AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Syvanthong, C.
Right arrow Articles by Zagoria, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Syvanthong, C.
Right arrow Articles by Zagoria, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.0058
AJR 2007; 188:1619-1621
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Observations

Effect of Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Tumors on Renal Function in Patients with a Solitary Kidney

Chockeo Syvanthong1, Geoffrey E. Wile and Ronald J. Zagoria

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157.

Received January 12, 2006; accepted after revision July 31, 2006.

 
Address correspondence to G. E. Wile (gwile{at}wfubmc.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect on renal function of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors in patients with a solitary kidney.

CONCLUSION. Ablation resulted in complete tumor eradication, and there were no serious complications. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors resulted in a 16% increase in serum creatinine concentration and a 13% decrease in creatinine clearance in patients with one kidney. These results are comparable with those of surgical resection of tumors in this group of patients.

Keywords: abdomen • ablation • oncologic imaging • radiofrequency • renal cell carcinoma


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In 2007, an estimated 31,590 renal tumors will be diagnosed in the United States [1]. This large number continues a trend that has shown a 30% increase in the past 10 years and a 100% increase since 1950 [2, 3]. This dramatic increase has been thought to be attributed to the incidental finding of asymptomatic lesions as the result of advances in imaging and the ability to detect small localized tumors [1]. The standard of care in most cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been radical nephrectomy. However, when RCC occurs in a solitary kidney, a nephron-sparing procedure, such as partial nephrectomy, is preferred to avoid renal failure. The long-term oncologic effects of radical and partial nephrectomy are similar [4]. Partial nephrectomy is associated with considerable operating time and morbidity [5].

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation has been used increasingly in the management of RCC. Percutaneous image-guided ablative procedures are being performed on patients who are not ideal surgical candidates, including those with one kidney [1, 2]. The purpose of this retrospective review was to evaluate the effect of radiofrequency ablation on serum creatinine concentration and creatinine clearance in patients with one kidney.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Approval for the retrospective review of patient records was obtained from the institutional review board. Retrospective review of the records of all 130 patients who had undergone radiofrequency ablation for renal tumors at our institution yielded 12 patients with a tumor-containing solitary kidney who underwent radiofrequency ablation between September 2003 and April 2005. Physical examinations were performed on all patients 1 day to 1 week before radiofrequency ablation. Serum creatinine level was measured at that evaluation. All radiofrequency ablation procedures were performed on an outpatient basis by one radiologist using conscious sedation and local anesthesia. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered immediately before the procedure. After ablation, patients stayed in an observation section of the hospital for approximately 6 hours before release to home. Vital signs were monitored, and a complete blood count was performed during the period of observation. Two patients were admitted to the hospital for reasons unrelated to radiofrequency ablation.

The diagnosis of RCC was made on the basis of biopsy, CT, or MRI findings before ablation. Followup imaging was performed 1–3 months after radiofrequency ablation, and these images were reviewed for evidence of residual tumor and complications.

Technique
All patients were interviewed and examined 1 week or less before the ablation procedure. Patients were instructed to stop taking aspirin, other anti-platelet agents, and warfarin before radiofrequency ablation. All radiofrequency ablation procedures were performed with a Cool-Tip system (Radionics) under CT guidance (Fig. 1A). For radiofrequency ablation, patients were positioned prone or decubitus on the CT table. The radiofrequency electrode selected depended on tumor size. The active tip of the electrode was approximately 1 cm greater than the tumor diameter. If the tumor was larger than 2 cm in diameter, a cluster electrode was used. For tumors larger than 3 cm in diameter, multiple overlapping ablations were used for complete tumor destruction. Ablations 8 minutes in duration were performed with the standard impedance control algorithm included with the Radionics system. If the serum creatinine concentration before the procedure was less than 2.0 mg/dL, contrast-enhanced CT was performed to determine whether viable tumor remained at the end of what was considered an adequate radiofrequency ablation session. If detected, enhancing tumor was treated with additional ablations before the radiofrequency ablation session was terminated.


Figure 1
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 61-year-old woman with solitary left kidney. Axial unenhanced CT image shows placement of radiofrequency ablation probe within left renal mass.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 61-year-old woman with solitary left kidney. Axial T2-weighted MR images without (B) and with (C) fat saturation obtained 2 months after tumor ablation show typical appearance of a treated tumor with low signal within ablation zone. Signal of ablated tumor approximates signal of surrounding fat on fat-saturated image. Contrast-enhanced images (not shown) revealed no evidence of enhancement [2].

 


Figure 3
View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 61-year-old woman with solitary left kidney. Axial T2-weighted MR images without (B) and with (C) fat saturation obtained 2 months after tumor ablation show typical appearance of a treated tumor with low signal within ablation zone. Signal of ablated tumor approximates signal of surrounding fat on fat-saturated image. Contrast-enhanced images (not shown) revealed no evidence of enhancement [2].

 
For follow-up, a clinical visit with physical examination and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT or MRI (Figs. 1B and 1C) was completed 2–3 months after radiofrequency ablation. Areas of contrast enhancement (> 10 H for CT or > 15% for MRI) were interpreted as residual viable RCC [6].

Data Collection
Extensive chart reviews were performed on the 12 patients involved in the study. The creatinine concentration before the radiofrequency ablation procedure and the first concentration available at least 1 month after the procedure were recorded for each patient. We also recorded the patient's weight to calculate creatinine clearance, adjusting for weight and age, as a more complete means of assessing renal function. Complications during or after the procedure also were recorded.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The study group consisted of 12 patients (four women, eight men; mean age, 77 years; age range, 61–87 years). Before the radiofrequency ablation procedure, all patients had an average serum creatinine (Cr) concentration of 2.28 mg/dL (range, 0.9–5.5 mg/dL). The average follow-up time was 2.9 months (range, 1–6 months), at which time an average creatinine concentration of 2.65 mg/dL was recorded (range, 0.9–6.9 mg/dL) (Fig. 2). The follow-up creatinine concentration indicated an average 0.37 mg/dL increase, which represents a 16.48% increase from baseline for this study group. The average creatinine clearance before the procedure was 40.83 mL/min (range, 8–69 mL/min). At follow-up visits 1 month or more after the procedure, the average creatinine clearance was 35.42 mL/min (range, 7–69 mL/min), which represents a 13.25% decrease in estimated creatinine clearance for men, calculated as [(140 – age) x weight] / (72 x Cr), and women, calculated as 0.85 [(140 – age) x weight] / (72 x Cr).


Figure 4
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Creatinine clearance after radiofrequency ablation. Graph shows long-term follow-up results for 12 patients. Because of variable follow-up periods for this group, data analysis was performed on findings at 1-month follow-up visit.

 
Among the 12 patients in this study, a range of one to four tumors were ablated during each treatment session. One patient had two tumors, one patient had four tumors, and the others had one tumor. The patient with four lesions ablated had a serum creatinine concentration of 1.7 mg/dL before ablation and a follow-up concentration of 1.8 mg/dL, which corresponds to estimated creatinine clearances of 22 and 21 mL/min, respectively. The patient with two tumors ablated had a serum creatinine concentration of 1.2 mg/dL before ablation and a follow-up creatinine concentration of 1.6 mg/dL, which corresponds to estimated creatinine clearances of 65 and 49 mL/min, respectively. Eleven of the 12 patients in this study were treated with curative intent. The 12th patient had stage IV RCC with widespread metastasis and intractable hematuria. This patient underwent radiofrequency ablation for control of hematuria, which completely resolved after radiofrequency ablation. Biopsies performed before radiofrequency ablation revealed RCC in nine patients and oncocytic neoplasm in one patient. The diagnosis of RCC was based on imaging findings alone in the other two patients. The size of the tumors ranged from 1 to 4.4 cm in largest diameter.

None of the 12 patients had complications during the radiofrequency ablation procedure. Procedures were performed on an outpatient basis in 10 of 12 cases. One patient remained hospitalized for 4 days after the procedure to reestablish therapeutic warfarin levels. Another patient stayed in the hospital 5 days after the procedure while receiving antibiotics for bacteremia and bacteruria found before the procedure. This patient needed radiofrequency ablation for the management of persistent hematuria after failed urologic interventions.

The success of radiofrequency ablation was measured with follow-up contrast-enhanced CT or MRI 2–3 months after radiofrequency ablation. Within this time interval, none of the patients had evidence of recurrent or residual tumor at the radiofrequency ablation site.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Although radical nephrectomy is the standard of care of many patients with RCC, nephron-sparing treatment is used whenever possible to treat patients with RCC in a solitary kidney. Partial nephrectomy is the standard of care with respect to nephron-sparing procedures. Duque et al. [7] found that 4–8 weeks after partial excision of a solitary kidney for RCC, nine of 10 patients had a greater than 0.6 mg/dL increase in serum creatinine concentration. The tenth patient recovered fully. In a study by Adkins et al. [8] that included 30 patients, the median serum creatinine concentration increased from 1.5 to 1.8 mg/dL. Gill et al. [9] evaluated laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of a single tumor in the solitary kidneys of 22 patients. Those investigators found median serum creatinine concentration increased from 1.1 to 1.5 mg/dL in a median follow-up period of 7.1 months, representing a median increase of 33%. Our results showed the average serum creatinine concentration increased 0.37 mg/dL after radiofrequency ablation. This finding is similar to the increase of 0.3 mg/dL in the study by Adkins et al. and is better than the increase of 0.6 mg/dL found by Duque et al.

The average follow-up periods in the studies by other authors [79] were longer than those in our study. The data in a study by Saranchuk et al. [10], however, show that the serum creatinine concentration in their sample increased to its greatest value 1 month after partial excision of a solitary kidney and continued to decline to nearly normal levels over the course of the next year. It would be reasonable to suggest that the length of our study was sufficient to show major deficiencies in renal function, if they were to occur in the absence of other confounding variables.

With estimated creatinine clearance as a measure of renal function, our sample had an average decrease of 5.41 mL/min, which represents a decrease of 13.25%. In comparing percentage loss of renal function, although serum creatinine concentration increased 16.48%, the decrease in estimated creatinine clearance was smaller. Creatinine clearance accounts for body habitus and may be a more accurate measurement of true renal function than is serum creatinine concentration.

In summary, patients with one kidney who undergo radiofrequency ablation of a renal tumor can be expected to have a decrease in renal function of 13–16%. This value is similar to that expected after partial nephrectomy, which is a more invasive procedure with higher morbidity and longer hospitalization. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation appears to be an effective alternative to partial nephrectomy in this subgroup of patients. No major complications occurred in this study group, and short-term follow-up indicated good oncologic control.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56 : 106–130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Merkle EM, Nour SG, Lewin JS. MR imaging follow-up after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: findings in 18 patients during first 6 months. Radiology2005; 235:1065 –1071[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Zagoria RJ. Imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal masses. RadioGraphics 2004;24 : S59–S71[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Tan YH, Young MD, L'Esperance JO, Preminger GM, Albala DM. Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar vascular clamping using a saline-cooled, high-density monopolar radiofrequency device. J Endourol 2004;18 : 883–887[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Johnson DB, Nakada SY. Cryosurgery and needle ablation of renal lesions. J Endourol 2001;15 : 361–368[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Schiller JD, Gervais DA, Mueller PR. Radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 2005;30 : 442–450[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Duque JL, Loughlin KR, O'Leary MP, Kumar S, Richie JP. Partial nephrectomy: alternative treatment for selected patients with renal cell carcinoma. Urology 1998;52 : 584–590[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Adkins KL, Chang SS, Cookson MS, Smith JA. Partial nephrectomy safely preserves renal function in patients with a solitary kidney. J Urol 2003; 169:79 –81[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Gill IS, Colombo JR, Moinzadeh A, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in solitary kidney. J Urol2006; 175:454 –458[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Saranchuk JW, Touijer AK, Hakimian P, Snyder ME, Russo P. Partial nephrectomy for patients with a solitary kidney: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. BJU Int 2004;94 :1323 –1328[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Stanley
Our Practice of Radiology: Reflections on its Growth and Stature
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1439 - 1439.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Syvanthong, C.
Right arrow Articles by Zagoria, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Syvanthong, C.
Right arrow Articles by Zagoria, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS