AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in AJR
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keppke, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keppke, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.0706
AJR 2007; 188:768-775
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Treatment with Yttrium-90 Microspheres

Ana L. Keppke1, Riad Salem1, Denise Reddy1, Jie Huang2, Jianhua Jin2, Andrew C. Larson1 and Frank H. Miller1

1 Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St. Clair, Ste. 800, Chicago, IL 60611.
2 Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611.

Received June 27, 2006; accepted after revision August 18, 2006.

 
Address correspondence to F. H. Miller.

R. Salem is a consultant for MDS Nordion.

FOR YOUR INFORMATION

The reader's attention is directed to the accompanying article, "Response of Liver Metastases After Treatment with Yttrium-90 Microspheres: Role of Size, Necrosis, and PET," which begins on page 776.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Yttrium-90 radioembolization is an emerging therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although therapeutic response based on size has been evaluated in numerous studies, necrosis has been used as a criterion of response in only a few studies. The purpose of our study was to describe the imaging features of HCC after 90Y treatment and to compare size criteria (World Health Organization [WHO] and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) with necrosis criteria and combined criteria (RECIST and necrosis) for assessment of response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. CT images of 42 patients with 76 90Y-treated HCC lesions were analyzed. We used four response criteria: WHO size, RECIST size, necrosis, and combined criteria (RECIST and necrosis). Imaging features of treated lesions included both nodular and peripheral rim enhancement. Survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS. The response rate was 23% according to RECIST criteria, 26% according to WHO criteria, 57% according to necrosis criteria, and 59% according to combined criteria. Response according to necrosis and combined criteria was detected earlier than response according to size criteria alone. Ten responding lesions initially increased in size. After therapy, enhancing peripheral nodules increased in size in 10 lesions, decreased in size in two lesions, and disappeared in two lesions. Twenty-one of 25 lesions with thin rim enhancement after 90Y administration responded to treatment. The median survival times were 660 and 236 days for Okuda stage I and Okuda stage II disease, respectively.

CONCLUSION. Use of combined size and necrosis criteria may lead to more accurate assessment of response to 90Y therapy than use of size criteria alone. Imaging features after 90Y treatment, including size, necrosis, peripheral enhancing nodules, and thin rim enhancement, are described.

Keywords: abdominal imaging • brachytherapy • CT • hepatocellular carcinoma • interventional radiology • liver • oncologic imaging • radioembolization • yttrium-90


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The prognosis among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is dismal, with the median survival period being less than 1 year [1-4]. Most patients are not candidates for surgical resection or liver transplantation, and systemic treatment options for unresectable HCC are largely ineffective. New treatment techniques include conformal and stereotactic radiation therapy, lesion ablation, and arterially delivered cytotoxic agents. Transarterial radiation therapy with 90Y incorporated into glass microspheres (TheraSphere, MDS Nordion) has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the management of unresectable HCC. Several studies have shown positive results with this technique, which delivers high radiation doses to tumors with relative sparing of normal liver [5-10]. This therapeutic option is appealing for patients with HCC, who often have very low hepatic reserve because of underlying cirrhosis.

Accurate evaluation of response to 90Y treatment on imaging studies is important for adequate clinical management. Guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) group represent the oncologic criteria for response [11, 12]. These criteria are based on changes in tumor size after therapy. Although numerous studies have been conducted to evaluate therapeutic response of HCC according to size criteria, in only a few studies has necrosis been used as a criterion of response. Moreover, the role of lesion necrosis in the therapeutic response to 90Y has not been satisfactorily investigated.

The purpose of our study was to describe the imaging features of HCC after 90Y treatment and to compare size criteria (WHO and RECIST) with necrosis criteria and combined criteria (RECIST and necrosis) for assessment of response. To our knowledge, this study is the largest to date of the cross-sectional imaging features of HCC after 90Y therapy.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
Forty-two consecutively registered patients (35 men, seven women; age range, 26-77 years; mean age, 64 years) with unresectable HCC received outpatient treatment with 90Y microspheres from December 2003 to December 2004. Fifteen patients had Okuda stage I disease and 27 patients had Okuda stage II [1]. The diagnosis of HCC was established with results of fine-needle aspiration or core biopsy (19 [45%] of the patients), with {alpha}-fetoprotein level (one [2%] of the patients), or imaging findings (22 [52%] of the patients). Unilobar or bilobar 90Y treatments were administered depending on the number and location of the liver lesions. Only patients with favorable response or stable disease in the first treated lobe received treatment to the other lobe. In patients with bilobar disease, each hepatic lobe was treated separately at 30- to 60-day intervals.

A total of 52 lobes were treated, and 76 HCC lesions were analyzed. One to four index lesions per lobe were analyzed. Physical examination, medical history interview, and laboratory tests were performed in all cases before 90Y treatment and repeated as clinically indicated. CT and MRI were performed immediately before treatment, a mean of 30 days after treatment, and at approximately 60- to 90-day intervals subsequently. Two to six CT examinations were performed per patient. The length of imaging follow-up after treatment ranged from 21 to 334 days (mean, 125 days). Follow-up imaging studies were categorized into intervals of 50 days for analytic purposes. Institutional review board approval was obtained. This retrospective study was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. All patients provided signed informed consent for 90Y treatment.

90Y Treatment
Hepatic arteriography and 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin scintigraphy for detection of extrahepatic shunting of blood were performed before 90Y treatment. Shunting to the lungs with a cumulative dose of less than 30 Gy was acceptable. Significant flow to extrahepatic organs was corrected by arterial coil embolization or catheter positioning. The most commonly embolized vessels were the gastroduodenal and the right gastric arteries.

Administration of 90Y has been described previously [7]. In short, 90Y glass microspheres were delivered into a lobar branch of the hepatic artery. The 90Y dose was based on liver volume (not tumor burden), which was calculated with CT or MRI. The corresponding liver mass was determined with the conversion factor 1.03 g/cm3 [13]. The activity required to deliver the desired dose to the liver was the product of the intended radiation absorbed dose and liver volume divided by 50. The desired 90Y dose was 100-120 Gy.

CT and MR Technique
CT examinations were performed with MDCT scanners (LightSpeed QX/i, GE Healthcare; and Sensation 16 and Sensation 64, Siemens Medical Solutions). According to our liver protocol, unenhanced and arterial and portal venous phase images were acquired. With the LightSpeed scanner, unenhanced 5-mm contiguous axial CT images of the abdomen were obtained in the high-quality mode with a rotation speed of 0.8, table speed of 15 mm/rotation, 120 kV, and 220 mAs. A rotation speed of 0.5 and effective tube current of 250 mAs were used for the Sensation scanners. Contrast-enhanced images were obtained with a delay of approximately 30 seconds (arterial phase) and 70 seconds (venous phase) after injection of 125 mL of iohexol (Omnipaque 350, Amersham Health) at a rate of 3-5 mL/s with a mechanical power injector (EHU 700, Medrad). For three patients, hepatic CT angiograms were obtained for better delineation of the vascular distribution and lesions.

MRI was performed with a 1.5-T system (Magnetom Sonata, Siemens Medical Solutions) with a highperformance gradient system (40 mT/m amplitude, 200 mT/m/ms slew rate) and phased-array body coil. Our MRI liver protocol consisted of axial and coronal multislice thin-section T2-weighted HASTE, axial unenhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted spoiled gradientecho, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced axial T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo sequences with fat suppression in the arterial (based on fluoroscopy-preparation timing sequence) and venous phases (45-60 and 90 seconds) and delayed phases 2-5 minutes after contrast administration. Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Berlex Pharmaceuticals) was administered with a power injector (Spectris, Medrad) at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg ({approx} 20 mL), followed by 20 mL of saline flush. T1-weighted fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo images with shared prepulses were obtained with the following parameters: TR/TE, 120-160/1.9; flip angle, 70°; slice thickness, 6 mm; gap, 1.8 mm; matrix size, 125 x 256; rectangular field of view, 30-40 cm; 23 slices acquired in breath-hold of 20 seconds.

Image Evaluation
CT and MR studies were analyzed retrospectively on a PACS workstation by two radiologists with 5 and 7 years of experience. Both radiologists in consensus evaluated all studies. When disagreement occurred, a third radiologist with more than 15 years of experience was invited to review the CT and MR images, needed in only four of the CT cases, and his judgment prevailed. Unenhanced and arterial and venous phase images were analyzed. Treatment response was evaluated according to size criteria (WHO and RECIST), necrosis criteria, and combined criteria (RECIST and necrosis) (Table 1). Complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease was determined by comparison of each set of follow-up images with the baseline images. Measurements of the lesions were obtained on baseline images and on each set of follow-up images. The percentage change in the sum of the product of the cross-sectional diameters of the index lesions was calculated according to WHO criteria [1]. The percentage change in the sum of the longest diameter of the index lesions was calculated according to RECIST criteria.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Criteria for Assessment of Response to 90Y Microsphere Treatment Assessed with CT and MRI

 

After therapy, lesions may not change in size or may become smaller or larger. Lesions also may become more heterogeneous in density or signal intensity. On arterial phase images, residual tumor tends to be hyperdense compared with the surrounding liver and necrotic portion. On portal venous phase images, tumor can be hypodense relative to the liver but become more enhanced than the necrotic portion. The tumor also can be isodense or hyperdense relative to the liver. We examined the size of the lesions and the necrosis and enhancement patterns.

Necrosis was defined as no enhancing tissue. A maximum increase of 10 H on CT after contrast administration was accepted for necrotic tissue because it was considered insignificant. We determined the change in the average percentage of necrosis of the index lesions by comparing the extent of necrosis before therapy with each posttherapy scan based on volume. Complete necrosis of a lesion was considered complete response. Partial response required an at least 30% increase in the percentage of lesion necrosis. This threshold for response according to necrosis criteria was based on percentages similar to those in the RECIST criteria, which require an at least 30% decrease in size for partial response. A third category consisted of insufficient change in lesion necrosis to be classified as complete or partial response. Necrosis criteria were not used to differentiate stable and progressive disease.


Figure 1
View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —59-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with 90Y microspheres. CT angiogram obtained before 90Y treatment shows 3.0 x 2.9 cm hypervascular tumor (arrow) with central area of low attenuation, suggestive of necrosis, in right hepatic lobe.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —59-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with 90Y microspheres. Axial arterial phase contrast-enhanced CT image obtained 1 month after 90Y treatment shows complete necrosis of lesion (arrow). Size of lesion has increased to 5.8 x 3.8 cm. This example shows that lesion size may not be reliable criterion for response evaluation.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C —59-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with 90Y microspheres. Axial arterial phase contrast-enhanced CT image obtained 3 months after B shows persistent lesion necrosis (arrow) and decrease in size to 4.4 x 3.2 cm. Findings show that initial increase in lesion size after treatment was transient and did not indicate progression of disease. Incidental gallstone is evident.

 
Our combined criteria included RECIST and necrosis criteria (Table 1). In conflicting cases, the criteria with the greatest change determined response. For example, a size increase of 20% (progressive disease) with a necrosis increase of 50% (partial response) was considered a partial response. Complete necrosis of treated lesions was considered complete response regardless of changes in lesion size. The occurrence of a new lesion in treated liver was considered progressive disease regardless of changes in lesion size or necrosis.

In addition to response by lobe, response by patient was evaluated. When both hepatic lobes were treated, the best response by lobe represented the response of the patient. For example, if a patient had stable disease in one lobe and partial response in the other lobe, the patient was considered to have a partial response. In addition to changes in lesion size and necrosis after 90Y treatment, imaging findings such as thin rim enhancement and enhancing peripheral nodules in treated lesions were analyzed and correlated with response to treatment.

We compared the response rate of patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) with that of patients without PVT according to our combined criteria. Imaging response was correlated with {alpha}-fetoprotein level in patients with a baseline {alpha}-fetoprotein level greater than 400 ng/mL. Time to response was measured from the treatment date until the criteria for response were first met. Survival was calculated from the date of first 90Y treatment until death or the patient's being alive on May 13, 2006, whichever came first. Twenty-seven patients died before May 13, 2006, owing to tumor progression or cirrhosis.

Statistical Analysis
Categoric measurements were summarized with count and percentage. The response rates based on the combined criteria were compared by use of two-sided Fisher's exact test in two groups: first between subjects with and those without PVT and then between subjects with stable or increased {alpha}-fetoprotein levels and those with at least a 50% decrease in {alpha}-fetoprotein level after treatment. Student's t test was used to compare the time to response between the group with and that without PVT. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine whether the baseline tumor size was associated with the outcome of interest: partial or complete response (yes vs no). The significance level was set at p = 0.05. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to produce survival curves and to estimate median survival time and corresponding 95% CI for patients with disease in each Okuda stage and for all patients.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The mean and median for baseline tumor size were 27.5 and 17.7 mm (range, 6 x 6 mm to 194 x 103 mm), respectively. There was no significant correlation between baseline tumor size and response to treatment defined according to WHO, RECIST, necrosis, or combined criteria (all p > 0.1). Adverse events occurring within 90 days of treatment included hyperbilirubinemia from cirrhosis and one case each of groin hematoma, infected closure device in groin, and ascites after therapy from tumor progression. No gastrointestinal ulceration, radiation pneumonitis, hepatitis, or cholecystitis was detected.


Figure 4
View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —72-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein thrombosis. Axial venous phase contrast-enhanced CT image obtained before 90Y treatment shows 7.0 x 6.4 cm hypodense mass (short arrow) in right hepatic lobe with extension (long arrow) into right portal vein.

 


Figure 5
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —72-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein thrombosis. Axial venous contrast-enhanced CT image obtained 26 months after 90Y treatment shows significant decrease in lesion (arrow) and thrombus. This example shows that patients with thrombosis of portal vein may respond well to 90Y therapy.

 


Figure 6
View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —61-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma and lack of correlation between {alpha}-fetoprotein levels and imaging response to 90Y microspheres. Axial arterial phase gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo MR image with fat suppression obtained before 90Y treatment shows 3.1 x 3.0 cm hyperenhancing and heterogeneous lesion (arrow) in left hepatic lobe. Alpha-fetoprotein level was 232 ng/mL.

 


Figure 7
View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —61-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma and lack of correlation between {alpha}-fetoprotein levels and imaging response to 90Y microspheres. Axial arterial phase contrast-enhanced CT image obtained 1 month after 90Y treatment shows complete necrosis and increased size (7.5 x 4.6 cm) of lesion (arrow). Alphafetoprotein level increased to 568 ng/mL and then decreased to 271 ng/mL 1 month later. This example shows that increase in lesion size associated with necrosis is not indicative of disease progression. In addition, it shows that transient increase in {alpha}-fetoprotein level may be due to tumor lysis and not worsening disease.

 
Treatment Response by Patient
The response rate by patient, including complete and partial response, was 23% (10/42) according to RECIST criteria, 26% (11/42) according to WHO criteria, 57% (24/42) according to necrosis criteria, and 59% (25/42) according to combined criteria. According to WHO criteria, five (33%) of 15 patients with Okuda stage I disease and six (22%) of 27 patients with Okuda stage II disease responded to treatment. The size of the lesions became stable after 90Y therapy in 52% (22/42) of the patients according to WHO criteria and 54% (23/42) of the patients according to RECIST criteria. The response rate including stable disease was 78% (33/42) according to RECIST and WHO criteria and 88% (37/42) according to combined criteria. Nine patients received treatment to both hepatic lobes, and one patient had three lobes treated (right, left, and caudate). This patient was the only patient in whom the caudate lobe was treated separately. In six (67%) of these nine patients, each lobe had a different response to treatment.

Treatment Response by Lobe
Response rate by lobe, including complete and partial response, was 19% (10/52) according to RECIST criteria, 21% (11/52) according to WHO criteria, 51% (27/52) according to necrosis criteria, and 53% (28/52) according to combined criteria. According to our combined criteria, 9% (5/52) of lobes had complete response, 44% (23/52) had partial response, 34% (18/52) had stable disease, and 11% (6/52) had progressive disease. In the lobes with complete response, the lesions became completely necrotic and decreased in size over time. Of the 23 lobes with partial response, 14 (60%) met necrosis criteria only, one (4%) met size criteria (RECIST) only, and eight (34%) met both necrosis and size criteria for response. Among the patients who did not respond to therapy (n =6) and in whom disease immediately progressed, time to progressive disease ranged from 22 to 127 days (median, 33 days; mean, 48 days). Three lobes with complete response and seven lobes with partial response according to our combined criteria had an increase in size of the lesions on the first follow-up examination (19-75 days after treatment; mean, 31 days) (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C).


Figure 8
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves of hepatocellular carcinoma patients from date of first 90Y microsphere treatment for Okuda stage I disease, Okuda stage II disease, and overall.

 
Time to Response
Among responding patients, the median time to response was 120 days according to WHO criteria, 118 days according to RECIST criteria, 30 days according to necrosis criteria, and 31 days according to combined criteria.

PVT
PVT was found before treatment in 19 patients. The thrombus appeared to be tumorous in 15 patients (in whom 10 thrombi appeared attached to parenchymal masses and five were not clearly attached), and four patients appeared to have bland thrombus. According to our combined criteria, 10 (52%) of the 19 patients with PVT and 15 (65%) of the 23 patients without PVT responded to treatment (Fig. 2A, 2B). The difference in the response rates in these two groups of patients was not statistically significant (p = 0.67, Fisher's exact test). The time to first response in patients with PVT was not statistically different from that in patients without PVT (p = 0.4612).

{alpha}-Fetoprotein
In five (41%) of 12 patients with a baseline {alpha}-fetoprotein level greater than 400 ng/mL, {alpha}-fetoprotein level decreased at least 50% after 90Y therapy. Four (80%) of these five patients responded to treatment, and one (20%) had progressive disease according to our combined criteria. There was no significant correlation between {alpha}-fetoprotein level and treatment response on CT (p = 0.11, Fisher's exact test). One patient with complete necrosis of the lesions after treatment had a transient increase in {alpha}-fetoprotein level from 232 to 568 ng/mL (Fig. 3A, 3B).

Survival
The median survival time was 660 days (95% CI, 447-upper limit is beyond the last observed time in the study group) for patients with Okuda stage I (n = 15) and 236 days (95% CI, 145-upper limit is beyond the last observed time in the study group) for patients with Okuda stage II (n = 27) disease. The median overall survival time was 431 days (95% CI, 192-upper limit is beyond the last observed time in the study group) (Fig. 4).

Imaging Findings
Thin rim enhancement—After treatment, 25 (32%) of 76 lesions had thin peripheral rim enhancement less than 5 mm thick (Fig. 5A, 5B). Eighty-four percent (21/25) of these lesions responded to treatment, 12% (3/25) became stable, and 4% (1/25) progressed according to our combined criteria. Rim enhancement was first seen 22-181 days (mean, 52 days) after treatment and lasted 25-282 days (mean, 131 days). This finding eventually disappeared in seven (28%) of the lesions. The length of follow-up for this specific group with thin rim enhancement ranged from 22 to 334 days (mean, 150), a rate similar to that in the overall study group.


Figure 9
View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A —72-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Axial arterial phase contrast-enhanced CT image obtained before 90Y treatment shows hypervascular lesion (long arrow) in left hepatic lobe and high-density material from previous chemoembolization (short arrows) in right lobe.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B —72-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Axial arterial phase contrast-enhanced CT image obtained 1 month after 90Y treatment shows lesion (arrow) in left hepatic lobe is hypodense with thin rim of enhancement compatible with inflammatory reaction from treatment.

 
Enhancing peripheral nodules—Unlike thin rim enhancement, a peripheral enhancing nodule larger than 5 mm in diameter was seen in 14 treated lesions (Fig. 6A, 6B, 6C). It was first seen 22-128 days (mean, 55 days) after treatment and lasted 37-304 days (mean, 144 days). The maximum diameter of the nodules ranged from 8 to 30 mm (mean, 17 mm). In 10 lesions, the size of enhancing nodules increased progressively after initial 90Y treatment and gradually filled out the lesions. Four of these lesions received additional 90Y treatment, which caused disappearance of the nodules and complete necrosis of the lesions. In two (14%) of the 14 lesions with peripheral nodules, the nodules decreased progressively in size but persisted on the last follow-up examination (79 and 90 days after treatment). In two (14%) other lesions, the nodules disappeared after 91 and 147 days, and the lesions became completely necrotic.


Figure 11
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A —78-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Axial arterial phase gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo MR image with fat suppression obtained before 90Y treatment shows 4.1 x 3.6 cm hypervascular lesion (arrow).

 

Figure 12
View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B —78-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Axial arterial phase contrast-enhanced CT image obtained 1 month after 90Y treatment shows significant reduction in lesion size and peripheral focal enhancing nodule (arrow) in anterior aspect of lesion.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6C —78-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma. Axial arterial phase contrast-enhanced CT image obtained 3 months after B shows further decrease in lesion size and no evidence of nodular enhancement (arrow).

 

Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The limited success of conventional therapies for HCC has prompted investigation of more effective treatment techniques. Most of the blood supply to normal liver comes from the portal vein, whereas the supply to malignant tumors comes from the hepatic artery. This dual hepatic system allows intraarterial administration of cytotoxic agents such as 90Y microspheres, which target tumors selectively with minimal effect on normal liver. Yttrium 90 treatment is well tolerated, does not induce significant hepatic or pulmonary toxicity [5-8, 14, 15], and can be administered on an outpatient basis because postembolization syndrome is minimal [16].

Imaging studies play an integral role in monitoring response to 90Y therapy [7, 8, 17, 18]. Traditionally, a decrease in tumor size according to the WHO and RECIST criteria has been considered CT evidence of treatment response [11, 12]. Although they represent the oncologic reference standard, these criteria are often unreliable, particularly after regional liver therapies [7, 19, 20]. The imaging response of HCC to 90Y therapy has been evaluated in only a few studies. In most of these studies, traditional size criteria were used for determining response to treatment.

Acknowledging the limitations of size criteria, the panel of experts on HCC of the European Association for the Study of the Liver proposed considering lesion necrosis in the evaluation of therapeutic response of malignant tumors [21, 22]. To our knowledge, a study of the role of lesion necrosis relative to changes in lesion size in the therapeutic response of HCC to 90Y has not been performed. Also, to our knowledge, the efficacy of the combined use of size and necrosis criteria to evaluate response has not been investigated. We conceived a method for response evaluation that combines size and necrosis criteria and allows comparison of responses according to each set of criteria separately. Our method allows identification of responses evidenced solely or predominantly by lesion necrosis. We used 30% necrosis, not any amount of necrosis, as the minimal threshold for response.

In our study, the response rates according to size criteria (WHO and RECIST) were underestimated compared with necrosis and combined criteria. In addition, use of necrosis and combined criteria led to detection of response much earlier than use of WHO and RECIST criteria. This finding shows the advantage of the necrosis criteria, because early identification of likelihood of response and lack of response is valuable in the care of patients with advanced HCC.

Necrosis, cystic degeneration, hemorrhage, and edema can increase the size of responding tumors [17]. Therefore increase in lesion size is not sufficient evidence for a diagnosis of progressive disease. In three lobes in our study, the treated lesions became completely necrotic but increased in size and were erroneously categorized as progressive disease on the basis of traditional size criteria. These responding lesions lacked enhancement, unlike tumors that increased in size but remained solid, indicating progression of disease. The addition of necrosis criteria to size criteria is important for detecting favorable response despite an increase in size after 90Y treatment.

Although the response rates according to size criteria were low, in most patients the size of the lesions became stable after 90Y therapy. Because all patients had progressive disease before treatment, and the disease likely would have progressed over time, stabilization of disease was an indication of clinical benefit. The response rates, including stable disease, were 78% (33/42) according to RECIST and WHO criteria and 88% (37/42) according to combined criteria. These response rates may be an accurate reflection of benefit from 90Y therapy.

A median survival period of 660 days was attained by patients with Okuda stage I disease and of 236 days by patients with Okuda stage II disease. The median overall survival period was 431 days. These survival times are consistent with those previously reported for patients with unresectable HCC undergoing 90Y microsphere treatment and show that 90Y therapy has a positive effect on the survival of these patients [5, 6, 9, 10]. In a study by Okuda et al. [1], the median survival time among 229 patients who received no specific treatment was 1.6 months, 0.7 month for patients with stage III disease, 2.0 months for patients with stage II disease, and 8.3 months for patients with stage I disease.

In patients with {alpha}-fetoprotein values greater than 400 ng/mL before treatment, we did not find a statistically significant association between {alpha}-fetoprotein level and imaging response according to our combined criteria. A significant decrease in {alpha}-fetoprotein level after 90Y treatment likely reflects response of hepatic lesions [7, 8]. An increase in {alpha}-fetoprotein level after treatment, however, may be due to extrahepatic progression of disease rather than worsening liver disease. A transient increase in {alpha}-fetoprotein level may also result from tumor lysis or necrosis, as occurred in one of our patients (Fig. 3A, 3B). Therefore {alpha}-fetoprotein value cannot be used without imaging in the assessment of treatment response.

Thin rim enhancement was seen in 32% (25/76) of the lesions in our study. Twenty-one (84%) of these lesions responded to treatment. This finding likely corresponds to the presence of granulation tissue related to inflammatory treatment reaction [23-25]. Thin rim enhancement has been reported after different ablation techniques, but to our knowledge, it has not been reported after 90Y therapy. According to the literature, thin rim enhancement is a transient finding with a maximal duration of 6 months [26, 27]. It was transient in only 28% (7/25) of the lesions in our study. However, sufficient follow-up to show resolution of this finding may not have been performed in all cases; 11 lesions did not have follow-up data for more than 6 months.

Enhancing peripheral nodules were seen in 18% (14/76) of treated lesions. The size of these nodules increased progressively in 10 (71%) of the 14 lesions and gradually filled out the lesions, indicating that they generally represented residual viable tumor. Residual tumor likely results from irregular distribution of 90Y microspheres inside the lesions [28, 29]. In addition, many cases of nodular enhancement represent incompletely treated tumor because they are in the watershed area between two vascular distributions. For example, the liver dome tumors may have supply from segments VIII and IV. At follow-up examinations, one distribution is treated, and the nodular area that has increased in size represents essentially untreated tumor. Some of the tumors present after treatment were believed to represent stable disease with residual tumor or scar rather than active aggressive tumor. They had decreased progressively in size in two of 14 (14%) lesions and decreased in size and eventually disappeared in two lesions that became completely necrotic. Tsuda et al. [30] found lack of growth and decreased enhancement of peripheral nodules in ablated HCC and attributed these findings to the slow development of coagulation necrosis in residual tumor. Delayed necrosis may explain the decrease in size or disappearance of peripheral nodules in our study. Some of the patients with peripheral nodular enhancement were treated after closure of the study owing to clinical progression. For this study, the statisticians and we considered it imperative to lock the database on a certain date.

HCC is frequently associated with PVT. Yttrium-90 treatment seems to be safe for these patients because, unlike transarterial chemoembolization, it does not produce a significant embolic effect, which can cause hepatic artery occlusion and liver failure in the setting of PVT [31]. We investigated whether PVT had any effect on response to 90Y treatment as evaluated with imaging. According to our results, 90Y treatment is as effective in HCC patients with PVT as it is in those without PVT. Therefore 90Y treatment seems to be an appealing therapy in this subset of patients with HCC and PVT.

We surmise that some patients do not respond to therapy because of radiation sensitivity and the cell cycle of the tumor. Using 90Y treatment, we treat at only one moment in time compared with standarddose fraction radiation therapy.

This retrospective study had limitations. Histopathologic correlation of imaging findings after therapy was not routinely obtained because of the potential for sampling error after therapy, and biopsy was considered too invasive without significant effect on future management. The HCC tumors were unresectable, and 90Y treatment was palliative. Correlation with functional information from PET studies was not obtained because the diagnostic sensitivity of PET for HCC is limited and, as a result, this examination is not routinely reimbursed by insurance.

In conclusion, as evaluated with imaging studies and survival analysis, 90Y treatment seems to be effective for patients with HCC, including patients with PVT. The combination of size (RECIST) and necrosis criteria may be superior to size criteria (WHO and RECIST) alone for determining response of HCC to 90Y treatment. We describe imaging features of HCC after 90Y treatment, including peripheral enhancing nodules and thin rim enhancement. Large, multiple-institution studies are necessary to validate the clinical efficacy, response criteria, and imaging findings among patients with HCC treated with 90Y microspheres.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Obata H, et al. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment: study of 850 patients. Cancer 1985;56 : 918-928[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Pawarode A, Tangkijvanich P, Voravud N. Outcomes of primary hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: an 8-year experience with 368 patients in Thailand. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000;15 : 860-864[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Herold C, Reck T, Fischler P, et al. Prognosis of a large cohort of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a single European center. Liver 2002; 22:23 -28[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. El-Serag HB, Mason AC, Key C. Trends in survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma between 1977 and 1996 in the United States. Hepatology 2001;33 : 62-65[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Geschwind JF, Salem R, Carr BI, et al. Yttrium-90 microspheres for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2004;127 [5 suppl 1]:S194 -S205[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Salem R, Thurston KG, Carr BI, Goin JE, Geschwind JF. Yttrium-90 microspheres: radiation therapy for unresectable liver cancer. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002;13 (9 Pt 2):S223 -S229[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Lau WY, Ho S, Leung TW, et al. Selective internal radiation therapy for nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with intraarterial infusion of 90yttrium microspheres. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 40:583 -592[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Liu MD, Uaje MB, Al-Ghazi MS, et al. Use of yttrium-90 TheraSphere for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Am Surg 2004; 70:947 -953[Medline]
  9. Carr BI. Hepatic arterial 90 yttrium glass microspheres (TheraSphere) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: interim safety and survival data on 65 patients. Liver Transpl2004; 10[2 suppl 1]:S107 -S110[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Atassi B, et al. Treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with use of 90Y microspheres (TheraSphere): safety, tumor response, and survival. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16:1627 -1639[Medline]
  11. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981;47 : 207-214[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92:205 -216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Overmoyer BA, McLaren CE, Brittenham GM. Uniformity of liver density and nonheme (storage) iron distribution. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1987; 111:549 -554[Medline]
  14. Lewandowski RJ, Thurston KG, Goin JE, et al. 90Y microsphere (TheraSphere) treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer metastases of the liver: response to treatment at targeted doses of 135-150 Gy as measured by [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomographic imaging. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16:1641 -1651[Medline]
  15. Goin JE, Salem R, Carr BI, et al. Treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic yttrium-90 microspheres: factors associated with liver toxicities. J Vasc Interv Radiol2005; 16:205 -213[Medline]
  16. Goin JE, Dancey JE, Roberts CA, Sickles CJ, Leung DA, Soulen MC. Comparison of post-embolization syndrome in the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: trans-catheter arterial chemo-embolization versus yttrium-90 glass microspheres. World J Nucl Med 2004; 3:49 -56
  17. Wong CY, Salem R, Raman S, Gates VL, Dworkin HJ. Evaluating 90Y-glass microsphere treatment response on unresectable colorectal liver metastases by [18F] FDG PET: a comparison with CT or MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29 : 815-820[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Torizuka T, Tamaki N, Inokuma T, et al. Value of fluorine-18-FDG-PET to monitor hepatocellular carcinoma after interventional therapy. J Nucl Med 1994;35 : 1965-1969[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Takayasu K, Arii S, Matsuo N, et al. Comparison of CT findings with resected specimens after chemoembolization with iodized oil for hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR 2000;175 : 699-704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ebied OM, Federle MP, Carr BI, et al. Evaluation of responses to chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 97:1042 -1050[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, et al. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma: conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. J Hepatol 2001;35 : 421-430[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Llovet JM, Beaugrand M. Hepatocellular carcinoma: present status and future prospects. J Hepatol 2003;38 [suppl 1]:S136 -S149[Medline]
  23. Kuszyk BS, Boitnott JK, Choti MA, et al. Local tumor recurrence following hepatic cryoablation: radiologic-histopathologic correlation in a rabbit model. Radiology 2000;217 : 477-486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Rossi S, Buscarini E, Garbagnati F, et al. Percutaneous treatment of small hepatic tumors by an expandable RF needle electrode. AJR 1998; 170:1015 -1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Shiina S, Tagawa K, Unuma T, et al. Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a histopathologic study. Cancer 1991; 68:1524 -1530[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Dromain C, de Baere T, Elias D, et al. Hepatic tumors treated with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: CT and MR imaging follow-up. Radiology 2002;223 : 255-262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Bartolozzi C, Lencioni R, Caramella D, Mazzeo S, Ciancia EM. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with percutaneous ethanol injection: evaluation with contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJR1994; 162:827 -831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kennedy AS, Nutting C, Coldwell D, Gaiser J, Drachenberg C. Pathologic response and microdosimetry of 90Y microspheres in man: review of four explanted whole livers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 60:1552 -1563[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Houle S, Yip TK, Shepherd FA, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: pilot trial of treatment with Y-90 microspheres. Radiology 1989;172 : 857-860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Tsuda M, Majima K, Yamada T, Saitou H, Ishibashi T, Takahashi S. Hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation therapy: dynamic CT evaluation of treatment. Clin Imaging2001; 25:409 -415[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Salem R, Lewandowski R, Roberts C, et al. Use of yttrium-90 glass microspheres (TheraSphere) for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with portal vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15:335 -345[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related articles in AJR:

Response of Liver Metastases After Treatment with Yttrium-90 Microspheres: Role of Size, Necrosis, and PET
Frank H. Miller, Ana L. Keppke, Denise Reddy, Jie Huang, Jianhua Jin, Mary F. Mulcahy, and Riad Salem
AJR 2007 188: 776-783. [Abstract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. Atassi, A. K. Bangash, A. Bahrani, G. Pizzi, R. J. Lewandowski, R. K. Ryu, K. T. Sato, V. L. Gates, M. F. Mulcahy, L. Kulik, et al.
Multimodality Imaging Following 90Y Radioembolization: A Comprehensive Review and Pictorial Essay
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 81 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. P. Kalva, A. Thabet, and S. Wicky
Recent Advances in Transarterial Therapy of Primary and Secondary Liver Malignancies
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 101 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. S. Welsh
Radiographically Identified Necrosis After 90Y Microsphere Brachytherapy: A New Standard for Oncologic Response Assessment?
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 765 - 767.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in AJR
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keppke, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keppke, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS