|
|
||||||||
University of São Paulo School of Medicine São Paulo, Brazil
WEBThis is a Web exclusive article.
This parameter was not controlled in our study, but some aspects of the group and the technique need to be taken into consideration: We had a high incidence of secondary infertility [2]: around one third of the group [3]. The most important reason for the failure of the cervical location, in our experience, is previous normal delivery; therefore it is also possible that the location of the isthmus balloon may frequently have been too high.
We would first try to locate and insufflate the balloon in the cervical canal (even in the case of patients with a previous normal delivery). If the balloon were not firmly located [3], we would introduce it a little further into the uterine isthmus.
Because of the above reasons, we think our results would not change even in the light of Dr. Silberzweig's information, making further studies necessary to confirm this hypothesis. However, we recommend avoiding insufflating the balloon in the uterine isthmus in future examinations.
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |