AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

The following table or figure may be downloaded to PowerPoint for personal use in teaching and presentations. This feature is available to all subscribers to the journal.

You MUST read and follow the guidelines at Request to Reproduce AJR Content if you are distributing or using AJR content beyond academic use (limited distribution, non-revenue producing, or educational purposes).

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 10


Fig. 3B —Performance of 3D CT colonography in detection of adenomas 8 mm or larger in Department of Defense CT colonography screening trial [1]. Bar graphs show sensitivity (green) and specificity (blue) at 8-mm size threshold according to temporal quarter (Qtr) of trial (A) and study site (B). Uniform performance characteristics range from 91% to 95% in all cases. That most radiologists in study were not based at academic medical centers and had relatively little experience (25-50 of fewer CT colonography cases) suggests that learning curve with primary 3D polyp detection is much simpler than that for primary 2D approach. Site 1 = National Naval Medical Center, site 2 = Naval Medical Center San Diego, site 3 = Walter Reed Army Medical Center.





Right arrow Return to article
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS