AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagaoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sata, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nagaoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sata, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0693
AJR 2007; 188:652-658
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Observations

Temporary Indwelling Catheter System via the Left Brachial Artery: Evaluation in 83 Patients with Hepatic Tumors

Sakae Nagaoka1, Satoshi Itano, Hiroaki Nagamatsu, Junji Akiyoshi, Junichi Kurogi, Nobuyoshi Tajiri, Masahiko Kajiwara and Michio Sata

1 All authors: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Asahimachi 67, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.

Received April 28, 2005; accepted after revision September 27, 2005.

 
Address correspondence to S. Nagaoka (sakae-nagaoka{at}syd.odn.ne.jp).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate retrospectively the usefulness and complications associated with a temporary indwelling catheter system through the brachial artery for patients with liver tumors.

CONCLUSION. The temporary indwelling catheter system via the left brachial artery can be used not only for CO2-enhanced sonographically guided aspiration biopsy, radiofrequency ablation, and percutaneous ethanol injection, but also for short-term hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

Keywords: catheters • interventional radiology • hepatocellular carcinoma • liver • port-catheter system • CO2-enhanced sonography


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Recent advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including transplantation, surgical resection, percutaneous ethanol injection therapy, and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, have led to an improved prognosis for patients with HCC [1-3]. However, the long-term prognosis remains unsatisfactory because of a high incidence of intrahepatic recurrence, and additional treatments are often required. The implanted port-catheter system is accepted for use in hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic liver tumors, and it has been recently shown to be effective in patients with advanced HCC and portal vein thrombosis [4].

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy involves the placement of a transbrachial angiographic catheter and the use of an implanted port-catheter system, but the use of such a system is associated with serious complications [5-10]. Recently, the percutaneous femoral or left subclavian approach has been used as a common access route [11, 12] because the use of the axillary or brachial artery is associated with a high frequency of catheter dislocation (2-44%) [13]. In our study, we used a new catheter that we refer to as a temporary indwelling catheter system via the left brachial artery, which is kept outside the skin and does not require subcutaneous implantation. To our knowledge, ours is the first report of such a procedure. The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of the temporary indwelling catheter system and related complications in patients with HCC and other liver tumors.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
From September 2001 to November 2003, the temporary indwelling catheter system was used for the delivery of treatment or sonographically guided tumor aspiration biopsy in 83 patients with HCC or other liver tumors. The indications for a temporary indwelling catheter system were as follow: obtaining tumor biopsy or delivery of percutaneous ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation therapy under CO2-enhanced sonographic guidance and treatment by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of patients with otherwise unresectable liver tumors. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients, and the institutional review board of our hospital approved the study.

The diagnosis of HCC was made by a combination of sonography, CT, MRI, digital subtraction angiography, and tumor aspiration biopsy. Patients with HCCs smaller than 3 cm in diameter and with fewer than four tumor masses were treated with percutaneous ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation. When viable portions of the primary tumor or recurrent tumors could not be detected using conventional sonographic biopsy, CO2-enhanced sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy was performed before treatment with percutaneous ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation. For patients with HCCs larger than 3 cm in diameter or with more than five tumor masses, the temporary indwelling catheter system was used for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy or chemoembolization.

Patient Characteristics
Disease was staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging criteria. Five patients were stage I; 40, were stage II; 30 were stage III A, B, and C; and four were stage IV. Four patients did not have HCC. Catheterization was successful in all patients. The ages of the patients ranged from 38 to 85 years (median age, 64.7 years); 55 patients were men and 28 were women. Of the 83 patients, 10 (12.0%) were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive, 67 (80.7%) were positive for antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), and six (7.2%) were negative for both HBsAg and anti-HCV. Using the Child-Pugh risk grouping ranked by the criteria of Pugh et al. [14], 54 patients (65.0%) were Child A, 25 (30.1%) were Child B, and four (4.8%) were Child C. Fifteen patients had diabetes mellitus, 23 had hypertension, three had atrial fibrillation, and one patient had a history of lacunar infarction.


Figure 1
View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —64-year-old woman with hepatocellular carcinoma. Celiac arteriogram shows standard hepatic artery anatomy.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —64-year-old woman with hepatocellular carcinoma. Arteriogram obtained through temporary indwelling catheter system via left brachial artery shows catheter tip located in left hepatic artery and side holes located in proper hepatic artery. Note that right gastric artery (arrow) is embolized with microcoils.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 —Photograph shows inserted part of catheter placed with silk thread in left brachial artery.

 
Technique
After the administration of a local anesthetic, the left brachial artery was punctured with a 22-gauge needle, using the Seldinger technique, and we then placed a J-shaped 4-French catheter (Angiographic Catheter HIRAI, Medikit) through a 4-French introducer sheath (Slit Super Sheath, Medikit). A combination of 1,000 U of heparin and 0.025-0.05 mL of nitroglycerin in 4 mL of saline was injected into the artery through the sheath. The angiographic catheter was advanced into the target artery under fluoroscopic guidance, and visceral arteriography was performed to assess any variant arterial supply.

In patients who underwent hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, the right gastric artery or the accessory left gastric artery was embolized using microcoils (Diamond Coil, Boston Scientific; Trufill, Cordis; or Hilal Embolization Microcoils, Cook Europe). A polyurethane-covered catheter (Anthron P-U Catheter, Toray Medical) with a tapered tip (5- and 3.3-French outer diameters of the shaft and tip, respectively; and 0.040- and 0.032-inch inner diameters of the shaft and tip, respectively) was used as the indwelling catheter. This catheter was tapered to 3.3-French for 60 cm from the tip. A 100-cm-long catheter was used in all patients

Catheterization was performed as follows: First, before catheterization, one or two side holes were manually made with a surgical knife. A 0.025-inch guidewire (Tranvas, Kaneka) was re-shaped into a mild J curve 8 cm from the tip. Second, the guidewire was inserted into the catheter and the catheter was advanced into the iliac artery; then the 4-French catheter and the 4-French introducer were removed. Third, the indwelling catheter was advanced distal to the thoracic aorta. After the tip of guidewire was withdrawn to the celiac artery, the guidewire was twisted clockwise and its tip inserted into the target artery (e.g., the right hepatic artery, left hepatic artery, proper hepatic artery or gastroduodenal artery) via the celiac artery. Next, the catheter was advanced into the target artery and the position of the side hole was adjusted to the target artery. The guidewire was then withdrawn. Figure 1A, 1B shows an arteriogram performed using the temporary indwelling catheter system inserted via the left brachial artery. Fourth, at the left brachial artery, the inserted part of the catheter was held in place with a silk thread (Fig. 2) and an adaptor cap (RV 100, Toray Medical) was connected to the catheter. The injection part of the cap was made of latex rubber. The redundant distal part of the catheter was not cut off. To avoid occlusion of the catheter, 2,000 U of heparin sodium was injected into the catheter after it had been used. When the catheter was not used for more than 3 days, 2,000 units of heparin was injected into the catheter every other day.

Removal of the Temporary Indwelling Catheter System
After the administration of local anesthetic, the catheter was removed under fluoroscopic guidance. To avoid embolism or embolization, we cleared away any adhesions around the side holes and the tip of the catheter by inserting a 0.025-inch guidewire and injecting 5-10 mL of saline.

Examination and Treatment Using the Temporary Indwelling Catheter System
Aspiration biopsy, percutaneous ethanol injection, and radiofrequency ablation—The temporary indwelling catheter system with CO2 enhancement was used to detect HCCs that were difficult to detect with conventional sonography. A bolus injection of CO2 (2-6 mL) was administered through the temporary indwelling catheter system into the hepatic artery. A gray-scale sonography scanner was used to monitor the flow of CO2 and to view the enhanced image of the liver tumor. The CO2 remained in the tumor for 12-15 minutes, which was long enough to insert a needle to perform aspiration biopsy, percutaneous ethanol injection, or radiofrequency ablation. Each tumor required performance of percutaneous ethanol injection two to six times with CO2-enhanced sonographic guidance.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy—One course of chemotherapy consisted of the daily administration of cisplatin (10 mg for 30 minutes on days 1-5) and the subsequent infusion of 5-fluorouracil (250 mg for 3 hours on days 1-5). Days 6 and 7 were rest days. On days 1 and 16 only, 20 mg of cisplatin was administered. When two or three courses of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy had reduced the number of small HCC nodules and facilitated the performance of selective transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, that procedure was performed, after which the temporary indwelling catheter system was removed. In patients who did not respond to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, port-catheter systems were implanted through the left brachial artery because of the requirement for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy treatment as outpatients.

For patients who underwent hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, the catheter days using the temporary indwelling catheter system (i.e., the device service interval) was defined as the period from catheterization to removal or port-catheter implantation. When a new catheter was implanted, the proximal end of the indwelling catheter was connected to a port (P-U Celsite Port Brachial, Toray Medical). A brachial pocket was formed where the port reservoir was to be placed. Outpatients were treated with cisplatin (20 mg for 30 minutes) and 5-fluorouracil (250 mg for 2 hours) biweekly.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using temporary indwelling catheter system—Lobar chemoembolization using the temporary indwelling catheter system was performed four times over a period of 2 weeks. An emulsion of epirubicin (20-30 mg per person) and Lipiodol (iodized oil, Guerbet) (2-4 mL) was administered into the feeding artery under fluoroscopic guidance. Finally, for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, after removal of the temporary indwelling catheter system, we placed a 4-French catheter through a 4-French introducer sheath and used a coaxial catheter to embolize the supply artery of the tumor with the epirubicin-Lipiodol emulsion and a gelatin sponge. The dose of epirubicin was determined on the basis of the remaining hepatic function, whereas the dose of Lipiodol was determined on the basis of the location and size of the tumor.

Complications Associated with Temporary Indwelling Catheter System
The frequency of complications associated with the temporary indwelling catheter system, such as hematoma, bleeding, hepatic artery occlusion, dislocation of the catheter, infection, and thrombosis, was reported. Hematoma was defined as a left brachial induration with a palpable liquid collection of more than 2 cm in diameter around the device. Un-controllable bleeding was defined as bleeding that could not be stopped by manual pressure for more than 10 minutes. Brachial artery thrombosis was diagnosed by the absence of a radial pulse in a routine check every morning and evening.

Dislocation of the catheter was detected as follows: For patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, digital subtraction angiography was performed within 3 days after the procedure and within 14 days through the temporary indwelling catheter system to visualize other organs; this allowed detection of catheter displacement. For patients injected with CO2, digital subtraction angiography confirmed catheter displacement when the distribution of CO2 over the whole liver could not be detected. For patients treated by chemoembolization, the position of the catheter was confirmed under fluoroscopic guidance before every treatment.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Diagnosis and Treatment
Temporary indwelling catheter system for CO2-enhanced sonography—In 10 patients, the temporary indwelling catheter system was used for CO2-enhanced sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Based on histopathologic examination, six of the 10 patients were found to have HCC and three patients, to have a dysplastic nodule. In the remaining patients, no tumor was detected on CO2-enhanced sonography. Ninety-six tumors in 39 patients were treated with CO2-enhanced sonographically guided percutaneous ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation. Of these, 64 tumors in 27 patients were treated with radiofrequency ablation only, 11 tumors in six patients were treated with percutaneous ethanol injection only, and 21 tumors in six patients were treated with a combination of radiofrequency ablation and percutaneous ethanol injection. On average, radiofrequency ablation was performed 2.8 times, percutaneous ethanol injection 3.5 times, and radiofrequency ablation-percutaneous ethanol injection combination procedures 3.3 times and 5.1 times, respectively.

Temporary indwelling catheter system for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization— Thirty patients were treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. In 15 of these patients, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was performed after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy followed by removal of the temporary indwelling catheter system. In these patients, short-term hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy reduced the number of small HCC nodules and facilitated the performance of selective transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. In the other 15 patients, who showed no improvement after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, the port-catheter systems were implanted through the left brachial artery, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy was provided on an outpatient basis. For implantation, new catheters were used. Seven of these 15 patients required replacement of the artery (Figs. 3A and 3B), and an alternative port-catheter system was implanted in these seven patients through the femoral artery (Figs. 3C and 3D).


Figure 4
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —69-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Arteriogram shows replaced right hepatic artery arising from superior mesenteric artery.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —69-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Arteriogram obtained through temporary indwelling catheter system via left brachial artery shows catheter tip and side holes located in right hepatic artery from superior mesenteric artery.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C —69-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Transfemoral arteriogram shows left hepatic artery.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D —69-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Arteriogram through transfemoral indwelling catheter obtained immediately after catheter placement shows that metallic coils were inserted into gastroduodenal artery through microcatheter to occlude gastroduodenal artery. Indwelling catheter tip was fixed in gastroduodenal artery.

 
Four patients were treated with lobar chemoembolization using the temporary indwelling catheter system, and segmental transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was performed as the last treatment.

Number of Catheter Days
All catheterization procedures were performed using interventional radiology, and no interventional complications occurred. The mean time for the procedure was 51 minutes (range, 15-210 minutes). The catheter tip was placed into the right hepatic artery (27 patients), the left hepatic artery (19 patients), the middle hepatic artery (two patients), the proper hepatic artery (10 patients), the gastroduodenal artery (21 patients), the common hepatic artery (two patients), the inferior phrenic artery (one patient), and one additional artery (one patient).

In one patient with occlusion of the celiac axis, the tip of the catheter was placed at the gastroduodenal artery through the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery from the superior mesenteric artery (Fig. 4A, 4B). The number of catheter days associated with various therapies is shown in Table 1. For all patients, the number of catheter days was 18.6 days (range, 1-43 days). For aspiration biopsy, the number of catheter days was 7.2 days (range, 1-18 days). The catheter was removed after the pathologic diagnosis was established.


Figure 8
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A —56-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Superior mesenteric arteriogram shows collateral circulation in celiac axis occlusion. Note enlargement of pancreatic arcade (large arrow) and dorsal pancreatic (arrowhead) arteries, which provided collateral flow to hepatic (small arrow) and splenic arteries.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B —56-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Arteriogram obtained through temporary indwelling catheter system via left brachial artery shows catheter tip and side holes located in gastroduodenal artery through postpancreatic arcade from superior mesenteric artery.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Purpose and Number of Catheter Days of the Temporary Indwelling Catheter System via the Left Brachial Artery

 

A second CO2-enhanced sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy was required for diagnosis in one patient. In one patient, no tumor staining was detected, and CO2-enhanced sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy could not be performed. The day after the procedure, the temporary indwelling catheter system was removed from this patient.

In eight patients, the catheter was removed within 10 days after the procedure. For patients treated with CO2-enhanced sonographically guided percutaneous ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation, the number of catheter days was 20.4 days (range, 1-43 days), whereas for patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and chemoembolization, the number of catheter days was 21.1 days (range, 4-42 days) and 18.6 days (range, 14-25 days), respectively. For patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, the number of catheter days was the time from catheterization to removal of the temporary indwelling catheter system or implantation of the port-catheter system.

Complications Associated with Catheterization
Complications occurred in eight patients (9.6%). These included bleeding in two cases (2.4%), hematoma formation in two patients (2.4%), occlusion of the catheter in one patient (1.2%), stenosis of the proper hepatic artery in one patient (1.2%), and dislocation of the catheter in one patient (1.2%); infection was suspected in one patient (1.2%). In the two patients who experienced bleeding, hemostasis was achieved by compression and suturing of the skin. In patients with bleeding or hematoma, transfusion or surgical evacuation was not needed. Occlusion of the catheter was due to the lack of heparin injection for 4 days; the catheter was removed and the temporary indwelling catheter system was reinserted. None of the patients developed brachial artery thrombosis, a transient ischemic attack, or cerebral infarction.

In the patient who developed stenosis of the proper hepatic artery, ERCP revealed invasion of the common bile duct by HCC and hemobilia. It was unclear whether stenosis of the proper hepatic artery was due to encasement or injury. In the patient with a displaced catheter, although the side holes were dislocated into the gastroduodenal artery, repositioning into the common hepatic artery was possible by withdrawing the catheter. In the patient in whom infection was suspected, tenderness in the left brachial artery to the axillary artery appeared after 4 days of catheterization. In this patient, the tenderness improved soon after removal of the catheter at 6 days after insertion.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Our results showed that the temporary indwelling catheter system facilitated various treatments and procedures, including repeated CO2-guided percutaneous ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation, aspiration biopsy, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, within 3-4 weeks. Previous studies have shown that percutaneous ethanol injection guided by CO2-enhanced sonography is useful [15, 16] because CO2 sonography enhances the detection of residual viable lesions and small new HCC lesions that cannot be otherwise detected on conventional sonography [17]. When the angiographic catheter remains in place after insertion through the femoral artery, patient activity is sometimes restricted. In such cases, the catheter position cannot be maintained for long enough periods to allow performance of several sessions of CO2-guided percutaneous ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation.

However, insertion of the temporary indwelling catheter system via the left brachial artery minimizes the limitations on patients, and several sessions of CO2-guided percutaneous ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation can be performed. Furthermore, conventional port-catheter systems require implantation and removal of the port, even for short-term treatments. Such procedures are unnecessary with the temporary indwelling catheter system, which therefore lessens the physical burden on patients.

The use of 3.3-French long tapered catheters has several advantages. Such catheters can be advanced to a distal artery, and a long tapered catheter makes it possible to catheterize a replaced artery from the left brachial artery in hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. Hepatic arteries show various variations, and the ratio of a replaced right hepatic artery and accessory right hepatic artery from the superior mesenteric artery can be 5-15%, and that of a replaced left hepatic artery and accessory left hepatic artery from the left gastric artery is 11.5-23% [18]. Indeed, 23% of patients who were treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy had a replaced artery: In 20% of patients, the replacement was of a right hepatic artery from the superior mesenteric artery, and in 3% of patients, it involved a left hepatic artery from the left gastric artery.

In comparing the complications reported in the studies listed in Table 2, we note that several authors have reported a high rate of complications with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy performed through transbrachial angiographic catheter placement (not implanted) [5-10]—complications such as dislocation, hepatic artery stenosis, and hepatic artery thrombosis. It is possible that the long tapered catheter that we used decreased occlusion of hepatic arteries and decreased distal catheter dislocation, thereby stabilizing the system [19]. In our study, the most common complication (4.8%) was bleeding and formation of hematomas. Compared with other studies, the rate of bleeding and hematomas was relatively low, and four patients with complications of bleeding or hematoma were classified as Child class C.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Complications of Catheter Placement via Left Brachial Artery in Various Studies

 

In comparing the present study with previous studies, we recognize some concerns with our approach. First, few studies have reported complications of an implanted port-catheter system. Dislocation of the catheter, thrombosis, and cerebral infarction may be related to the duration of implantation or catheterization. Second, the sample size was small and had a potential bias in patient selection; 92.3% of patients had chronic liver disease. For use in the implanted port-catheter system, the safety and usefulness of our long tapered catheter should be evaluated further. However, major complications were not detected in patients treated using the temporary indwelling catheter system or in 15 patients implanted with port-catheter systems based on our catheter.

The advantages of prophylactic hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for metastatic liver tumor from a primary colorectal cancer using the port-catheter system have been reported, including the regional arterial infusion of a protease inhibitor and antibiotics for severe pancreatitis and the hepatic arterial infusion of antibiotics or amphotericin B for multiple liver abscess [20, 21]. Hence, the temporary indwelling catheter system may be appropriate for short-term catheter-based treatment, not only for patients with liver tumor but also for patients with benign diseases such as liver abscess and pancreatitis.

In conclusion, compared with other catheter systems, the temporary indwelling catheter system is convenient and its use is associated with a reduced incidence of catheter dislocation, hepatic artery stenosis, and thrombosis, suggesting that various therapies for both liver tumors and other diseases will be facilitated by this system.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 1996;334 : 693-699[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Arii S, Yamaoka Y, Futagawa S, et al. Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Hepatology 2000;32 : 1224-1229[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Llovet JM, Real MI, Montana X, et al. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 359:1734 -1739[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Sumie S, Yamashita F, Ando E, et al. Interventional radiology for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transcatheter arterial Lipiodol chemoembolization. AJR 2003; 181:1327 -1334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ansfield FJ, Ramirez G, Skibba JL, Bryan GT, Davis HL, Wirtanen GW. Intrahepatic arterial infusion with 5-fluorouracil. Cancer 1971; 28:1147 -1151[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Ansfield FJ, Ramirez G, Davis HL, et al. Further clinical studies with intrahepatic arterial infusion with 5-fluorouracil. Cancer 1975; 36:2413 -2417[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Clouse ME, Ahmed R, Ryan RB, Oberfield RA, McCaffrey JA. Complication of long term transbrachial hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. AJR 1977;129 : 799-803[Abstract]
  8. Oberfield RA, McCaffrey JA, Polio BS, Clouse ME, Hamilton T. Prolonged and continuous percutaneous intra-arterial hepatic infusion chemotherapy in advanced metastatic liver adenocarcinoma from colorectal primary cancer. Cancer 1979;44 : 414-423[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Cho KJ, Andrews JC, Williams DM, Doenz F, Guy GE. Hepatic arterial chemotherapy: role of angiography. Radiology1989; 173:783 -791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Habbe TG, McCowan TC, Goertzen TC, Leveen RF, Culp WC, Tempero MA. Complications and technical limitations of hepatic arterial infusion catheter placement for chemotherapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol1998; 9:233 -239[Medline]
  11. Herrmann KA, Waggershauser T, Sittek H, Reiser MF. Liver intraarterial chemotherapy: use of the femoral artery for percutaneous implantation of catheter-port systems. Radiology2000; 215:294 -299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Tanaka T, Arai Y, Inaba Y, et al. Radiologic placement of a side-hole catheter with tip fixation for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14 : 63-68[Medline]
  13. Venturini M, Angeli E, Salvioni M, et al. Complications after percutaneous transaxillary implantation of a catheter for intraarterial chemotherapy of liver tumors: clinical relevance and management in 204 patients. AJR 2004;182 : 1417-1426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the esophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973; 60:646 -649[Medline]
  15. Chen RC, Liao LY, Wang CS, et al. Carbon dioxide-enhanced sonographically guided percutaneous ethanol injection: treatment of patients with viable and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR 2003; 181:1647 -1652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Numata K, Tanaka K, Kiba T, et al. Nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma improved by percutaneous ethanol injection therapy guided by CO2-enhanced sonography. AJR2001; 177:789 -798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kudo M, Tomita S, Tochio H, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis with US angiography with intraarterial CO2 microbubbles. Radiology 1992;182 : 155-160[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Covey AM, Brody LA, Maluccio MA, Getrajdman GI, Brown KT. Variant hepatic arterial anatomy revisited: digital subtraction angiography performed in 600 patients. Radiology 2002;224 : 542-547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Irie T. Intraaterial chemotherapy of liver metastasis: implantation of a microcatheter-port system with use of the modified fixed catheter tip technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12 : 1215-1218[Medline]
  20. Sadahiro S, Suzuki T, Ishikawa K, et al. Prophylactic hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for the prevention of liver metastasis in patients with colon carcinoma. Cancer2004; 100:590 -597[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Takeda K, Yamauchi J, Shibuya K, Sunamura M, Mikami Y, Matsuno S. Benefit of continuous regional arterial infusion of protease inhibitor and antibiotic in the management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2001;1 : 668-673[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagaoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sata, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nagaoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sata, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS