AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.5403
AJR 2007; 188:887
© American Roentgen Ray Society

See Your AJR Online for Comprehensive New ACR MRI Safety Guidelines

Robert J. Stanley

Editor in Chief



 
rstanley{at}uabmc.edu

Although the print version of this article will not appear until the June 2007 issue of AJR, the ARRS and AJR Websites (www.arrs.org and www.ajronline.org) now provide free access to the third and most comprehensive version of the American College of Radiology's Guidance Document for MR Safe Practices: 2007 [1]. The first American College of Radiology white paper on MR safety appeared in the June 2002 issue of the AJR. This first report was produced by a blue-ribbon panel of experts chaired by Emanuel Kanal, MD, and covered all areas related to MR safety. A second version of the report, which appeared in the May 2004 issue of the AJR, provided an update and revisions. The current report is the product of a significantly expanded panel of experts that includes academic and community practice radiologists and representatives of anesthesiology, cardiology, medical physics, MR technology, MR nursing, architecture, legal counsel, the Food and Drug Administration, and numerous related disciplines. Dr. Emanuel Kanal again serves as the chair of this distinguished panel.

In comparison with the earlier white papers on MR safety, this third version is substantially more comprehensive, related to the growth in the types, field strengths, and uses of MRI devices and MR contrast agents, prior experience with adverse events, greater knowledge about the behavior of ferrous and nonferromagnetic materials in the MR area, improvements in patient safety and screening measures, and management of emergencies that could introduce personnel untrained in MR area requirements. The material contained in this report represents the unanimous consensus of all members of the panel, and not simply a majority opinion.

Included are recommendations on imaging pregnant patients, pediatric screening and sedation issues, the safety of accompanying family or personnel, and relevant physical principles associated with high magnetic fields, to name a few. The section on MR contrast agent use is very current, including information on the association of certain gadolinium-based MR contrast agents with the recently described nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with impaired renal function.

Appended are very useful forms including a safety screening form and MR hazard checklist, as well as MR facility safety design guidelines. Specific safety analyses of all of the related MR zones and cryogen handling are also included. In essence, the document is a mandatory onsite safe practice guideline for all users of MR equipment. We are most grateful for the opportunity to publish this comprehensive report.

In addition, the April issue of the AJR includes a unique historical perspective on how the mindset of scientists and physicians was prepared for the introduction of X-radiation and its diagnostic and therapeutic roles at the turn of the last century [2]. When I first read the manuscript, I was concerned that the topic might be too far removed from the usual contents of the AJR. However, since we are still celebrating our AJR centennial (1906-1907) with commemorative articles, I decided that this fascinating review of the antecedents of radiology and radiotherapy would be most appropriate and enjoyed by our readership. The advances in the biosciences that took place in the 18th and 19th centuries, with the evolving role of electricity and ultraviolet light into the medical sphere, prepared the minds of physicians and scientists alike to be receptive to this amazing discovery of Roentgen. We are grateful to Dr. Aronowitz for providing us with this most enlightening review of medical history.


References
Top
References
 

  1. Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, et al. ACR guidance document for MR safe practices: 2007. AJR 2007; 188:epub ahead of print, wwwajronline.org
  2. Aronowitz JN. Ethereal fire: antecedents of radiology and radiotherapy. AJR 2007;188 : 904-912[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS