AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Cine Loop SG1 through S4F
Right arrow Cine Loop S5 through S9C
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, T.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, T.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M.-C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.0709
AJR 2007; 188:W431-W439
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pictorial Essay

MDCT Evaluation After Closure of Atrial Septal Defect with an Amplatzer Septal Occluder

Tain Lee1,2,3, I-Chen Tsai1,2,3,4, Yun-Ching Fu3,4,5, Sheng-Lin Jan5, Chung-Chi Wang6, Yen Chang6 and Min-Chi Chen1

1 Department of Radiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung Harbor Rd., Taichung 407, Taiwan, Republic of China.
2 Faculty of Medicine, Medical College of Chung Shan Medical University, Taiwan, Republic of China.
3 Department of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taiwan, Republic of China.
4 Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taiwan, Republic of China.
5 Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China.
6 Section of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China.

Received May 26, 2006; accepted after revision November 21, 2006.

 
Address correspondence to I.-C. Tsai (sillyduck{at}vghtc.gov.tw).

Tain Lee and I-Chen Tsai contributed equally to this study.

WEB This is a Web exclusive article.

FOR YOUR INFORMATION

The data supplement accompanying this Web exclusive article can be viewed from the information box in the upper right corner of the article at: www.ajronline.org.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The essay describes the protocol for and interpretation of MDCT scans in the evaluation of patients after insertion of an Amplatzer septal occluder.

CONCLUSION. In anatomic regions that cannot be confidently evaluated with transthoracic echocardiography, MDCT is useful for evaluating Amplatzer septal occluders for protrusion, migration, and residual shunt. Radiologists should be familiar with the imaging protocol and interpretation.

Keywords: cardiac imaging • cardiovascular disease • congenital malformations • CT


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Closure of an atrial septal defect (ASD) with an Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation) entails a shorter hospital stay and is less invasive than surgery [1]. If accompanied by intracardiac echocardiography rather than transesophageal echocardiography, closure with this device can be performed without general anesthesia [2]. For this reason, the Amplatzer septal occluder has gradually been recognized as an important alternative for closure of secundum-type ASD. Patient acceptance is high. After the procedure, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) usually is used for follow-up to check for migration, protrusion, and residual shunt. Because of the highly echogenic nature of the occluder, however, and the limited acoustic window in adult patients, some small defects are not visualized with confidence even with color Doppler technique. In such circumstances, MDCT can be used for further evaluation. We describe the imaging protocol for and interpretation of MDCT follow-up images after insertion of an Amplatzer septal occluder. Except for pediatric radiologists in specialized centers, most radiologists may not be familiar with the Amplatzer septal occluder [1-5]. Harper et al. [5] review current concepts. The composition and design of the device are described on the manufacturer's Website (www.amplatzer.com).


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Cardiac CT Protocol
The records of all patients who underwent insertion of an Amplatzer septal occluder and were referred for cardiac CT between January 2005 and April 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Before CT, these patients were evaluated with TTE, the findings of which suggested protrusion, migration, or the presence of residual shunt.

Oral propranolol (Cardilol, Veterans Pharmaceutical Factory) at 0.5 mg/kg body weight was given 1 hour before MDCT to reduce heart rate. Imaging was performed with a 40-MDCT scanner (Brilliance 40, Philips Medical Systems) and a dual-syringe injector (Stellant, Medrad). The parameters were tube voltage of 120 kV, weight-based effective tube current adjustment of 150-700 mAs per section, collimation of 40 x 0.625 mm, rotation time of 0.4 seconds, and pitch of 0.2 with retrospective ECG gating. The scan was starting from 0.5 cm below the carina to the end of the heart in the craniocaudal direction. Bolus-tracking technique was performed 5 seconds after contrast injection, and serial tracker images were obtained at the level of the ascending aorta. After the region of interest in the ascending aorta reached the threshold of 150 H, scanning was started after a 5-second postthreshold delay. For patients who could hold their breath when instructed, scans were obtained with a breath-hold. Otherwise, scans were obtained during free breathing under mild sedation with rectally administered chloral hydrate.

Patients weighing more than 50 kg were given 100 mL of contrast medium ([iohexol], Omnipaque 350, Amersham) and a 30-mL saline chaser. Patients weighing less than 50 kg were given contrast medium in the dose of 2 mL/kg body weight and a saline chaser of 0.6 mL/kg body weight. The flow rate was the contrast volume divided by the summation of scanning time plus 8. A boy weighing 35 kg, for example, was given 70 mL of contrast medium and a saline chaser of 21 mL. After the scanning range was planned on the pilot film, the scanner reported a scanning time of 13 seconds. Thus, the flow rate for both contrast medium and saline chaser would be 3.3 mL/s.

Cardiac CT Interpretation
A dedicated MDCT workstation (Extended Brilliance Workspace, Philips Medical Systems) was used for interpretation. All the reconstructed phases from 0% to 90% of the R-R interval with 10% spacing were loaded. In the most quiescent phase, the plane was swiveled to the perpendicular axis of the Amplatzer septal occluder. To facilitate finding the perpendicular plane, we simply swiveled the plane to cut through the two metallic points on each side of the device (the microscrew and the left atrial disk center) (Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 1F and S1G-S1K.). The reviewer scrolled up and down to comprehensively evaluate the location and shape of the device. The relations between the device and the adjacent anatomic structures—superior vena cava, aorta, left atrium, right atrium, coronary sinus, and inferior vena cava—also were examined. At least two orthogonal planes were evaluated to complete the interpretation. We recommend the oblique axial and oblique sagittal planes because it is easier for beginners to identify the anatomic structures in these planes. Dynamic motion during the heart cycle also can be evaluated in any plane. This step was helpful in visualizing flow in the superior and inferior venae cavae, dynamic coronary sinus compression, and the relation between the mitral valve and residual defect or shunt.


Figure 1
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —9-year-old girl with Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation) in good position. See also Figs. S1G-S1K, cine loops, in supplemental data. Oblique axial MDCT image in plane perpendicular to Amplatzer septal occluder shows anatomic features. Two metallic points (arrows) should appear simultaneously to ensure perpendicularity between plane and device. After plane is set, scrolling up and down shows device for comprehensive evaluation. Oblique axial images are useful in evaluating device and its relation to aorta, mitral valve, tricuspid valve, and coronary sinus. LA = left atrium, LV = left ventricle, RA = right atrium, RV = right ventricle.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —9-year-old girl with Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation) in good position. See also Figs. S1G-S1K, cine loops, in supplemental data. Oblique sagittal MDCT image shows plane perpendicular to device. Oblique sagittal images are useful for evaluating device and its relation to superior vena cava (SVC), inferior vena cava (IVC), and coronary sinus. Device protrusion over superior and inferior portions can be easily identified. LA = left atrium, RA = right atrium.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C —9-year-old girl with Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation) in good position. See also Figs. S1G-S1K, cine loops, in supplemental data. MDCT in four-chamber view shows dynamic relations between device and mitral and tricuspid annuli. LA = left atrium, LV = left ventricle, RA = right atrium, RV = right ventricle.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D —9-year-old girl with Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation) in good position. See also Figs. S1G-S1K, cine loops, in supplemental data. Multiplanar reformation image with plane through two metallic points (arrow) and coronary sinus shows severely compressed coronary sinus.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E —9-year-old girl with Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation) in good position. See also Figs. S1G-S1K, cine loops, in supplemental data. Multiplanar reformation image with plane through two metallic points and superior vena cava shows laminar flow (arrow) from superior vena cava to right atrium. In most patients with Amplatzer septal occluder, right atrial disk (arrowheads) protrudes slightly into superior vena caval to right atrial flow tract, which is normal condition. In some patients, protrusion is so prominent that normal laminar flow is interrupted (Fig. 7C).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F —9-year-old girl with Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation) in good position. See also Figs. S1G-S1K, cine loops, in supplemental data. Global multiplanar reformation image of coronary arteries shows malignant coronary anomaly. Right coronary artery arises from left sinus of Valsalva with interarterial course (arrowheads). High-pressure compression between aorta (Ao) and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) would expose patient to risk of sudden death during vigorous exercise. Whole-heart approach is important during interpretation because atrial septal defect can be combined with other congenital cardiac anomaly. AL = anterior leaflet, CRX = circumflex artery, LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery, RA = right atrium, RCA = right coronary artery.

 

Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Good Position
In well-selected cases with adequate septal rim and sizing (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 1F), the results of ASD closure were excellent [3] (Figs. S1G-S1K). In any perpendicular axis, the left atrial disk should be in the left atrium, and the right atrial disk should be in the right atrium with the waist of the device stenting the ASD. In the correct position, a properly sized device is disk shaped rather than mushroom shaped (see section, ASD Closed with Relatively Large Amplatzer Septal Occluder).

Multiple ASD Managed with Two Amplatzer Septal Occluders
In selected patients with two or more atrial septal defects (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C, S2D, and S2E), we used two Amplatzer septal occluders to close all the defects. The several-millimeter margins between the borders of the two disks and the waist was used to cover adjacent small defects. Because of acoustic shadowing, it is difficult to use TTE to examine patients in whom two devices have been inserted. MDCT is used to evaluate these patients. The perpendicular plane must be used to evaluate each device.


Figure 7
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —3-year-old boy after insertion of two Amplatzer septal occluders (AGA Medical Corporation). MDCT was performed with mild sedation and free breathing. See also Figs. S2D and S2E, cine loops, in supplemental data. Oblique axial MDCT image in plane through center of upper and larger Amplatzer septal occluder shows proper position of device. LA = left atrium, LV = left ventricle, RA = right atrium, RV = right ventricle.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —3-year-old boy after insertion of two Amplatzer septal occluders (AGA Medical Corporation). MDCT was performed with mild sedation and free breathing. See also Figs. S2D and S2E, cine loops, in supplemental data. Oblique axial MDCT image in plane through lower, smaller device shows suspected device migration with mild compression of coronary sinus. LA = left atrium, LV = left ventricle, RA = right atrium, RV = right ventricle.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C —3-year-old boy after insertion of two Amplatzer septal occluders (AGA Medical Corporation). MDCT was performed with mild sedation and free breathing. See also Figs. S2D and S2E, cine loops, in supplemental data. Oblique sagittal MDCT image shows two devices in proper position. Both devices cross border (dashed line) between left atrium (LA) and right atrium (RA). Device position is difficult to evaluate with transthoracic echocardiography because of limited acoustic window and severe acoustic shadow. This case emphasizes need to evaluate Amplatzer septal occluder in perpendicular plane.

 
ASD Closed with Relatively Large Amplatzer Septal Occluder
Sizing of the device refers to the relative size between the occluder and the defect. Before deployment, repeated sizing with a sizing balloon, sizing plate, or intracardiac echocardiography was performed to measure the defect. Thus, in single ASD, even the largest 40-mm Amplatzer septal occluder can be placed adequately if properly sized [4] (Figs. 3A, 3B, S3C, and S3D). In patients with more than one ASD, because the sizes would change with application of different stenting forces, it was difficult to determine the adequate sizes of Amplatzer septal occluders. We therefore deployed one occluder on the smaller ASD and then used a relatively larger occluder to close the larger defect and clip the small occluder to provide extra stability. A mushroom shape, which indicated the occluder was larger than the stretched size of the ASD, was identified (Figs. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, S4E, and S4F). Because the disks do not clip the rim tightly under such conditions, it was important to evaluate for residual shunt through the waist.


Figure 10
View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —31-year-old woman after insertion of 40-mm Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation), which is in good position. See also Figs. S3C and S3D, cine loops, in supplemental data. Forty-millimeter Amplatzer device is not yet approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Oblique sagittal MDCT image shows proper position of device. LA = left atrium, IVC = inferior vena cava, RA = right atrium.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —31-year-old woman after insertion of 40-mm Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation), which is in good position. See also Figs. S3C and S3D, cine loops, in supplemental data. Forty-millimeter Amplatzer device is not yet approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Four-chamber view MDCT image shows relation between device and mitral and tricuspid valves (arrowheads) and space (arrow) between device and mitral valve. LA = left atrium, LV = left ventricle, RA = right atrium, RV = right ventricle.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A —18-year-old woman with incidentally found left ventricular noncompaction after insertion of two Amplatzer septal occluders (AGA Medical Corporation), one of which is relatively large. See also Figs. S4E and S4F, cine loops, in supplemental data. Oblique sagittal MDCT image in plane through two devices shows tethered waist (arrow) and mushroom shape of larger device. Larger device was chosen to adequately clip upper smaller device and provide extra stability. LA = left atrium, RA = right atrium, SVC = superior vena cava.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B —18-year-old woman with incidentally found left ventricular noncompaction after insertion of two Amplatzer septal occluders (AGA Medical Corporation), one of which is relatively large. See also Figs. S4E and S4F, cine loops, in supplemental data. Photograph shows disk shape of 20-mm Amplatzer septal occluder clipping 20-mm defect. Both left and right atrial disks are flat and in close contact with rim.

 

Figure 14
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C —18-year-old woman with incidentally found left ventricular noncompaction after insertion of two Amplatzer septal occluders (AGA Medical Corporation), one of which is relatively large. See also Figs. S4E and S4F, cine loops, in supplemental data. Photograph shows 20-mm Amplatzer septal occluder placed into 6-mm hole, which is too small for device. Mushroom shape is caused by waist tethering (arrow).

 

Figure 15
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D —18-year-old woman with incidentally found left ventricular noncompaction after insertion of two Amplatzer septal occluders (AGA Medical Corporation), one of which is relatively large. See also Figs. S4E and S4F, cine loops, in supplemental data. MDCT image of short axis of left ventricle shows prominent left ventricular trabeculation (black arrows), prominent noncompaction (NC) layer (long white arrow), and thin compaction (C) layer (short white arrow). Ratio of noncompaction layer to compaction layer is greater than 2, which meets criterion for diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction. This rare cardiomyopathy is difficult to recognize even retrospectively on transthoracic echocardiography. Because disease is inherited, family screening was undertaken and showed same disorder in patient's 15-year-old brother. LV = left ventricle, RV = right ventricle.

 
Good Position but Residual Shunt
Good position of the occluder but residual shunt is shown in Figure 5 (also Fig. S5.) Most ASDs are not circular. They can be oval or irregular in shape [5]. In some cases, even when the septal occluder was placed in proper position, the defect still was not completely closed. In such circumstances, the residual defect was usually out of the acoustic window of TTE, and the echogenic disk blocked detailed evaluation. MDCT was useful in the evaluation of these patients. Patients such as these need close follow-up to determine whether the residual defect is clinically important. Epithelialization seals the defect in some cases. If needed, surgical removal of the device with simultaneous closure of the defect can be considered.


Figure 16
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5 —7-year-old boy with minimal residual shunt due to rim deficit after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). Oblique axial MDCT image shows 1-mm residual defect (arrow) near superior vena cava (SVC). In some patients, focal rim deficit results in residual defect even with proper position of device. Because of high position and device blocking, transthoracic echocardiography could not be used to evaluate residual defect. Because patient's condition was asymptomatic, outpatient follow-up was suggested because small defect can be sealed during epithelialization. Ao = aorta, LA = left atrium, LAA = left atrial appendage, RAA = right atrial appendage, RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract. See also Fig. S5, cine loop, in supplemental data.

 
Mild Protrusion but No Residual Shunt
Mild protrusion of the device with no residual shunt is shown in Figure 6A, 6B (also Figs. S6C-S6E). In some patients, good position without residual shunt was found immediately after deployment. With the rim defect and several days of heart beating, however, sliding can occur owing to inadequate fixing force. In most cases, the protrusion was minimal, without residual defect or instability. With the passage of time, epithelialization can cover the protrusion.


Figure 17
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A —34-year-old woman with minimal protrusion due to rim deficit but no residual shunt after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S6C and S6D, cine loops, in supplemental data. Oblique sagittal MDCT image shows upper portion of device protruding into right atrium (RA). Both left and right atrial disks (arrow) are in right atrium. IVC = inferior vena cava, LA = left atrium, SVC = superior vena cava.

 

Figure 18
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B —34-year-old woman with minimal protrusion due to rim deficit but no residual shunt after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S6C and S6D, cine loops, in supplemental data. Oblique coronal MDCT image confirms position in another plane. Arrow indicates protruded upper portion of device. IVC = inferior vena cava, LA = left atrium, RA = right atrium, SVC = superior vena cava.

 
Device Protrusion with Mild Residual Shunt
Device protrusion with mild residual shunt is shown in Figure 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D (also Figs. S7E-S7G). Because of the inherent curves of the atrial septum and inability to fit the device in some patients, in combination with rim deficit and vigorous cardiac motion, intracardiac echocardiography immediately after the procedure might have shown no residual defect, but protrusion and residual shunt developed later. The protrusion usually was over the region of the rim deficit.


Figure 19
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A —8-year-old girl with minimal residual shunt between left atrium and inferior vena cava after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S7E-S7G, cine loops, in supplemental data. Oblique sagittal MDCT image shows residual shunt from left atrium (LA) to inferior vena cava (arrow). Shunts appear as radiopaque jet projecting from defect to right side of heart. RA = right atrium.

 

Figure 20
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B —8-year-old girl with minimal residual shunt between left atrium and inferior vena cava after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S7E-S7G, cine loops, in supplemental data. MDCT image shows protrusion and residual shunt related to different inherent curves of atrial septum (black line) and device (white line). LA = left atrium, RA = right atrium, RAA = right atrial appendage, SVC = superior vena cava.

 

Figure 21
View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7C —8-year-old girl with minimal residual shunt between left atrium and inferior vena cava after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S7E-S7G, cine loops, in supplemental data. Oblique sagittal MDCT image in diastolic phase shows absence of shunt (arrow). Because of pressure change during heart cycle and check-valve effect of device, left-to-right shunt was present only in systolic phase. Because of low location and blocking by device, residual shunt was missed on routine follow-up echocardiography.

 

Figure 22
View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7D —8-year-old girl with minimal residual shunt between left atrium and inferior vena cava after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S7E-S7G, cine loops, in supplemental data. Oblique sagittal MDCT image in plane through device and superior vena cava shows upper portion of right atrial disk (arrowheads) protruding into superior vena caval to right atrial flow tract, causing turbulent flow (arrows).

 
Marked Device Protrusion with Large Residual Shunt
Marked device protrusion with large residual shunt is shown in Figure 8A, 8B, 8C, 8D, 8E, 8F, 8G, 8H (also Figs. S8H-S8J). In some cases, probably because of rim deficit or poor fit between the device and the atrial septum, a small residual shunt appeared on intracardiac echocardiography immediately after the procedure. Patients with these findings need close follow-up to assess whether the shunt seals by epithelialization or enlargement. There are only limited reports in the literature about device dislocation and migration, and the incidence is considered low. Because of instability, surgical removal with defect closure is suggested to prevent distal migration [6].


Figure 23
View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8A —43-year-old man with marked device protrusion after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S8H-S8J, cine loops, in supplemental data. Lateral chest radiographs show marked device protrusion in patient (A) and normal position of Amplatzer septal occluder in different patient of same age (B). Occluder in good position is in vertical orientation, which represents orientation of atrial septum. If there is marked protrusion into right atrium, marked anterior tilting with nearly horizontal orientation is present.

 

Figure 24
View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8B —43-year-old man with marked device protrusion after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S8H-S8J, cine loops, in supplemental data. Lateral chest radiographs show marked device protrusion in patient (A) and normal position of Amplatzer septal occluder in different patient of same age (B). Occluder in good position is in vertical orientation, which represents orientation of atrial septum. If there is marked protrusion into right atrium, marked anterior tilting with nearly horizontal orientation is present.

 

Figure 25
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8C —43-year-old man with marked device protrusion after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S8H-S8J, cine loops, in supplemental data. Oblique sagittal MDCT image shows marked protrusion of upper portion of both left and right atrial disks (arrowheads) in right atrium. Residual defect (arrow) also is evident. LA = left atrium, RA = right atrium.

 

Figure 26
View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8D —43-year-old man with marked device protrusion after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S8H-S8J, cine loops, in supplemental data. Systolic (D) and diastolic (E) MDCT images of same section show waving of atrial septum (arrows). Intracardiac sonogram immediately after deployment of device showed good position of device with only minimal shunting. After 1 week, marked protrusion was found on chest radiograph and transthoracic echocardiogram. Cause of migration was not clear but was considered to be related to rim deficit and redundant and waving atrial septum.

 

Figure 27
View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8E —43-year-old man with marked device protrusion after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S8H-S8J, cine loops, in supplemental data. Systolic (D) and diastolic (E) MDCT images of same section show waving of atrial septum (arrows). Intracardiac sonogram immediately after deployment of device showed good position of device with only minimal shunting. After 1 week, marked protrusion was found on chest radiograph and transthoracic echocardiogram. Cause of migration was not clear but was considered to be related to rim deficit and redundant and waving atrial septum.

 

Figure 28
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8F —43-year-old man with marked device protrusion after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S8H-S8J, cine loops, in supplemental data. Virtual angioscopic image from workstation shows relations between device and septum. Residual defect and extent of protrusion are evident. ASO = Amplatzer septal occluder, LSPV = left superior pulmonary vein, RIPV = right inferior pulmonary vein, RSPV = right superior pulmonary vein.

 

Figure 29
View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8G —43-year-old man with marked device protrusion after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S8H-S8J, cine loops, in supplemental data. Surgical photograph shows protruding device. To prevent further migration, surgical removal of device with concomitant atrial septal defect closure was performed. After incision of right atrium, migrated upper portion (arrowheads) and normally positioned lower portion (arrow) clipping lower atrial septum were identified. Forceps indicates protruded upper portion of device in right atrium.

 

Figure 30
View larger version (181K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8H —43-year-old man with marked device protrusion after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). See also Figs. S8H-S8J, cine loops, in supplemental data. Virtual angioscopic image viewed from right atrium shows findings identical to surgical findings, that is, migrated upper portion (arrowheads) and normally positioned lower portion (arrow) clipping lower atrial septum.

 
Device Compression of Coronary Sinus
Compression of the coronary sinus was found in cases of rim deficit near the coronary sinus (Figs. 1D and S1J.) In general, however, the coronary sinus had a large lumen (approximately 1 cm) and the Amplatzer septal occluder moved during the heart cycle, so the compression was usually dynamic and seldom caused occlusion. Thus, the condition was usually asymptomatic, and no further intervention was required.

Incidentally Found Cardiac Lesions
Because of the excellent spatial resolution of MDCT, we were able to evaluate cardiac abnormalities while assessing the results of treatment with the Amplatzer septal occluder. These lesions, which were not seen on echocardiography, may further explain the clinical course and symptoms. Radiologists evaluating MDCT images after insertion of the septal occluder should evaluate the entire heart, including the coronary arteries (Figs. 1F and 9B), myocardium (Fig. 4C), and other cardiovascular structures, such as the left superior vena cava (Figs. S1, S4, and S9).


Figure 32
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9B —35-year-old man with incidental finding of left main coronary artery compressed by right pulmonary artery during evaluation after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). Patient had experienced long-term chest tightness and was found to have atrial septal defect, which was closed with Amplatzer septal occluder. Chest tightness did not subside after procedure. Because of unusual clinical course, MDCT was performed for further device evaluation. See also Fig. S9C, cine loop, in supplemental data. Oblique coronal MDCT image in section through left main coronary artery (LM) shows dilated right pulmonary artery (RPA) compressing proximal portion of left main coronary artery with 90% diameter stenosis. Because pulmonary artery diameter and pressure were expected to decrease after closure of atrial septal defect, patient was discharged with oral ß-blocker and advice to avoid vigorous exercise. Symptoms subsided gradually within 6 months. This case emphasizes importance of whole-heart evaluation, especially when clinical course cannot be explained. Ao = aorta, ASO = Amplatzer septal occluder, CPA = central pulmonary artery, LV = left ventricle, RV = right ventricle.

 

Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
MDCT was feasible for evaluating Amplatzer septal occluders. The metallic component of the occluder, which is a major problem for MRI and echocardiography, does not impair the diagnostic quality of MDCT scans. Because MDCT can depict any plane retrospectively owing to its volume data acquisition capability, many residual defects, shunts, and protrusions not seen on TTE can be identified. If symptoms are present that cannot be explained by the TTE findings or if TTE cannot be used with confidence to evaluate the device, MDCT is a good choice for further evaluation.

In addition to MDCT after TTE, intracardiac sonography and transesophageal echocardiography can be used to evaluate septal occluding devices. These techniques are invasive, however, and necessitate sedation or general anesthesia, which cannot be performed on an outpatient basis. All patients except those with contraindications to radiation exposure or injection of contrast medium can be referred for MDCT. Because of safety considerations, artifacts, and limited spatial resolution of MRI, only animal studies of this technique have been conducted [7].

The main limitation of MDCT is the inherent radiation. Women of child-bearing age must be confirmed not to be pregnant. The general pediatric population also is at risk. Thus, MDCT is not intended to replace TTE as the routine primary survey technique. In clinical practice, patients should always be evaluated by TTE before referral for MDCT. Meticulous radiation control also is needed. We suggest weight-based current selection to avoid excessive radiation of small children. Another effective way to reduce radiation exposure is online ECG tube current modulation, as with ECG pulsing or DoseRight Cardiac (Philips Medical Systems). We did not use this technique because of possible impairment of image quality during early diastole, a phase that often is crucial in a child's fast heart rate.

In anatomic regions that cannot be confidently imaged with TTE, MDCT has powerful capability in evaluation of Amplatzer septal occluders for protrusion, migration, and residual shunt. Radiologists should be familiar with the imaging protocol and image interpretation to provide optimum patient care.


Figure 31
View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9A —35-year-old man with incidental finding of left main coronary artery compressed by right pulmonary artery during evaluation after insertion of Amplatzer septal occluder (AGA Medical Corporation). Patient had experienced long-term chest tightness and was found to have atrial septal defect, which was closed with Amplatzer septal occluder. Chest tightness did not subside after procedure. Because of unusual clinical course, MDCT was performed for further device evaluation. See also Fig. S9C, cine loop, in supplemental data. Oblique sagittal MDCT image shows good device position. IVC = inferior vena cava, LA = left atrium, RA = right atrium, SVC = superior vena cava.

 


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Du ZD, Hijazi ZM, Kleinman CS, Silverman NH, Larntz K. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults: results of a multicenter nonrandomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39 : 1836-1844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Zanchetta M, Onorato E, Rigatelli G, et al. Intracardiac echocardiography-guided transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect: a new efficient device selection method. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42:1677 -1682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Lin MC, Fu YC, Jan SL, et al. Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect using the Amplatzer septal occluder: initial results of a single medical center in Taiwan. Acta Paediatr Taiwan2005; 46:17 -23[Medline]
  4. Lopez K, Dalvi BV, Balzer D, et al. Transcatheter closure of large secundum atrial septal defects using the 40 mm Amplatzer septal occluder: results of an international registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 66:580 -584[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Harper RW, Mottram PM, McGaw DJ. Closure of secundum atrial septal defects with the Amplatzer septal occluder device: techniques and problems. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;5 : 508-524
  6. Tsilimingas NB, Reiter B, Kodolitsch YV, Munzel T, Meinertz T, Hofmann T. Surgical revision of an uncommonly dislocated self-expanding Amplatzer septal occluder device. Ann Thorac Surg2004; 78:686 -687[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Rickers C, Jerosch-Herold M, Hu X, et al. Magnetic resonance image-guided transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects. Circulation 2003;107 : 132-138[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Cine Loop SG1 through S4F
Right arrow Cine Loop S5 through S9C
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, T.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, T.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M.-C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS