AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirakawa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirakawa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.2032
AJR 2007; 188:1564-1567
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Observations

Detection of the Gonadal Veins in the Diagnosis of Transposed Ovaries in Patients with Cervical Carcinoma: A Useful Sign on MDCT

Masakazu Hirakawa1, Kengo Yoshimitsu, Daisuke Kakihara, Hiroyuki Irie, Yoshiki Asayayama, Kousei Ishigami and Hiroshi Honda

1 All authors: Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

Received November 20, 2005; accepted after revision February 28, 2006.

 
Address correspondence to M. Hirakawa (mahira{at}radiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the detectability of the gonadal vein of transposed ovaries in patients with uterine cervical cancer on MDCT.

CONCLUSION. Gonadal veins and surgical clips of transposed ovaries can be shown with high consistency on MDCT. Tracking the gonadal veins and detecting the surgical clips may prevent the transposed ovaries from being misinterpreted as peritoneal implants.

Keywords: cervical carcinoma • CT • gonadal veins • ovaries • pelvic imaging • women's imaging


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Ovarian transposition was first proposed in 1958 as a method for maintaining ovarian function in patients receiving irradiation for cervical cancer [1]. This procedure is now being performed in premenopausal women who have a variety of pelvic malignancies, including rectal cancer and lymphoma [2]. The ovaries are frequently transposed laterally at the paracolic gutter outside the radiation field. They are typically seen as multi- or monocystic masses with a varying amount of interstitium at this location. The placement of surgical clips around these masses has been reported to be useful for recognizing the transposed ovaries on CT [3]. These ovaries could easily be misinterpreted as one of various disorders, including appendiceal mucocele, lymphocele, or peritoneal implants [4] if the history of ovarian transposition is not given. The detection of gonadal veins on MDCT is useful in the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses by determining the ovarian origin of the masses [5, 6]. We recently encountered a case in which no surgical clip was detected around the transposed ovary, probably because of dislodgement and migration. This prompted us to examine whether the detection of gonadal veins on MDCT is useful as an adjunctive or secondary sign in the identification of transposed ovaries.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patient Population
From January 2000 to June 2005, 30 patients at our institute underwent ovarian transposition during surgical treatment of stage IB squamous cell cervical cancer (radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy). Twenty-six of the 30 patients underwent contrast-enhanced MDCT after surgery, and these 26 patients formed the study population. The patients ranged in age from 21 to 48 years old (mean age, 36.2 years). Four ovaries were resected and two ovaries were not transposed. A total of 46 ovaries were thus transposed in the 26 patients. None of the patients had clinical evidence of pain or hormonal dysfunction.

The time interval between MDCT and ovarian transposition was 1–18 months (mean, 6.6 months). In 22 patients, MDCT scans (two to 13, median, four) were obtained. The interval change of the size in the 39 transposed ovaries of 22 patients was evaluated (follow-up period, 6–48 months; median, 24 months).

Surgical Technique
Lateral ovarian transposition was performed by laparotomy in all patients. When the ovaries were macroscopically normal, both ovaries were transposed. For the transposition, the uteroovarian ligament was ligated and cut and the Fallopian tube was separated from the ovary. The ureter was identified and the peritoneum incised along the infundibulopelvic ligament to mobilize the ovaries. The ovaries were laterally transposed and fixed to the peritoneum in paracolic gutters by metallic surgical clips for later radiographic localization. In all cases, the transposed ovaries were outside the external beam irradiation volume.

CT Technique
MDCT of the abdomen and pelvis was performed in all cases. We used two CT scanners, an Aquillion scanner (Toshiba) and a Somatom Volume Zoom scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions), which together formed a 4-MDCT scanner. The parameters for the scanning were 2.5- or 3-mm collimation, 5-mm reconstruction, and a pitch of 5.5. Scanning was begun 60 and 240 seconds after the IV injection of contrast medium containing 300 mg I/mL of iodine (Iopamiron 300 [iopamidol], Nihon Shering) with a total volume of 100 mL at a rate of 2 mL/s, covering from the top of the liver to the pubis with oral contrast material.


Figure 1
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 31-year-old woman 2 years after hysterectomy and lateral transposition of bilateral ovaries because of stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Arrows and arrowheads indicate surgical clips and gonadal veins, respectively. Bilateral gonadal veins were fully visible and given detectability score of 5 (totally detectable) by two reviewers. Early-phase CT scans through levels of S1–S2 (A), L5–S1 (B), and L4–L5 (C).

 


Figure 2
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 31-year-old woman 2 years after hysterectomy and lateral transposition of bilateral ovaries because of stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Arrows and arrowheads indicate surgical clips and gonadal veins, respectively. Bilateral gonadal veins were fully visible and given detectability score of 5 (totally detectable) by two reviewers. Early-phase CT scans through levels of S1–S2 (A), L5–S1 (B), and L4–L5 (C).

 


Figure 3
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 31-year-old woman 2 years after hysterectomy and lateral transposition of bilateral ovaries because of stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Arrows and arrowheads indicate surgical clips and gonadal veins, respectively. Bilateral gonadal veins were fully visible and given detectability score of 5 (totally detectable) by two reviewers. Early-phase CT scans through levels of S1–S2 (A), L5–S1 (B), and L4–L5 (C).

 


Figure 4
View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D 31-year-old woman 2 years after hysterectomy and lateral transposition of bilateral ovaries because of stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Arrows and arrowheads indicate surgical clips and gonadal veins, respectively. Bilateral gonadal veins were fully visible and given detectability score of 5 (totally detectable) by two reviewers. Curved multiplanar reconstruction image shows complete course of bilateral gonadal veins as well as transposed ovaries (open arrows) and surgical clips.

 
Image Interpretation and Analysis
The axial MDCT images and curved multiplanar images done on a workstation were retrospectively evaluated by two experienced abdominal radiologists, who had been given the surgical information regarding the transposed ovaries, on a monitor (Coronis 3MP, Barco) using the scrolling method. The gonadal veins were tracked backward from the draining point at the inferior vena cava or the left renal veins in a caudal direction to the transposed ovaries [7]. The visibility of each gonadal vein was scored individually on a 5-point scale (1, not detectable; 2, partially detectable [< 50%]; 3, 50–75% detectable; 4, 75% or less detectable; 5, totally detectable). We assessed and scored both early and late contrast-enhanced images.

The interobserver difference for the detection of the gonadal veins was evaluated using kappa statistics; detectability was then calculated by defining confidence level ratings of 4 and 5 as positive and 3 or less as negative after discrepancies between the two observers were resolved by consensus. Kappa values greater than 0 were considered to be indicative of a positive correlation. Values of 0.40 or less were considered to be indicative of a positive but poor correlation; 0.41–0.75, a good correlation; and greater than 0.75, an excellent correlation. The maximum diameters of the gonadal veins were measured at the consensus interpretation. The presence or absence of the surgical clips and interval change in the appearance of the transposed ovaries on follow-up MDCT were also evaluated and recorded. Discrepancies between the two observers were again resolved by consensus.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
All 46 transposed ovaries were visualized on MDCT. Forty-three ovaries were located laterally to the lower paracolic gutter. Three ovaries were found at the posterior intraperitoneal space in the upper pelvis, lateral or anterolateral to the psoas muscle.

Detectability of the gonadal veins was 83.3% on the right side and 68.1% on the left side on MDCT, with interobserver kappa values ({kappa} = 0.7000 on the right and {kappa} = 0.7905 on the left) showing good correlation for the right gonadal veins and excellent correlation for the left (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D). We could not find any difference in detectability of the gonadal veins between ovaries transposed to the lower paracolic gutter and those transposed to the posterior intraperitoneal space in the upper pelvis. Detectability on the right side tended to be higher than that on the left side, but the difference was not statistically significant (p < 0.05, McNemar's test).


Figure 5
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 48-year-old woman 3 years after hysterectomy and transposition of right ovary for stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Left ovary was resected. Delayed-phase CT scan through level of iliac fossa reveals formation of cyst on transposed ovary (arrow). Surgical clips could not be detected. Arrowhead indicates gonadal vein.

 


Figure 6
View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 48-year-old woman 3 years after hysterectomy and transposition of right ovary for stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Left ovary was resected. Curved multiplanar reconstruction image shows complete course of right gonadal veins (arrowheads), as well as transposed ovary with cyst formation (arrow). Right gonadal vein was given detectability score of 5 (totally detectable) by both reviewers.

 


Figure 7
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 33-year-old woman 2 years after hysterectomy and transposition of right ovary for stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Left ovary was resected. Early-phase CT scan through level of iliac fossa shows high-density spot at anterolateral aspect of ascending colon (arrow), mimicking contrast-filled colonic diverticulum. Dense region was subsequently identified as surgical clip by consensus. Arrowhead indicates right gonadal vein.

 


Figure 8
View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 33-year-old woman 2 years after hysterectomy and transposition of right ovary for stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Left ovary was resected. Curved multiplanar reconstruction image shows complete course of right gonadal vein (arrowhead) as well as transposed ovary (open arrow) and surgical clip (solid arrow). Right gonadal vein was given detectability score of 5 (totally detectable) by both reviewers.

 
The maximum diameters of the gonadal veins on the left side (2.3–4.6 mm; mean, 3.1 ± 0.55 mm) tended to be smaller than those on the right side (2.4–5.0 mm; mean, 3.8 ± 0.63 mm); again, the difference was not significant (p < 0.05, Student's unpaired t test).

Surgical clips of transposed ovaries were found in 98% (45/46) of cases. In one patient in whom surgical clips could not be detected, probably because of dislodgement and migration, gonadal veins were well shown (Fig. 2A, 2B). In two other patients, although one radiologist interpreted high densities around the right transposed ovaries as residual gastrointestinal contrast material in the diverticula of the ascending colon, the densities were identified as surgical clips at the consensus interpretation (Fig. 3A, 3B). In these two cases, the gonadal veins were well shown and could be tracked back to the transposed ovaries.

Interval changes in the appearance of the 39 transposed ovaries in 22 patients, in whom multiple MDCT scans were obtained, were observed in 33% (13/39) of cases and included both interval increases (10/13) and decreases (3/13) in size.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Ovarian transposition is an effective procedure that enables preservation of ovarian function in patients younger than 40 years who are treated with a combination of radiation therapy and surgery for early-stage cervical cancer and in patients with pelvic malignancies before irradiation to the pelvic lymph nodes. The ovaries are commonly repositioned laterally, either to the lower paracolic gutters close to the lateral aspect of the colon above the iliac fossa level, or to the posterior intraperitoneal space in the upper pelvis, lateral or anterolateral to the psoas muscle outside the radiation field [6]. The procedure involves mobilizing the ovary, the suspensory ligament, and the contained ovarian vessels [3, 8].

According to our data, gonadal veins were successfully detected and tracked back along the anterior surface of the psoas major muscle to the transposed ovary in most patients (83% on the right, 68% on the left side). Thus, gonadal veins continuous to the cystic mass at the paracolic gutter can be a useful adjunct sign in identifying transposed ovaries. In our study, surgical clips marking the ovarian location were detected around the transposed ovaries in all patients but one. Therefore, detecting gonadal veins may not be necessary in diagnosing transposed ovaries in most cases; however, it increases the confidence level of the diagnosis, particularly when an appropriate clinical history of previous surgery is not provided.

In only one patient were surgical clips not detected around the right transposed ovary, possibly because of dislodgement and migration. In this particular case, we tracked the right gonadal veins back to the transposed ovary and thereby correctly identified the transposed ovary. In two other patients in whom the surgical clips mimicked residual gastrointestinal contrast material in the colonic diverticula, the gonadal veins again could be tracked back to the transposed ovaries, leading to a correct identification of the surgical clips and the transposed ovaries.

Asayama et al. [7] reported a slightly higher detection rate of the gonadal veins in patients with large pelvic masses (84.6% on the right side and 92.3% on the left) compared with our study. The mean diameter of the gonadal veins in their study was also larger than that in our patients. We speculate that this difference may have been due to the history of hysterectomy in our patients. The diameter of the gonadal vein may be affected by various factors: The gonadal vein conveys venous blood not only from the ovaries, but also from the uterus; there may even be a bidirectional flow, particularly on the left side, where the gonadal veins drains into the left renal vein [9]. Because hysterectomy was performed in all of our patients, the volume of venous blood conveyed through the gonadal veins may have been less than that of normal women who have not undergone hysterectomy, leading to smaller-diameter gonadal veins.

To evaluate more precisely the usefulness of gonadal veins in the identification of transposed ovaries, a blinded interpretation test should be performed using both positive (patients with transposed ovaries) and negative (patients without transposed ovaries but with other pathology at the paracolic gutter) cases. However, to do this was beyond the scope of our study.

In conclusion, gonadal veins were detected on MDCT and tracked back to the transposed ovaries in 70–80% of the cases; this information could be used as an adjunct sign in diagnosing this entity. This may be particularly useful when appropriate clinical information is not available regarding the previous surgery, and when there are no detectable surgical clips around the lesions.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. McCall ML, Keaty EC, Thompson JD. Conservation of ovarian tissue in the treatment of the carcinoma of the cervix with radical surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1958;75 : 590–600[Medline]
  2. Bisharah M, Tulandi T. Laparoscopic preservation of ovarian function: an underused procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol2003; 188:367 –370[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Kier R, Chambers SK. Surgical transposition of the ovaries: imaging findings in 14 patients. AJR 1989;153 :1003 –1006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bashist B, Freidman WN, Killackey MA. Surgical transposition of the ovary: radiologic appearance. Radiology1989; 173:857 –860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lee JH, Jeong YK, Park JK, et al. "Ovarian vascular pedicle" sign revealing organ of origin of a pelvic mass lesion on helical CT. AJR 2003;181 : 131–137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Saksouk FA, Johnson SC. Recognition of the ovaries and ovarian origin of pelvic masses with CT. RadioGraphics2004; 24[suppl 1]:S133 –S146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Asayama Y, Yoshimitsu K, Aibe H, et al. MDCT of the gonadal veins in females with large pelvic masses: value in differentiating ovarian vs uterine origin. AJR 2006;186 : 440–448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Morice P, Juncker L, Rey A, El-Hassan J, Haie-Meder C, Castaigne D. Ovarian transposition for patients with cervical carcinoma treated by radiosurgical combination. Fertil Steril2000; 74:743 –748[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Umeoka S, Koyama T, Kogashi K, et al. Vascular dilatation in the pelvis: identification with CT and MR imaging. RadioGraphics 2004;24 : 193–208[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirakawa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirakawa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS