AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ersoy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rybicki, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ersoy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rybicki, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.0901
AJR 2007; 188:1246-1254
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Time-Resolved MR Angiography: A Primary Screening Examination of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism and Contraindications to Administration of Iodinated Contrast Material

Hale Ersoy1, Samuel Z. Goldhaber2, Tianxi Cai3, Tuan Luu1, Joshua Rosebrook1, Robert Mulkern4 and Frank Rybicki1

1 Cardiovascular Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., ASB I-L1-004, Boston, MA 02115.
2 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
3 Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
4 Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Received July 24, 2006; accepted after revision October 11, 2006.

 
Address correspondence to H. Ersoy (hersoy{at}partners.org).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
APPENDIX 1: Segmentation and...
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency and reproducibility of a single-breath-hold time-resolved 3D MR angiographic technique in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

MATERIAL AND METHODS. Twenty-seven consecutively registered patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism and contraindication to administration of iodinated contrast agents underwent imaging by time-resolved 3D MR angiography at 1.5 T. Bolus timing was not required. Two reviewers independently analyzed MR angiograms for overall image quality and evidence of pulmonary embolism. Additional imaging techniques, including pulmonary embolism CT angiography, ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scanning, venous duplex sonography for deep venous thrombosis, and echocardiography for right ventricular strain, and 30-day and 3-month clinical follow-up were used to confirm the MR angiographic findings.

RESULTS. Image quality was sufficient for diagnosis in the cases of 98% of lobar, 92-93% of segmental, and 94-95% of all vessel parts from the main pulmonary artery though the segmental branches with excellent interobserver agreement. Findings on MR angiography were concordant with the anatomic distribution of abnormalities for all pulmonary embolism CT angiographic examinations (n = 2) and four of seven V/Q lung scans. Screening with time-resolved 3D MR angiography allowed confident exclusion or inclusion of pulmonary embolism in 96% of patients.

CONCLUSION. Time-resolved 3D MR angiography provides high temporal resolution (nine phases, one phase per 3.3 seconds) and consistently yields arterial phase only images. As found with clinical follow-up, confident diagnosis of pulmonary embolism from the main pulmonary artery through the segmental branches can be incorporated into a clinical service as a screening examination of patients with contraindications to the use of iodinated contrast material.

Keywords: angiography • cardiopulmonary imaging • dynamic MRI • lung • MRI • MRI technique


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
APPENDIX 1: Segmentation and...
References
 
CT of the pulmonary arteries is the standard-of-care imaging test in the evaluation of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). In a small subset of patients, however, especially those with renal insufficiency (serum creatinine concentration > 1.5 mg/dL) and those with severe allergic reactions, use of iodinated contrast material is contraindicated. When such patients need imaging, most centers rely on ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scans. The results of these scans, however, are not definitive in the diagnosis of PE. The specificity of lung scanning can be as low as 10% [1, 2]. When used as the primary diagnostic examination, V/Q lung scanning often leads to additional testing that results in delay, additional cost, and the risk of unnecessary anticoagulation treatment.

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography has been proposed as a noninvasive tool for the diagnosis of PE, with early reports showing a sensitivity of 68-77% and a specificity of 95-100% [3-6]. Patients who have had reactions to iodinated contrast media are at increased risk of contrast reactions during MRI [7, 8]. MR angiography, however, is performed with gadolinium chelates for contrast enhancement. The overall rate of severe allergic reactions to gadolinium chelates (0.01%) [9] is small compared with the rate of severe reactions to ionic and nonionic iodinated contrast materials, 0.16% and 0.03%, respectively [10]. Therefore, patients with severe allergies to iodine can be imaged safely with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Moreover, the nephrotoxicity profile of 0.5 mmol/L gadolinium chelate given at less than 0.4 mmol/kg is generally considered less than that of iodinated contrast agents [11, 12].

Despite its accuracy and safety profile, the routine use of MR angiography in the evaluation of PE in a specific subset of patients has been limited by technical and practical factors. Image degradation from respiratory and cardiac motion is common. In general, respiratory motion is more of a problem with MRI than it is with state-of-the-art CT scanners, because the average breath-hold is significantly longer. High spatial resolution is necessary because of the small diameter of the branch vessels of the pulmonary arterial tree. High temporal resolution is required to produce arterial phase only images, avoiding the pulmonary venous enhancement that can obscure evaluation of the arteries. One reason that pulmonary MR angiography has not been routinely used is the challenge of obtaining high temporal resolution while maintaining high spatial resolution.

Just as improvements in CT technology, such as thinner slices, more slices per gantry rotation, and faster gantry rotation times, have made CT the mainstay in the diagnosis of PE, advances in MRI technology, in particular faster gradients, have enabled it to become more robust as a second-line imaging technique for PE. We evaluated the efficiency and reproducibility of a single-breath-hold time-resolved 3D MR angiographic technique in imaging of patients with clinically suspected PE.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
APPENDIX 1: Segmentation and...
References
 
Patients
Twenty-seven consecutively registered patients (14 men, 13 women; mean age, 62 years; age range, 35-92 years) with clinically suspected PE and a contraindication to administration of iodinated contrast material were imaged. The patient records were obtained from our cardiovascular imaging section, which offers 3D MR angiography as a clinical service. All patients included in this study were inpatients, including several intensive care patients, with one or more of the following comorbid conditions: malignancy, trauma, long-term postoperative immobilization, infection, nephritic syndrome, and collagen vascular disease. Images and clinical information were retrospectively reviewed. The protocol was approved by the human research committee of our institution.

MR Angiography
All MR angiographic examinations were performed with a 1.5-T MRI system (Signa 11.0, GE Healthcare) with gradients operating at a speed of 40 mT/m. After placement of a 20-gauge IV angiocatheter in an antecubital vein for administration of a gadolinium-based paramagnetic contrast agent, the patients were placed on the imaging table in the supine feet-first position. A standard eight-channel phased-array coil was used for signal reception. Three-plane steady-state free precession acquisition (fast imaging with steady-state acquisition) was used as the locator for prescription of the 3D MR angiographic imaging volume. For time-resolved 3D MR angiography, we used elliptic centric time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics. This sequence is based on a fast 3D gradient-echo pulse sequence with the specific view-sharing and temporal interpolation scheme described in Appendix 1 [13-16].

Imaging parameters for time-resolved 3D MR angiography were as follows: TR/TE, 3.5/1.3; receiver bandwidth, ± 62.5 kHz; number of signals averaged, 0.5; flip angle, 35°; field of view, 340 mm; phase field of view, 1; matrix size, 256 x 192. A coronal oblique slab was prescribed with 30 partitions with effective thickness of 3 mm. The MR angiographic sequence included two phases with separate breath-holds, unenhanced mask (14.7 seconds), and contrast-enhanced dynamic acquisition (41 seconds) with the same imaging parameters. The mask acquisition was followed by dynamic imaging with 40 mL of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Berlex) and immediate 20-mL saline flush at a rate of 3 mL/s. An automated injector (Medrad) was used for contrast and saline administration. Bolus timing was not required. A standard scan delay (3 seconds) was used between the beginning of the contrast infusion and the start of time-resolved 3D MR angiographic acquisition.

Patients were instructed to perform a breath-hold for as long as possible, and the beginning of imaging was synchronized to the breath-hold. Mask subtraction was fully automated on the MRI unit. With this MR angiographic technique, nine phases were acquired in immediate succession with a temporal output rate of one phase per 3.3 seconds over the 41-second scanning time. The high temporal resolution necessitated a compromise with respect to spatial resolution. With a 340-mm field of view, the voxel size was 1.3 x 1.8 x 3 mm. After zero interpolation, the displayed spatial resolution was 0.7 x 0.7 x 1.5 mm. In the clinical service protocol we included complementary equilibrium phase imaging with a breath-hold 3D T1-weighted fast gradient-echo pulse sequence with fat suppression (4.6/1.1; receiver bandwidth, ± 62.5 kHz; number of signals averaged, 0.75; flip angle, 12°; matrix size, 320 x 224) to identify thoracic abnormalities other than PE that could explain the symptoms.

Image Interpretation and Data Analysis
Two experienced cardiovascular imagers blinded to the clinical information independently scored the pulmonary arterial tree to the level of the segmental branches. For analysis, the parts of the pulmonary arterial system were as follows: main pulmonary artery, right and left pulmonary arteries, five lobar arteries (right upper, right middle, right lower, left upper, left lower), and 18 segmental branches, for a total of 26 parts. Image interpretation was performed with a workstation on which source images were viewed and multiplane reformatted images and maximum intensity projections were made for each of the nine phases. The MRI finding diagnostic of PE was defined as an arterial filling defect throughout all phases or as abrupt cutoff of the main or lobar pulmonary arteries.

For each patient, 26 vessel parts were separately analyzed for overall image quality, including respiratory motion and venous contamination. Image quality was rated on a three-point scale: 1, no artifact; 2, artifact present so that the arterial part was seen but the findings were insufficient for confident diagnosis or exclusion of PE; 3, artifact substantial enough to preclude identification of the arterial part. For assessment of image quality and the presence of PE, the rate of agreement between the two imagers was determined with the kappa statistic with linear weight [17]. This value was computed for the lobar and the segmental arteries separately and for the total 26 vessel parts. A weighted kappa value greater than 0.80 indicated excellent interobserver agreement. For each patient, both reviewers independently identified which of the nine phases yielded the best arterial phase 3D data set.

Clinical and imaging follow-up data were collected through review of medical and radiologic record. Clinical follow-up included admission and preadmission diagnoses, comorbid conditions (e.g., malignant disease, congestive heart failure, pulmonary disease, and infection), clinical course during the hospitalization, anticoagulant treatment, incidence of new PE, and mortality within 30 days and 3 months after the initial MR angiographic study.


Figure 1
View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 —46-year-old man with retrosternal chest pain and increasing shortness of breath for past 2 hours. Three-dimensional time-resolved pulmonary MR angiogram (TE/TR, 3.5/1.3; bandwidth, ± 62.5 kHz; flip angle, 35°, 30 partitions with effective thickness of 3 mm; matrix size, 256 x 192; scan time, 41 seconds) shows nine temporally resolved phases acquired with single breath-hold. Fourth phase has best image quality, as was true for most patients in this study.

 
Additional imaging of each of the 27 patients was separated into three categories: PE CT angiography (CTA), V/Q lung scan, and duplex sonography for deep venous thrombosis and echocardiography for right ventricular strain. Two imaging studies of the pulmonary arterial system, PE CTA and V/Q lung scan, were used to determine concordance with the MR angiographic findings when these studies were performed within 24 hours of MR angiography. PE CTA is considered the reference standard in the diagnosis of PE [18]. All images from both PE CTA and V/Q lung scanning were reviewed and compared with the radiology reports. For patients who underwent PE CTA, after correction of a transient increase in serum creatinine concentration, the MR angiographic findings were compared with the PE CTA findings vessel part by vessel part. The pretest PE probability of the V/Q scan was rated low (< 10%), intermediate (10-50%), moderately high (> 50-90%), or high (> 90%) [19]. With respect to V/Q scans, low probability was considered concordant with negative findings on MR angiography. Moderately high and high probability were considered concordant with positive findings on MR angiography. V/Q scans with intermediate probability were classified neither discordant nor concordant [19]. For patients with intermediate-probability or indeterminate V/Q scans and those in whom the scan results conflicted with clinical expectation, results of further studies—duplex sonography of the leg veins and echocardiography—were taken into consideration before the patient was selected for active treatment. Imaging reports from duplex sonography and echocardiography performed within 1 week of MR angiography were reviewed. None of the patients underwent digital subtraction angiography.


Figure 2
View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —54-year-old man who underwent right antecubital vein injection and had unknown central venous thrombosis. Fifth phase of acquisition of coronal time-resolved 3D MR angiogram shows poor enhancement of pulmonary arteries (open arrows) due to slow venous flow from collateral veins.

 

Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
APPENDIX 1: Segmentation and...
References
 
All patients tolerated imaging well, and there were no substantial complications or adverse events during or after gadolinium administration. All data sets were eligible for evaluation. Most of our patients had central lines in place. We did not, however, notice substantial image degradation due to the metallic susceptibility artifact caused by the central lines. In all instances, we obtained arterial phase only images without significant pulmonary venous overlap (Fig. 1). In one of 27 patients, pulmonary arterial enhancement was significantly delayed until the eighth phase owing to massive central venous thrombosis and delayed arrival of contrast material into the right atrium through venous collaterals (Fig. 2A, 2B).


Figure 3
View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —54-year-old man who underwent right antecubital vein injection and had unknown central venous thrombosis. Contrast-enhanced equilibrium phase 3D fast gradient-echo image shows thrombosis (arrows) of central veins.

 

In the cases of 26 of the 27 patients, both reviewers were in complete agreement that either the third or the fourth phase of the acquisition was optimal for evaluation of the arterial tree. For assessment of image quality (Table 1), both reviewers were in complete agreement regarding the central (main, right, and left) pulmonary arteries and found 98% of the vessel parts to have no artifacts. Two segmental parts were not included within the imaging volume. Image quality was rated diagnostic by both reviewers for 127 (98%) of 129 lobar arteries. Image quality was rated diagnostic for 423 (92%) of 462 segmental parts by reviewer 1 and for 429 (93%) of 462 segmental arteries by reviewer 2. For all parts (main, left, right, lobar, and segmental pulmonary arteries), image quality was rated diagnostic for 629 (94%) of 670 parts by reviewer 1 and for 635 (95%) of 670 parts by reviewer 2. Interobserver agreement was very good for lobar arteries, segmental arteries, and all parts (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Assessment of Diagnostic Quality of Time-Resolved MR Angiography

 

On the basis of MR angiographic findings, both reviewers identified PE in four of 27 patients. There was complete agreement regarding the vessel parts considered to have positive findings. With respect to additional imaging (Table 2), two of the four patients with the diagnosis of PE based on MR angiographic findings underwent PE CTA within 24 hours of MR angiography (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C). Both reviewers independently identified PE in identical parts on MR angiography and PE CTA in both patients. Seven patients underwent V/Q lung scans (four, low probability; two, intermediate; one, indeterminate). Findings on all four low-probability V/Q lung scans were concordant with negative MR angiographic findings. Two patients with intermediate-probability V/Q lung scans had MR angiographic findings positive for PE. The areas of V/Q mismatch were concordant with the distribution of emboli diagnosed with MR angiography (Fig. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D). In a patient with intermediate-probability V/Q lung scans, MR angiography did not show PE. MR angiography of this patient showed pulmonary artery dilatation, and echocardiography showed enlargement of the right ventricle. The patient died in the hospital 9 days after MR angiography, but an autopsy was not performed. Two other patients died during the 3-month follow-up period (11% all-cause mortality). Both of these patients died in the hospital, and both deaths were attributed to comorbid conditions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Findings on MR Angiography and Corroborative Studies (n = 27)

 

Figure 4
View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —49-year-old woman with hypercoagulable state, shortness of breath, and bilateral leg swelling who underwent MR angiography followed by pulmonary embolism CT angiography within 24 hours. Coronal 3D MR angiogram (A) and source image from fourth phase of acquisition (B) show filling defect in left lower lobe artery (arrow).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —49-year-old woman with hypercoagulable state, shortness of breath, and bilateral leg swelling who underwent MR angiography followed by pulmonary embolism CT angiography within 24 hours. Coronal 3D MR angiogram (A) and source image from fourth phase of acquisition (B) show filling defect in left lower lobe artery (arrow).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C —49-year-old woman with hypercoagulable state, shortness of breath, and bilateral leg swelling who underwent MR angiography followed by pulmonary embolism CT angiography within 24 hours. Coronal reformatted image from CT angiography confirms presence of pulmonary embolism (arrow) in anatomic area identical to A and B.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A —56-year-old woman with chest pain, dyspnea, and lower extremity edema referred for pulmonary MR angiography. Intermediate-probability ventilation (A)-perfusion (B) lung scan obtained within 24 hours of MR angiography shows moderate ventilation-perfusion mismatch (curved arrow, B) in superior segment of right lower lobe.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B —56-year-old woman with chest pain, dyspnea, and lower extremity edema referred for pulmonary MR angiography. Intermediate-probability ventilation (A)-perfusion (B) lung scan obtained within 24 hours of MR angiography shows moderate ventilation-perfusion mismatch (curved arrow, B) in superior segment of right lower lobe.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C —56-year-old woman with chest pain, dyspnea, and lower extremity edema referred for pulmonary MR angiography. 3D MR angiographic image shows persistent partial filling defect (arrow) in right lower lobe pulmonary artery.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D —56-year-old woman with chest pain, dyspnea, and lower extremity edema referred for pulmonary MR angiography. 3D MR angiographic source image shows abrupt cutoff of superior segmental branch of right lower lobe artery (open arrow).

 

In none of the 20 patients with negative MR angiographic findings was PE diagnosed within 30 days of the initial scan. During the 3-month follow-up period, PE developed in one of the 20 patients. This patient was undergoing anticoagulation for a known hypercoagulable state and atrial fibrillation. Among the 24 patients who survived the follow-up period, 14 avoided long-term anticoagulation. Among the 10 patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy, four had PE, four had deep venous thrombosis, and two had atrial fibrillation.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
APPENDIX 1: Segmentation and...
References
 
Although the spatial resolution of time-resolved 3D MR angiography is less than that of PE CTA, confident diagnoses were made at the main, lobar, and segmental levels. The accuracy of these diagnoses was confirmed with clinical follow-up. In most cases, this clinical information, even without evaluation of subsegmental arteries, has significant implications for patient care, particularly when use of iodinated contrast material is contraindicated. The 70% of patients with MR angiographic findings negative for PE avoided long-term anticoagulation therapy and the associated complications.

Time-resolved 3D MR angiography as a primary screening examination enabled confident exclusion or inclusion of PE in 96% (26/27) of patients, emphasizing the utility of this technique in imaging of patients who would otherwise undergo PE CTA. In two patients who underwent PE CTA, imaging findings were identical to those of MR angiography. In four of seven patients who underwent V/Q lung scanning, the results were concordant with those of MR angiography. Because of the small number of patients who underwent both V/Q scanning and MR angiography, inferences are difficult. Because the pretest probability of an intermediate scan is 10-50% [19], the definition that an intermediate-probability V/Q scan is concordant with positive or negative findings on MR angiography is subject to debate.

Higher spatial resolution may, in theory, be achieved at the expense of temporal resolution. Theoretic improvement in spatial resolution without compromising temporal resolution may be achieved by incorporating parallel imaging techniques [20, 21]. Work in the near future will explore the benefits of incorporating parallel imaging.


Figure 11
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A —57-year-old man with chest pain, shortness of breath, and known renal cell carcinoma. 3D MR angiographic image shows no pulmonary embolism in pulmonary arterial system.

 


Figure 12
View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B —57-year-old man with chest pain, shortness of breath, and known renal cell carcinoma. Contrast-enhanced equilibrium phase 3D fast gradient-echo image shows tumor plaque (arrow) in bronchus intermedius as result of direct invasion through subcarinal metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Atelectasis (open arrows) of right middle and right lower lobes also is evident.

 
The MR angiography protocol described is routinely used on our clinical service. It is designed to minimize the risk of human error on the part of the large number of technologists needed to perform the examination. Bolustiming technique is not used because the pulse sequence is inherently insensitive to timing error. However, central venous obstruction (i.e., between the IV access site and the pulmonary arterial system) can degrade image quality (Fig. 2A, 2B). In patients with known central venous obstruction, fluoroscopic triggering can be used for visualization of the transit of contrast material through the right atrium, right ventricle, and main pulmonary artery.

The magnet gradient time (i.e., excluding patient preparation) was approximately 10 minutes. This imaging time was considerably long compared with that of PE CTA, which takes less than 1 minute for data acquisition. Imaging time is a potential disadvantage of PE MR angiography, particluarly due to the patient population that can be severely ill, dyspneic, and in hemodynamically unstable condition. However, none of our patients was unable to tolerate the study, primarily because of adequate patient preparation and monitoring.

Gadolinium-enhanced CTA has been suggested as an alternative to PE CTA with iodinated contrast agents. However, high-quality gadolinium-enhanced CTA requires the use of at least 16-MDCT technology [11]. In addition, there is still considerable debate over the relative nephrotoxicity of gadolinium chelates versus iodinated contrast media. For equivalent X-ray attenuating doses, gadolinium may be more nephrotoxic than the iodinated agents. Although gadolinium-enhanced CTA has promise, we consider its use controversial and believe equivalent or superior images can be obtained with MR angiography [22].

The weakness of this study was the lack of a reference standard for the diagnosis of PE. Only four of 27 patients underwent PE CTA within 24 hours before or after MR angiography. Three of the PE CTA studies were performed with an iodinated contrast agent and one with a gadolinium chelate. In addition, as is the case for PE CTA, alternative diagnoses are important. The protocol also included a contrast-enhanced 3D T1-weighted fast gradient-echo sequence with fat suppression. This sequence was performed after time-resolved imaging and was primarily used for identifying other thoracic abnormalities to explain the patient's symptoms (Fig. 5A, 5B). We recognize that pathologic findings depicted on MRI are suboptimal in comparison with those depicted on CT.

The typical patients referred for PE CTA or MR angiography had dyspnea and chest pain in addition to other comorbid conditions. Patients were not expected to perform a breath-hold for 41 seconds (the maximum time for data acquisition). Instead, patients were instructed to performed a breath-hold for as long as possible and then to breathe shallowly until the end of acquisition. Because of the temporal interpolation scheme (Appendix 1), some respiratory motion was expected. The negative effect on image quality was minimal, if any. The arterial phase only image quality remained high in the third and fourth phases because arterial phase images were acquired before the cumulative effects of respiratory motion became relevant. We attribute this phenomenon to the specific interpolation algorithm discussed in Appendix 1.

The technique of time-resolved 3D MR angiography of the pulmonary arteries used in this study provides high temporal resolution (nine phases, one phase per 3.3 seconds) and consistently yields pure arterial phase images without bolus injection timing. The acquired spatial resolution enables confident diagnosis of PE from the main pulmonary artery through the segmental branches and can be incorporated into routine clinical workflow. This management strategy using MR angiography as a primary screening examination allows rapid exclusion of PE in patients with contraindications to the use of iodinated contrast agents.


APPENDIX 1: Segmentation and View-Sharing Algorithm for Angiographic Images
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
APPENDIX 1: Segmentation and...
References
 
In the 3D elliptic-centric time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (EC-TRICKS) pulse sequence, the k-space is divided into four segments, A, B, C, and D, all of equal area, in the phase- and slice-encoding dimensions (Fig. 6). This sequence is a refinement of the linear 3D TRICKS technique, in which the k-space is divided into seven equal segments along the slice direction only with three pairs symmetric on both sides along the phase-encoding (ky) direction [13, 14]. The refinements allow faster updating of image contrast enhancement represented by the low-frequency k-space data (segment A) with less frequent sampling of the static vessel edge detail (segments B, C, and D). Because contrast enhancement is characterized mostly by the low spatial components, EC-TRICKS generally provides optimal arterial-venous separation [15, 16].


Figure 13
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6 —Drawing shows k-space segmentation for elliptic centric phase ordering for 3D time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics MR angiographic acquisition. Segment A represents center of k-space (contrast enhancement). Segments B, C, and D represent periphery of k-space. kz = slice-encoding direction, ky = phase-encoding direction.

 


Figure 14
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7 —Schematic shows temporal interpolation and view-sharing algorithm used for reconstruction of time-resolved MR angiographic images.

 
The initial mask acquisition without contrast enhancement provides complete k-space coverage (ABCD). After contrast administration, 12 partitions of k-space are acquired over two loops. This acquisition is specific to this protocol. In general, more partitions and loops can be used as long as the data acquisition memory allows. For each loop, the order of acquisition is ABACAD. Nine temporal phases are generated from the 12 partitions. The specific partitions used for each of the nine temporal phases are shown in the view-sharing algorithm (Fig. 7).

In this scheme, the contribution of the second loop to the first three or four temporal phases is largely limited to peripheral k-space data. This limitation may be why respiratory motion during the second loop did not appear to compromise the arterial phase only images, those important for identifying pulmonary embolism. On the other hand, misregistration between the mask and the contrast-enhanced data can lead to severe image degradation because this mask is used for background signal subtraction.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
APPENDIX 1: Segmentation and...
References
 

  1. [No authors listed]. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED Investigators. JAMA 1990; 263:2753 -2759[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Ginsberg JS, et al. A noninvasive strategy for the treatment of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154:289 -297[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Gupta A, Frazer C, Ferguson J, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography. Radiology1999; 210:353 -359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Meaney JF, Weg JG, Chenevert TL, Stafford-Johnson D, Hamilton BH, Prince MR. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. N Engl J Med 1997;336 : 1422-1427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Oudkerk M, van Beek EJ, Wielopolski P, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study. Lancet 2002; 359:1643 -1647[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Kluge A, Luboldt W, Bachmann G. Acute pulmonary embolism to the subsegmental level: diagnostic accuracy of three MRI techniques compared with 16-MDCT. AJR 2006;187 : 127; [web]W7-W14[CrossRef]
  7. Nelson KL, Gifford LM, Lauber-Huber C, Gross CA, Lasser TA. Clinical safety of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 1995;196 : 439-443[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Niendorf HP, Haustein J, Cornelius I, Alhassan A, Clauss W. Safety of gadolinium-DTPA: extended clinical experience. Magn Reson Med 1991; 22:222 -228[Medline]
  9. Li A, Wong CS, Wong MK, Lee CM, Au Yeung MC. Acute adverse reactions to magnetic resonance contrast media: gadolinium chelates.Br J Radiol 2006; 79:368 -371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Cochran ST. Anaphylactoid reactions to radiocontrast media. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2005;5 : 28-31[Medline]
  11. Remy-Jardin M, Bahepar J, Lafitte JJ, et al. Multi-detector row CT angiography of pulmonary circulation with gadolinium-based contrast agents: prospective evaluation in 60 patients. Radiology2006; 238:1022 -1035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Runge VM. Safety of magnetic resonance contrast media. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12 : 309-314[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Korosec F, Frayne R, Grist T, Mistretta C. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med1996; 36:345 -351[Medline]
  14. Mistretta CA, Grist TM, Korosec FR, et al. 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR DSA: advantages and tradeoffs. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40:571 -581[Medline]
  15. Zhou Y. Improving the temporal resolution of 3D time-resolved MRA with elliptic centric view ordering: a partial Fourier approach. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkley, CA: ISMRM, 2002
  16. Zhou Y, Carroll T, Esparza-Coss E, Grist T, Misretta C, Korosec F. Time-resolved MRA with elliptical centric view reordering. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkley, CA: ISMRM, 2001
  17. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley,1981
  18. Schoepf UJ, Goldhaber SZ, Costello P. Spiral computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation2004; 109:2160 -2167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Miniati M, Monti S, Bauleo C, et al. A diagnostic strategy for pulmonary embolism based on standardised pretest probability and perfusion lung scanning: a management study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30:1450 -1456[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med1999; 42:952 -962[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Fink C, Ley S, Kroeker R, Requardt M, Kauczor HU, Bock M. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the chest: combination of parallel imaging with view sharing (TREAT). Invest Radiol 2005;40 : 40-48[Medline]
  22. Thomsen HS, Almen T, Morcos SK. Gadolinium-containing contrast media for radiographic examinations: a position paper. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:2600 -2605[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ersoy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rybicki, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ersoy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rybicki, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS