|
|
||||||||
University of Missouri–Columbia School of Medicine Columbia,
MO
Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, CT
WEB—This is a Web exclusive article.
That gadodiamide is cleared by dialysis [2] could suggest that once the gadolinium-based contrast media (or free gadolinium ion) deposits in the extravascular tissues, back-diffusion out of the tissues into plasma occurs very slowly or not at all. Indeed, Joffe and colleagues [2] documented that, although the serum concentration of gadodiamide decreased progressively throughout a hemodialysis session, there did not appear to be an appreciable increase in the serum levels between dialysis sessions.
Although the Joffe et al. [2] study did not directly assess the removal of free gadolinium ions, animal studies suggest a significantly higher residual concentration of gadolinium in tissue after administration of gadodiamide compared with other agents [3]. It is also important to note that studies documenting the removal of gadolinium-based contrast media with dialysis only measure the reduction in serum levels and not the mass transfer or total amount of contrast material extracted. Thus, although serum levels are reduced, there is no information regarding residual tissue amounts.
Thus, it appears that timing of dialysis could be of the essence in preventing the redistribution of gadolinium into the extravascular space and ultimately the development of NSF, especially given the recent documentation of gadolinium detection in the skin biopsies from patients with NSF [4]. It would be helpful to nephrologists if the authors could provide more details regarding the dialytic therapy each of the three patients received. Of utmost importance would be the elapsed time between contrast administration and the initiation of dialysis and specific information regarding the dialysis prescription (continuous vs intermittent, membrane characteristics, blood and dialysate flow rates, bath used, and so on).
In conclusion, we found the manuscript by Broome and colleagues [1] to be a significant addition to the literature regarding NSF. It would, however, be extremely informative if the authors would elaborate further regarding the dialysis treatment provided to the patients.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. M. Colletti Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis and Gadolinium: A Perfect Storm Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1150 - 1153. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Prince, H. Zhang, M. Morris, J. L. MacGregor, M. E. Grossman, J. Silberzweig, R. L. DeLapaz, H. J. Lee, C. M. Magro, and A. M. Valeri Incidence of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis at Two Large Medical Centers Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 807 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |