AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zilocchi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stanson, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zilocchi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stanson, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2370
AJR 2007; 189:712-719
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: Imaging Findings

Massimo Zilocchi1,2, Thanila A. Macedo1, Gustavo S. Oderich3, Terri J. Vrtiska1, Pietro R. Biondetti2 and Anthony W. Stanson1

1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St., SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.
3 Division of Vascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Received November 28, 2006; accepted after revision April 7, 2007.

 
Address correspondence to T. A. Macedo (macedo.thanila{at}mayo.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), formerly known as EDS type IV, is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by fragility of medium and large arteries due to type III procollagen deficiency. Our purpose was to review the imaging findings in a cohort of patients with a diagnosis of vascular EDS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The radiologic, surgical, and genetic databases at a single multispecialty medical practice were reviewed for a 35-year period between 1971 and 2006. Thirty-three patients with a clinical diagnosis of vascular EDS were identified. Imaging studies were available for 28 patients, 13 men and 15 women, with a mean age of 39.8 ± 16 years at the time of diagnosis. A vascular radiologist reviewed a total of 189 imaging examinations: 87 CT, 27 MRI, 59 sonography, and 16 angiography.

RESULTS. Vascular abnormalities were present in 22 (78%) of 28 patients. Arterial abnormalities included 41 aneurysms, 19 dissections, 12 ectasias, and 10 occlusions. There was one splenic vein aneurysm and one carotid cavernous fistula. Six patients had a total of 10 parenchymal infarcts involving the brain (n = 5), kidney (n = 3), and spleen (n = 2). Nine patients had 10 hemorrhagic events, five related to spontaneous vascular rupture and five associated with interventional or surgical procedures. Six patients had 13 nonvascular findings.

CONCLUSION. The most common findings were arterial aneurysms and dissections, followed by arterial ectasias and occlusions. Life-threatening complications included hemorrhage and infarcts.

Keywords: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome • vascular imaging


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a rare heterogeneous group of connective tissue disorders with distinct inheritance patterns and biochemical defects. The estimated prevalence is one in every 25,000 births [1]. Vascular EDS, formerly known as EDS type IV, is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by heterozygous mutations in the COL3A1 gene encoding for type III procollagen [17]. The clinical implication of a structural defect in type III procollagen is excessive tissue fragility predisposing to premature arterial, intestinal, or uterine rupture [8]. Unlike the other types of EDS, vascular EDS carries a poor prognosis because of the risk of life-threatening arterial rupture.

The diagnosis of vascular EDS is challenging. Patients often have subtle phenotypic features and are unaware of the diagnosis at the time of their first vascular complication [9]. From the radiologist's perspective, prompt diagnosis of patients with vascular EDS is of paramount importance for at least two reasons. First, invasive studies such as conventional angiography and other percutaneous interventions should be avoided because of the excessive risk of arterial tear or dissection due to catheter-related trauma [10, 11]. Therefore, noninvasive imaging studies such as sonography, CT angiography (CTA), and MR angiography are preferred over conventional angiography. Second, familiarity with the imaging findings of vascular EDS is important because the diagnosis may first be suspected on the basis of radiologic findings. The purpose of this study was to discern the imaging findings in a cohort of 28 patients with a clinical diagnosis of vascular EDS.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
We reviewed the radiologic, surgical, and medical genetics database collected at a single multispecialty medical practice for a 35-year period between 1971 and 2006. Thirty-three patients were identified with the clinical diagnosis of vascular EDS. The study was approved by the institutional review board.

Imaging studies were available in 28 patients, who formed our study population. There were 13 men and 15 women with mean age of 39.8 ± 16 years (range, 17–81 years) at the time of vascular EDS diagnosis. Eight women were nulliparous, seven were multiparus. The clinical characteristics (Table 1) and outcome were previously reported [12], and herein we concentrate on imaging findings.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Technique and Location of 189 Radiologic Examinations in 28 Patients

 

The clinical diagnosis of vascular EDS was made on the basis of at least two of four major diagnostic criteria, as defined by the revised nosology of Villefranche in 1997 [2]. These criteria include thin, translucent skin; extensive bruising; characteristic facial features (thin, pinched nose and prominent eyes); and history of arterial, intestinal, or uterine fragility [2]. Laboratory confirmation of the diagnosis was made in 22 patients by the presence of structurally abnormal type II procollagen using a culture of dermal fibroblasts or through the detection of COL3A1 gene mutation. Six patients had the diagnosis established solely on the basis of clinical criteria. Of the 28 patients included in the study, only nine (32%) had an established diagnosis before presentation at our institution.

Imaging Technique and Analysis
Each of the 28 patients underwent at least one imaging study, including CT, CTA, MRI, MR angiography, sonography, or conventional angiography. Thirteen patients had three or more studies, 10 had two, and five had one. The mean number of examinations per patient was 6.7 ± 8.5 (range, 1–34 examinations). Imaging findings were divided into one of two categories: vascular and nonvascular. Vascular complications were defined as arterial or venous rupture, dissection, aneurysm, and organ infarct or rupture. A vascular radiologist reviewed a total of 189 examinations (Table 1). Multiple studies in a given patient were reviewed at the same time.

A variety of equipment and protocols were used during a time period involving more than three decades of imaging advances. Conventional angiography was performed in standard technique, with most examinations acquired through femoral artery access. CT was performed with a section thickness ranging from 1.25 to 10 mm. Sixteen CT examinations were performed without IV contrast material. CTA was performed with a section thickness ranging from 0.6 to 3 mm during the arterial phase of contrast triggered by automatic bolus tracking and injection of 100–140 mL of iodinated contrast material. MRI was performed, including T1- and T2-weighted sequences, in 27 examinations and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography with gadolinium enhancement in 17 cases.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Vascular abnormalities were present in 22 of 28 patients. Of these patients, three (3/22) had the vascular abnormalities on previous outside examinations, which were not available for our review. Two (2/22) patients presented with hemorrhagic complications without other vascular findings. The remaining 17 of 22 patients had vascular findings as summarized in Table 2. Only nonvascular findings were found in two of 28 patients. No abnormalities were found in four (14.3%) of 28 patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Clinical and Imaging Findings in Patients with Vascular Type Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

 

Vascular Findings
A total of 83 vascular findings, including ectasia (n = 12), aneurysm (n = 42), dissection (n = 19), and occlusion (n= 10), were noted in 17 of the 28 patients. Fifty vascular abnormalities occurred in nine men and 33 occurred in eight women, with an average number of 5.5 lesions in men and 4.1 lesions in women. The spectrum and distribution of vascular findings are summarized in Figure 1. Vascular abnormalities were most commonly seen in the visceral (n = 26), iliac (n = 22), and head and neck (n = 16) locations. However, the most common location of abnormalities considering the overall number of patients was visceral arteries (eight patients), head and neck (eight patients), and aorta (eight patients). The single vessel with the largest number of lesions was the iliac artery: 13 abnormalities were noted in three men and nine in two women (one of whom was pregnant). Most patients (13/17) with vascular findings had multiple vascular abnormalities (range, 2–18 abnormalities) (Fig. 2); three patients had more than nine abnormalities. Other vascular findings included spontaneous carotid cavernous fistula and acute deep venous thrombosis of the calf veins. Fifty-eight examinations (30.7%) showed no abnormalities.


Figure 1
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Spectrum and distribution of vascular findings in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: total of 83 abnormal vascular findings including ectasia, aneurysm, dissection, and occlusion. DTA = descending thoracic aorta, IMA = inferior mesenteric artery, SFA = superior femoral artery, SMA = superior mesenteric artery.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 22-year-old woman with common iliac and hypogastric artery aneurysms. CT angiogram with 3D reconstruction reveals dissecting aneurysm of right common iliac artery (thin arrow) as well as aneurysms of right hypogastric artery and left common iliac artery (thick arrows).

 
Vascular Complications
Six patients had a total of 10 parenchymal infarcts involving the brain (n =5), kidney (n = 3), and spleen (n = 2). Seven patients had 10 hemorrhagic events, including five spontaneous vascular ruptures and five hemorrhagic events associated with interventional or surgical procedures. The spontaneous vascular ruptures consisted of, in one patient each, subcapsular and intraparenchymal splenic hematoma, hemothorax, intraparenchymal lung hemorrhage, splenic vein–ruptured aneurysm (Fig. 3A), and inferior epigastric artery rupture (Fig. 3B). Two patients had hemorrhagic events after catheterization. These included a perforation of the internal mammary artery with associated hemomediastinum (Fig. 3C) and a perforation of the carotid artery during attempts to occlude a carotid cavernous fistula. The other three hemorrhagic complications included a subcapsular hepatic hematoma after cholecystectomy, a small perihepatic hematoma after liver biopsy, and a prolonged groin hematoma after superficial femoral artery graft placement in one patient each.


Figure 3
View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 51-year-old woman with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. CT angiography of abdomen shows ruptured splenic vein aneurysm (thin arrow) and thrombus (thick arrow) in portal vein.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 51-year-old woman with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Three days later, patient developed spontaneous rupture of left inferior epigastric artery with active bleeding and a rectus sheath hematoma shown in this CT image.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C 51-year-old woman with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Patient underwent coil embolization complicated by perforation of left internal mammary artery, extravasation of contrast material, and development of hemomediastinum (arrow), shown in this radiograph obtained during conventional angiography.

 
Progression of Vascular Disease
Five patients had serial studies obtained over a period of 3–7 years. A summary of the imaging findings is outlined below:

Patient 1—An 81-year-old man with a clinical diagnosis of vascular EDS and no biochemical or molecular confirmation had progression of multiple aneurysms over a 3-year period. A 5-cm ascending thoracic aorta and distal arch aneurysm increased to a maximum diameter of 6 cm during a 19-month follow-up, prompting surgical repair. The thoracoabdominal aorta at the diaphragmatic level enlarged from 4.1 to 5 cm over 33 months, and then to 5.7 cm during the next 3 months. An internal iliac artery aneurysm enlarged from 3 to 4 cm, and the deep femoral artery enlarged from 1.1 to 1.4 cm over 33 months. Bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms remained stable in size. A new 6-cm paraanastomotic aneurysm developed in the distal anastomosis of a previously placed femoropopliteal graft, and a 2.1-cm left subclavian aneurysm increased to 2.7 cm in 6 months.

Patient 2—A 47-year-old man with a clinical and laboratory diagnosis of vascular EDS presented with spontaneous renal artery dissection and renal infarcts. Five days after presentation he developed dissections of the gastroduodenal and contralateral renal and splenic arteries with associated splenic infarct. Repeat examination 3 days later showed new dissection of the celiac artery, dissection and dilatation of the common hepatic artery, and occlusion of the gastroduodenal branch (Figs. 4A, 4B, and 4C). Three-year follow-up imaging revealed new dissection and ectasia of both the common and the external iliac arteries.


Figure 6
View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A 47-year-old man with multiple vascular abnormalities. Selective left renal artery angiogram shows intimal flap consistent with dissection (arrow) associated with cortical infarcts.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (185K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B 47-year-old man with multiple vascular abnormalities. After 5 days, repeat angiogram reveals new dissection of gastroduodenal artery (arrow).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C 47-year-old man with multiple vascular abnormalities. Three days later, 3D MR angiography with gadolinium bolus shows new dissection of celiac artery (arrow).

 
Patient 3—A 34-year-old woman with clinical and laboratory evidence of vascular EDS presented with a 1.2-cm celiac axis saccular aneurysm (Fig. 5A) and developed near-complete thrombosis over a 2-day period. Follow-up examination 2 months later showed recanalization of the celiac axis aneurysm and resolution of the thrombus. This patient also had bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms, right internal iliac ectasia, and a left internal iliac aneurysm (Fig. 5B) that developed a small amount of mural thrombus over 2 years.


Figure 10
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A 34-year-old woman with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. CT angiography of abdomen with volume-rendered 3D reconstruction shows 1.2-cm saccular aneurysm (arrow) arising from inferior wall of celiac axis.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B 34-year-old woman with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. CT angiography of pelvis with volume-rendered reconstruction shows bilateral common iliac arteries, left internal iliac aneurysm, and right internal iliac ectasia.

 


Figure 9
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D 47-year-old man with multiple vascular abnormalities. Enhanced CT scan of pelvis 3 years later shows patient has developed new dissection and ectasia of left common and external iliac arteries (arrow).

 

Patient 4—A 65-year-old man with clinical and laboratory diagnoses of vascular EDS and a history of aortobifemoral and femoropopliteal bypasses developed multiple aneurysms. These included a 6-cm femoral anastomotic aneurysm and a 1.3-cm internal iliac aneurysm over a 17-year interval. In addition, at an 8-month follow-up multiple aneurysms were noted, including bilateral fusiform aneurysms of the vertebral arteries, ectasia of the ascending thoracic aorta, a 1.6-cm celiac artery aneurysm, a 1.2-cm proximal superior mesenteric artery aneurysm, a 1.8-cm mid superior mesenteric artery fusiform thrombosed aneurysm, bilateral renal artery aneurysms, and a 2.5-cm femoral anastomotic aneurysm.

Patient 5—A 33-year-old woman with clinical and laboratory diagnoses of vascular EDS developed dissection of the left renal artery and cortical infarcts over an 8-month interval. In addition, 1 month later she developed ectasia of the previously dissected main renal artery and also a new dissection in the contralateral renal artery.

Nonvascular Findings
Six patients had 13 nonvascular findings, including three cavernous hemangiomas, two cases of diverticulitis, and one case each of cholecystitis, sclerosing cholangitis, cholangiocarcinoma, focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver, lumbar vertebral body hemangioma, recent pancreatitis, and ulcerative colitis. One patient had partial colectomy because of ruptured sigmoid colon.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Ehlers [13] and Danlos [14] described the classic features of skin hyperelasticity and joint hypermobility in the early 1900s. Since then, a variety of terms have been used to describe the vascular manifestations of EDS. Sack in 1936 first introduced the term "status dysvascularis" [15], and Barabas [3] in 1967 described the vascular or arterial–ecchymotic type. The disorder was then named after the two physicians as "Sack-Barabas syndrome." The first classification system of EDS defined 11 types, of which "type IV EDS" was used to describe patients with increased vascular fragility. A more recent consensus conference has simplified this old classification system into six distinct varieties: classic, hypermobility, vascular, kyphoscoliosis, arthrochalasia, and dermatosparaxis types. Therefore, the current recommended nomenclature is "vascular EDS."

Vascular EDS is rare and accounts for fewer than 4% of all EDS patients [6, 7]. Patients often have subtle and variable phenotypic features as compared with patients with other forms of EDS. The clinical diagnosis can be established on the basis of major diagnostic criteria. Excessive bruising and a tendency to form hematomas is the most common sign and may be the first clue to the diagnosis in children and adolescents. Skin hyperelasticity is usually not present. Instead, nearly 80% of patients have thin, translucent skin with highly visible superficial veins on the chest, shoulders, and abdomen [12]. A characteristic facial appearance—thin, delicate, and pinched nose; thin lips; and prominent bones and eyes—is noticed in 30% or fewer of vascular EDS patients [1, 8, 12]. Although the clinical diagnosis of vascular EDS should have a high specificity, laboratory confirmation is strongly recommended to confirm the diagnosis. The preferred strategy for definitive diagnosis is direct assessment of procollagen III deficiency through culture of dermal fibroblasts, which requires skin biopsy. Alternatively, analysis of the DNA sequence can determine the presence of COL3A1 gene mutation.

Vascular EDS is of special interest to the radiologist because it can be characterized by widespread vascular changes, including aneurysms, dissections, ruptures, and fistula formation. The disorder can affect medium and large arteries in any location. Because patients are frequently unaware of the diagnosis at the time of their first vascular complication, vascular EDS should be suspected in young patients presenting with unusual or extensive vascular findings.

Previous case reports have discussed involvement of the thoracic and abdominal aorta, the celiac axis, and the splenic, hepatic, pancreaticoduodenal, renal, iliac, carotid, cervical, and intracranial arteries [1623]. In our study, the main characteristic in patients with vascular EDS is the tendency to have multiple abnormalities in various vascular segments at a relatively young age. In fact, of the patients with vascular abnormalities, most (13/17) had more than two vascular abnormalities, and in three cases there were more than nine abnormalities in the same patient. Although serial examinations were available in only five patients, all of them showed progression of vascular findings: aneurysm enlargement and development of secondary complications such as dissections, occlusions, or spontaneous ruptures. The most common vascular segments affected, in decreasing order of frequency, were the abdominal visceral arteries, iliac arteries, thoracic and abdominal aorta, lower limb, carotid, vertebral, subclavian, pulmonary, and cerebral arteries.

In our experience, the most common complications were hemorrhagic events and parenchymal infarcts affecting the cerebral, renal, and splenic circulation. Vascular ruptures are common and may result from minor trauma or be iatrogenic or spontaneous in nature. In a recent article, Boutouyrie et al. [24] described the geometric and elastic properties of conducting arteries to assess the pathogenesis of vascular complications in patients with vascular EDS. There was abnormally low intima–media thickness, which generates high wall stress and potentially increases the risk of dissection and rupture [24]. This is shown in our study by the occurrence of spontaneous ruptures of the inferior epigastric artery, spontaneous subcapsular and intraparenchymal splenic hematoma, splenic vein aneurysm rupture, and pulmonary hemorrhage with hemothorax.

The role of routine noninvasive imaging and periodic arterial screening has not been evaluated in vascular EDS patients [25]. However, we found that the use of noninvasive imaging such as sonography, CTA, and MR angiography readily diagnosed and identified early complications in vascular EDS. Conventional angiography was used more frequently at the beginning of our experience and was associated with hemorrhagic complications in two patients. We currently have substituted noninvasive techniques for conventional angiography because of the higher complication rates of angiography due to vascular wall fragility [10, 11] and the improved resolution available with noninvasive imaging examinations. Conventional angiography is currently used as part of a planned interventional procedure, such as coil embolization of bleeding arteries in remote locations.

In conclusion, patients with vascular type EDS usually have multiple vascular abnormalities, with aneurysms being the most common, followed by dissection and ectasia involving the visceral arteries, aorta, and head and neck most frequently. Our series showed that the vascular abnormalities are progressive; therefore, noninvasive imaging should be considered not only as a diagnostic tool but also as a valuable tool in the follow-up of identified vascular lesions.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Byers PH. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. In: Rimoin DL, Connor JM, Pyeritz RE, eds. Emery and Rimoin's principles and practice of medical genetics, 3rd ed., vol. 1. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1997:1067 -1081
  2. Beighton P, De Paepe A, Steinmann B, Tsipouras P, Wenstrup RJ. Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: revised nosology, Villefranche, 1997. Am J Med Genet 1998; 77:31 -37[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Barabas AP. Heterogeneity of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: description of three clinical types and a hypothesis to explain the basic defect(s). Br Med J 1967;2 : 612-613[Free Full Text]
  4. Barabas AP. Vascular complications in the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, with special reference to the "arterial type" or Sack's syndrome. J Cardiovasc Surg 1972;13 : 160-167[Medline]
  5. Pope FM, Martin GR, Lichtenstein JR, et al. Patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV lack type III collagen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1975; 72:1314 -1316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Germain DP, Herrera-Guzman Y. Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Ann Genet 2004;47 : 1-9[Medline]
  7. Germain DP. Clinical and genetic features of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg 2002;16 : 391-397[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. De Paepe A, Malfait F. Bleeding and bruising in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and other collagen vascular disorders. Br J Haematol 2004; 127:491 -500[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Pepin M, Schwarze U, Superti-Furga A, Byers PH. Clinical and genetic features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, the vascular type. N Engl J Med 2000;342 : 673-680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Driscoll SH, Gomes AS, Machleder HI. Perforation of the superior vena cava: a complication of digital angiography in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. AJR 1984; 142:1021 -1022[Free Full Text]
  11. Slingenberg EJ. Complications during intravascular diagnostic manipulations in the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Neth J Surg 1980; 32:56 -58[Medline]
  12. Oderich GS, Panneton JM, Bower TC, et al. The spectrum, management and clinical outcome of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV: a 30-year experience. J Vasc Surg 2005;42 : 98-106[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Ehlers E. Cutis laxa neigung zu haemorrhagien in der haut, lokerung mehrerer artikulationen. Dermatol Ztschr1901; 8:173 -174
  14. Danlos M. Un cas de cutis laxa avec tumeurs par contusion chronique des coudes et des genoux (xanthome juvenile pseudodiabetique de MM Hallopeault Mace de Lepinari). Bull Soc Franc Dermatol Syph1908; 19:70
  15. Sack G. Status dysvascularis, ein Fall von besonderer Zerreiblichkeit der Blutgefabe. Dtsch Arch klink Med1936; 178:663 -669
  16. Karkos CD, Prasad V, Mukhopadhyay U, Thomson GJ, Hearn AR. Rupture of the abdominal aorta in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg 2000; 14:274 -277[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Parfitt J, Chalmers RTA, Wolfe JHN. Visceral aneurysms in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: case report and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg 2000; 31:1248 -1251[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Casana R, Nano G, Dalainas I, Tealdi DG. Endovascular treatment of hepatic artery aneurysm in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: case report. Int Angiol 2004;23 : 291-295[Medline]
  19. Imamura A, Nakamoto H, Inoue T, et al. Ruptured dissecting aneurysm in bilateral iliac arteries caused by Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV: report of a case. Surg Today 2001;31 : 85-89[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Schievink WI, Piepgras DG, Earnest F, Gordon H. Spontaneous carotid-cavernous fistulae in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV. J Neurosurg 1991; 74:991 -998[Medline]
  21. Nekrysh SY. Association between heritable connective tissue disorders and intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol2000; 54:77 -78[Medline]
  22. Kato T, Hattori H, Yorifuji T, Nakahata T. Intracranial aneurysms in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV in early childhood. Ped Neurol 2001; 25:336 -339[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Yost BA, Vogelsang JP, Lie JT. Fatal hemoptysis in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: old malady with a new curse. Chest1995; 107:1465 -1467[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Boutouyrie P, Germain DP, Fiessinger JN, Laloux B, Perdu J, Laurent S. Increased carotid wall stress in vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Circulation 2004;109 : 1530-1535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Bergqvist D. Ehlers-Danlos type IV syndrome: a review from a vascular surgical point of view. Eur J Surg1996; 162:163 -170[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zilocchi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stanson, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zilocchi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stanson, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS