AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shih, M.-C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hagspiel, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shih, M.-C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hagspiel, K. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1168
AJR 2007; 188:462-471
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pictorial Essay

CTA and MRA in Mesenteric Ischemia: Part 2, Normal Findings and Complications After Surgical and Endovascular Treatment

Ming-Chen Paul Shih1,2, John F. Angle3, Daniel A. Leung3,4, Kenneth J. Cherry5, Nancy L. Harthun5, Alan H. Matsumoto3 and Klaus D. Hagspiel1,3

1 Division of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee St., PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
2 Present address: Department of Medical Imaging, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
3 Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA.
4 Present address: Division of Interventional Radiology, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA.
5 Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA.

Received July 6, 2005; accepted after revision December 7, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to K. D. Hagspiel (kdh2n{at}virginia.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Surgical Techniques
Complications of Surgical...
Endovascular Therapy
Complications of Endovascular...
Summary
References
 
OBJECTIVE. A number of surgical and endovascular options exist for the treatment of acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia. Both surgical and endovascular treatments necessitate close clinical and imaging follow-up because the consequences of acute occlusions can be catastrophic. MDCT angiography (CTA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) are the preferred imaging techniques in this setting.

CONCLUSION. We review the appearance of the normal and complicated surgical and endovascular treatment on CTA and MRA.

Keywords: abdominal imaging • angiography, CT • angiography, MR • gastrointestinal imaging • ischemia • mesentery • stents


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Surgical Techniques
Complications of Surgical...
Endovascular Therapy
Complications of Endovascular...
Summary
References
 
Therapeutic treatment of ischemic bowel is based on relief of causes and consequences of arterial obstruction. The type of treatment depends largely on the clinical presentation, with time being the most important factor determining viability before irreversible damage occurs to the bowel [1, 2]. In acute mesenteric ischemia, the viability of the bowel is usually in doubt, which necessitates an open surgical approach to assess for bowel infarction and to urgently revascularize the bowel. Percutaneous endovascular procedures are more appropriate in patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia [3, 4].

A number of surgical and endovascular therapeutic options exist for the treatment of patients with acute or chronic mesenteric ischemia [5-7]. Although these techniques are valuable in restoring mesenteric blood flow, they all can lead to complications and all may be subject to early or late failure. Therefore, clinical followup is mandatory, and high-quality vascular imaging is essential. MDCT angiography (CTA) and, to a lesser extent, contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) are the most suitable noninvasive techniques [8-10]. In this pictorial essay we review the normal appearance of surgical and endovascular treatments of mesenteric ischemia and their complications as seen on CTA and contrast-enhanced MRA. All scanning was performed on 4-, 8-, or 16-MDCT scanners and 1.5-T high-performance MR scanners. Image reconstruction was performed on Carestream PACS (Eastman Kodak) and Aquarius workstations (TeraRecon).


Surgical Techniques
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Surgical Techniques
Complications of Surgical...
Endovascular Therapy
Complications of Endovascular...
Summary
References
 
Embolectomy and Thrombectomy
Surgical embolectomy or thrombectomy, together with resection of nonviable bowel, is the procedure of choice for emboli and graft thromboses that cause acute mesenteric ischemia. Early postoperative studies may show residual emboli or branch occlusions. Dissections can be also seen associated with embolectomy.

Late stenoses can develop at the arteriotomy site or diffusely as a consequence of embolectomy balloon-associated intimal injury.

Endarterectomy
Endarterectomy is the surgical removal of plaque from an artery that has become narrowed or blocked, which usually occurs as a consequence of chronic atherosclerosis. The first successful treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia by superior mesenteric thromboendarterectomy was reported in 1958 [7] (Fig. 1A, 1B). It is performed when atherosclerosis of the supra- and infraceliac aorta and the ostia of the visceral arteries would make placement of bypass graft difficult [11, 12]. Endarterectomy is also performed in cases of bowel perforation and contamination of the surgical field [12].


Figure 1
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —43-year-old woman with history of Takayasu's arteritis, descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (not shown), and premature atherosclerosis. Her clinical complaint was classic triad of mesenteric ischemia. Thin-slab maximum-intensity-projection MDCT angiograms before (A) and after (B) surgery show that aortic endarterectomy was performed at distal thoracic aorta and celiac trunk (arrowhead) as well as at origin of superior mesenteric artery and paravisceral abdominal aorta through a thoracoretroperitoneal approach. Note widely patent postoperative lumen.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —43-year-old woman with history of Takayasu's arteritis, descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (not shown), and premature atherosclerosis. Her clinical complaint was classic triad of mesenteric ischemia. Thin-slab maximum-intensity-projection MDCT angiograms before (A) and after (B) surgery show that aortic endarterectomy was performed at distal thoracic aorta and celiac trunk (arrowhead) as well as at origin of superior mesenteric artery and paravisceral abdominal aorta through a thoracoretroperitoneal approach. Note widely patent postoperative lumen.

 
Bypass Placement
Bypass grafts can be antegrade from the supraceliac abdominal aorta or retrograde from the infraceliac abdominal aorta, the common iliac arteries, or previous grafts. Most vascular surgeons prefer antegrade or retrograde bypass grafts to thrombectomy or endarterectomy [11], mainly because of the shorter clamping times and greater technical ease.

Both vein grafts and synthetic grafts are used, but synthetic grafts are superior because they have better patency [4, 12] (Figs. 2 and 3A, 3B). Differentiating these bypass materials is not essential, but they have several specific characteristics. Vein grafts appear to be of relatively small caliber. Postoperative synthetic grafts should be of a uniform size.


Figure 3
View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 —56-year-old woman with claudication and intermittent abdominal pain. Postoperative volume-rendered MDCT angiogram shows aortobifemoral bypass with 14 x 7 mm PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) graft, retrograde 6-mm PTFE superior mesenteric artery bypass off aortobifemoral bypass graft (arrowhead), and inferior mesenteric artery reimplantation (arrow).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —58-year-old man who underwent placement of supraceliac bypass to superior mesenteric artery (SMA) using reversed greater saphenous vein for typical symptoms of chronic mesenteric ischemia. One year after surgery, symptoms recurred that were found to be caused by stenosis of proximal graft anastomosis and 70% stenosis in SMA just distal to graft anastomosis on catheter angiography (not shown). Patient underwent recanalization of occluded proximal native SMA and placement of balloon-expandable stent as well as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of SMA just distal to anastomosis. Stenosis in graft was not treated. MDCT angiogram immediately after intervention shows vein graft stenosis (arrowhead), stent in proximal SMA (solid arrow), and widely patent SMA after successful PTA (black arrow).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —58-year-old man who underwent placement of supraceliac bypass to superior mesenteric artery (SMA) using reversed greater saphenous vein for typical symptoms of chronic mesenteric ischemia. One year after surgery, symptoms recurred that were found to be caused by stenosis of proximal graft anastomosis and 70% stenosis in SMA just distal to graft anastomosis on catheter angiography (not shown). Patient underwent recanalization of occluded proximal native SMA and placement of balloon-expandable stent as well as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of SMA just distal to anastomosis. Stenosis in graft was not treated. Follow-up MDCT angiogram 1 year later shows that antegrade graft is now occluded, presumably because of progression of intimal hyperplasia and reduced flow caused by patent SMA.

 
A single-vessel bypass to the superior mesenteric artery is generally effective in providing symptomatic relief even in patients with multiple vessel occlusions (Fig. 3A, 3B). However, a higher incidence of graft failure and recurrence of symptoms occurs after single as opposed to multiple-vessel revascularizations [13]. If revascularization of two or more visceral branches is performed, bifurcated grafts (Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C) and jump grafts (Fig. 5A, 5B) can be used instead of several individual grafts.


Figure 6
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A —47-year-old woman with mesenteric ischemia who received supraceliac bifurcated bypass graft to celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) using 12 x 7 mm Hemashield Dacron graft (Boston Scientific). On postoperative day 2, patient complained of abdominal pain. MDCT angiography was performed and showed graft thrombosis. Sagittal multiplanar reformation shows stump of graft (arrowhead) as well as two separate areas of occlusion in SMA (arrows). Patient underwent emergent embolectomy that restored patency of bifurcated graft. Hepatic graft anastomosis was revised by inserting interposition graft.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B —47-year-old woman with mesenteric ischemia who received supraceliac bifurcated bypass graft to celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) using 12 x 7 mm Hemashield Dacron graft (Boston Scientific). On postoperative day 2, patient complained of abdominal pain. MDCT angiography was performed and showed graft thrombosis. Sagittal multiplanar reformation (B) and volume-rendered MDCT angiogram (C) show patent anastomosis and two patent limbs of Y-graft (arrowheads, C) after successful surgical revision.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C —47-year-old woman with mesenteric ischemia who received supraceliac bifurcated bypass graft to celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) using 12 x 7 mm Hemashield Dacron graft (Boston Scientific). On postoperative day 2, patient complained of abdominal pain. MDCT angiography was performed and showed graft thrombosis. Sagittal multiplanar reformation (B) and volume-rendered MDCT angiogram (C) show patent anastomosis and two patent limbs of Y-graft (arrowheads, C) after successful surgical revision.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A —63-year-old woman with history of postprandial pain, 50-lb [22.5-kg] weight loss, and aversion to food underwent MDCT angiography for assessment of mesenteric circulation. Volume-rendered CT angiogram reveals severe celiac artery stenosis as well as 4-cm-long proximal occlusion of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) (arrows). Inferior mesenteric artery was prominent and supplied SMA territory via Riolan's arch (arrowhead).

 

Figure 10
View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B —63-year-old woman with history of postprandial pain, 50-lb [22.5-kg] weight loss, and aversion to food underwent MDCT angiography for assessment of mesenteric circulation. Volume-rendered CT angiogram after surgery shows placement of supraceliac jump grafts in coronary artery and SMA using Hemashield Dacron (Boston Scientific), which resulted in complete symptomatic relief despite stenosis just distal to anastomosis with SMA (arrowhead).

 
Reimplantation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) during aortic reconstructive surgery is usually performed if there is intraoperative lack of backbleeding from the dissected IMA because that indicates inadequate collateralization (Fig. 6). Not reimplanting the IMA in these cases would put the patient at risk for mesenteric ischemia.


Figure 11
View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6 —86-year-old man who underwent placement of aortobiiliac graft and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) reimplantation (arrowhead) for aneurysmal disease of aorta with insufficient intraoperative backbleeding from IMA. Note right internal iliac artery aneurysm (arrow).

 
Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome
The treatment of medial arcuate ligament syndrome is surgical and consists of release of the ligament with or without placement of a bypass (Fig. 7). Endovascular therapies have proven to be ineffective because stents are crushed by the ligament [14].


Figure 12
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7 —45-year-old woman with median arcuate ligament syndrome who underwent surgical median arcuate ligament release with antegrade celiac artery bypass. Patient developed stenosis at proximal anastomosis (arrowhead) that was subsequently treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

 

Complications of Surgical Therapy
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Surgical Techniques
Complications of Surgical...
Endovascular Therapy
Complications of Endovascular...
Summary
References
 
Kinking
Antegrade bypasses are less prone to kinking and compression than retrograde ones, but antegrade bypasses have been associated with renal ischemia because of the need for suprarenal aortic clamping. Retrograde bypasses from the infrarenal abdominal aorta or iliac artery are technically easier and avoid renal ischemia, but they are more prone to reduced inflow and graft kinking [7, 11].

Intimal Hyperplasia
All bypasses are prone to develop stenoses due to intimal hyperplasia, especially at the anastomotic sites. Stenosis usually develops within the first 3-6 months after surgery. Advanced stages of intimal hyperplasia can ultimately lead to graft thrombosis [7, 11] (Figs. 3A, 3B, 8, and 9).


Figure 13
View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8 —66-year-old man who underwent placement of aortobiiliac graft and retrograde graft to superior mesenteric artery (SMA). He presents with acute onset of abdominal pain. Sagittal multiplanar reformatted MDCT angiogram shows occlusion of retrograde graft close to anastomosis caused by acute thrombus (arrow). Anastomotic stenosis was identified at surgery as underlying culprit lesion.

 

Figure 14
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9 —26-year-old woman with Takayasu's arteritis who underwent placement of extraanatomic aortic bypass for abdominal aortic occlusion (solid arrow). Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is supplied by graft off left iliac artery (arrowheads), and right and left kidneys, via graft from supraceliac aorta and extraanatomic aortic graft, respectively. Note old thrombosed graft off right common iliac artery that previously supplied SMA and celiac artery (open arrows).

 
Early Graft Occlusion
Graft occlusion in the immediate postoperative period is almost always due to technical or surgical problems such as kinking, twisting, or inadequate anastomoses [7] (Fig. 4A, 4B). Hypercoagulable states are occasionally responsible, with no identifiable underlying anatomic cause. Surgical revision is almost always indicated in all cases of early graft occlusion. Early and late graft occlusion can be catastrophic events resulting in bowel necrosis.

CT can show bowel-wall thickening and pneumatosis [8]. Both CTA and contrast-enhanced MRA are excellent for visualizing grafts and graft anastomoses. Rarely, surgical clips cause streak artifact on CT or signal void on MRI that reduce the diagnostic usefulness of these studies. Graft thrombosis and occlusion can be reliably diagnosed [8, 10] (Figs. 8 and 9).

Reperfusion Syndrome
Both surgical and endovascular revascularization can result in massive hyperemia of the bowel and visceral organs, resulting in severe complications such as pancreatitis, liver failure with ascites, and food intolerance [15]. CTA shows massive hyperemia of the bowel and the abdominal organs (Fig. 10A, 10B, 10C).


Figure 15
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10A —64-year-old woman with severe postprandial abdominal pain and weight loss who underwent successful recanalization with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery (SMA), resulting in temporary reperfusion syndrome with ascites and pancreatitis. Abdominal aortogram shows total occlusion of celiac trunk, SMA, and inferior mesenteric artery at their ostia ("bald aorta").

 

Figure 16
View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10B —64-year-old woman with severe postprandial abdominal pain and weight loss who underwent successful recanalization with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery (SMA), resulting in temporary reperfusion syndrome with ascites and pancreatitis. Coronal subvolume maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) MDCT angiogram after endovascular revascularization shows massive mesenteric hyperemia as evidenced by strong portal venous enhancement in this arterial phase scan.

 

Figure 17
View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10C —64-year-old woman with severe postprandial abdominal pain and weight loss who underwent successful recanalization with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery (SMA), resulting in temporary reperfusion syndrome with ascites and pancreatitis. Subvolume MIP of same MDCT angiogram shows ascites (arrowhead) and enlarged pancreatic vessels (arrow). Liver function abnormalities, pancreatitis, abdominal pain, and inability to tolerate food normalized after 5 days, and patient was discharged with no symptoms.

 

Endovascular Therapy
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Surgical Techniques
Complications of Surgical...
Endovascular Therapy
Complications of Endovascular...
Summary
References
 
Endovascular techniques, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, angioplasty, stenting, and endoluminal stent-graft placement, are important therapeutic options for the treatment of mesenteric ischemia.

Thrombolysis and Embolectomy
Thrombi and emboli can be effectively treated with either pharmacologic or mechanical thrombectomy [14].

Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
The first percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the mesenteric circulation was performed in 1980 [16]. Since then, PTA of the superior mesenteric artery, the IMA, and the celiac trunk has been reported in many patients. Both CTA and contrast-enhanced MRA allow visualization of vessel patency after PTA. Possible complications are vessel occlusion, emboli, dissection, and rupture [14].

Stent Placement
Stents are generally used in cases of PTA failure, and they are particularly suitable for ostial lesions (Fig. 11A, 11B). Their use results in higher technical and clinical success rates than PTA alone. Their patency appears also to be superior to PTA in the long term, with one group reporting a primary patency rate of 74% at 18 months and an assisted patency rate of 83% at 3 years [5] (Figs. 11A, 11B, 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 14A, 14B, 15A, 15B). Only CTA can be used for follow-up of stents because stent-induced artifacts preclude assessment of stent patency on contrast-enhanced MRA [17] (Figs. 10A, 10B, 10C, 11A, 11B, 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 14A, 14B).


Figure 18
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11A —70-year-old woman with history of hypercholesterolemia and bilateral renal stents presents with intermittent abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea. Catheter angiography showed ostial 90% celiac artery stenosis with pressure gradient greater than 60 mm Hg that was successfully treated with balloon-expandable stent dilated to 7 mm. Control angiogram immediately after stent placement shows widely patent proximal celiac artery.

 

Figure 19
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11B —70-year-old woman with history of hypercholesterolemia and bilateral renal stents presents with intermittent abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea. Catheter angiography showed ostial 90% celiac artery stenosis with pressure gradient greater than 60 mm Hg that was successfully treated with balloon-expandable stent dilated to 7 mm. Multiplanar reformation of MDCT angiogram obtained day after intervention also shows widely patent stent.

 

Figure 20
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12A —81-year-old woman with occlusion of celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) as well as high-grade inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) stenosis who underwent treatment with placement of two balloon-expandable stents in IMA. Curved multiplanar reformation of MDCT angiogram after revascularization shows widely patent stent lumen.

 

Figure 21
View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12B —81-year-old woman with occlusion of celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) as well as high-grade inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) stenosis who underwent treatment with placement of two balloon-expandable stents in IMA. Volume-rendered image shows IMA stent (arrowhead) and reconstitution of SMA and celiac trunk via Riolan's arch and pancreaticoduodenal arcades, respectively.

 

Figure 22
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 13A —56-year-old man with calcified high-grade ostial superior mesenteric artery stenosis who was treated with balloon-expandable stent. Angiogram after completion of stent placement shows mild stenosis at inferior stent border due to noncompressible plaque (arrowhead).

 

Figure 23
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 13B —56-year-old man with calcified high-grade ostial superior mesenteric artery stenosis who was treated with balloon-expandable stent. Curved multiplanar reformation of MDCT angiogram shows heavily calcified plaque causing incomplete stent expansion (arrowhead).

 

Figure 24
View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 14A —76-year-old woman who presented with persistent nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea of approximately 2 months' duration. Catheter angiogram reveals 90% stenosis of superior mesenteric artery (SMA), large calcified plaque at its ostium, and 50% celiac artery stenosis. After successful stenting of SMA origin, patient experienced almost immediate symptomatic relief from her abdominal pain.

 

Figure 25
View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 14B —76-year-old woman who presented with persistent nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea of approximately 2 months' duration. Follow-up MDCT angiogram shows widely patent stent. Nonocclusive protrusion of calcified aortic plaque was present proximal to stent but could not be seen on angiographic films.

 

Figure 26
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 15A —83-year-old woman with chronic occlusion of celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and high-grade stenosis of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) who underwent treatment with placement of balloon-expandable stent in IMA (not shown). Preprocedure-rendered MDCT angiogram shows IMA (arrowhead) and reconstitution of SMA and celiac trunk via Riolan's arch and pancreaticoduodenal arcades, respectively. Patient did well after discharge but presented 4 months later in emergency department with acute abdomen.

 

Figure 27
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 15B —83-year-old woman with chronic occlusion of celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and high-grade stenosis of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) who underwent treatment with placement of balloon-expandable stent in IMA (not shown). Emergent MDCT angiogram showed occluded IMA stent (not shown) as well as complete bowel necrosis as evidenced by extensive pneumatosis. Patient subsequently died.

 
Although recurrent symptoms have a slightly higher incidence after interventional radiologic treatment [6] than after open surgery, the former has gained wide popularity, especially in high-risk patients. Interventional treatment has also been used to minimize the recurrence of symptoms and organ infarction after graft failure [7] (Fig. 3A, 3B).

Aortic Dissection
Endovascular techniques attempt to restore flow to the true lumen with aortic stent-grafts and to the viscera via stenting of the visceral vessels or fenestration of the dissection membrane. Surgical options include aortic repair and fenestration. The choice of surgical versus endovascular techniques depends on the type of dissection, the degree of branch vessel obstruction, individual anatomy, and preexisting morbidities [14, 18].


Complications of Endovascular Treatment
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Surgical Techniques
Complications of Surgical...
Endovascular Therapy
Complications of Endovascular...
Summary
References
 
Intimal Hyperplasia and Restenosis
Percutaneous interventions can trigger inflammatory reactions leading to the development of intimal hyperplasia (Fig. 13A, 13B). This reaction is even more prominent in atheromatous plaques in which inflammatory cells have already been activated and in stents (Figs. 15A, 15B and 16A, 16B). Untreated restenosis ultimately leads to thrombosis and occlusion [19] (Fig. 17). CTA shows intimal hyperplasia as hypodense tissue on the inner stent surface.


Figure 28
View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 16A —64-year-old man 16 months after placement of balloon-expandable stent in superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Catheter arteriogram shows significant intimal hyperplasia (arrowhead).

 

Figure 29
View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 16B —64-year-old man 16 months after placement of balloon-expandable stent in superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Curved multiplanar reformation of MDCT angiogram also shows hypodense intimal hyperplastic tissue in stent (arrowhead).

 

Figure 30
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 17 —64-year-old woman 3 years after placement of balloon-expandable stent in superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Curved multiplanar reformation of MDCT angiogram shows stent fracture (arrowhead) and preserved stent patency in this asymptomatic patient.

 
Stent Fracture and Migration
In our experience, migration of a stent is usually a complication that occurs during placement, whereas stent fracture is an unusual late-term complication of endovascular treatment. Both can be readily detected on CTA (Figs. 17 and 18A, 18B).


Figure 31
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 18A —60-year-old man who underwent stenting of ostial celiac artery stenosis that was complicated by migration of stent due to undersizing. Catheter angiogram shows stent free-floating in celiac artery (arrowhead). Stent was then deployed more distally with larger balloon but was not covering ostial lesion. A second stent was therefore placed in ostium.

 

Figure 32
View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 18B —60-year-old man who underwent stenting of ostial celiac artery stenosis that was complicated by migration of stent due to undersizing. Volume-rendered MDCT angiogram shows two stents (arrowheads).

 

Summary
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Surgical Techniques
Complications of Surgical...
Endovascular Therapy
Complications of Endovascular...
Summary
References
 
Mesenteric ischemia is a life-threatening entity. Even after successful open or percutaneous therapy, symptoms can recur. Sudden graft failure carries a high mortality rate. CTA is a technique that is well suited for assessing the normal and complicated appearances after mesenteric ischemia treatment. In our opinion, the ability to visualize the lumen of metallic stents, the higher spatial resolution, and the much faster acquisition times on modern MDCT scanners make CTA superior to contrast-enhanced MRA in this setting. Aggressive therapy improves survival but requires imaging surveillance to detect complications early. Knowledge of the normal and abnormal appearances after mesenteric ischemia therapy is mandatory for the radiologist involved in the care of these patients.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Surgical Techniques
Complications of Surgical...
Endovascular Therapy
Complications of Endovascular...
Summary
References
 

  1. English WP, Pearce JD, Craven TE, et al. Chronic visceral ischemia: symptom-free survival after open surgical repair. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2004; 38:493 -503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Merle C, Lepouse C, De Garine A, et al. Surgery for mesenteric infarction: prognostic factors associated with early death within 72 hours. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004;18 : 734-741[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. van Bockel JH, Geelkerken RH, Wasser MN. Chronic splanchnic ischaemia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol2001; 15:99 -119[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Mansour MA. Management of acute mesenteric ischemia. Arch Surg 1999;134 : 328-330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Sheeran SR, Murphy TP, Khwaja A, Sussman SK, Hallisey MJ. Stent placement for treatment of mesenteric artery stenoses or occlusions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999;10 : 861-867[Medline]
  6. Kasirajan K, O'Hara PJ, Gray BH, et al. Chronic mesenteric ischemia: open surgery versus percutaneous angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 2001;33 : 63-71[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Shanley CJ, Ozaki CK, Zelenock GB. Bypass grafting for chronic mesenteric ischemia. Surg Clin North Am1997; 77:381 -395[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Wildermuth S, Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Marinecek B. Multislice CT in the pre- and postinterventional evaluation of mesenteric perfusion. Eur Radiol 2005;15 : 1203-1210[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Chow LC, Chan FP, Li KC. A comprehensive approach to MR imaging of mesenteric ischemia. Abdom Imaging 2002;27 : 507-516[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Hagspiel KD, Leung DA, Angle JF, et al. MR angiography of the mesenteric vasculature. Radiol Clin North Am2002; 40:867 -886[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Mateo RB, O'Hara PJ, Hertzer NR, Mascha EJ, Beven EG, Krajewski LP. Elective surgical treatment of symptomatic chronic mesenteric occlusive disease: early results and late outcomes. J Vasc Surg1999; 29:821 -831[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Park WM, Cherry KJ, Chua HK, et al. Current results of open revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia: a standard for comparison. J Vasc Surg 2002;35 : 853-859[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. McAfee MK, Cherry KJ, Naessens JM, et al. Influence of complete revascularization on chronic mesenteric ischemia. Am J Surg 1992; 164:220 -224[Medline]
  14. Hagspiel KD, Angle JF, Spinosa DJ, Matsumoto AH. Mesenteric ischemia: angiography and endovascular interventions. In: Long W, Peterson GJ, Jacobs DL, eds. Intestinal ischemia disorders: pathophysiology and management. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing,1999 : 105-154
  15. Cerqueira NF, Hussni CA, Yoshida WB. Pathophysiology of mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion: a review. Acta Cir Bras2005; 20:336 -343[Medline]
  16. Furrer J, Gruntzig A, Kugelmeier J, Goebel N. Treatment of abdominal angina with percutaneous dilatation of an arteria mesenterica superior stenosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol1980; 3:43 -44[Medline]
  17. Hagspiel KD, Leung DA, Nandalur KR, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 T after implantation of platinum stents: in vitro and in vivo comparison with conventional stent designs. AJR2005; 184:288 -294[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Williams DM, Lee DY, Hamilton BH, et al. The dissected aorta: percutaneous treatment of ischemic complications—principles and results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997;8 : 605-625[Medline]
  19. Karas SP, Gravanis MB, Santoian EC, Robinson KA, Anderberg KA, King SB 3rd. Coronary intimal proliferation after balloon injury and stenting in swine: an animal model of restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20:467 -474[Abstract]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. P. Forman
Back to the Beginning
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 295 - 296.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shih, M.-C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hagspiel, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shih, M.-C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hagspiel, K. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS