|
|
||||||||
Technical Innovation |
1 Department of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Mount
Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave L. Levy Pl., Box 1234, New York, NY
10029.
2 Department of Vascular Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Mount Sinai
Medical Center, New York, NY.
3 Department of Vascular Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Mount Sinai
Medical Center, New York, NY.
Received January 8, 2006;
accepted after revision November 21, 2006.
Address correspondence to R. A. Lookstein
(robert.lookstein{at}msnyuhealth.org).
Abstract
|
|
|---|
CONCLUSION. All patients in this series were treated in a single session. Complete clot removal was successfully achieved without the development of any complications. This is the first description of the application of this technique in the treatment of Paget-Schroetter syndrome to our knowledge.
Keywords: Paget-Schroetter syndrome thrombolysis venography
|
|
|---|
Although the condition was once thought to be an acute, low morbidity disorder, its capacity for significant long-term sequelae is now widely recognized. The degree of disability that can result is compounded by the young age and generally healthy status of the population it afflicts. Late complications include a postthrombotic syndrome characterized by recurrent episodes of pain, swelling, and superficial thrombophlebitis and chronic venous insufficiency secondary to venous hypertension and valvular damage [1, 2]. Pulmonary embolism and rare cases of phlegmasia cerulea dolens have also been reported [1].
The current standard of care for treating Paget-Schroetter syndrome involves catheter-directed thrombolysis followed by surgical decompression with resection of the ipsilateral first rib. Although this technique effectively addresses the acute symptoms and reduces the frequency of long-term sequelae, it requires a long lysis time with multiple visits to the angiography suite and has been associated with complications that include intracerebral hemorrhage, pulmonary embolism, and access site bleeding requiring transfusion [4]. In this article, we describe the application of a rapid pharmacomechanical thrombolysis technique, termed "power-pulse spray thrombectomy," to the treatment of Paget-Schroetter syndrome to more rapidly debulk thrombus. Power-pulse spray thrombectomy has previously been described by Allie et al. [5] in the treatment of acute limb ischemia due to iliofemoral arterial thrombosis. This single-center initial clinical experience is the first reported application of this technique in the treatment of Paget-Schroetter syndrome to our knowledge.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
Case 2
A 22-year-old woman who is a tennis player presented with left arm swelling
and pain after strenuous exercise. On examination, her left arm was markedly
swollen, but her pulses were palpable. Doppler sonography showed extensive
multifocal thrombus of the left axillary-subclavian vein. This was confirmed
by venography (Figs. 1A and
1B). Significant stenosis was
also apparent in the mid subclavian vein on abduction. The patient was treated
with power-pulse spray mechanical thrombectomy followed by balloon angioplasty
to eliminate residual thrombus. The total procedure time was 2.5 hours with no
postprocedural complications. The patient was given heparin before, during,
and after the procedure. The next morning her symptoms were much improved and
duplex venography showed a widely patent vein with the arm adducted, but some
stenosis was apparent on abduction (Fig.
1C). The patient was discharged on postprocedure day 2 on oral
anticoagulants and, at the vascular surgeon's preference, she returned 10 days
later for first rib resection.
Case 3
An otherwise healthy 44-year-old woman, referred from an outside hospital,
presented with the sudden onset of left upper extremity swelling and mild
cyanosis. Duplex sonography at the outside hospital and CT venography at our
institution confirmed the presence of thrombosis in the left
axillary-subclavian vein. The patient promptly underwent power-pulse spray
mechanical thrombectomy followed by balloon angioplasty for residual
thrombosis. The total procedure time was 2 hours 10 minutes. Postprocedural
venography showed normal filling of the vein with the arm in the anatomic
position, but persistent narrowing on abduction with no visualization of
collateral flow. Her postoperative course was uncomplicated. The patient was
discharged on postprocedure day 2 on oral anticoagulation. The patient
underwent successful first rib resection 2 weeks after the thrombectomy.
At 1-year follow up, all patients in this series had full function of their arms, no residual symptoms, and no reoccurrence of deep venous thrombosis.
|
|
|---|
Although conservative therapies were effective in treating acute symptoms, their long-term success rates were limited. In one study by Adams and DeWeese [1], of 28 patients undergoing conservative treatment, 12% suffered pulmonary embolism; 18% had venous distention; and 70% had residual symptoms of swelling, pain, and superficial thrombophlebitis at follow-up [1]. Such dismal results led to the development of more aggressive therapies, including thrombectomy and surgical decompression as adjuvants to anticoagulation [1].
Since 1980, the use of catheter-directed thrombolysis followed by first rib resection and neurovascular decompression has become the standard of care. This approach has reduced the necessity for thrombectomy and its associated complications of proximal venous control, air embolism, bleeding, and brachial plexus injury [7]. After surgical decompression, clots that failed to lyse completely with thrombolytics tended to lyse spontaneously or recanalize [7].
Although catheter-directed thrombolysis with surgical decompression does offer significantly better results compared with conservative treatments, it is both costly and labor intensive, requiring multiple visits to the angiography suite and monitoring in step-down or intensive-care facilities during the period of thrombolysis, which can last from 1 to 3 days [7, 8]. Moreover, both major and minor complications of catheter-directed thrombolysis as a treatment for deep venous thrombosis have been reported at rates of 4.9% and 7.3%, respectively [4].
In this article, we have presented three cases of Paget-Schroetter syndrome treated with a novel interventional technique, power-pulse spray pharmacomechanical thrombectomy. By using a combination of mechanical and pharmacologic thrombolysis, this technique reduces lysis time to a period of 2-3 hours, which can be completed during a single visit to the angiography suite. All patients in this series were successfully treated in a single session, with complete removal of thrombus from the deep venous system and without any complications.
Although risk of pulmonary embolism secondary to clot removal is a valid theoretic concern, the previous protocol at our institution for catheter-directed thrombolysis did not require any aggressive preventive measures, such as the placement of a temporary superior vena cava filter before the procedure. When adapting this protocol for the power-pulse spray technique, we thought that use of the AngioJet catheter did not necessitate additional precautions with respect to pulmonary embolism. None of the patients in this series had clinical evidence of pulmonary embolism during or after the procedures.
One of the shortcomings of this study is the difficulty in quantifying the relative effects of t-PA infusion compared with mechanical thrombectomy on clot lysis. Additional studies comparing pharmacologic lysis to mechanical lysis are warranted to more fully characterize the benefits of the combined pharmacomechanical approach. In addition, this initial single-center study is limited by the small number of patients. Despite these limitations, we hope that this report will stimulate further studies to clarify the role of the power-pulse spray technique in the treatment of upper extremity venous thrombosis secondary to Paget-Schroetter syndrome.
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |