AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tombesi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sartori, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tombesi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sartori, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2128
AJR 2007; 189:W168
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Renal Mass Core Biopsy

Paola Tombesi, Mirella Catellani and Sergio Sartori

St. Anna Hospital Ferrara, Italy



 
WEB—This is a Web exclusive article.

We read with great interest the article by Maturen et al. [1] about renal mass core biopsy. In a retrospective review of 152 imaging-guided biopsies of renal masses, they performed multiple (up to four) passes of an 18-gauge cutting needle, obtaining diagnostic specimens in 96% of biopsies performed. Sensitivity for malignancy was 97.7% and specificity was 100%. Immediate and delayed complications were 1.3% and 0.7%, respectively. The authors concluded that the technique is safe and highly sensitive and can significantly affect clinical management. We strongly agree with their conclusions.

From January 2003 to June 2006, we performed 32 biopsies of suspicious renal masses (mean diameter, 4.5 cm; range, 2.5–11 cm) with inconclusive imaging findings. Twenty lesions were solid with colliquative or necrotic areas; 12 were partially or predominantly cystic. Low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography was used to identify viable tissue and to guide the placement of an 18-gauge cutting needle into viable portions of the lesions. One needle pass was performed in 24 cases, and two needle passes were performed in eight. All patients underwent control sonography 6 hours after the biopsy was performed.

One (3.1%) biopsy result was nondiagnostic, 22 biopsies (68.8%) were positive for malignancy (12 renal cell carcinomas [RCCs], four lymphomas, three metastases, and three undefined carcinomas), and nine (28.1%) revealed benign lesions (two pyelonephritis, two abscesses, two hemorrhagic cysts, one infarct, one tuberculosis, and one cystic dysplasia). No immediate or delayed complications were observed. The patient with the nondiagnostic biopsy underwent nephrectomy, and surgical pathology revealed a widely necrotic RCC. All diagnoses of benign and malignant lesions were confirmed by surgery or clinical and imaging follow-up (median, 18 months; range, 8–40 months). Biopsy findings avoided unnecessary nephrectomy in 14 patients (43.8%).

Our results are quite similar to those of Maturen et al. [1], but in our series fewer needle passes were needed to obtain diagnostic specimens. Contrast-enhanced sonographic guidance is likely to have played a key role in this regard. Contrast-enhanced sonography allows real-time imaging of microcirculation, enabling differentiation of viable from necrotic tissue and detection of residual viable foci of hepatocellular carcinomas after radiofrequency ablation [2]. Such an ability to identify viable tissue can also be useful in reducing the rate of nondiagnostic biopsies of predominantly necrotic or cystic lesions. Some years ago we successfully exploited this ability to guide transthoracic biopsy of a widely necrotic lung neoplasm after conventional sonography-guided biopsy failed to yield an adequate diagnostic sample [3].

The number of needle passes is considered a risk factor affecting the frequency of complications of liver biopsy [4], and it has also been reported to represent a risk factor in percutaneous renal biopsy [5]. Although there may have been some bias because our series was small, our results suggest that contrast-enhanced sonography can enable the achievement of a high rate of diagnostic specimens with a low number of needle passes. In our opinion, contrast-enhanced sonography should be regarded as the method of choice to guide percutaneous biopsy of renal masses, particularly when they are predominantly necrotic or cystic, whenever an adequate acoustic window can be identified.


References
Top
References
 

  1. Maturen KE, Nghiem HV, Caoili EM, Higgins EG, Wolf JS Jr, Wood DP Jr. Renal mass core biopsy: accuracy and impact on clinical management. AJR 2007; 188:563 -570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bartolozzi C, Crocetti L, Cioni D, Donati FM, Lencioni R. Assessment of therapeutic effect of liver tumor ablation procedures. Hepatogastroenterology 2001;48 : 352-358[Medline]
  3. Sartori S, Nielsen I, Trevisani L, Tombesi P, Ceccotti PC, Abbasciano V. Contrast-enhanced sonography as guidance for transthoracic biopsy of a peripheral lung lesion with large necrotic areas. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23:133 -136[Free Full Text]
  4. Kim SH, Lim HK, Lee J, Cho JM, Jang HJ. Needletract implantation in hepatocellular carcinoma: frequency and CT findings after biopsy with a 19.5-gauge automated biopsy gun. Abdom Imaging2000; 25:246 -250[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Prakash J, Singh M, Tripathi K, Rai US. Complications of percutaneous renal biopsy. J Indian Med Assoc1994; 92:395 -396[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tombesi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sartori, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tombesi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sartori, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS