AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Permpongkosol, S.
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Permpongkosol, S.
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, S. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.0810
AJR 2007; 188:1028-1032
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Differences in Ablation Size in Porcine Kidney, Liver, and Lung After Cryoablation Using the Same Ablation Protocol

Sompol Permpongkosol1,2, Theresa L. Nicol3, Richard E. Link1,4, Ioannis Varkarakis1, Hema Khurana5, Qihui Jim Zhai5, Louis R. Kavoussi1,6 and Stephen B. Solomon1,7

1 James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
2 Present address: Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
3 Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
4 Present address: Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
5 Department of Pathology, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
6 Present address: Institute for Urology, North Shore LIJ Health System, Long Island, New York, NY.
7 Present address: Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY.

Received June 19, 2006; accepted after revision September 12, 2006.

 
Address correspondence to S.B. Solomon (SolomonS{at}mskcc.org).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the variation in size of acute necrosis and the variation in thermal map measured during cryoablation in multiple organs using the same ablation protocol for each organ.

MATERIAL AND METHODS. Eight female pigs underwent one cryoablation per organ of kidney, lung, and liver performed with open surgery with a 2.4-mm cryoprobe. A 12- and 8-minute double-freeze cycle was used. Intratissue temperatures were monitored using 16-gauge thermometers spaced at 5.0-mm increments from the cryoprobe. The comparison of results among tissues was performed using the multiple analysis of variance. The -20°C thermal diameter was correlated with tissue damage. The kidneys, lungs, and liver were removed and examined histologically for a pathologic complete coagulative necrosis zone.

RESULT. A single 2.4-mm cryoprobe had a mean ice ball diameter in kidney, lung, and liver of 38.5 ± 4.7, 35.5 ± 3.6, and 32.5 ± 2.7 mm, respectively. A mean -20°C thermal diameter was achieved at 24.07 ± 1.38 mm in kidney, 12.76 ± 3.0 mm in lung, and 8.8 ± 3.7 mm in liver by means of regression analysis. The acute pathologic complete coagulative necrosis zone size was 21.0 ± 1.56 mm (kidney), 11.6 ± 1.48 mm (lung), and 8.0 ± 1.20 mm (liver).

CONCLUSION. The inherent characteristics of different organs manifest different ablation zone sizes during cryoablation despite the same ablation protocol being used. This information should be factored into planning for ablation procedures.

Keywords: ablation • coagulative necrosis • cryoablation • kidney • liver • lung • porcine studies


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Cryoablation is a promising technique for causing localized tissue coagulative necrosis that has been applied clinically to various tissues including liver, kidney, uterus, prostate, and lung [1-3]. However, concerns regarding the effectiveness of this technique to kill tumor cells in situ still exist. One of the challenges during cryoablation is the need to space individual cryoprobes in a pattern that will guarantee adequately low temperatures for coagulation in all areas of viable tumor. How widely these probes must be spaced depends on the relationship of temperature to distance from the cryoprobe. This relationship will differ in various tissues on the basis of thermal conductivity and tissue characteristics, including differences in freezing point or the temperature sink effect [4-6]. Gage and Baust [4] reviewed the mechanism of tissue injury in cryotherapy and suggested that tissue thermal conductivity was seldom a factor in most solid organs because of the high water content of tissue. However, the normal lung containing air has a lower thermal conductivity, which may affect the ultimate necrosis zone size in this particular organ [7, 8]. Appropriate spacing of cryoprobes is critical to achieve the low temperatures (-20°C) necessary to kill cells consistently [9]. Another potential limitation to thermal ablation results from the heat (or cold) sink effect, in which nearby blood vessels deliver 37°C blood flow to the area being heated or cooled [10]. Therefore, during cryotherapy, the size of the ablation zone, and consequently, the diameter of coagulative necrosis, may vary from tissue to tissue depending on the inherent characteristics of the various tissues [11].

In this study, we sought to correlate the acute coagulative necrosis size in different organs with the thermal map around a single cryoprobe to provide rational guidance of ablation procedures in clinical practice today.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Animals
The animal protocol was approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. Eight female pigs weighing 50-60 kg were anesthetized with 22 mg/kg of ketamine (intramuscular) and 5-8 mg/kg of thiopental (Sodium Pentothol, Abbott Laboratories) (IV) and then underwent general endotracheal anesthesia with 2% isoflurane. At the conclusion of the procedure, euthanasia was performed with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital. The professional veterinarians and trained personnel provided comprehensive care for the animals throughout the study period.


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 —Schematic of study design shows cryoprobe placement during freezing process, with temperature probes placed at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm from cryoprobe.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 —Positioning of temperature probes in kidney is confirmed with sonography. Sonogram shows tips of thermocouples as hyperechoic spots. Acoustic shadowing caused by ice ball is seen.

 
Cryotherapy
A small plastic guide was made with holes to accommodate a single 2.4-mm cryoprobe (PERC-24, Endocare) assembled with five 16-gauge thermometer probes (TempProbe, Endocare). The temperature probes were placed at sequentially greater distances from the cryoprobe so that temperature recordings could be made at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm from an argon-based cryoprobe (Fig. 1). The guide was used to keep the thermometers and cryoablation probe in position throughout the procedure.

First, a midline laparotomy was performed, enabling access to both kidneys and the liver. The intestine was covered with dry abdominal pads to prevent freezing damage. The cryoablation probe and thermometers were inserted vertically to the same depth (20 mm) under visual guidance. Positioning of the thermometer probes was confirmed with sonography (Ultramark 9, ATL) (Fig. 2). During cryoablation, the leading edge of the ice ball zone can be identified as a hyperechoic interface with posterior acoustic shadowing.

After the kidney ablations, cryoablation was performed at the left lobe of the liver. Probes were placed far enough from the anterior liver edge to have a sufficient thickness of parenchyma, but not too close to the hepatic hilum or to the vena cava, in order to avoid major vascular or biliary injury. In one pig enough room remained to accommodate two independent liver cryoablations. The thermometer probes were fixed into the liver at precise distances from the cryoprobe.

For the lung, a small, right anterior thoracotomy was performed in the fifth intercostal space after complete ablation of kidney and liver. The lingual segment of the left upper lung lobe was exposed. Special care was taken to avoid compression of the pulmonary parenchyma and interference with the blood flow to the surface of the lung in the region to be frozen, similar to the procedure in the prior report of Rodgers et al. [12]. Again, the cryoablation probe and thermometers were inserted to the same depth (20 mm) under visual guidance. Sonography was not used with the lung.

Cryoablation was performed with two freezing/thawing cycles. An initial freezing was performed for 12 minutes with argon gas followed by an active thawing with helium gas. This was then repeated with an 8-minute freeze and an active thaw. This protocol is similar to that used for cryoablation in human subjects of kidney cryotherapy [13]. The temperature of the cryoprobe was checked before and during ablation to ensure effective cryoablation. The diameter of the ice ball was recorded by direct visualization. Temperature measurements from each of the thermometer probes were recorded at 0, 6, and 12 minutes for the initial freeze and at 4 and 8 minutes for the second freeze. After the probes were removed, the animals were sacrificed, and the ablated kidney, liver, and lung were harvested immediately. One animal experiment required approximately 3 hours to complete.

Pathology
Before histologic processing, the organs were fixed in 10% buffered formalin. After fixation, the cryoprobe insertion site served as the central axis of dissection, the samples were serially sectioned, and the zone of ablation was identified grossly. Ablation necrosis measurements were made from the mounted 5-µm microscopic slides stained with H and E. Slides were examined by pathologists for coagulative necrosis, hemorrhage, interface width, and surrounding tissue damage. The zones of coagulative necrosis were histologically mapped with a calibrated microscope (x100 magnification). The radii of the complete necrosis zones were measured perpendicular to the cryoprobe axis, as previously reported [14].

Statistical Analysis and Terminology
Statistical analysis was performed with commercially available software. Regression analysis was performed to obtain the -20°C thermal diameter. The comparison of results among tissues was performed using the multiple analysis of variance. We reported our studies using the standardization of terminology and reporting criteria of imaging-guided tumor ablation provided by the Society of Interventional Radiology [15].


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Reproducible relationships between temperature and distance from the cryoprobe were measured. Eight kidney, eight liver, and eight lung lesions were evaluated. The mean lowest temperatures of the cryoprobe in kidney, lung, and liver were -134.13°C ± 1.5°C, -134.88°C ± 1.13°C, and -133.13°C ± 1.96°C, respectively. No significant difference was seen among the probes according to multiple analysis of variance tests (p = 1.0 in kidney and lung, p = 0.66 in kidney and liver, p = 0.11 in liver and lung). The mean lowest temperature measurements made at 5.0-mm increments from the cryoprobe at the end of the second freeze cycle are displayed in Table 1. Figure 3A, 3B, 3C shows extrapolated temperature relationships with distance over the entire cryoablation procedure in porcine kidney, lung, and liver. The correlation coefficients between the lowest temperature and distance from the cryoprobe in kidney, lung, and liver were 0.95, 0.92, and 0.90, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Mean Lowest Temperatures at Different Distances from Cryoprobe Center and in Different Tissues at End of Second Freeze

 

Figure 3
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —Temperatures during cryotherapy. Graphs show mean temperatures at different time points during cryotherapy measured at varying distances from cryoprobe in porcine kidney (A), lung (B), and liver (C) during entire double freezing cycle. Thermometer probes were inserted at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm from axis of cryoprobes.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —Temperatures during cryotherapy. Graphs show mean temperatures at different time points during cryotherapy measured at varying distances from cryoprobe in porcine kidney (A), lung (B), and liver (C) during entire double freezing cycle. Thermometer probes were inserted at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm from axis of cryoprobes.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C —Temperatures during cryotherapy. Graphs show mean temperatures at different time points during cryotherapy measured at varying distances from cryoprobe in porcine kidney (A), lung (B), and liver (C) during entire double freezing cycle. Thermometer probes were inserted at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm from axis of cryoprobes.

 

With the use of repeated analysis of variance tests, the lowest temperature in kidneys was significantly lower than those in ablated lung (p < 0.001) and liver (p = 0.005) at the same distance. Although the temperature of lung decreased more than that of liver at the same distance from the cryoprobe, no significant difference was seen in comparison analysis. Using regression analysis, the temperature of -20°C was achieved at a mean diameter of 24.07 ± 1.38, 12.76 ± 3.0, and 8.8 ± 3.7 mm in kidney, lung, and liver, respectively.

The diameters of the ice ball were 38.5 ± 4.7, 35.5 ± 3.6, and 32.5 ± 2.7 mm in kidney, lung, and liver, respectively. The mean diameter of the histologic complete necrotic zone seen was 21.0 ± 1.56 mm (kidney), 11.6 ± 1.48 mm (lung), and 8.0 ± 1.2 mm (liver). Table 2 compares the pathologic ablation zone diameters in each organ with the -20°C temperatures. Microscopic examination with H and E revealed coagulation necrosis with no viable parenchyma in the ablated region (Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C). Cytoplasmic and architectural details were destroyed in ablated foci. Coagulative necrosis was present with resultant congestion.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Comparison of the Diameter of Ice Ball, –20°C Thermal Diameter, and Diameter of Coagulative Necrosis in Different Tissues Created with 2.4-mm Cryoprobe Using the Same Protocol

 

Figure 6
View larger version (167K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A —Photomicrographs of ablated tissue. In kidney, clear demarcation is seen between viable (R) and infarcted kidney (L). Area indicated by R shows viable tubules and mild intervening interstitial fibrosis. Area indicated by L shows tubules lined by nucleated, hypereosinophilic epithelium and desquamated necrotic cells and debris in lumen.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B —Photomicrographs of ablated tissue. In lung, right side of photomicrograph displays normal lung architecture that has clear demarcation in center. Left side shows infracted lung parenchyma, congested alveolar capillaries, and compressed alveoli (focal) filled with amorphous pink material.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C —Photomicrographs of ablated tissue. In liver, area of infarction (lower left field) with poorly stained and mummified hepatocytes and occasional lysed nuclei is seen. Scattered congested sinusoids are also noted. Hexagonal liver architecture is retained.

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The clinical success of thermal ablation for hepatic tumors has led to the application of this approach to tumors in other organs, including kidney and lung [16]. However, each of these organs has its own specific thermal characteristics. Protocols that have been acceptable in the liver [17], for instance, may not be ideal for the kidney or lung. One of the specific differences between organs is the degree and pattern of perfusion. A limitation to thermal ablation is the thermal sink effect, in which normal blood flow to an organ serves to limit the heating or cooling of the ablation probe [18-21]. However, other tissue-specific factors—most notably thermal conductivity and tissue composition, including differences in freezing point—might play a role in the cryoablation effect in different organs [4, 5]. For instance, the lung, containing air, has a low thermal conductivity [4], and air movement may provide an additional thermal sink. For this reason, tissue-specific protocols are needed to ensure adequate killing of tumor cells during thermal ablation.

In our study, the same cryotherapy protocol applied to liver, lung, and kidney showed varying temperature gradients that are most likely related to these organ-specific differences. The liver showed the smallest ablation zone, -20°C thermal diameter, and an acute pathologic coagulative necrosis zone, whereas the kidney had the largest ablation of the tested organs. The implications of these findings are that cryoablation in the liver may require longer freeze cycles or more densely clustered cryoprobes for consistent success. Operators should recognize that the expected size of tissue coagulation in the liver for a given probe size may be smaller than that observed in another organ.

One limitation of this study is that normal healthy porcine tissues were ablated. The ablation efficacy observed in tumor tissue might differ because of increased vascularity, increased cell density, or other alterations in tissue composition as compared with healthy controls. In addition, the procedures documented here were performed through a laparotomy, thereby exposing the tissues to room temperature. Cryoablation performed laparoscopically or percutaneously might result in slightly different temperature relationships than those observed here because of the maintenance of surrounding body temperature at 37°C. Last, thermocouples in this experiment were placed linearly, whereas the cryoprobes create an oblong ice ball that varies in diameter at different depths. Therefore, the thermal map lines derived in these experiments may not have been taken at the ice balls' greatest diameters.

In this study, direct visualization of the ice ball proved to be an unreliable predictor of effectively low temperature during cryoablation. For example, the diameter of tissue with a temperature of ≤ -20°C and the acute pathologic coagulative necrosis zone was approximately 2 cm in the kidney, whereas the visible ice ball extended to > 3.5 cm. Clinically, ice ball growth is often monitored by sonography, CT, or MRI. However, operators must recognize that the ice ball edge does not represent the coagulation necrosis zone and that this coagulation zone may be significantly smaller than the ablation zone, similar to revious reports [9]. Although some suggest that the mechanism and ultimate size of the coagulation may be also due to other nonthermal mechanisms such as ischemia [19, 21], the implications of our work suggest that on the basis of temperature alone, expected zones of coagulation would be smaller than the visualized ice ball seen by the physician.

Interestingly, unpublished Endocare data (John Rewcastle, personal communication) show that a single 2.4-mm cryoprobe would have a 28-mm thermal diameter at -20°C in gelatin phantoms after 10 minutes of cryotherapy. However, these phantom results do not appear to be applicable to tissue with blood perfusion, because our data revealed a -20°C thermal diameter of approximately 24.07 ± 1.38 mm in kidney, 12.76 ± 3.0 mm in lung, and 8.8 ± 3.7 mm in liver. Our results confirm those of a prior study by Schmidlin et al. [22] that showed a -22°C freeze/thaw ablation zone with a 3.4-mm cryoprobe in renal tissue had a roughly 20-mm diameter [22].

Prior data have suggested that cooling tissue to -20°C during cryotherapy leads to reliable coagulation, and our data confirmed these findings in the acute setting. Acute pathologic analysis revealed coagulative necrosis zones close to the -20°C isotherm. In the chronic setting, these necrosis zones may be still larger because of nonthermal events such as ischemia. These observations are similar to those of Rupp et al. [14]. However, Seifert et al. [23] have suggested that -38°C is the effective temperature for destruction of colorectal liver metastasis. This discrepancy may represent a difference between normal and cancerous tissue and warrants additional investigation.

Moreover, although our study used placement of thermocouples to make temperature measurements, a number of potential noninvasive methods for thermal mapping might be more practical in clinical practice. Our study data can serve as guidelines for ablation, but ideally an online system of thermal monitoring would be preferred. Such a system would allow adjustment of the ablation during the procedure. The uses of noninvasive thermal mapping with MRI, CT, and sonography have all been investigated and may provide a practical solution.

In conclusion, our study highlights the differences of the cryoablation zone size in different organs. Although our data may be specific to cryoablation, the general concept that an organ-specific ablation protocol is necessary is probably a valid one for all thermal ablation energy sources. Compared with in vitro experiments, these in vivo results document significantly smaller-than-expected zones of necrosis. Moreover, potentially clinically significant differences were observed, with liver having much smaller zones of coagulative necrosis than kidney or lung. The implications of these findings are that operators should modify their ablation protocols to reflect the presence of the variability of this effect in different organs during cryoablation.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Erce C, Parks RW. Interstitial ablative techniques for hepatic tumours. Br J Surg 2003;90 : 272-289[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Lee JM, Stitik FP, Carter D, Baker RR. Local ablative procedures designed to destroy squamous-cell carcinoma. Thorax1975; 30:152 -157[Medline]
  3. Murphy DP, Gill IS. Energy-based renal tumor ablation: a review. Semin Urol Oncol 2001;19 : 133-140[Medline]
  4. Gage AA, Baust J. Mechanisms of tissue injury in cryosurgery. Cryobiology 1998;37 : 171-186[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Gage AA, Baust JG. Cryosurgery: a review of recent advances and current issues. Cryo Letters 2002;23 : 69-78[Medline]
  6. Hinshaw JL, Lee FT Jr. Image-guided ablation of renal cell carcinoma. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am2004; 12:429 -447, vi[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Liang XG, Ge XS, Zhang YP, Wang GJ. A convenient method of measuring the thermal conductivity of biological tissue. Phys Med Biol 1991; 36:1599 -1605[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ponder E. The coefficient of thermal conductivity of blood and of various tissues. J Gen Physiol 1962;45 : 545-551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Campbell SC, Krishnamurthi V, Chow G, Hale J, Myles J, Novick AC. Renal cryosurgery: experimental evaluation of treatment parameters. Urology 1998; 52:29 -33; discussion 33-24[Medline]
  10. Ladd AP, Rescorla FJ, Baust JG, Callahan M, Davis M, Grosfeld JL. Cryosurgical effects on growing vessels. Am Surg1999; 65:677 -682[Medline]
  11. Moser RP, Abbott IR, Stephens CL, Lee YY. Computerized tomographic imaging of cryosurgical iceball formation in brain. Cryobiology 1987;24 : 368-375[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Rodgers BM, Blake KD, Alexander JA. The effects of profound cryotherapy upon the pulmonary parenchyma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 83:784 -789[Abstract]
  13. Gupta A, Allaf ME, Kavoussi LR, et al. Computerized tomography guided percutaneous renal cryoablation with the patient under conscious sedation: initial clinical experience. J Urol2006; 175:447 -452; discussion 452-443[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Rupp CC, Hoffmann NE, Schmidlin FR, Swanlund DJ, Bischof JC, Coad JE. Cryosurgical changes in the porcine kidney: histologic analysis with thermal history correlation. Cryobiology2002; 45:167 -182[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Cardella JF, et al. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. Radiology 2005;235 : 728-739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Gilbert JC, Rubinsky B, Wong ST, Brennan KM, Pease GR, Leung PP. Temperature determination in the frozen region during cryosurgery of rabbit liver using MR image analysis. Magn Reson Imaging1997; 15:657 -667[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Popken F, Seifert JK, Engelmann R, Dutkowski P, Nassir F, Junginger T. Comparison of iceball diameter and temperature distribution achieved with 3-mm accuprobe cryoprobes in porcine and human liver tissue and human colorectal liver metastases in vitro. Cryobiology2000; 40:302 -310[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Chang I, Mikityansky I, Wray-Cahen D, Pritchard WF, Karanian JW, Wood BJ. Effects of perfusion on radiofrequency ablation in swine kidneys. Radiology 2004;231 : 500-505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kollmar O, Richter S, Schilling MK, Menger MD, Pistorius GA. Advanced hepatic tissue destruction in ablative cryosurgery: potentials of intermittent freezing and selective vascular inflow occlusion. Cryobiology 2004;48 : 263-272[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Lu DS, Raman SS, Vodopich DJ, Wang M, Sayre J, Lassman C. Effect of vessel size on creation of hepatic radiofrequency lesions in pigs: assessment of the "heat sink" effect. AJR2002; 178:47 -51[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Schuder G, Pistorius G, Fehringer M, Feifel G, Menger MD, Vollmar B. Complete shutdown of microvascular perfusion upon hepatic cryothermia is critically dependent on local tissue temperature. Br J Cancer 2000; 82:794 -799[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Schmidlin FR, Rupp CC, Hoffmann NE, et al. Measurement and prediction of thermal behavior and acute assessment of injury in a pig model of renal cryosurgery. J Endourol 2001;15 : 193-197[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Seifert JK, Gerharz CD, Mattes F, et al. A pig model of hepatic cryotherapy: in vivo temperature distribution during freezing and histopathological changes. Cryobiology2003; 47:214 -226[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Permpongkosol, S.
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Permpongkosol, S.
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, S. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS