AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silberzweig, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silberzweig, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.0084
AJR 2007; 189:W48
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Incidence of Pain During Hysterosalpingography Using a Balloon Catheter

James E. Silberzweig

Columbia University New York, NY



 
WEB—This is a Web exclusive article.

In the July 2006 issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology, de Mello and colleagues [1] concluded that performing hysterosalpingography with a flexible balloon catheter or metal cannula with a previous paracervical block produced similar levels of pain.

The authors indicated that hysterosalpingography balloon inflation was classified as uncomfortable by 23.3% of patients and painful by 10%. The high incidence of pain during balloon inflation may be related to the location of balloon inflation. The authors noted that "the balloon was inflated to the level of the cervical or uterine isthmus." Inflation of the balloon at the uterine isthmus (Fig. 1) rather than at the cervical isthmus frequently causes significant patient discomfort.


Figure 1
View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 32-year-old woman with infertility. Normal hysterosalpingogram shows balloon positioned within uterine isthmus (arrow).

 

Gynecologists have reported that passage of a hysteroscope through the internal cervical os represents a technical obstacle because of related patient discomfort [2]. The diameter of the internal cervical os is approximately 4–5 mm. Passage of a large-diameter hysteroscope will result in stretching of the internal cervical os. The use of smaller-diameter hysteroscopes has been shown to be well tolerated and can be performed as an outpatient procedure [3, 4].

The incidence of pain during hysterosalpingography using a balloon catheter may be significantly reduced if effort is made to avoid inflating the balloon catheter at the uterine isthmus.


References
Top
References
 

  1. de Mello JFL Sr, Abrao MS, Cerri GG, de Barros N. Evaluation of pain in three hysterosalpingography techniques: metal cannula with and without paracervical blockage and balloon catheter. AJR2006; 187:86 -89[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bettocchi S, Nappi L, Ceci O, Selvaggi L. What does `diagnostic hysteroscopy' mean today? The role of the new techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003; 15:303 -308[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Cicinelli E, Parisi C, Galantino P, Pinto V, Barba B, Schonauer S. Reliability, feasibility, and safety of minihysteroscopy with a vaginoscopic approach: experience with 6,000 cases. Fertil Steril2003; 80:199 -202[Medline]
  4. Campo R, Molinas CR, Rombauts L, et al. Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod2005; 20:258 -263[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. F. L. de Mello Sr., M. S. Abrao, and G. G. Cerri
Reply
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): W49 - W49.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silberzweig, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silberzweig, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS