AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chong, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chong, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.-Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.0503
AJR 2007; 188:1223-1231
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Integrated PET/CT of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications

Semin Chong1, Kyung Soo Lee1, Byung-Tae Kim2, Joon Young Choi2, Chin A Yi1, Myung Jin Chung1, Dae-Kun Oh1 and Ji-Young Lee1

1 Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50, Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul, South Korea, 135-710.
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Received April 7, 2006; accepted after revision August 18, 2006.

 
Address correspondence to K. S. Lee (kyungs.lee{at}samsung.com).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to describe retrospectively integrated PET/CT findings on pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors and to correlate the findings with prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between May 2003 and February 2005, 37 consecutively enrolled patients (33 men and four women; mean age, 60 years) with histopathologically proven pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT after enhanced standalone CT. CT was used to analyze the morphologic features of the tumors and PET to measure maximum standardized uptake value (SUV). Maximum SUVs of carcinoid tumors, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs), and small-cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs) were compared, and maximum SUV and tumor stage and prognosis were correlated.

RESULTS. Four (two typical and two atypical) of the seven carcinoid tumors had no FDG uptake or less than mediastinal uptake. The maximum SUVs of primary tumors, in increasing order, were significantly different for carcinoids (mean, 4.0; median, 3.4), LCNECs (mean, 12.0; median, 10.7), and SCLCs (mean, 11.6; median, 11.7) (p = 0.006, Kruskal-Wallis test). There was no significant correlation between maximum SUV of the primary tumor and the tumor stages of carcinoids, LCNECs, or SCLCs (p = 0.08, Jonckheere-Terpstra test; p = 0.768, Mann-Whitney test). Results of receiver operating characteristics analysis showed a maximum SUV greater than 13.7 suggested a poor survival period in cases of LCNEC and SCLC.

CONCLUSION. The maximum SUVs of neuroendocrine tumors are significantly different for carcinoid tumors, LCNECs, and SCLCs, and a high maximum SUV suggests short survival of patients with LCNEC or SCLC.

Keywords: chest • CT • lung • oncologic imaging • PET/CT


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung are neoplasms that arise from Kulchitsky cells, which are normally present in the bronchial mucosa. The tumors share neuroendocrine morphologic features such as organoid nesting, palisading, rosettes, and a trabecular growth pattern. These tumors represent a broad clinicopathologic spectrum with variable morphologic features and biologic behaviors. In 1991, Travis et al. [1] proposed the following classification of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors: low-grade malignancy, namely, typical carcinoid tumors; medium-grade malignancy, which includes atypical carcinoid tumors; and high-grade malignancy, such as large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Moreover, the prognosis and behavioral features of these neuroendocrine tumors worsen as the grade of malignancy increases [2]. Neuroendocrine tumors account for more than 25% of all pulmonary neoplasms, and most neuroendocrine tumors are SCLC [3].

The imaging findings of neuroendocrine tumors are well recognized. Typical and atypical carcinoid tumors appear on CT as spherical or ovoid nodules or masses with well-defined and slightly lobulated borders. Nonspherical tumors are elongated with the long axis parallel to adjacent bronchi. Calcification or ossification is present in as many as 30% of tumors [4]. The CT findings for LCNEC of the lung are nonspecific and similar to those of other non-small cell carcinoma of the lung [4-6]. Most SCLCs are located centrally and appear with mediastinal (92% of cases) or hilar (84%) lymphadenopathy accompanying lobar atelectasis (30%) or a noncontiguous parenchymal mass [7]. In 5-10% of cases, SCLC manifests as a peripheral nodule without associated lymphadenopathy [8, 9].

It has been anecdotally reported [10] that carcinoid tumors do not exhibit increased activity during PET and usually have less 18F-FDG uptake than is expected for malignant tumors. It also has been reported [10, 11], however, that carcinoids may have increased FDG uptake and thus high metabolic activity and malignant potential. Because it is used to evaluate non-small cell carcinoma of the lung, FDG PET has been studied for evaluation of SCLC. In those studies, FDG PET was found to be highly sensitive in the detection of SCLC and useful for predicting prognosis and tumor stage [12-17]. To our knowledge, however, no study has been conducted on PET of LCNEC. The purpose of our study was to describe integrated PET/CT findings on neuroendocrine tumors of the lung in a relatively large number of patients and to correlate the findings with prognosis.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Our institutional review board approved this study. Patient informed consent was not required for the retrospective study, but written informed consent was obtained from all patients for integrated FDG PET/CT and standalone enhanced CT.

Patient Population
Between May 2003 and February 2005, a total of 1,276 patients consecutively underwent integrated PET/CT examinations after contrast-enhanced standalone CT for the evaluation of lung neoplasms. At our institution, integrated PET/CT was usually recommended for cancer staging before surgery on patients with confirmed lung neoplasms and for tissue characterization in patients with clinically indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules. Among the 1,276 patients, 37 patients (33 men and four women; age range, 23-78 years; mean age, 60 years) proved to have a neuroendocrine tumor of the lung. Ten (27%) of the 37 patients (one with atypical carcinoid, seven with LCNEC, and two with SCLC) had a medical history of pulmonary tuberculosis as determined with clinical or imaging studies.

Enhanced Standalone CT Acquisition and Image Analysis
CT scans were acquired with helical technique (16-MDCT, HiLight or LightSpeed Ultra, GE Healthcare). Images were obtained with the following parameters: 120 kVp, 170 mA, 5-mm collimation, and total active detector length pitch of 1.3-1.5. The scans covered the level of thoracic inlet to the middle portion of both kidneys. Image data were reconstructed in the transverse (5.0-mm thickness) plane only. In all cases, a power injector (MCT Plus, Medrad) was used for IV injection of 100 mL of contrast medium ([iopamidol], Iopamiron 300, Bracco) at a rate of 2 mL/s.

A thoracic radiologist with 6 years of experience interpreted all CT scans. This reviewer was unaware of integrated PET/CT, surgical, and pathologic findings and of clinical information except that the patient had a lung tumor. CT scans were analyzed for location, size, and shape of the tumor; pattern and degree of enhancement compared with chest wall muscle; marginal characteristics; and the presence of calcification, necrotic low-attenuation area, and associated postobstructive atelectasis or pneumonia. Tumors were regarded as central when located within or proximal to the segmental bronchial lumen. Otherwise, tumors were considered to be peripherally located. Tumor size was defined as longest diameter; tumor shape was classified as round, ovoid, or rectangular; and tumor contour was classified as smooth, lobulated, spiculated, or lobulated and spiculated. Calcifications were classified as stippled, round nodular, popcornlike, diffuse, or laminated.

Tumor staging was performed with the newly revised International System for Staging Lung Cancer as adopted by the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the International Union Against Cancer for the classification of lung cancer [18]. Tumor staging was performed in consideration of size, involvement of surrounding organ and chest wall, and distance of the primary tumor from the carina. Lymph node assessment was based on size. Nodes with a short-axis diameter greater than 10 mm were defined as abnormal, and the presence of necrosis within a lymph node was considered a sign of malignancy, regardless of node size. Hilar lymph nodes were considered positive for malignancy when their greatest diameter exceeded 10 mm.

Integrated PET/CT Acquisition and Image Analysis
All patients fasted for at least 6 hours before PET/CT, although oral hydration with glucose-free water was allowed. After verification of a normal blood glucose level in the peripheral blood, patients received an IV injection of 370 MBq (10 mCi) of FDG and then rested for approximately 45 minutes before undergoing imaging. Image acquisition was performed with an integrated PET/CT device (Discovery LS, GE Healthcare) consisting of a PET scanner (Advance NXi) and an 8-MDCT scanner (Light Speed Plus). The axes of both systems were mechanically aligned such that the patient could be moved from the CT scanner to the PET scanner with movement of the examination table 68 cm.

CT was performed from the head to the pelvic floor according to the following standardized protocol: 140 kV, 80 mA, tube rotation time of 0.5 second per rotation, pitch of 6, and a section thickness of 5.0 mm, which matched the PET image section thickness. Patients were allowed normal shallow respiration during acquisition of CT scans. No contrast material was administered. Immediately after CT, PET was performed with an identical axial field of view. The acquisition time for PET was 5 minutes per table position. CT data were resized from a 512 x 512 matrix to a 128 x 128 matrix to match the PET data to allow image fusion, and CT transmission maps were generated. PET image data sets were reconstructed iteratively with the ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm with segmented measured attenuation correction (two iterations, 28 subsets) with the CT data. Coregistered images were displayed with eNTEGRA software (GE Healthcare), which allowed image fusion and analysis.

The images were interpreted by one chest radiologist, who was not involved in standalone CT analysis, and one nuclear medicine physician. The chest radiologist had 16 years of CT interpretation experience and 2 years of integrated PET/CT interpretation experience. The nuclear medicine physician had 11 years of PET interpretation experience and 2 years of integrated PET/CT interpretation experience. The reviewers were blinded to clinical, standalone CT, and pathologic results and together prospectively evaluated integrated PET/CT data sets. Decisions on findings were reached by consensus.

After analysis of CT images for tumor location, size, shape, attenuation value, and margin characteristics and for the presence of calcification, necrotic low-attenuation areas, and associated post-obstructive atelectasis or pneumonia, as in the analysis of enhanced standalone CT images, PET maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) of primary lung tumors were measured. The presence of hilar nodal, mediastinal nodal, and extrathoracic FDG uptake was recorded for carcinoid tumors and LCNEC. For SCLC, maximum SUV was chosen from the node of highest uptake when the disease appeared as extensive hilar or mediastinal lymph node enlargement without pulmonary nodules. When the disease manifested as a pulmonary nodule plus hilar or mediastinal lymph node enlargement, the maximum SUV was chosen from the area of greatest uptake, whether or not greatest uptake was identified as being associated with a pulmonary nodule or lymph node. Hilar or mediastinal nodal uptake was considered positive when it was greater than mediastinal uptake. Extrathoracic uptake was considered positive when it was greater than the normal uptake of the surrounding organ (e.g., positive when adrenal uptake was greater than liver uptake). Even if glucose uptake was high (greater than background activity), calcified lymph nodes and lymph nodes with greater attenuation than the surrounding great vessels on CT images at integrated PET/CT were considered benign [19].

Surgical and Histopathologic Analysis
Surgical staging was performed by one of two experienced thoracic surgeons who had 17 years and 12 years of experience. Tumor stages were determined with the TNM and American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems [16] for carcinoid tumors and LCNECs. Surgical staging of carcinoids (n =7) and LCNECs (n = 15) included mediastinoscopy alone (n = 1), mediastinoscopy and thoracotomy (n = 10), and thoracotomy alone (n = 10). In one patient with LCNEC, who underwent only bronchoscopic biopsy, clinical staging was based on imaging findings alone. For carcinoids (n =7) and LCNECs (n = 15), patients in whom the primary tumor was limited to a lobe (n = 13) underwent lobectomy. Patients with hilar node metastasis of extracapsular invasion or tumor located in the bronchus intermedius underwent bilobectomy (n = 3) or pneumonectomy (n =4). Two patients with LCNEC in pathologic stages T1N3 and T2N2 underwent chemoradiation therapy without surgical removal. Histologic diagnoses of SCLC (n = 15) were obtained by bronchoscopic biopsy in eight cases and by transthoracic percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy in seven cases.

If thoracotomy was performed, a lung pathologist with 10 years of experience evaluated tumors for histopathologic class, size, surrounding organ involvement, necrosis, and distance from the resection margin and evaluated lymph nodes for location and number. The surgeons labeled dissected lymph nodes using a numbering system based on the lymph node map definition of lung cancer staging proposed by Mountain and Dresler [18]. A pathologist evaluated the nodes as numbered in the surgical field. Specimens were stained with H and E and examined with light microscopy.

Extrathoracic Cancer Staging
In addition to whole-body PET/CT, thoracic and abdominal CT, whole-body bone scanning, and dedicated brain MRI were used for additional conventional cancer staging. The use of these staging techniques was considered in the context of the clinical situation. Tumor staging of SCLC was performed with the Veterans Administration Lung Study Group definition of SCLC [20]. Limited-stage SCLC was defined as carcinoma confined to a tolerable radiation port and included regional mediastinal and supraclavicular lymph nodes and pleural effusion. Integration of whole-body integrated PET/CT and brain MRI results and clinical findings, including follow-up study results if any, served as the reference standard for tumor staging.

Data Analysis and Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed with SAS 8.2 (SAS Institute). Differences in maximum SUVs and patient ages among carcinoid tumors, LCNECs, and SCLCs were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Sex difference and presence of extrathoracic involvement among the three groups were tested with the chi-square test. Survival rates among the three groups were compared by use of Kaplan-Meier methods. Correlation between the maximum SUV of primary tumors and tumor stage in patients with carcinoids and those with LCNECs was performed with the Jonckheere-Terpstra test. Differences between the maximum SUVs of limited and extensive stages of SCLC were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. Correlation between maximum SUV and survival length was evaluated with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. When any cutoff value was acquired with ROC analysis, the appropriateness of the value was tested by use of the Cox proportional hazards model to adjust age and other variables. For carcinoids, LCNECs, and SCLCs, tumor staging accuracy with PET/CT was compared with that with standalone CT and the conventional staging method.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Tumor Histology, Staging, and Patients' Survival
Typical and atypical carcinoids were found in two and five patients, respectively. LCNEC was detected in 15 patients and SCLC in 15. The tumor stage of carcinoids (n = 7) was IA in one (14%) of the patients, IB in four (57%), and IIA in two (29%). The stage of LCNEC (n = 15) was IA in three (20%) of the patients, IB in four (27%), IIA in one (7%), IIB in four (27%), III in two (13%), and IV in one (7%). In cases of SCLC (n = 15), limited disease was found in nine (60%) and extensive disease in six (40%) of the patients (Tables 1 and 2). Among the three tumor groups, patient ages were significantly different (mean age ± SD for carcinoids, 46 ± 11.6 years; LCNECs, 64 ± 7.0; SCLCs, 63 ± 11.5; p = 0.007, Kruskal-Wallis test). There was no significant sex difference among the three groups (p = 0.224, chi-square test).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE I: CT and 18F-FDG PET Findings for Carcinoid Tumors (n = 7) and Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (n = 15)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: CT and 18F-FDG PET Findings in Small-Cell Lung Cancer (n = 15)

 

All seven patients with carcinoids survived a mean follow-up period of 18 months (range, 12-26 months; median, 19 months). Eight (53%) of 15 patients with LCNEC survived a mean follow-up period of 17 months (range, 1-25 months; median, 19 months). Seven (47%) of 15 patients with SCLC survived a follow-up period of 15 months (range, 5-27 months; median, 15 months). There was no significant difference in survival rates among the three groups (p = 0.183, Kaplan-Meier method).

Morphology of Tumors on CT
Of seven carcinoids, three were centrally located and four peripherally located (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C and 2A, 2B, 2C). Four tumors were ovoid; two, round; and one, polygonal. Six tumors had a smooth margin, and one was lobulated. Punctate calcification was found in one (14%) of seven carcinoids (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C). One atypical carcinoid had a small area (< 10% of tumor volume) of necrosis. Two typical carcinoids exhibited greater enhancement than chest wall muscle. Two atypical carcinoids exhibited greater enhancement than chest wall muscle, and three exhibited isoattenuation. Obstructive pneumonia or atelectasis was found in three central tumors (Table 1). In one atypical carcinoid, the tumor appeared as a small (12 mm in longest diameter) parenchymal nodule with extensive ipsilateral hilar lymph node enlargement (Fig. 2A, 2B, 2C).


Figure 1
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —23-year-old man with typical carcinoid with little 18F-FDG uptake (Table 1, patient 1). Transverse unenhanced CT scan (5-mm section thickness, 80 mA) obtained through right middle lung zone shows 32-mm central mass (arrows) occupying right bronchus intermedius. Punctuate calcifications (arrowheads) are evident.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —23-year-old man with typical carcinoid with little 18F-FDG uptake (Table 1, patient 1). and C, FDG PET (B) and integrated PET/CT (C) scans show little FDG uptake (arrows) within tumor (maximum standardized uptake value, 3.2)

 

Figure 3
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C —23-year-old man with typical carcinoid with little 18F-FDG uptake (Table 1, patient 1). FDG PET (B) and integrated PET/CT (C) scans show little FDG uptake (arrows) within tumor (maximum standardized uptake value, 3.2)

 

Figure 4
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —42-year-old woman with atypical carcinoid with little 18F-FDG uptake (Table 1, patient 7). Transverse unenhanced CT scan (1-mm section thickness, 180 mA) obtained at level of left inferior pulmonary vein shows 12-mm nodule (arrow) in left lower lobe.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —42-year-old woman with atypical carcinoid with little 18F-FDG uptake (Table 1, patient 7). Transverse contrast-enhanced CT scan (5-mm section thickness, 180 mA) obtained 10-mm superior to A shows enlarged lymph nodes (arrows) in left hilum.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C —42-year-old woman with atypical carcinoid with little 18F-FDG uptake (Table 1, patient 7). PET scan obtained at level between A and B shows little FDG uptake within primary tumor (arrow) (maximum standardized uptake value, 1.7) and considerable FDG uptake within left hilar lymph node (arrowhead) (maximum standardized uptake value, 11.2).

 
Ten of the 15 LCNECs were located peripherally (Fig. 3A, 3B) and five centrally. Eleven of these tumors were ovoid and four round. Thirteen tumors had a lobulated margin, and two were smooth. Punctate calcification was found in one (7%) of the 15 tumors. Twelve (75%) of the 15 tumors exhibited necrosis, ranging from 5% to 85% of tumor volume (mean, 26%; median, 25-30%). Ten tumors exhibited isoattenuation to chest wall muscle. On contrast-enhanced CT, four tumors exhibited greater attenuation and one less attenuation than chest wall muscle. Obstructive pneumonia or atelectasis was found in three of five central tumors (Table 1).


Figure 7
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —51-year-old man with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with high 18F-FDG uptake (Table 1, patient 16). Transverse contrast-enhanced CT scan (5-mm section thickness, 180 mA) obtained at level of distal left main bronchus shows 45-mm mass (arrows) encircling apicoposterior segmental bronchus in left upper lobe.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —51-year-old man with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with high 18F-FDG uptake (Table 1, patient 16). Integrated PET/CT scan shows high FDG uptake within tumor (maximum standardized uptake value, 13.4).

 
Eight of the 15 SCLCs manifested as extensive hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement, six as a small peripheral pulmonary nodule accompanying extensive hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement, and one as a peripheral pulmonary nodule (Table 2) (Fig. 4A, 4B). Lesions had low attenuation in six, isoattenuation in seven, and high attenuation in two cases. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed homogeneous attenuation in 11 cases and heterogeneous attenuation in four cases.


Figure 9
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A —78-year-old man with small cell lung cancer manifesting as solitary pulmonary nodule (Table 2, patient 11). Transverse CT scan (5-mm section thickness, 180 mA) obtained with lung window at level of aortic arch shows 15-mm nodule (arrow) in left upper lobe.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B —78-year-old man with small cell lung cancer manifesting as solitary pulmonary nodule (Table 2, patient 11). Integrated PET/CT scan shows high 18F-FDG uptake within tumor (arrow) (maximum standardized uptake value, 8.1).

 
FDG Uptake of Tumors: Correlation with Tumor Staging and Prognosis
In 37 patients, the maximum SUV of tumors ranged from 1.7 to 25.6 (mean, 10.3; median, 9.4). The FDG uptake of four (two typical and two atypical) of seven carcinoids was less than mediastinal uptake (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C). In one atypical carcinoid, the maximum SUV of a 12-mm pulmonary nodule was 1.7, whereas that of a hilar node was 11.2 (Fig. 2A, 2B, 2C). Maximum SUVs of primary tumors were significantly different for carcinoids (range, 1.7-7.1; mean, 4.0; median, 3.4), LCNECs (range, 3.9-25.6; mean, 12.0; median, 10.7) (Fig. 3A, 3B) and SCLCs (range, 6.1-17.3; mean, 11.6; median, 11.7) (Fig. 4A, 4B), the value increasing for carcinoid through LCNEC to SCLC (p = 0.006, Kruskal-Wallis test). The mean maximum SUV of limited-stage SCLC was 11.9 (range, 6.1-17.3), whereas that of extensive-stage SCLC was 11.1 (range, 7.1-16.7). There was no significant positive correlation between the maximum SUV of primary tumors and tumor stage of carcinoids and LCNECs (p = 0.078, Jonckheere-Terpstra test). Differences in maximum SUV between the limited and extensive stages of SCLC were not statistically significant (p = 0.7683, Mann-Whitney test). A maximum SUV greater than 13.7 suggested a short survival time for patients with LCNEC and those with SCLC (ROC analysis area under the curve, 0.850; p < 0.001).

Comparison of Staging Accuracy Between Conventional Methods and PET/CT
Histologic examination revealed hilar nodal metastatic lesions in two patients with atypical carcinoid and seven patients with LCNEC. Mediastinal nodal metastasis was present in three patients with LCNEC (N2 in two patients and N3 in one patient). For hilar nodal metastasis, false-negative interpretation was rendered at integrated PET/CT of one patient with LCNEC (patient 12, Table 1), and false-positive interpretation was rendered at standalone CT of another patient (patient 16, Table 1). The two techniques were correct for prediction of mediastinal nodal metastasis. However, in a patient with N3 disease in whom right supraclavicular lymph node metastasis was present (patient 14, Table 1), only PET/CT depicted the nodal metastatic lesion.

Extrathoracic tumor involvement was present in one of 15 patients with LCNEC (bone involvement) and three of 15 patients with SCLC (involvement of colon, brain, and paraaortic nodes in the abdominal cavity). There was no difference in extrathoracic involvement ratios among the three groups (p = 0.499, chi-square test). Bone metastasis in a patient with LCNEC (Fig. 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D) was detected only at integrated PET/CT.


Figure 11
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A —49-year-old man with rib metastasis from large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (Table 1, patient 17). Rib metastasis was detected only with integrated PET/CT. Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan (5-mm section thickness, 180 mA) obtained with mediastinal window at level of distal bronchus intermedius shows lobulated mass (arrow) in left hilar area with enlarged lymph nodes (arrowhead) in subcarinal area.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B —49-year-old man with rib metastasis from large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (Table 1, patient 17). Rib metastasis was detected only with integrated PET/CT. CT scan obtained at same time as A shows no abnormality in FDG uptake area. Bone scan (not shown) also did not suggest rib metastasis. Thus patient underwent follow-up CT examination without tissue confirmation.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5C —49-year-old man with rib metastasis from large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (Table 1, patient 17). Rib metastasis was detected only with integrated PET/CT. Transverse PET scan obtained at same time as A and B shows increased 18F-FDG uptake (arrow) suggestive of rib metastasis in posterior arc of left third rib.

 

Figure 14
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5D —49-year-old man with rib metastasis from large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (Table 1, patient 17). Rib metastasis was detected only with integrated PET/CT. Follow-up CT scan obtained at similar level to and 6 months after B and C shows bone destruction and soft-tissue lesion (arrows) at previous FDG uptake area.

 
Among 15 patients with LCNEC, PET/CT findings led to understaging (false-negative hilar node) in one patient. Conventional imaging findings led to overstaging (false-positive hilar node) in one patient and understaging in two patients (false-negative supraclavicular nodal metastasis in one patient and false-negative bone metastasis in the other).


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
While analyzing PET findings in seven cases of carcinoid tumor (six typical and one atypical), Erasmus et al. [10] noticed that in six of the seven cases, tumor FDG uptake was less than mediastinal uptake. These six tumors were smaller than 30 mm in diameter (range, 5-30 mm). One atypical carcinoid less than 30 mm in diameter also had little uptake compared with mediastinal uptake. Only one 10-cm typical carcinoid had high uptake. Wartski et al. [11] found that typical and atypical carcinoids may have increased FDG uptake. In our study, however, the uptake of both typical carcinoids larger than 30 mm in diameter was less than mediastinal uptake, although three (60%) of five atypical carcinoids had higher than mediastinal uptake (maximum SUV, 4.0-7.1). One small atypical carcinoid with a diameter of 12 mm had faint uptake (maximum SUV, 1.7), and the three atypical carcinoids with increased PET uptake had the largest diameters, ranging from 25 to 58 mm. Therefore, carcinoids show variable FDG uptake according to mitotic figure and tumor proliferation.

It has been reported [21] that an atypical carcinoid can appear as a small pulmonary nodule with extensive hilar or mediastinal lymph node enlargement. In our study, one case of atypical carcinoid appeared as a small peripheral nodule and extensive hilar lymph node enlargement (patient 7, Table 1). In this case, the parenchymal nodule had a maximum SUV of 1.7, whereas hilar nodes had a maximum SUV of 11.2. Carcinoids tend to be vascular and can exhibit considerable enhancement. This characteristic is particularly helpful for differentiating tumor from obstructive atelectasis and adjacent mucous plugs [4]. In our study, four of seven carcinoids had high and homogeneous enhancement.

LCNEC manifests as peripheral pulmonary nodules more often (73-84% of cases) than it does as central lesions accompanying obstructive pneumonia or atelectasis [5, 6]. In our study, 10 (67%) of 15 LCNECs appeared as peripheral lung nodules. The frequencies of the presence of tumor necrosis (75%, 12 of 15 tumors) and a lobulated tumor margin (87%, 13 of 15 tumors) in our cases concurred with the findings in previous reports [5, 6]. With regard to maximum SUV, all LCNECs had homogeneously high FDG uptake. The maximum SUV of LCNECs ranged from 3.9 to 25.6 (mean, 12.0; median, 10.7). This finding is somewhat contradictory to the maximum SUV of adenocarcinoma. Adenocarcinoma has low FDG uptake proportional to the extent of the bronchioloalveolar carcinoma component in the tumor and thus simulates benign nodules with a large bronchioloalveolar carcinoma component [22, 23].

In LCNEC, both integrated PET/CT and standalone CT showed similar and high accuracy in prediction of the presence of hilar and mediastinal nodal metastasis. However, PET/CT helped identify supraclavicular nodal metastasis in one patient and bone metastasis in another. Thus in overall staging, integrated PET/CT was better than standalone CT and conventional staging. Moreover, the maximum SUV greater than 13.7 suggested a short survival period. Therefore, integrated PET/CT was useful not only in staging but also in predicting prognosis of LCNEC.

Accurate staging is as important in SCLC as it is in non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Patients with limited-stage SCLC are treated with chemoradiation therapy, whereas those with extensive-stage disease usually receive chemotherapy alone. PET has been regarded as valuable for initial tumor staging (limited vs extensive) and for the planning of treatment of patients with presumed limited-stage disease [12-17].

According to a report by Pandit et al. [12], PET of patients with SCLC is useful for predicting prognosis, especially among treated patients. After-treatment survival in PET-positive cases is significantly worse than in PET-negative cases. We found a significant negative correlation between maximum SUV and survival. In addition, in the cases of eight untreated patients, PET staging results concurred with the final clinical stage determined by conventional methods. Also in our study, the maximum SUV of SCLC before treatment showed a negative correlation with survival time.

In our study, the maximum SUVs of primary tumors were significantly different for carcinoid tumors, LCNECs, and SCLCs, increasing in that order. However, there was no significant positive correlation between maximum SUV of primary tumors and tumor stage of carcinoids, LCNECs, and SCLCs. The absence of positive correlation between the maximum SUV of the primary tumor and tumor stage has been reported [24]. Therefore, the maximum SUV of primary pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors appears not to be a crucial factor in the initial differentiation of early from advanced stages of disease.

Our study suffered from selection bias. The number of SCLC patients enrolled was small compared with the clinical population. According to tumor registry data [25-27], carcinoid tumors account for 1-2% of pulmonary neoplasms; LCNECs, 3%; and SCLCs, 20%. Therefore, a disproportionate number of carcinoid and LCNEC cases may have been included in our study. In addition, we did not routinely perform immunohistochemical staining, such as Ki 67 marker studies, for quantification of tumor proliferation. A study comparing immunohistochemical marker findings and tumor SUV may help clarify tumor differentiation and proliferation and thus overall prognosis.

In conclusion, approximately one half of carcinoid tumors simulate benign tumors by exhibiting little FDG uptake. The maximum SUVs of neuroendocrine tumors are significantly different for carcinoids, LCNECs, and SCLCs, maximum SUV increasing in the order listed. In addition, maximum SUV greater than 13.7 for LCNEC and SCLC suggests a short survival period. Integrated PET/CT is more accurate than standalone CT or conventional staging methods in the detection of extrapulmonary metastatic lesions.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Travis WD, Linnoila RI, Tsokos MG, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung with proposed criteria for large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: an ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, and flow cytometric study of 35 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1991;15 : 529-553[Medline]
  2. Travis WD, Rush W, Flieder DB, et al. Survival analysis of 200 pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors with clarification of criteria for atypical carcinoid and its separation from typical carcinoid. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22:934 -944[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Yesner R. Small cell tumors of the lung. Am J Surg Pathol 1983; 7:775 -785[Medline]
  4. Chong S, Lee KS, Chung MJ, Han J, Kwon OJ, Kim TS. Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: clinical, pathologic and imaging findings. RadioGraphics 2006;26 : 41-58[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Jung KJ, Lee KS, Han J, et al. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: clinical, CT, and pathologic findings in 11 patients. J Thorac Imaging 2001;16 : 156-162[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Oshiro Y, Kusumoto M, Matsuno Y, et al. CT findings of surgically resected large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung in 38 patients. AJR 2004; 182:87 -91[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Pearlberg JL, Sandler MA, Lewis JW Jr, Beute GH, Alpern MB. Small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma: CT evaluation. AJR1988; 150:265 -268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Quoix E, Fraser R, Wolkove N, Finkelstein H, Kreisman H. Small cell lung cancer presenting as a solitary pulmonary nodule. Cancer 1990; 66:577 -582[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Yabuuchi H, Murayama S, Sakai S, et al. Resected peripheral small cell carcinoma of the lung: computed tomographic-histologic correlation. J Thorac Imaging 1999;14 : 105-108[Medline]
  10. Erasmus JJ, McAdams HP, Patz EF Jr, Coleman RE, Ahuja V, Goodman PC. Evaluation of primary pulmonary carcinoid tumors using FDG PET. AJR 1998; 170:1369 -1373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wartski M, Alberini JL, Leroy-Ladurie F, et al. Typical and atypical bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors on FDG PET/CT imaging. Clin Nucl Med 2004;29 : 752-753[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Pandit N, Gonen M, Krug L, Larson SM. Prognostic value of [18F]FDG-PET imaging in small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30:78 -84[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Bradley JD, Dehdashti F, Mintun MA, Govindan R, Trinkaus K, Siegel BA. Positron emission tomography in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2004;22 : 3248-3254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Blum R, MacManus MP, Rischin D, Michael M, Ball D, Hicks RJ. Impact of positron emission tomography on the management of patients with small-cell lung cancer: preliminary experience. Am J Clin Oncol2004; 27:164 -171[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Brink I, Schumacher T, Mix M, et al. Impact of [18F]FDG-PET on the primary staging of small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004; 31:1614 -1620[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Kamel EM, Zwahlen D, Wyss MT, Stumpe KD, von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC. Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET improves the management of patients with small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2003;44 : 1911-1917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Schumacher T, Brink I, Mix M, et al. FDG-PET imaging for the staging and follow-up of small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28:483 -488[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Mountain CF, Dresler CM. Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. Chest 1997;111 : 1718-1723[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Shim SS, Lee KS, Kim BT, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: prospective comparison of integrated FDG PET/CT and CT alone for preoperative staging. Radiology 2005;236 : 1011-1019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Zelen M. Keynote address on biostatistics and data retrieval. Cancer Chemother Rep 3 1973;4 : 31-42
  21. Forster BB, Muller NL, Miller RR, Nelems B, Evans KG. Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1989;170 : 441-445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kim BT, Kim Y, Lee KS, et al. Localized form of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: FDG PET findings. AJR 1998;170 : 935-939[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Yi CA, Lee KS, Kim BT, et al. Tissue characterization of solitary pulmonary nodule: comparative study between helical dynamic CT and integrated PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2006;47 : 443-450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Sasaki R, Komaki R, Macapinlac H, et al. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography predicts outcome of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23 : 1136-1143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer 2003;97 : 934-959[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Jiang SX, Kameya T, Shoji M, Dobashi Y, Shinada J, Yoshimura H. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: a histologic and immunohistochemical study of 22 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22:526 -537[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Quinn D, Gianlupi A, Broste S. The changing radiographic presentation of bronchogenic carcinoma with reference to cell types. Chest 1996; 110:1474 -1479[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. M. Park, J. M. Goo, H. J. Lee, M. A Kim, C. H. Lee, and M.-J. Kang
Tumors in the Tracheobronchial Tree: CT and FDG PET Features
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 55 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Y. Jeong, K. S. Lee, J. Han, B.-T. Kim, T. S. Kim, Y. M. Shim, and J. Kim
Integrated PET/CT of Salivary Gland Type Carcinoma of the Lung in 12 Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1407 - 1413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chong, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chong, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.-Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS