DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2341
AJR 2007; 189:W171
© American Roentgen Ray Society
MRI of Marjolin's Ulcer
Orla Buckley,
Emily Ward,
Peter L. Munk and
William C. Torreggiani
The Adelaide and Meath Hospital Dublin, Ireland
Vancouver General Hospital Vancouver, BC, Canada
The Adelaide and Meath Hospital Dublin, Ireland
WEB—This is a Web exclusive article.
We read with interest the case report by Chiang et al.
[1] in which the authors
describe the MRI features of a Marjolin's ulcer in a 47-year-old man, which
developed in the area of a burn scar. In their discussion, the authors
eloquently describe the utility of MRI in defining the extent of bone
destruction, the margins of the lesion, and the associated soft-tissue mass.
In the past, radiographic films were used to assess bone destruction, but the
authors correctly point out the advantage MRI confers over radiographs. MRI in
their case provided clear definition of the margins of the ulcer, allowing
accurate lesion identification and aiding potential preoperative planning. In
addition, the authors pointed out the usefulness of gadolinium enhancement to
further characterize the nature and extent of the ulcer in their case.

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1A —42-year-old man with Marjolin's ulcer. Anteroposterior
radiograph of tibia and fibula show evidence of old fracture that has not
united and chronic osteomyelitis with associated varus deformity.
|
|
We would like to further their case by describing a 42-year-old man we
encountered who developed a Marjolin's ulcer secondary to chronic
osteomyelitis. Initial radiographs in our case showed evidence of an old
fracture and features of chronic osteomyelitis
(Fig. 1A). Contrast-enhanced
MRI showed an enhancing mass involving both the cutaneous and osseous
structures, suggesting the possibility of a complicating Marjolin's ulcer
(Fig. 1B). This was confirmed
on biopsy. As in the case described by Chiang et al.
[1], MRI in our case was able
not only to suggest the presence of a Marjolin's ulcer but also to depict its
extent and relationship to the underlying region of chronic osteomyelitis. In
addition, we found contrast enhancement to be a useful adjunct in depicting
the extent of the lesion. Therefore, in agreement with Chiang et al., we
conclude that that MRI should be used as the imaging technique of choice in
assessing Marjolin's ulcer, regardless of the underlying associated cause. In
addition we also think that contrast enhancement is useful in such cases.
References
- Chiang KH, Chou AS, Hsu YH, et al. Marjolin's ulcer: MR appearance.
AJR 2006; 186:819
-920[Free Full Text]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-H. Chiang, A. S.-B. Chou, and P.-Y. Chang
Reply
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
September 1, 2008;
191(3):
W151 - W151.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|