical spectrum, management and outcome. Pediatr Radiol 2000;30:58 -63[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Kim JH. US features of transient small bowel intussusception in pediatric patients. Korean J Radiol2004; 5:178 -184[Medline]
  3. Doi O, Aoyama K, Hutson JM. Twenty-one cases of small bowel intussusception: the pathophysiology of idiopathic intussusception and the concept of benign small bowel intussusception. Pediatr Surg Int 2004;20:140 -143[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Tiao MM, Wan YL, Ng SH, et al. Sonographic features of small-bowel intussusception in pediatric patients. Acad Emerg Med2001; 8:368 -373[Medline]
  5. Navarro O, Daneman A. Intussusception. Part 3. Diagnosis and management of those with an identifiable or predisposing cause and those that reduce spontaneously. Pediatr Radiol2004; 34:305 -312[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Lvoff N, Breiman RS, Coakley FV, Lu Y, Warren RS. Distinguishing features of self-limiting adult small-bowel intussusception identified at CT. Radiology2003; 227:68 -72[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ko SF, Lee TY, Ng SH, et al. Small bowel intussusception in symptomatic pediatric patients: experiences with 19 surgically proven cases. World J Surg2002; 26:438 -443[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Siaplaouras J, Moritz JD, Gortner L, et al. Small bowel intussusception in childhood [in German]. Klin Padiatr2003; 215:53 -56[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Blakelock RT, Beasley SW. The clinical implications of non-idiopathic intussusception. Pediatr Surg Int1998; 14:163 -167[Medline]
  10. Carucci LR, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Laufer I, Assad S, Herlinger H. Evaluation of patients with jejunostomy tubes: imaging findings. Radiology2002; 223:241 -247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hui GC, Gerstle JT, Weinstein M, Connolly B. Small-bowel intussusception around a gastrojejunostomy tube resulting in ischemic necrosis of the intestine. Pediatr Radiol2004; 34:916 -918[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Martinez G, Israel NR, White JJ. Celiac disease presenting as entero-enteral intussusception. Pediatr Surg Int2001; 17:68 -70[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Sonmez K, Turkyilmaz Z, Demirogullari B, et al. Conservative treatment for small intestinal intussusception associated with Henoch-Schönlein's purpura. Surg Today2002; 32:1031 -1034[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Harris JP, Munden MM, Minifee PK. Sonographic diagnosis of multiple small-bowel intussusceptions in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a case report. Pediatr Radiol2002; 32:681 -683[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Navarro O, Dugougeat F, Kornecki A, et al. The impact of imaging in the management of intussusception owing to pathologic lead points in children: a review of 43 cases. Pediatr Radiol2000; 30:594 -603[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Munden, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Munden, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Munden, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Munden, R. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS