AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suga, K.
Right arrow Articles by Matsunaga, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suga, K.
Right arrow Articles by Matsunaga, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.1290
AJR 2007; 189:455-463
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Automated Breath-Hold Perfusion SPECT/CT Fusion Images of the Lungs

Kazuyoshi Suga1, Yasuhiko Kawakami1, Hideyuki Iwanaga2, Osamu Tokuda2 and Naofumi Matsunaga2

1 Department of Radiology, St. Hill Hospital, 1462-3 Nishikiwa, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-0151, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.

Received September 29, 2006; accepted after revision March 2, 2007.

 
Address correspondence to K. Suga (sugar{at}sthill-hp.or.jp).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical applicability and feasibility of deep-inspiratory breath-hold (DIBrH) perfusion SPECT for improving adverse respiratory motion effects and for accuracy of SPECT/CT image fusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eighty-seven consecutive patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n = 43), acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) (n = 26), and interstitial lung disease (ILD), (n = 18), underwent respiratory-monitored DIBrH SPECT with a dual-headed SPECT system. Two COPD and four acute PTE patients were excluded because of inappropriate scanning due to DIBrH difficulty. DIBrH SPECT was automatically fused with DIBrH CT. Perfusion defect clarity and heterogeneity and SPECT/CT matching were compared between DIBrH SPECT and non-breath-hold SPECT.

RESULTS. Compared with non-breath-hold SPECT, DIBrH SPECT significantly enhanced defect clarity in acute PTE (p < 0.0001) and perfusion heterogeneity (coefficient of variations [CV] of pixel counts) in COPD and ILD (p < 0.0001). CV in COPD was also better correlated with lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (p < 0.05). DIBrH SPECT also significantly improved SPECT/CT matching (p < 0.0001), with excellent matching of CT lung internal landmarks and pathology with corresponding defects. Fusion images confirmed wedge-shaped defects extending along specific pulmonary arterial branches in acute PTE and heterogeneous defects associated with airway or lung parenchymal abnormalities in COPD and ILD, with perfusion distribution consistent with lung CT attenuation changes.

CONCLUSION. DIBrH SPECT is acceptable for routine application to improve respiratory motion effects and accuracy of SPECT/CT image fusion. Confirmative perfusion-morphologic correlation with reliable fusion images appears useful for clarifying the cause of perfusion defects and abnormal lung CT attenuation.

Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease • CT • lung • lung diseases • nuclear medicine • pulmonary perfusion • pulmonary thromboembolism • SPECT


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Pulmonary perfusion SPECT with 99mTc macroaggregated albumin (MAA) has been shown to improve diagnostic information compared with planar scanning [1-8] and has been used for assessment of lung perfusion impairment in various lung diseases. However, on traditional non-breath-hold SPECT, respiratory lung motion and cyclically varying lung volume changes during image acquisition inherently degrade image quality and smear perfusion defects [9, 10]. Traditional SPECT also has some limitations in obtaining accurately coregistered SPECT/CT fusion images because of these adverse respiratory motion effects, although these images are expected to be useful for accurate and objective assessment of regional perfusion-morphologic correlation in the lung, as has been frequently applied in assessment of other organs [11-14].

In this study, to resolve these problems of traditional non-breath-hold perfusion SPECT, we developed a respiratory-monitored deepinspiratory breath-hold (DIBrH) SPECT technique using a widely available dual-headed SPECT system. A phantom study was preliminarily conducted to determine the optimal DIBrH SPECT technique and to test the ability of this technique in improving respiratory motion effects. On the basis of the results of the phantom study, we performed DIBrH SPECT in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), and interstitial lung disease (ILD) and evaluated the clinical applicability and feasibility of this technique to improve respiratory motion effects and accuracy of SPECT/CT image fusion compared with non-breath-hold SPECT. The feasibility of perfusion-morphologic correlation on DIBrH SPECT/CT fusion images in evaluation of respective diseases was also discussed.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Phantom Study
To determine the minimal and optimal number of projection data sets for reconstructing DIBrH SPECT and to test the ability of this SPECT technique in improving respiratory motion effects, a phantom study using an anthropomorphic chest phantom (SPECT-CT phantom, Kyoto Kagaku) was conducted. SPECT of this phantom was performed with a dual-headed SPECT system (E-cam, Toshiba Medical Systems), as was used in the clinical study. The phantom had a 26-cm short axis, 32-cm long axis, 22-cm height, and 83-cm circumference, and the inside contained the simulated lung parenchyma filled with 4.8 L of water and 185 MBq of 99mTc pertechnetate in which two round water-filled simulated nodules of 24 and 8 mm were placed.

Initially, 360° projection data of the standing phantom were repeatedly obtained with an acquisition time of 20 seconds (simulation of SPECT during 20-second DIBrH in the clinical study) 10 times, using a continuous rotating repeated acquisition (CRRA) mode, in a 128 x 128 matrix (field of view, 422.4 x 422.4 mm; 1 voxel = 3.3 mm3) and with an energy window of 140 keV ± 10%. In this mode, a gantry rotation of 180° around the phantom of each detector in clockwise and counterclockwise directions provided the projection data over a full 360° arc to eliminate the setting time between projection and acquisition of multiple temporal samples of data.

Subsequently, this standing phantom was also scanned using a step-and-shoot mode, with 30 stops over 180° for each detector and a preset time of 16 seconds for each stop of 6°, for a total acquisition time of 8 minutes. This phantom was regularly moving in a head-to-caudal direction with a range of 12 mm at 15 cycles per minute to simulate respiratory lung motion in patients. To control this regular motion, the phantom was placed on a plastic table with four runners. This table was directly connected to the piston arm of the volume-cycled ventilator using hard aluminum arms. SPECT of this moving phantom was performed with a total acquisition time of 8 minutes using the same step-and-shoot mode.

On the image workstation (GCA 9300 A/DI, Toshiba Medical Systems), transaxial, 3.3-mm-thick SPECT images of the standing chest phantom were reconstructed from every 6° projection data set of 3-10 projection data from the continuous rotating repeated acquisition mode using a Butter-worth prefilter (order number, 8; cutoff frequency, 0.49 cycles/cm) and a ramp back-projection filter. The conventional SPECT images of the standing and moving phantom were reconstructed from the every 6° projection data of a step-and-shoot mode, with the same thickness and a Butterworth prefilter of the same order number and cutoff frequency. The lung parenchyma of the phantom was drawn at a 10% threshold of the maximum radioactivity.

Clinical Study
Patient population—A total of 87 consecutive patients including 43 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (36 patients with pulmonary emphysema, four patients with obstructive bronchiolitis, two patients with diffuse panbronchiolitis, and one patient with bronchomalacia), 26 patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), and 18 patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) underwent DIBrH perfusion SPECT during the period between February 2004 and May 2006. Of these patients, two patients with COPD and four patients with acute PTE were excluded because of difficulty with DIBrH, although non-breath-hold SPECT was obtained. All patients with COPD and ILD underwent unenhanced CT within 7 days of the SPECT examination, and those with acute PTE underwent unenhanced CT and CT pulmonary angiography after SPECT. Unenhanced CT in patients with acute PTE was performed to evaluate the presence or absence of other lung lesions causing dyspnea and hypoxia or pulmonary infarction, and the indication for CT pulmonary angiography was decided on the basis of the results of the SPECT study. The diagnosis of each lung disorder was determined by clinical features and course, laboratory findings, pulmonary function test results, bronchofiberscopic biopsy, and imaging techniques such as high-resolution CT, ventilation SPECT, or CT pulmonary angiography and according to the diagnostic criteria presented in the previously established guidelines [2, 8, 15]. In all patients with acute PTE, CT pulmonary angiography showed a single or several filling defects indicative of intravascular clots in the pulmonary arteries. The procedure of DIBrH SPECT was approved by the institutional review board of the Yamaguchi University School of Medicine. After the nature of the procedure had been fully explained, informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Respiratory-monitored DIBrH perfusion SPECT— DIBrH perfusion SPECT was performed using the same SPECT system as used in the phantom study and a pressure sensor respiratory tracking device (AZ-733, Anzai Sogyo Co.). With each subject in the supine position, the pressure sensor was attached to the subject's thoracic or abdominal walls showing the maximum respiratory movement and connected to a physiologic respiratory tracking unit for monitoring real-time respiratory motion on the time-distance curves. Then each subject was directed to take regular DIBrH for 20 seconds by referring to the time curves on the respiratory tracking monitor. The decision to perform repeated DIBrH SPECT with 20-second DIBrHs was made on the basis of observation of the first 20-second DIBrH with or without nasal oxygen inhalation (1-3 L/min).

In the patients who could not perform the first DIBrH with oxygen inhalation, only non-breath-hold SPECT was performed. After IV injection of 185 MBq of 99mTc MAA ({approx} 800,000 particles), projection data were acquired only during each DIBrH in a 128 x 128 matrix (field of view, 422.4 x 422.4 mm, 1 voxel = 3.3 mm3) and with an energy window of 140 keV ± 10% using the CRRA mode, as mentioned earlier. A gantry rotation of 180° of each detector around the patient's chest during each DIBrH provided the projection data over a full 360° arc. The projection data were acquired with sufficient rest for each individual patient, until eight adequate projection data sets (four clockwise and four counterclockwise) with almost the same respiratory dimensions could be obtained. For comparison, non-breath-hold SPECT during rest breathing was subsequently acquired in a 128 x 128 matrix using a step-and-shoot mode, with 30 stops over 180° for each detector and a preset time of 16 seconds for each stop of 6°. The image acquisition time was 8 minutes.

On the image data processor, DIBrH SPECT was reconstructed from every 6° projection of eight selected projection data sets, and non-breath-hold SPECT from every 6° projection of the acquired data. For respective SPECT examinations, a total of 72-128 transaxial sections, 3.3-mm thick, covering the entire lungs were reconstructed using a Butterworth prefilter (order number, 8; cutoff frequency, 0.49 cycles/cm for DIBrH SPECT and 0.15 cycles/cm for non-breath-hold SPECT) and a ramp back-projection filter. The use of the cutoff frequency of 0.49 cycles/cm for DIBrH SPECT was based on the validation in our initial patient group. Lung contour on respective SPECT examinations was drawn at a threshold of 10% of the maximum radioactivity of the lungs in each patient.

Automated image fusion of DIBrH perfusion SPECT and CT—DIBrH CT was performed using a 4-MDCT scanner (Volume Zoom, Siemens-Asahi Medical Ltd.). With the subject in the supine position, 3-mm-thick high-resolution CT images were obtained in the helical mode in a 512 x 512 matrix during DIBrH using 3-mm collimation with a tube rotation time of 1.0 second at 120-135 kVp and 200-230 mA. Transaxial CT images were reconstructed with the lung algorithm.

DICOM data of CT and SPECT were electronically transferred to the teleradiologic workstation (GMS 5500 A/DI, Toshiba Medical Systems) and were reformatted to 168 x 168 matrix images for automated image fusion. Image fusion was performed using a simple rigid-body transformation technique provided by the fully automated 3D multiimage registration software (ART [automatic registration tool], Toshiba Medical Systems) [10, 12]. The automated image fusion was performed by definition of body contour and clustering of the voxels inside the body contour into a set of connected components using a rigid-body transformation technique [12]. The optimal registration parameters (translation for x-, y-, and z-axes and rotation angles for these axes) were automatically and three-dimensionally found by minimizing the variance of the SPECT voxel values within each connected component using the method of coordinate descent. Fully automatic registration was possible even when the slice range and thickness of the object were different between SPECT and CT. This software also allowed manual SPECT/CT matching on three orthogonal (transaxial, coronal, and sagittal) planes. Fusion images throughout the lungs were displayed together with the corresponding SPECT and CT images on the three orthogonal planes. To visually distinguish CT from SPECT information on fusion images, CT images were displayed in gray-scale and SPECT images in color.

Image Interpretation and Data Analysis
Phantom study—Two experienced observers visually compared the perfusion defect clarity of the simulated nodules among SPECT images of the standing phantom reconstructed from 1-13 continuous rotating repeated acquisition mode projection data sets and reconstructed from the projection data obtained using a step-and-shoot mode with a total acquisition time of 8 minutes and of the moving phantom obtained using a step-and-shoot mode with a total acquisition time of 8 minutes. The result was based on a consensus of these observers. The inhomogeneity of radiotracer distribution in the simulated lung parenchyma was quantitatively compared among those SPECT images mentioned earlier by estimating the coefficient of variation (CV = SD/mean counts) values of pixel counts. For this assessment, the regions of interest (ROIs) were manually placed on the same location of the lung parenchyma at five slices on each SPECT image. The size of these ROIs ranged from 1,194 to 1,562 pixels (mean, 1,247 ± 232 pixels).

Clinical study—To compare the detectability of perfusion defects between DIBrH and non-breath-hold SPECT examinations, the number of perfusion defects in patients with PTE was counted independently by the two observers. These observers randomly reviewed SPECT images of all cases on the display. The confidence level for each defect was scored (no defect = 0, possible defect = 1, definitive defect = 2) to evaluate the interobserver agreement. A perfusion defect with the confidence level score of 1 or 2 for both reviewers was defined as a positive defect, and a defect with the confidence level of 0 for either observer was judged as a negative defect.

For quantitative analysis, the maximum difference in respiratory dimension among the eight continuous rotating repeated acquisition mode projection data sets used for reconstructing DIBrH SPECT was calculated. The total lung radioactivity counts in all patients, perfusion defect clarity in patients with acute PTE, and perfusion heterogeneity in patients with COPD and ILD were compared between DIBrH and non-breath-hold SPECT. Perfusion defect clarity in acute PTE was compared by estimating the count ratio of defects against the adjacent normal areas (D/N ratio) in 54 relatively small defects at various locations. For this assessment, ROIs were manually placed over each defect and the adjacent normal areas at the same locations between respective SPECT images by consensus of two experienced observers, and the D/N ratio was calculated by using the mean counts per pixel. The ROI size ranged from 8 to 94 pixels (mean, 34 ± 23 pixels). Perfusion heterogeneity in COPD and ILD was compared by estimating CV values in the entire lungs. The CV values estimated on DIBrH and non-breath-hold SPECT in patients with COPD were correlated with the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide/alveolar volume ratios (DLCO/VA) as an indicator of alveolar dysfunction. (DLCO/VA) was measured by the single-breath method (Pulmorecorder, Model R1551S, Anima), according to the recommendation of the American Thoracic Society [15].

Two experienced observers made a consensus comparison of SPECT/CT matching accuracy between the automated fusion images created by DIBrH and non-breath-hold SPECT examinations by assessing boundary matching of the lungs, internal landmarks (the large hilar vessels and bronchi, mediastinal structures, and diaphragm), and visible CT lung abnormalities with corresponding perfusion defects. After confirming accurate SPECT/CT matching, these observers also made a consensus interpretation of perfusion defect-morphologic correlation on DIBrH SPECT/CT fusion images. Because the reformatted 168 x 168 matrix CT images on fusion images still kept sufficient resolution to identify pulmonary vessels at the subsegmental level, comprehensive correlation with lung morphology on unreformated 512 x 512 matrix CT images could be performed.

The other two observers quantitatively compared SPECT/CT mismatch distance between the lung base and diaphragm contours on these fusion images. For this assessment, fusion images were displayed on three orthogonal planes, and these observers independently and manually reperformed the best matching of the lung base and diaphragm contours. From the translated distances of {Delta}X, {Delta}Y, and {Delta}Z (mm) relative to the x-, y-, and z-axes for this best matching, 3D mismatch distance was calculated by the formula of ({Delta}X2 + {Delta}Y2 + {Delta}Z2)0.5. The values were averaged between the two measurements by these observers and were compared between the respective fusion images.

Statistical Analysis
Values were expressed as mean ± SD, and a paired or unpaired Student's t test was applied to compare the differences in the data between DIBrH and non-breath-hold SPECT images. Interobserver agreement in detection of perfusion defects of patients with acute PTE on DIBrH SPECT was assessed by calculating the kappa value using the confidence level scores of two observers. To evaluate the correlation between CV values and (DLCO/VA) in patients with COPD, a linear regression analysis was performed using commercially available software (StatView 4.02 SE + Graphics, Abacus Concepts), and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant for each correlation coefficient (R). The significant difference of R values of the multiple regression lines was evaluated by Neyaman-Pearson test with Fischer's Z transformation scores, where the Z value of 1.96 was used for 95% confidence.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Phantom Study
With increases in the number of continuous rotating repeated acquisition mode projection data used for SPECT reconstruction of the standing phantom, perfusion defects of the simulated nodules became clearer (Fig. 1A). SPECT of the standing phantom reconstructed from eight continuous rotating repeated acquisition mode projection data sets showed similar image quality compared with SPECT obtained with a step-and-shoot mode and a total acquisition time of 8 minutes. The perfusion defect of the small 8-mm nodule on this SPECT became clear compared with that on the conventional SPECT of the moving phantom obtained using a step-and-shoot mode and with a total acquisition time of 8 minutes.


Figure 1
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —Chest phantom study. As CT of phantom shows, inside of phantom contains two round water-filled nodules of 24 and 8 mm (arrows, a). With increases in number of continuous rotating repeated acquisition (CRRA) mode projection data sets for reconstructing SPECT of standing phantom, perfusion defects of these nodules becomes more distinct (arrows, b). SPECT reconstructed from eight continuous rotating repeated acquisition mode projection data (b; n = 8) has good image quality, as does SPECT (arrow, c) obtained with step-and-shoot mode and total acquisition time of 8 minutes. Perfusion defect of small 8-mm nodule on this SPECT is clearer compared with that on SPECT (arrow, d) of moving phantom (moving in head-to-caudal direction with range of 12 mm at frequency of 15 times/min) obtained using step-and-shoot mode and with total acquisition time of 8 minutes (d). R = right.

 
With increases in the number of continuous rotating repeated acquisition mode projection data sets used for SPECT reconstruction of the standing phantom, the mean CV value of the lung parenchyma at five slices was also gradually decreased and steady. The value of 0.27 ± 0.06 on SPECT reconstructed from eight continuous rotating repeated acquisition mode projection data sets was almost equal to that of 0.27 ± 0.03 on SPECT of the standing phantom obtained with a step-and-shoot mode and a total acquisition time of 8 minutes (Fig. 1B). From these results, eight DIBrH projection data sets were used for reconstructing DIBrH SPECT in the clinical study.


Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —Chest phantom study. Coefficient of variation (SD/mean count value of pixel counts) of lung parenchyma measured at five different slices on SPECT of standing phantom is gradually decreased and steady as number of continuous rotating repeated acquisition mode projection data sets increases. Value of 0.27 ± 0.06 on SPECT reconstructed from eight CRRA-mode projection data was almost equal to that of 0.26 ± 0.03 on SPECT of standing phantom obtained with step-and-shoot mode and total acquisition time of 8 minutes.

 

Clinical Study
In all 81 patients, eight adequate continuous rotating repeated acquisition mode projection data sets were obtained with nine to 14 repeated DIBrHs, for a total examination time of 8.7 ± 1.8 minutes (range, 6-14 minutes), although oxygen inhalation was given in eight patients. The maximum difference in respiratory dimension among these projection data sets was minimal at 2.2 ± 0.5 mm (range, 1.1-4.3 mm).

Total lung radioactivity counts on DIBrH SPECT were decreased to approximately 29% of those on non-breath-hold SPECT (4.2 x 106 ± 0.64 counts vs 14.7 x 106 ±0.63 counts). However, DIBrH SPECT often enhanced perfusion defect clarity in patients with acute PTE compared with non-breath-hold SPECT, with frequent expansion of defects (Figs. 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C, 4A, 4B, 5A, 5B). This SPECT, in addition, detected 32 (31%) defects compared with non-breath-hold SPECT (135 vs 103) in these patients, with a good interobserver agreement (kappa value, 0.79). D/N ratios at 54 small defects were significantly less on DIBrH SPECT (0.29 ± 0.18 vs 0.35 ± 0.24; p < 0.0001).


Figure 3
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —71-year-old man with pulmonary emphysema. R=right. CT shows bullous changes in both peripheral lungs and organized consolidation in left lung (left image, arrows). Deep-inspiratory breath-hold (DIBrH) SPECT shows more heterogeneous defects compared with non-breath-hold SPECT, with expansion of several defects (center image, arrows). Image set of transaxial DIBrH SPECT, SPECT/CT fusion, and CT confirms perfusion defects associated with bullous changes or consolidation on CT (right image, arrows). Heterogeneous defects are also seen in normal right ventral lung on CT.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —71-year-old man with pulmonary emphysema. R=right. As seen in image sets of coronal and sagittal SPECT, SPECT/CT fusion, and CT, DIBrH SPECT improves SPECT/CT matching of lung base and diaphragmatic contours compared with non-breath-hold SPECT (arrows). Image sets of DIBrH SPECT also show excellent matching of perfusion defects and peripheral bullous changes on CT. Although extensive peripheral defects are not well recognized on DIBrH SPECT alone, fusion images confirm these defects by delineating outer boundary of lungs on coregistered CT.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —Deep-inspiratory breath-hold (DIBrH) SPECT/CT fusion images. 44-year-old man with obstructive bronchiolitis.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —Deep-inspiratory breath-hold (DIBrH) SPECT/CT fusion images. 45-year-old man with diffuse panbronchiolitis.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C —Deep-inspiratory breath-hold (DIBrH) SPECT/CT fusion images. 58-year-old woman with bronchomalacia. R = right.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A —52-year-old woman with acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). R = right. CT scan (left) shows wedge-shaped area of low attenuation in right lung base (left image, arrow). Deep-inspiratory breath-hold (DIBrH) SPECT enhances perfusion defects compared with non-breath-hold SPECT, with expansion of several defects (center image, arrows). Image set of transaxial DIBrH SPECT, SPECT/CT fusion, and CT (right images) shows excellent matching between perfusion defects and low CT attenuation.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B —52-year-old woman with acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). R = right. As seen in image sets of coronal and sagittal perfusion SPECT, SPECT/CT fusion, and CT, DIBrH SPECT improves SPECT/CT matching of lung base and diaphragmatic contours compared with non-breath-hold SPECT. Image sets of DIBrH SPECT also show excellent matching between wedge-shaped defect and lung base low CT attenuation.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A —59-year-old man with interstitial pneumonia. R =right. CT image shows peripheral areas of high attenuation in both lungs (left image, arrows). Deep-inspiratory breath-hold (DIBrH) SPECT shows more heterogeneous perfusion defects compared with non-breath-hold SPECT, with expansion of defects (center image, arrows). Image set of transaxial DIBrH SPECT, SPECT/CT fusion, and CT (right images) shows excellent matching between perfusion defects and high CT attenuation areas (arrows). Defects are also seen in normal lung areas on CT.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B —59-year-old man with interstitial pneumonia. R =right. As seen in image sets of coronal and sagittal perfusion SPECT, SPECT/CT fusion, and CT, DIBrH SPECT improves SPECT/CT matching of lung base and diaphragmatic contours (arrows).

 
DIBrH SPECT also enhanced perfusion heterogeneity in patients with COPD and ILD, with frequent enhancement of ill-defined defects (Figs. 2A, 2B and 5A, 5B). The CV values in the entire lungs of these patients on DIBrH SPECT were significantly greater compared with non-breath-hold SPECT (0.31 ± 0.09 vs 0.21 ± 0.04; p < 0.0001 and 0.31 ± 0.09 vs 0.31 ± 0.06; p < 0.001, respectively). The CV values on DIBrH SPECT in patients with COPD were significantly better correlated with (DLCO/VA) compared with those on non-breath-hold SPECT (Z transformation score, 2.07; p < 0.05) (Fig. 6).


Figure 12
Figure 12
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6 —Comparison of correlation of coefficient of variation (CV) values and diffusing capacity of lungs for carbon monoxide/alveolar volume ratios (DLCO/VA) between deepinspiratory breath-hold (DIBrH) and non-breath-hold SPECT in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

 
Automated image fusion of DIBrH SPECT and CT was successful in all patients (Figs. 2A, 2B and 5A, 5B), although manual gross matching was required in four patients with relatively extensive defects. The image fusion process was completed within 4 minutes in all patients. However, automated non-breath-hold SPECT/CT registration failed in 11 (13%) patients even after manual gross matching because of the marked geometric difference. The mean 3D mismatch distance between the lung base and the diaphragm contours in 70 comparable patients was significantly better on DIBrH SPECT/CT fusion images compared with that on non-breath-hold SPECT/CT fusion images (2.6 ± 1.2 mm; range, 0.6-6.7 mm vs 29.8 ± 10.7 mm; range, 3.8-56.4 mm; p < 0.0001).

On unreformatted CT, all patients with COPD had low CT lung attenuation areas representative of emphysematous changes or air trapping, with or without bullae or bronchial wall thickening. All patients with ILD had high CT attenuation areas representative of interstitial thickening. Twelve of the 22 patients with acute PTE had low CT attenuations or mixed low and high (mosaic) attenuations in embolized lungs. DIBrH SPECT/CT fusion images showed an excellent matching of these visible lung abnormalities and corresponding defects, with excellent boundary matching of the lungs and internal landmarks with their defects (Figs. 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C, 4A, 4B, 5A, 5B). These fusion images could confirm wedged-shaped defects extending along the specific pulmonary arterial branches in patients with acute PTE (Fig. 4A, 4B) and heterogeneous defects associated with the airway or lung parenchymal morphologic abnormalities described earlier in patients with COPD and ILD (Figs. 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C, 5A, 5B). These images also could accurately confirm peripheral or subpleural defects according to the outer boundary of the lungs delineated by coregistered CT (Figs. 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C, 5A, 5B). The heterogeneous defects in normal lung areas on CT were also occasionally confirmed in patients with COPD and ILD (Figs. 2A, 2B, 5A, 5B). In three patients with COPD and two patients with acute PTE, only focal relatively high CT attenuation areas within widely affected lungs mimicked ground-glass opacities associated with focal pneumonia or alveolar edema. Fusion images could confirm that these areas were normal with preserved perfusion (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C).


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The phantom study indicated that perfusion SPECT reconstructed from an optimized number of continuous rotating repeated acquisition mode projection data could provide good image quality compatible with SPECT obtained with a step-and-shoot mode and a longer acquisition time, and that DIBrH SPECT certainly improved image clarity of small perfusion defects compared with non-breath-hold SPECT. Clinically, DIBrH SPECT could be successfully obtained within a relatively short examination time in the majority of our patients and also enhanced perfusion defects and heterogeneity compared with non-breath-hold SPECT. Enhanced defects and heterogeneity on this SPECT seem to correctly reflect the lung pathophysiology because CV values were closely correlated with DLCO as an indicator of alveolar dysfunction in our patients with COPD. As was expected, DIBrH SPECT also showed excellent SPECT/CT matching on the automated fusion images. Thus, this technique appears applicable in routine practice and is useful for improving respiratory motion effects and for providing reliable automated SPECT/CT image fusion.

The enhancement of perfusion defect clarity and heterogeneity on DIBrH SPECT in our patients can be explained by significant reduction of respiratory motion effects and by expansion of defects due to lung volume increases at DIBrH [9-11]. On conventional non-breath-hold SPECT, the lung motion during every respiratory cycle and the cyclically changing lung volume inherently degrade image sharpness of ill-defined defects [11]. Respiratory lung volume change alters radioactivity per unit of lung volume and perfusion defect size, although 99mTc MAA distribution is fixed and the size of defects depends on the respiratory conditions existing during injection [11].

Due to lung volume increases at DIBrH, various degrees of expansion of perfusion defects should occur in patients with acute PTE, as shown in the previous PTE animal model study on planar perfusion [16]. The radioactivity per unit of lung volume should not be significantly changed in diseased lung areas of patients with COPD and ILD due to air trapping or low breathing compliance, although it is significantly increased in the surrounding normal lungs due to significant reduction of alveolar air space enhancing perfusion defect clarity. The superiority of perfusion SPECT compared with CT in detecting mild lesions of COPD and ILD has been previously reported [5, 8, 17-21]. DIBrH SPECT should further facilitate this advantage of perfusion SPECT.

DIBrH SPECT provided reliable automated fusion images with separately performed DIBrH CT without additional CT and without the use of multiple radioactive external landmarks or transmission images obtained using an external radionuclide [22, 23]. The use of the same respiratory phase of SPECT and CT for image fusion can yield automated reliable fusion images without use of other complex nonrigid deformation algorithms [13, 24]. The mean 3D misregistration of 2.6 ± 1.2 mm between the lung base and diaphragm contours on the present fusion images is smaller than the previously reported data in SPECT/CT and PET/CT fusion image studies [11, 13, 24-29].

Coregistered CT on these reliable fusion images compensated low-spatial-resolution SPECT and allowed accurate localization of perfusion defects on underlying detailed CT lung anatomy. As a result, segmental or heterogeneous nonsegmental defects, defects consistent with abnormal lung CT morphology or attenuation changes, could be confirmed in our patients. In acute PTE, wedge-shaped defects should appear along embolized pulmonary arterial branches, and these defects occasionally result in low CT lung attenuation due to direct reduction in the diameter and volume of peripheral vessels distal to vascular obstruction [30]. Previous angiographic studies showed focal low-attenuation areas in patients with acute PTE, with reduction of diameters and volume of the embolized pulmonary arteries [31, 32]. In this disease, objective localization of perfusion defects with fusion images is of value, because CT pulmonary angiography cannot reliably identify actually affected lung areas, regardless of excellent detectability of intravascular clots [2, 30].

In COPD, heterogeneous alveolar destruction or alveolar inflation or hypoxic vasoconstriction associated with heterogeneous air trapping should result in perfusion defects consistent with heterogeneous low CT attenuation [33, 34]. In ILD, alveolar interstitial tissues are usually affected heterogeneously with spared lung areas, and perfusion should be reduced at high CT attenuation areas representative of alveolar wall thickening or cellular infiltration [35]. As seen in several of our patients with acute PTE and COPD, focally spared normal lung areas within widely affected lungs might be misinterpreted as lesions. Accurate perfusion-morphologic correlation with fusion images appears useful for preventing such misinterpretation [10]. The present fusion images also occasionally confirmed perfusion defects even in morphologically normal lung areas in our patients with COPD and ILD. Detection of such areas with fusion images is of value because these defects reflect early stage lesions of COPD and ILD [18-21]. Previous studies showed the superiority of perfusion scintigraphy to CT in detecting mild lesions of these diseases [5, 8, 10, 17-21].

In conclusion, the present DIBrH SPECT technique appears acceptable for routine practice. By improving respiratory motion effects, DIBrH SPECT facilitates detectability of perfusion defects and provides reliable automated SPECT/CT fusion images. Confirmative perfusion-morphologic correlation with these fusion images appears to have incremental value for clarifying the cause of perfusion defects or abnormal CT appearance and may enhance diagnostic accuracy in various lung diseases. Although hybrid SPECT/CT systems will facilitate the use of lung fusion images, the problem of adverse respiratory motion effects should remain. The present technique will be also useful for resolving this problem. However, for patients who have difficulty with repeated DIBrH, a shorter projection data acquisition with optimization of administration dose of the radiotracer, numbers of projection data sets, or detector rotation speed is warranted.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Palmer J, Bitzen U, Jonson B, Bajc M. Comprehensive ventilation/perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med2001; 42:1288 -1294[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Reinartz P, Wildberger JEV, Schaefer W, Nowak B, Mahnken AH, Buell U. Tomographic imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a comparison between V/Q lung scintigraphy in SPECT technique and multiple spiral CT. J Nucl Med 2004;45 : 1501-1508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Collart JP, Roelants V, Vanpee D, et al. Is a lung perfusion scan obtained by using single photon emission computed tomography able to improve the radionuclide diagnosis of pulmonary embolism? Nucl Med Commun 2002; 23:1107 -1113[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Lewis DH, Kott B, Jacobson AF. Single-photon emission tomography imaging of the chest. Respir Care 2001;46 : 940-945[Medline]
  5. Sando Y, Inoue T, Nagai R, Endo K. Ventilation/perfusion ratios and simultaneous dual-radionuclide single-photon emission tomography with krypton-81m and technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin. Eur J Nucl Med 1997; 24:1237 -1244[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Mitomo O, Aoki S, Tsunoda T, Yamaguchi M, Kuwabara H. Quantitative analysis of nonuniform distributions in lung perfusion scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 1998;39 : 1630-1635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Meignan MA. Lung ventilation/perfusion SPECT: the right technique for hard times. J Nucl Med 2002;43 : 648-651[Free Full Text]
  8. Sasaki Y, Imai T, Shinkai T, et al. Estimation of regional lung function in interstitial pulmonary disease using Tc-99m-Technegas and Tc-99m macro-aggregated albumin single-photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1998; 25:1623 -1625[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Suga K, Kawakami Y, Zaki M, Yamashita T, Matsumoto T, Matsunaga N. Pulmonary perfusion assessment with respiratory-gated Tc-99m-macroag-gegated albumin SPECT: preliminary results. Nucl Med Commun2004; 25:183 -193[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Suga K, Kawakami Y, Zaki M, et al. Assessment of regional lung functional impairment with co-registered respiratory-gated ventilation/perfusion SPET-CT images: initial experiences. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31 : 240-249[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Ketai L, Hartshorne M. Potential of computed tomography-SPECT and computed tomography: coincidence fusion images of the chest. Clin Nucl Med 2001; 26:433 -441[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Ardekani BA, Braun M, Hutton BF, Kanno I, Iida H. A fully automatic multimodality image registration algorithm. J Compt Assist Tomogr 1995; 19:615 -623[Medline]
  13. Yu JN, Fahey FH, Gage HD, et al. Intermodality, retrospective image registration in the thorax. J Nucl Med1995; 36:2333 -2338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Damen EM, Muller SH, Boersma LJ, de Boer RW, Lebesque JV. Quantifying local lung perfusion and ventilation using correlated SPECT and CT data. J Nucl Med 1994;35 : 784-792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. American Thoracic Society. Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152 (5 Pt 2):S78 -S83
  16. Alderson PO, Vieras F, Housholder DF, Mendenhall KG, Wagner HN Jr. Gated and cinematic perfusion lung imaging in dogs with experimental pulmonary embolism. J Nucl Med 1979;20 : 407-412[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Noma S, Moskowitz GW, Herman PG, Khan A, Rojas KA. Pulmonary scintigraphy in elastase-induced emphysema in pigs: correlation with high-resolution computed tomography and histology. Invest Radiol 1992; 27:429 -435[Medline]
  18. Barbera JA, Riverola A, Roca J, et al. Pulmonary vascular abnormalities and ventilation-perfusion relationships in mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 149:423 -429[Abstract]
  19. Gevenois PA, Maertelaer VD, Vuyst PD, et al. Comparison of computed density and microscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154 : 187-192[Abstract]
  20. Miller RP, Müller NL, Vedal S. Limitations of computed tomography in the assessment of emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 139:980 -983[Medline]
  21. Kuwano K, Matsuba K, Ikeda T, Murakami J, Araki A, Shigematsu Nl. The diagnosis of mild emphysema: correlation of computed tomography and pathology scores. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141 : 169-178[Medline]
  22. Gutman F, Hangard G, Gardin I, et al. Evaluation of a rigid registration method of lung perfusion SPECT and thoracic CT. AJR 2005; 185:1516 -1524[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Dey D, Slomka PJ, Hahn LJ, Kloiber R. Automatic three-dimensional multimodality registration using radionuclide transmission CT attenuation maps: a phantom study. J Nucl Med 1999;40 : 448-455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Kwa SLS, Theuwas JCM, van Herk M, et al. Automatic three-dimensional matching of CT-SPECT and CT-CT to localize lung damage after radiotherapy. J Nucl Med 1998;39 : 1074-1080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Ling CC, et al. Effect of respiratory gating on reducing lung motion artifacts in PET imaging of lung cancer. Med Phys 2002; 29:366 -371[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Nehmeh S, Erdi YE, Rosenzweig KE, et al. Reduction of respiratory motion artifacts in PET imaging of lung cancer by respiratory correlated dynamic PET: methodology and comparison with respiratory gated PET. J Nucl Med 2003;44 : 1644-1648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Cohade C, Osman M, Marshall LT, Wahl RL. PET-CT: accuracy of PET and CT spatial registration of lung lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30:721 -726[Medline]
  28. Osman MM, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y, Marshall LT, Leal JP, Wahl RL. Clinically significant inaccurate localization of lesions with PET/CT: frequency in 300 patients. J Nucl Med2003; 44:240 -243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Goerres GW, Kamel E, Heidelberg TN, Schwitter MR, Burger C, von Schulthess GK. PET-CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respiration. Eur J Nucl Med 2002;29 : 351-360[CrossRef]
  30. Herold CJ, Wetzel RC, Robotham JL, et al. Acute effects of increased intravascular volume and hypoxia on the pulmonary circulation: assessment with high-resolution CT. Radiology1992; 183:655 -662[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Groell R, Peichel KH, Ugowitzer MM, Schmid F, Hartwagner K. Computed tomography densitometry of the lung: a method to assess perfusion defects in acute pulmonary embolism. Eur J Radiol1999; 32:192 -196[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Screaton NJ, Coxson HO, Kalloger SE, et al. Detection of lung perfusion abnormalities using computed tomography in a porcine model of pulmonary embolism. J Thorac Imaging2003; 18:14 -20[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Guckel C, Wells AU, Taylor DA, et al. Mechanism of mosaic attenuation of the lungs on computed tomography in induced bronchospasm. J Applied Physiol 1999;86 : 701-708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. West JB. Vascular diseases. In: West JB, ed. Pulmonary pathophysiology: the essentials, 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1992: 108-128
  35. West JB. Restrictive diseases. In: West JB, ed. Pulmonary pathophysiology: the essentials, 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1992:89 -107

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suga, K.
Right arrow Articles by Matsunaga, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suga, K.
Right arrow Articles by Matsunaga, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS