AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.2190
AJR 2007; 188:1212-1214
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Observations

Microwave Ablation of Renal Parenchymal Tumors Before Nephrectomy: Phase I Study

Peter E. Clark1,2, Ralph D. Woodruff3, Ronald J. Zagoria4 and M. Craig Hall1,5

1 Department of Urology and Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.
2 Present address: Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
3 Department of Pathology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC.
4 Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157.
5 Present address: Piedmont Urological Associates, High Point, NC.

Received December 20, 2005; accepted after revision March 30, 2006.

 
Address correspondence to R. J. Zagoria (rzagoria{at}wfubmc.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine, in renal neoplasms, the size of ablation zones induced in vivo with percutaneous microwave probes and whether skip areas remain within the ablation zones.

CONCLUSION. For a single 10-minute ablation, ablated volumes averaged 27 cm3 and 105 cm3 with a single-probe and a three-probe ablation array, respectively. There were no skip areas within the ablated zone. Microwave ablation can safely and quickly generate large ablation lesions and renal neoplasms.

Keywords: interventional radiology • kidney • microwave coagulation therapy • oncology • percutaneous ablation


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In 2007, there will be an estimated 51,190 new cases of renal cancer in the United States [1]. A number of centers have reported on minimally invasive ablative approaches that may be useful in the management of renal tumors [2-6]. These approaches include cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation. Experience with the use of microwave energy is more limited [7].

Although it has had considerable initial success in the management of renal cell carcinoma, radiofrequency ablation has a number of potential limitations. These include restrictions on the size of the tumor that can be managed, the number of repeated treatments needed for management of larger tumors, the time needed to perform the procedure on larger tumors, the need for grounding pads and the risk of cutaneous burns, and inability to perform real-time monitoring of the extent of ablation. Microwave energy has the potential to overcome some of these limitations [7]. We initiated a phase 1 study to assess tumor destruction and to further develop a minimally invasive method of in situ tumor ablation with a microwave device. Microwave energy has been used extensively for ablation of hepatic lesions [8-15]. This study was designed to assess through histologic examination the utility of microwave energy for in vivo ablation of renal neoplasms.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
From November 2003 to September 2004, 10 patients were enrolled in a phase 1 study of microwave thermal ablation of solid renal tumors. The study was approved by our institutional review board. Requirements for inclusion in the study were, first, the presence of a solid enhancing (attenuation increase > 15 H on contrast-enhanced CT or > 15% on gadolinium-enhanced MRI) renal parenchymal mass consistent with renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging and, second, scheduling for radical nephrectomy through an open or a laparoscopic approach. Patients who had undergone radiation therapy to the retroperitoneum were excluded. Also excluded were patients with severe medical or psychiatric illness that precluded adequate informed consent. All patients were required to sign a protocol-specific informed consent document before enrollment in the study. The intent of the study was to test the performance characteristics and safety of a microwave ablation system in the management of renal lesions, so limitations were not placed on the size of the renal lesion to be managed.

Patients underwent standard radical nephrectomy through either an open or a hand-assisted laparoscopic approach. Before ligation of the renal blood vessels, needle biopsy of the tumor was performed. After biopsy, one or an array of three microwave ablation probes (VivaWave, Vivant Medical), depending on the size of the lesion and surgeon preference, were inserted into the tumor under direct visual guidance. The 13-gauge probe shafts were cooled by continuous flow of saline solution according to the manufacturer's specifications. Microwave energy was delivered through the probes at 60 W for a total of 10 minutes. The probes were removed, the renal blood vessels were promptly ligated, and the surgical specimen, consisting of the kidney and tumor within the Gerota fascia, was removed en bloc.

The specimen was immediately subjected to pathologic processing. The main end point of the study was the size of the ablative tissue produced in one ablation cycle with one of three configurations of probes. For the purposes of this trial, it was not relevant whether the entire tumor was ablated, because no specific effort was made to ensure complete coverage of the tumor. The size of the ablated tissue was evaluated. In two cases, the ablated area was in an already necrotic tumor, making thermal changes difficult to detect at microscopic examination, so visual inspection (color change) and palpation (dense texture) in addition to standard histologic examination were used in combination to determine the size of the ablation.

In eight of the 10 cases, ablation area and cell death were confirmed by staining for reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) diaphorase with our previously described technique [16]. In the other two cases, NADH staining could not be done for technical reasons. All histopathologic and NADH-stained specimens were reviewed by one pathologist. Size of the ablative lesion was expressed as both 3D rectilinear volume and volume of a prolate spheroid according to the formula V= 4/3{pi}ab2, where a is the major semiaxis and b is the minor semiaxis. If the volume had two different minor axes, an average of the two was used. Toxicity was recorded according to the revised National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Ten patients (eight men and two women; mean age, 56 years; age range, 42-80 years) were enrolled in the study. The final pathologic findings and the size of the ablative lesions achieved with one or three probes are shown in the Table 1. The mean size of the ablated tissue achieved with a single probe (not counting the one probe that malfunctioned) was 4.1 x 2.7 x 2.2 cm (total rectilinear volume, 27 cm3; prolate spheroid volume, 15 cm3). With a three-probe array, the mean size of the ablative lesion was 5.7 x 4.7 x 3.8 cm (total rectilinear volume, 105 cm3; prolate spheroid volume, 56 cm3). Technical malfunction of one probe caused the shaft to overheat. The malfunction was caused by failure to properly assemble the continuous flow of saline solution to the probe shaft. The result was a grade 1 skin burn at the probe insertion site that resolved without treatment or sequelae. This lesion was not included in the calculations of mean lesion size and volume.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE I: Clinical Results for 10 Patients Undergoing Microwave Thermal Tumor Ablation and Radical Nephrectomy

 

In no case did thermal ablation interfere with determining the stage and grade of the tumor. Most of the tumors were conventional renal cell carcinoma (Table 1). Lesion size at visual inspection and palpation correlated well with size at histopathologic examination, and the results of NADH staining confirmed the presence of uniform cell death in the apparent ablation zone (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D). Histopathologic examination and staining for NADH diaphorase revealed no cell death beyond the visually observed ablation zone. In four cases, the ablation zone included tumor tissue and benign renal parenchyma next to the tumor. There were no bleeding complications.


Figure 1
View larger version (177K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —Photomicrographs show histopathologic features of untreated and treated chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Area outside ablated tissue zone. Photomicrograph shows normal cellular architecture for this neoplasm. (H and E, x10)

 

Figure 2
View larger version (176K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —Photomicrographs show histopathologic features of untreated and treated chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Area within ablated tissue zone. Photomicrograph shows abnormalities after ablation including small pyknotic nuclei and reduced cytoplasm. (H and E, x10)

 

Figure 3
View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C —Photomicrographs show histopathologic features of untreated and treated chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Area outside ablated tissue zone. Photomicrograph shows avid staining indicating viable tissue throughout specimen. (Vital stain with reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide [NADH], x10)

 

Figure 4
View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D —Photomicrographs show histopathologic features of untreated and treated chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Area within ablated tissue zone. Photomicrograph shows no significant staining, indicating no viable cells within sample. (Vital stain with NADH, x10)

 

Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The results of this phase 1 study show that microwave thermal energy can be used to generate reproducible large ablative lesions in solid renal neoplasms. This system is efficient in that one 10-minute treatment is all that is required. Radiofrequency ablation can require multiple sequential treatments to achieve comparable lesion size, and cryoablation requires more than one freeze-and-thaw cycle for maximum efficiency.

Microwave thermal ablation has been used clinically in Japan for several years. Like radiofrequency ablation, this technology entails the use of heat to destroy tumor cells. Microwave thermal ablation, however, does not consist of electrical current and therefore does not require grounding the patient. Instead, microwave energy is delivered through an antenna probe placed in the center of the tumor, causing local heating. Microwave energy techniques of thermal ablation have not been widely adopted in the United States because the ablative lesions generated with the original technology were relatively small. Advances in engineering have led to development of an advanced microwave energy-based thermal ablation device that has overcome much of this size limitation. The manufacturer of the device used in this study has developed an antenna with improved material and structural properties that allows optimized electromagnetic power deposition into a tumor and a resultant larger, hotter thermal lesion. This device has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for thermocoagulation of human tissue.

In our study, the mean size of ablative lesion achieved with a single probe was 4.1 x 2.7 x 2.2 cm compared with a lesion size of 1.4-2.4 cm achieved with a single radiofrequency probe (Cool-tip radiofrequency ablation system, Radionics) and 2.2-6.3 cm with a three-probe array in a previous treat-and-resect protocol at our institution [16]. Unlike radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation can be readily performed with multiple probes simultaneously. Multiple probes can be used for radiofrequency ablation, but the procedure is cumbersome and time consuming.

With the microwave system, large tumors can be easily managed with a single ablation or with concurrent ablation of several anatomically separate lesions [17]. In our study, the mean ablative lesion size with a three-probe array was 5.7 x 4.7 x 3.8 cm. Achievement of this large lesion size may decrease the need for repeated treatments, avoid inadequate management of large tumors, and increase the speed of therapy, thereby decreasing the complication rate, although we did not directly assess this factor. Total treatment time may be substantially reduced with the new microwave thermal ablation device. Testing these potential advantages will require direct comparison of radiofrequency and microwave technologies.

Microwave thermal ablation has been shown safe and efficacious in the management of liver tumors in both porcine models and a phase 1 trial with human subjects [8-15]. To our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the performance characteristics of this technology in the setting of renal tumors. The results of our study confirm that the technology can reliably and reproducibly produce a large ablative lesion with uniform tissue necrosis, that is, no skip areas, of solid renal neoplasms. One case of grade 1 toxicity occurred but was caused by human error rather than a failure of the technology. Additional studies are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of this technology in the setting of a treat-and-leave protocol, as in the setting of percutaneous, image-directed therapy.

This novel microwave ablation system can safely and quickly generate large ablative lesions in renal neoplasms. The test cases showed excellent uniform cell kill. Further studies of this system are warranted in a setting of minimally invasive management of renal neoplasms.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Jamal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57 : 43-66[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. [No authors listed]. Radio frequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma via image guided needle electrodes. J Urol1999; 161:599 -600[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Gill IS, Novick AC, Meraney AM, et al. Laparoscopic renal cryoablation in 32 patients. Urology2000; 56:748 -753[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Rukstalis DB, Khorsandi M, Garcia FU, Hoenig DM, Cohen JK. Clinical experience with open renal cryoablation. Urology2001; 57:34 -39[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Arellano RS, McDougal WS, Mueller PR. Renal cell carcinoma: clinical experience and technical success with radio-frequency ablation of 42 tumors. Radiology2003; 226:417 -424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Zagoria RJ, Hawkins AD, Clark PE, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal neoplasms: factors influencing success. AJR 2004; 183:201 -207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Simon CJ, Dupuy DE, Mayo-Smith WW. Microwave ablation: principles and applications. RadioGraphics 2005;25 [suppl 1]:S69 -S83[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wright AS, Lee FT Jr, Mahvi DM. Microwave ablation of hepatic tumors: results of a phase I clinical trial. (abstr) Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 56:78A
  9. Wright AS, Lee FT Jr, Mahvi DM. Hepatic microwave ablation with multiple antennae results in synergistically larger zones of coagulation necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10 : 275-283[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Wright AS, Mahvi DM, Haemmerich DG, Lee FT Jr. Minimally invasive approaches in management of hepatic tumors. Surg Technol Int 2003; 11:144 -153[Medline]
  11. Shock SA, Meredith K, Warner TF, et al. Microwave ablation with loop antenna: in vivo porcine liver model. Radiology2004; 231:143 -149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Seki S, Sakaguchi H, Kadoya H, et al. Laparoscopic microwave coagulation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Endoscopy 2000;32 : 591-597[Medline]
  13. Midorikawa T, Kumada K, Kikuchi H, et al. Microwave coagulation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000; 7:252 -259[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Dong BW, Liang P, Yu XL, et al. Sonographically guided microwave coagulation treatment of liver cancer: an experimental and clinical study. AJR 1998; 171:449 -454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Izumi N, Asahina Y, Noguchi O, et al. Risk factors for distant recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the liver after complete coagulation by microwave or radiofrequency ablation. Cancer2001; 91:949 -956[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Matlaga BR, Zagoria RJ, Woodruff RD, Torti FM, Hall MC. Phase II trial of radio frequency ablation of renal cancer: evaluation of the kill zone. J Urol 2002;168 : 2401-2405[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Sato M, Watanabe Y, Kashu Y, Nakata T, Hamada Y, Kawachi K. Sequential percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy for liver tumor. Am J Surg 1998;175 : 322-324[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H.-P. Song, M. Yu, J. Zhang, Z.-H. Han, H.-L. Su, X.-L. Ren, Z.-R. Wei, W. Luo, J.-G. He, and X.-D. Zhou
Hemostasis of Active Bleeding From the Liver With Percutaneous Microwave Coagulation Therapy Under Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonographic Guidance: An Experimental Study
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2008; 27(6): 867 - 874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS