AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sobolevsky, S.
Right arrow Articles by Perry, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sobolevsky, S.
Right arrow Articles by Perry, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.1064
AJR 2007; 188:1047-1049
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Technical Innovation

Femoral-to-Port Through-and-Through Wire Access to Reestablish Subcutaneous Port Function

Sergei Sobolevsky1, Robert G. Sheiman, Salomao Faintuch and Laura Perry

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215.

Received August 10, 2006; accepted after revision October 4, 2006.

 
Address correspondence to R. G. Sheiman (rsheiman{at}bidmc.harvard.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Case 1
Case 2
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Central venous catheter malfunction often results from fibrin sheath formation and is routinely addressed with thrombolytic therapy or mechanical stripping. Mechanical stripping from a distant access site such as a femoral vein is the only option for a subcutaneous port that has failed thrombolytic therapy. When a fibrin sheath has rendered the catheter tip inaccessible to snaring, catheter salvage cannot be achieved, requiring port exchange. We report two cases in which an inaccessible catheter tip was mobilized via advancing a wire through the port and through the catheter, allowing for successful snaring, mechanical stripping, and return of normal port function.

CONCLUSION. Passage of a hydrophilic wire through a subcutaneous port and beyond the catheter tip is technically possible. The wire can be snared from a femoral access to achieve successful catheter stripping when direct catheter snaring is not possible.

Keywords: central venous devices • interventional radiology • venography


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Case 1
Case 2
Discussion
References
 
Totally implantable subcutaneous central venous ports are frequently used in oncology patients who require chemotherapy infusion and blood aspiration. One important cause of port failure is formation of a fibrin sheath around the tip of the catheter [1, 2]. Common techniques of port salvage include dissolution of fibrin using intracatheter thrombolysis with urokinase or tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) or stripping of the fibrin sheath from the catheter tip using a snare device [1, 3-6]. The latter method, although usually successful, may prove cumbersome because the tip of the catheter that is covered with fibrin may be difficult or impossible to mobilize and snare, especially if it is adherent to the superior vena cava (SVC) or atrial wall. In such a scenario, salvage usually cannot be achieved, requiring port exchange. We present two situations in which fibrin sheath stripping was achieved via the introduction of a guidewire through the port into the inferior vena cava (IVC) and subsequently snared from a femoral access. The wire was then used as a rail for catheter tip repositioning, snaring, and stripping, resulting in restoration of port function.


Case 1
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Case 1
Case 2
Discussion
References
 
A 62-year-old woman with recurrent breast cancer presented to our interventional radiology service due to difficulty with aspiration of her 8-French, single lumen, end-hole subcutaneous chest port, which had been placed 5 years earlier. The port, placed via the right subclavian vein, had been functional with respect to infusion of medication and aspiration since implantation until approximately 2 weeks earlier, when aspiration could no longer be achieved. Meticulous port care had always been maintained per hospital policy, which included flushing with heparinized saline daily when accessed, after each use, and monthly when not accessed.

A venogram via the port using a standard 19-gauge right-angled needle (Huber Plus, Nowmedical) was obtained and confirmed the presence of a fibrin sheath around the tip of the catheter by showing flow of contrast material directed upstream from the catheter tip. The venogram also confirmed wide patency of the SVC to the right atrium and otherwise showed no caval filling defects to suggest thrombus. Multiple challenges of 2.5 mg of t-PA through the port and into the catheter were unsuccessful at restoring blood aspiration, so catheter stripping was undertaken.

After informed written consent was obtained, access into the right common femoral vein was gained with a 6-French sheath (Bright Tip Sheath, Cordis). A 6-French nitinol snareguiding sheath was advanced over a Bentson wire (Angiodynamics) into the SVC, after which the wire was replaced with a 15-mm snare. Several unsuccessful attempts were made to grasp the catheter tip within the SVC. The fibrin sheath was thought to be indirectly inhibiting snaring by encasing the catheter tip and causing adherence to the SVC.


Figure 1
View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —62-year-old woman with left subclavian port. Anteroposterior fluoroscopic image of chest shows 0.018-inch wire (arrows) traversing through left chest subcutaneous port (arrowheads), through catheter, and into superior vena cava.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —62-year-old woman with left subclavian port. Coned-down anteroposterior fluoroscopic image of chest shows 0.018-inch wire was snared and then withdrawn through femoral vein to achieve through-and-through access, allowing catheter tip repositioning and successful mechanical stripping.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 —61-year-old woman with right subcutaneous port. Axial CT image shows fibrin sheath (long arrow) as low-density filling defect within inferior vena cava and surrounding catheter tip (short arrow).

 
The port was then accessed with a 19-gauge straight Huber needle. An 0.018-inch glide guidewire (Radifocus Glidewire, Boston Scientific) was advanced through the needle into the port reservoir and steered under direct fluoroscopy into the port egress, through the catheter, and into the SVC (Fig. 1A). This required approximately 2 minutes of fluoroscopy. The 15-mm snare was then used to pull the 0.018-inch guidewire from the SVC into the IVC (Fig. 1B) and then through our 6-French right femoral sheath to achieve through-and-through wire access. By tracking along the 0.018-inch guidewire with a 15-mm snare and also manually pulling our through-and-through wire at the femoral access, it was possible to free the catheter tip from the wall of the SVC, which then enabled easy repeated snaring and mechanical stripping. Repeat port injection showed no radiographic evidence of a fibrin sheath, with port aspiration restored. The port has been functioning well (infusion and aspiration) up to the present time (8-month follow-up).


Case 2
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Case 1
Case 2
Discussion
References
 
A 61-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer presented to our interventional radiology service because of difficulty with port aspiration that was unresponsive to treatment with t-PA. Catheter care had also included adherence to hospital protocol for flushing with heparinized saline. The 8-French port was surgically placed in December 2002 via the right cephalic vein and was otherwise functional. A CT angiogram of the chest 2 weeks earlier had shown a fibrin sheath around the catheter with associated SVC luminal compromise (Fig. 2). After informed consent was obtained, the right common femoral vein was accessed and a 6-French sheath placed. A nitinol snare-guiding system was advanced over an Amplatz Super Stiff wire (Boston Scientific) into the SVC and snaring of the catheter tip was attempted with a 15-mm- and then 20-mm-diameter nitinol snare.

Neither snare could be advanced beyond the catheter tip to perform mechanical fibrin sheath removal. The guiding system was exchanged for a 10 mm x 3 cm angioplasty balloon (Opti Pro, Cordis Endovascular), which was inflated adjacent to the catheter tip to disrupt the fibrin sheath or cause catheter tip repositioning or both. This procedure was followed by repeated attempts to snare the catheter tip, which again failed. The port was then accessed with a 19-gauge straight Huber needle and an 0.018-inch glide guidewire advanced into the port reservoir, through the catheter, into the SVC, and then into the IVC. The wire was then snared via the previously obtained femoral access and pulled though the femoral sheath to create through-and-through access. Tension on both ends of the guidewire enabled tracking of a 15-mm snare beyond the catheter tip, allowing successful stripping and restoration of port function. Port function has been maintained to date (5-month follow-up).


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Case 1
Case 2
Discussion
References
 
Fibrin sheath formation leading to central venous catheter malfunction is a common phenomenon [4, 7] and can occur as early as 24 hours after catheter placement [8-10]. Although the radiographic diagnosis of a fibrin sheath can be made fluoroscopically if injection of contrast medium through the catheter is possible [11], diagnosis of a fibrin sheath is often inferred.

Catheter dysfunction can vary from simple difficulty with aspiration, as in our cases, to complete catheter failure. Increasing accumulation of fibrin can eventually cause vessel luminal compromise and complete thrombosis. Other reported complications resulting from fibrin sheath formation include infection due to bacterial colonization of the sheath itself, catheter mechanical compromise with fragmentation at the time of removal, and retrograde tracking of infused chemotherapeutic substances causing cutaneous or subcutaneous necrosis.

Several techniques have been successfully used for the treatment of a fibrin sheath involving central venous lines with freely accessible lumens. These include simple catheter exchange over a wire with tip positioning beyond the fibrin sheath confines [9]; catheter removal, intravascular fibrin sheath disruption with a balloon catheter, and catheter replacement; and mechanical sheath disruption using wires or brushes passed through the line itself. Such techniques, however, are not readily applicable to central lines accessed from a subcutaneous port.

Salvage of a malfunctioning central venous port by dissolution of the fibrin sheath using thrombolytic agents can be effective [11, 12] and was the initial mode of attempted treatment for our patients. The success of this method is believed to be related to addressing the pericatheter thrombus formation sometimes associated with a fibrin sheath [12]. Both urokinase and t-PA have been shown to restore catheter function (aspiration and infusion) in more than 90% of patients who present with first-time catheter malfunction related to fibrin sheath formation [2]. However, the durability of chemical thrombolysis infusion therapy may be quite short [1, 12]. It may also be contraindicated in patients with recent major surgery, prior hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident, and thrombocytopenia.

Because of the lack of response to t-PA infusion directly into the port and catheter of our patients, mechanical stripping of the fibrin sheath from the catheter wall was undertaken before considering port removal and replacement. Fibrin sheath stripping using a snare inserted through the common femoral vein has been used on all types of central venous catheters with mixed results. Although some published series have shown excellent results, with patency rates of 100% at 3 months [1, 13], others have shown dismal postprocedural patency rates, with 70% of catheters requiring retreatment at 20 days [14]. The snare placed around the tip of a malfunctioning catheter, passed retrograde beyond all catheter openings, tightened, and then gently pulled along the catheter can enable removal of the sheath and restoration of catheter function. Although this method is associated with some potential complications, including pulmonary artery thrombosis of the disrupted sheath [11], it is generally safe and well tolerated by the patient.

Our initial attempts to snare the catheter in either patient via a femoral approach were unsuccessful because of the absence of a free catheter tip, likely due to fibrin surrounding the tip and, in the first case, fibrin also causing adherence of the tip to the SVC wall. Such obstacles were overcome by placing a wire into the chest port, through the central venous catheter, and then snaring the wire from a femoral site and using this through-and-though wire to successfully snare the catheter tip. To our knowledge, this approach has not been applied previously to subcutaneous ports because of the perceived inability to pass a wire through the port orifice, catheter, and beyond the catheter tip. By using a noncoring straight Huber needle and an 0.018-inch tapered hydrophilic wire, we were able to achieve through-and-through wire placement and perform this salvage maneuver successfully and with long-term results.

There are potential drawbacks to our approach, however. We found that only an 0.018-inch hydrophilic wire with a curved tip could allow port orifice selection. We were unsuccessful with braided wires. The potential for hydrophilic wire fragmentation or shearing of the coating does exist during attempts to negotiate the port orifice. We try to aim the access needle toward the orifice using fluoroscopy and to enter the port as obliquely as possible to minimize the angle between the access needle and wire. We also do not recommend wire withdrawal through the needle. If the wire must be withdrawn from the port, we remove it and the access needle as a unit to ensure that there is no relative movement of the wire and needle tip.

Finally, we have been able to perform this procedure in other patients who have single ports with success, but we have not been able to access either port orifice in patients who have failing double ports, regardless of the port manufacturer. This is likely due to the angle or position of the orifice of both port chambers. We should also add that both of our patients had silicone catheters, which allowed hydrophilic wire passage. However, catheters made of other polymers may not be traversed with a hydrophilic wire as easily.

Overall, in patients with failing subcutaneous ports in whom thrombolytic agents are contraindicated or unsuccessful and who cannot undergo stripping because of catheter tip inaccessibility due to position or adherence to a vessel wall, port salvage is still possible. Snaring of an 0.018-inch hydrophilic wire through the port orifice and beyond the catheter tip to achieve through-and-through access for tip snaring and stripping can be performed successfully. However, caution must be exercised to minimize the chances of wire fragmentation and shearing.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Case 1
Case 2
Discussion
References
 

  1. Whigham CJ, Lindsey JI, Goodman CJ, Fisher RG. Venous port salvage utilizing low dose tPA. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol2002; 25:513 -516[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Whigham CJ, Greenbaum MC, Fisher RG, Goodman CJ, Thornby JI, Thomas JW. Incidence and management of catheter occlusion in implantable arm ports: results in 391 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol1999; 10:767 -774[Medline]
  3. Merport M, Murphy TP, Egglin TK, Dubel GJ. Fibrin sheath stripping versus catheter exchange for the treatment of failed tunneled hemodialysis catheters: randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:1115 -1120[Medline]
  4. Suhocki PV, Conlon PJ Jr, Knelson MH, Harland R, Schwab SJ. Silastic cuffed catheters for hemodialysis vascular access: thrombolytic and mechanical correction of malfunction. Am J Kidney Dis1996; 28:379 -386[Medline]
  5. Crain MR, Mewissen MW, Ostrowski GJ, Paz-Fumagalli R, Beres RA, Wertz RA. Fibrin sleeve stripping for salvage of failing hemodialysis catheters: technique and initial results. Radiology1996; 198:41 -44[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rockall AG, Harris A, Wetton CW, Taube D, Gedroyc W, Al-Kutoubi MA. Stripping of failing hemodialysis catheters using the Amplatz gooseneck snare. Clin Radiol 1997;52 : 616-620[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Hoshal VL Jr, Ause RG, Hoskins PA. Fibrin sleeve formation on indwelling subclavian central venous catheters. Arch Surg 1971; 102:253 -258[Medline]
  8. Schwab SJ, Beathard G. The hemodialysis catheter conundrum: hate living with them, but can't live without them. Kidney Int 1999; 56:1 -17[Medline]
  9. Northsea C. Using urokinase to restore patency in double lumen catheters. ANNA J 1994;21 : 261-264, 273[Medline]
  10. O'Farrell L, Griffith JW, Lang CM. Histologic development of the sheath that forms around longterm implanted central venous catheters. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1996;20 : 156-158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gray RJ, Levitin A, Buck D, et al. Percutaneous fibrin sheath stripping versus transcatheter urokinase infusion for malfunctioning well-positioned tunneled central venous dialysis catheters: a prospective, randomized trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol2000; 11:1121 -1129[Medline]
  12. Savader SJ, Ehrman KO, Porter DJ, Haikal LC, Oteham AC. Treatment of hemodialysis catheter-associated fibrin sheaths by rt-PA infusion: critical analysis of 124 procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol2001; 12:711 -715[Medline]
  13. Bessoud B, de Baere T, Kuoch V, et al. Experience at a single institution with endovascular treatment of mechanical complications caused by implanted central venous access devices in pediatric and adult patients. AJR 2003; 180:527 -532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Haskal ZJ, Leen VH, Thomas-Hawkins C, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Baum RA, Soulen MC. Transvenous removal of fibrin sheaths from tunneled hemodialysis catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol1996; 7:513 -517[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sobolevsky, S.
Right arrow Articles by Perry, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sobolevsky, S.
Right arrow Articles by Perry, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS