AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jaramillo, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jaramillo, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2416
AJR 2007; 189:867-872
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

MRI for Detection of Abscess in Acute Osteomyelitis of the Pelvis in Children

Susan A. Connolly1, Leonard P. Connolly2, Laura A. Drubach2, David Zurakowski1,3 and Diego Jaramillo4

1 Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Ave., Main 2, Boston, MA 02115.
2 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA.
3 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA.
4 Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA.

Received February 24, 2006; revised April 23, 2007;

 
Address correspondence to S. A. Connolly.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. We analyzed our experience with MRI of pelvic acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO) to address the following questions: What does MRI reveal about bone involvement? How often are fluid collections indicative of abscess shown? Are clinical parameters predictive of the cases in which MRI would be more beneficial?

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed the imaging studies and medical records from the past 5 years of 38 children ranging in age from 25 to 211 months who were diagnosed with pelvic osteomyelitis using MRI. Statistical analysis of demographic and clinical variables was compared between patients with an abscess (n = 21) and those without (n = 17) who were identified on MRI.

RESULTS. Osteomyelitis involved metaphyseal equivalent sites in every case (n = 38), with single bone involvement in 24 (63%) and contiguous bone involvement in the remaining 14 (37%). Fluid collections indicative of an abscess were seen in 21 cases (55%), and abscess drainage was performed in 10 (26%). Univariate analysis of demographic and clinical variables between patients with and without an abscess indicated no significant differences for any variable except erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (74 ± 19 vs 56 ± 24 mm/h; p< 0.05, Student's t test).

CONCLUSION. Childhood pelvic AHO is relatively uncommon and produces variable signs and symptoms that are often attributed to another process. The results of our study show the ability of MRI to provide additional information that affected patient management in cases of pelvic abscess. We therefore advocate the use of MRI as the imaging technique of choice for any child suspected of having pelvic AHO.

Keywords: MRI • pediatric imaging • pelvic abscess • pelvic osteomyelitis


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO) is a common pediatric disease. Early diagnosis helps lessen the risk of complications such as sepsis, chronic infection, and growth arrest. AHO is rarely diagnosed with radiography because osseous manifestations are not evident radiographically for 7–10 days after the onset of infection [1, 2]. Skeletal scintigraphy has played a central role in expediting diagnosis and treatment since its use for this purpose was described in 1975 and 1976 [35]. Skeletal scintigraphy is usually positive by 24–72 hours after symptom onset. The emergence of MRI has raised questions regarding when it should be used for diagnosis of AHO. Evidence of marrow edema and, with the use of gadolinium, hyperemia, in an infected bone can be shown within 24–48 hours of symptom onset [6]. MRI can also reveal intraosseous, subperiosteal, and soft-tissue abscesses [6, 7].

In approximately 10% of cases, AHO involves the pelvic bones [1, 8]. The pathophysiology is the same as that underlying AHO of the long tubular bones, which are the site of infection in more than 70% of cases. Blood-borne organisms lodge and proliferate in highly vascular regions with looping arterial vessels and venous sinusoids in which flow is sluggish. In the long tubular bones, this vascular anatomy predominates in the metaphysis. In the flat bones of the pelvis, the same vascular anatomy is present before skeletal maturation at sites bordering cartilage [1]. These sites are considered metaphyseal equivalents [9].

A higher occurrence of abscesses with pelvic AHO has led to the suggestion that MRI is the preferred diagnostic technique in instances of the specific question of pelvic infection [6, 10]. We report our 5-year experience and review how often fluid collections indicative of abscess on MRI occur in pelvic AHO and whether clinical parameters can predict the occurrence of such abscesses.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
We retrospectively reviewed the imaging studies and medical records of 38 children (26 boys, 12 girls) ranging in age from 25 to 211 months (mean, 124 months) who were diagnosed with pelvic osteomyelitis using MRI during a 5-year period. The study was approved by our institutional review board; patient informed consent was not required.

MRI was performed with a 1.5-T system (Signa, GE Healthcare). All examinations included sagittal or coronal T1-weighted and fast spin-echo inversion recovery images, fat-saturated axial fast spinecho T2-weighted images, and—after the IV administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine, 0.2 mL/kg (Magnevist, Berlex)—axial and coronal or sagittal fat-suppressed T1-weighted images. Sedation was used for MRI in six patients.

Image Analysis
A consensus interpretation of all MR images was made by two experienced pediatric radiologists who were blinded to the scintigraphic, radiologic, and sonographic findings and to the clinical information. Findings of marrow hypointensity on T1, hyperintensity on T2, and enhancement after gadolinium administration were considered indicative of osteomyelitis. The location and number of pelvic bones involved were recorded. The site of osteomyelitis in an individual pelvic bone was noted as the region of maximum bone marrow edema. An abscess was considered when a nonenhancing fluid collection with a peripheral rim of enhancement was identified [7]. The location of the collection was recorded as intraosseous, subperiosteal, or within the soft tissues. All collections were measured in three dimensions. The presence or absence of a joint effusion was recorded.

Statistical Analysis
Demographic and clinical variables, including age, sex, duration of symptoms, presence of fever, rectal temperature, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), left shift (when 20% of the total neutrophils are immature), and serum WBC, were compared between patients identified on MRI as having an abscess (n = 21) and those not having an abscess (n = 17). A subgroup analysis was performed to consider only patients who had a drained abscess (n = 10). Continuous variables that followed a normal distribution (age, temperature, and serum WBC) were compared using the Student's t test and expressed using the mean ± SD. Duration of symptoms was summarized by the median and interquartile range and the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Based on the primary groups compared (patients with and those without an abscess), a power analysis indicated that the sample sizes provided 80% power ({alpha} = 0.05, ß = 0.20) to detect mean differences of 20% for each of the continuous variables on the basis of the two-sample Student's t test (version 5.0, nQuery Advisor, Statistical Solutions) [11]. Univariate comparisons of categoric variables such as sex and presence of fever were performed using Fisher's exact test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the trade-off between the true-positive rate (sensitivity) and the false-positive rate (1 – specificity) using ESR as a predictor of abscess [12]. Logistic regression was applied to control for any possible confounding among the variables and to determine the significant multivariate predictors of an abscess. The likelihood ratio test was used for assessing significance of the variables in the model, and the probability of an abscess was derived on the basis of maximum likelihood estimation for any significant predictors [13]. All reported p values are two-tailed using a significance level of 0.05. Analyses of the data were performed using the SPSS software package (version 13.0, SPSS).


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Musculoskeletal symptoms were present in 37 (97%) of the 38 patients. Pelvic or hip pain was present in 36 (95%), and altered weight-bearing was present in 13 (34%) patients. All but one of the patients with altered weight-bearing also described pain. Fever of 38°C or greater (range, 38–41°C; mean, 38.6°C) was reported in 31 (82%) patients, including one for whom it was the only presenting sign or symptom. The duration of symptoms or signs before MRI ranged from 2 to 14 days (mean, 6.1 days).

The ESR (mm/h) was high (> 20 mm/h) in 36 (95%) patients (range, 20–107 mm/h; mean, 65 mm/h). In nine (24%) patients, the WBC was elevated (> 12 x 109/L) (range, 12.1–19 x 109/L; mean, 15.1 x 109/L). A left shift was present in 16 (42%) patients, seven of whom had elevated WBCs. Blood cultures were positive in 16 (48%) of the 33 patients in whom they were obtained. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism, but Streptococcus pneumoniae was reported in one patient.

Univariate comparisons between patients with and those without an abscess as determined by MRI indicated no significant differences for any of the demographic or clinical variables except ESR (Table 1). Patients with an abscess had significantly elevated ESR compared with those without an abscess (74 ± 19 vs 56 ± 24 mm/h; p < 0.05, Student's t test). A clear difference can be seen by inspecting the empiric patient data for the two groups shown in Figure 1. Using the mean level of ESR in the patients with no abscess as a cutoff point, 81% of the patients with an abscess had ESR levels greater than 55 mm/h compared with only 47% of the nonabscess group (p < 0.05, Fisher's exact test). This translates into a sensitivity of 81% (17/21) and a specificity of 53% (9/17) using an ESR cutoff value of 55 mm/h.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: Comparison of Demographic and Clinical Variables Between Patients With and Without Abscess as Determined on MRI

 

Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Scatterplot shows empiric data for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for each of 38 patients in our study segregated by whether they had an abscess on MRI. Those 21 patients with abscess are segregated by whether abscess required drainage. Horizontal lines indicate mean ESR values for the 21 patients with abscess and the 17 patients with no abscess (74 and 56 mm/h, respectively). Student's t test indicated that patients with abscess have significantly elevated ESR.

 

ROC analysis indicated an AUC of 0.716, which would indicate good discrimination in using ESR as a measure to identify an abscess. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the only variable independently associated with the presence of an abscess was ESR (likelihood ratio test = 12.49; p < 0.01). The relationship based on the regression analysis can be illustrated by a curve showing the increased probability of an abscess for higher levels of ESR. For example, a patient with an ESR level of 37 mm/h would have an estimated 10% probability of having an abscess, whereas a patient with a level of 70 mm/h would have a 50% probability (Fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Theoretic curve based on logistic regression analysis depicts estimated probability of abscess according to patient's erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Positive relationship was observed with higher sedimentation rates among patients who had abscess identified on MRI (p < 0.01). This relationship was independent of age, sex, duration of symptoms, presence of fever, and serum WBC.

 

Similar differences were found regarding ESR when considering as a subgroup those patients who had a drained abscess (n =10) compared with others (84 ± 17 vs 59 ± 22 mm/h; p < 0.01) (Table 2). All 10 of the patients who had a drained abscess had ESR levels greater than 55 mm/h compared with 54% of the other patients (p < 0.01). This would translate into a sensitivity of 100% (10/10) and a specificity of 46% (13/28). The area under the ROC curve using ESR as a continuous variable to identify a drainable abscess is 0.815, indicating a very good test. Table 2 indicates that none of the other demographic or clinical variables were associated with abscesses that required drainage (p >0.20 for all).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Comparison of Demographic and Clinical Variables Between Patients With and Without Drained Abscesses

 

Radiography was positive in only one patient. Hip sonography had been obtained before MRI in 26 patients. Sonography performed specifically to assess for hip effusion was normal in 22 patients, revealed an effusion in three, and showed a fluid collection adjacent to the inferior pubic ramus in one. Skeletal scintigraphy was performed before MRI in 17 patients. All patients studied with scintigraphy had a site of abnormal osseous uptake; these patients included the one patient who presented with only fever.

MRI showed findings indicative of AHO in 53 bones of the 38 patients. In 24 (63%) patients, a single bone was affected. Involvement of contiguous bones was identified in 14 (37%) patients, 13 of whom had two and one of whom had three bones involved. Involvement of noncontiguous bones was not identified in any case. In all patients, the site of osteomyelitis was along a metaphyseal equivalent (Fig. 3A, 3B). Table 3 summarizes the distribution of metaphyseal equivalent sites. MRI revealed fluid collections indicative of abscess in 21 (55%) patients. The most common compartment affected was soft tissue, where a fluid collection was found in 17 patients (Fig. 4A, 4B). A single compartment was affected in 18 patients (soft tissue, 14; subperiosteum, 4). Two patients had soft-tissue, subperiosteal, and intraosseous fluid collections, and one had soft-tissue and intraosseous collections (Fig. 5A, 5B). Soft-tissue fluid collections ranged in size from 0.5 to 3.0 cm (mean, 1.6 cm), subperiosteal fluid collections ranged in size from 0.6 to 2.0 cm (mean, 1.2 cm), and intraosseous fluid collections had a range of 0.4–0.5 cm (mean, 0.43 cm).


Figure 3
View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 12-year-old boy with 1-week history of right buttock pain. Coronal STIR image shows bone marrow and soft-tissue edema in metaphyseal equivalent of right ischial tuberosity (arrow).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 12-year-old boy with 1-week history of right buttock pain. Gadolinium-enhanced axial T1-weighted fatsaturated image shows enhancing edema in ischium and soft tissues (arrow), and no abscess.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3: Distribution of Metaphyseal Equivalent Sites

 

Figure 5
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A 10-year-old boy with 6-day history of left hip pain who underwent aspiration of sterile left hip joint effusion 1 day before MRI. Axial T2-weighted fat-saturated image shows edema of left acetabulum, ileum, and pubis centered at metaphyseal equivalent of triradiate cartilage (asterisk). Edema and enlargement of left obturator internus muscle is seen (arrow). Note left hip effusion.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B 10-year-old boy with 6-day history of left hip pain who underwent aspiration of sterile left hip joint effusion 1 day before MRI. Gadolinium-enhanced coronal T1-weighted fatsaturated image shows small nonenhancing fluid collection and abscess (arrow) in obturator muscle.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A Osteomyelitis of left anterior superior iliac spine, metaphyseal equivalent, in 7-year-old boy with 4-day history of left hip pain. Axial T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced fat-saturated images show marrow edema in left ileum and surrounding soft tissues. Two nonenhancing fluid collections, abscesses, are seen. One is intraosseous and other is in gluteal soft tissues (arrow).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B Osteomyelitis of left anterior superior iliac spine, metaphyseal equivalent, in 7-year-old boy with 4-day history of left hip pain. Axial T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced fat-saturated images show marrow edema in left ileum and surrounding soft tissues. Two nonenhancing fluid collections, abscesses, are seen. One is intraosseous and other is in gluteal soft tissues (arrow).

 

Fluid collections were drained in 10 (26%) patients, eight of whom underwent CT-guided percutaneous drainage and two of whom underwent surgical drainage. No patient underwent more than one drainage. In all patients who underwent drainage, the largest or only fluid collection was located in the soft tissues. Drainage was performed within 24 hours of MRI in seven (18%) patients. The largest or only fluid collection ranged in size from 2 to 3 cm (mean, 2.7 cm) in these patients. Drainage was performed two or more days after MRI because of continued symptoms in three (8%) patients. In these patients, the largest or only fluid collection was 1–2 cm (mean, 1.3 cm) at the time of initial MRI and 1.2–4.0 cm (mean, 2.6 cm) at the time of a second MRI before drainage. Drainage was performed in all eight patients whose fluid collections had a maximum dimension of 2 cm (range, 2.0–3.0 cm; mean, 2.5 cm); in two of eight patients in whom the largest fluid collection had a maximum dimension of 1.0–1.9 cm (range, 1.0–1.5 cm; mean, 1.2 cm); and in none of five patients in whom the largest fluid collection had a maximum dimension of less than 1.0 cm (range, 0.2–0.8 cm; mean, 0.5 cm). Cultures of drainage fluid grew S. aureus in all 10 patients who underwent drainage.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Clinical diagnosis of pelvic AHO can be difficult. The disease is relatively uncommon, produces variable signs and symptoms that are often attributed to another process, and peaks in incidence at an older age than AHO in general [9, 1417]. Pelvic AHO is difficult to differentiate clinically from septic arthritis, pyomyositis [18], and infections of the pelvic organs such as appendicitis and tuboovarian abscesses. The difficulty in clinical diagnosis of pelvic AHO is underscored by the clinical parameters recorded in our patients. Emphasis has been placed on the importance of considering pelvic AHO in a febrile child with limitation of motion around the hip or altered gait [15], but nearly 20% of our patients and more than 50% of 64 patients reported by Davidson et al. [14] were not febrile.

The percentages of our patients with leukocytosis (24%), left shift (42%), and positive blood cultures (48%) are representative of what others have reported [9, 14]. The ESR was elevated in 95% of our patients, but it is a very nonspecific parameter. The average age of our patients (10.3 years) is similar to that reported by Davidson et al. (11.5 years) and falls within the average ages of 7–14 years encountered in their literature review [14]. This age distribution contrasts with one third of all patients with AHO at any site being under 2 years old and more than half being under 5 years old [1].

Imaging plays a central role in assessing children with suspected pelvic AHO. Radiography indicated the diagnosis in only one of our 38 patients despite the mean duration of symptoms approaching the point at which radiography might reveal an osseous manifestation. The low yield of radiography likely reflects Nixon's observation [9] that identification of early osseous manifestations of AHO is particularly difficult in the pelvis. Given that radiographs are usually negative, the question becomes which imaging test to perform next.

The high sensitivity of MRI for AHO has been established by other studies [10, 1921]. The results of our study show the ability of MRI to provide additional information that affects patient management in cases of pelvic AHO. Fluid collections that were considered abscesses were identified in more than 50% of patients studied with MRI. Although we can prove only that the collections that were drained were abscesses, we think it is appropriate to regard all fluid collections encountered in these patients as abscesses. Most abscesses involved the soft tissues located over the infected bone. Intraosseous and subperiosteal abscesses also occurred. Just fewer than 20% of our patients underwent drainage within 24 hours of diagnostic MRI, and an additional 8% did so within 3 days.

The small number of cases and the retrospective nature of this study prevent our suggesting dimensions at which abscesses should be drained and at which abscesses may respond to medical management. Nevertheless, it is worth noting the results of management in our patients, for whom the principal factor driving abscess drainage seemed to be abscess size. All but one patient with an abscess of 2 cm or more in maximum dimension underwent drainage within 24 hours of diagnostic MRI. We cannot state that all drainages that were performed within 24 hours of diagnostic MRI favorably affected outcome, but the need for later drainage in the one patient with an abscess that reached this size and that was not drained within 24 hours of diagnosis suggests that early drainage facilitated treatment in at least some patients. Medical therapy was successful without drainage in all patients with an abscess smaller than 1 cm in maximum dimension. This observation supports but does not establish the appropriateness of the medical management that was chosen for those patients, who numbered only five.

The involvement of multiple bones, seen in more than one third of our patients, deserves an explanation. The pelvis forms from three primary centers of ossification. The ilium, ischium, and pubis contribute together or in part to form a combined epiphysis at the triradiate cartilage, ischiopubic junction, and pubic symphysis. These chondroosseous relationships allow integrated growth of the pelvis. In these regions the physeal cartilage extends between the metaphyses of the ossification centers. This unique metaphyseal relationship—several bones sharing a single fused physis—may account for the apparent contiguous spread of infection [22]. An alternative explanation may be a primary single bone involvement with sympathetic edema in contiguous bones.

All foci of infection were located in metaphyseal equivalents. This is important because the focus of bone infection can sometimes be subtle relative to the extent of the soft-tissue involvement. The radiologist is more likely to make an accurate diagnosis of osteomyelitis rather than of isolated myositis or soft-tissue abscess if the metaphyseal-equivalent areas are searched for abnormalities. The universal origin of bone infections in the metaphyseal regions also confirms the pathophysiology of pelvic osteomyelitis as suggested by Nixon [9].

The high prevalence of fluid collections, seen in more than half of our patients, speaks strongly in favor of using MRI instead of scintigraphy for the evaluation of pelvic osteomyelitis. The increased frequency of abscesses may be related to the fact that an accurate diagnosis of pelvic AHO is often delayed because of the complexity of the symptoms [6]. In contrast, AHO in the long bones often results in early localizing symptoms. One drawback regarding the use of MRI is the potential for missing a site of disease because of referred or poorly localized symptoms or because of multifocality of disease.

The ease of performing a whole-body survey with skeletal scintigraphy is often cited as an advantage of that technique. We do not believe that the potential for missing a disease site in a patient with localized symptoms outweighs the advantages of MRI. Although the presence of localized pelvic or hip pain in 95% of our patients may be somewhat misleading because MRI is more likely to be performed when symptoms are well localized, referred or poor symptom localization is primarily encountered in younger children than those in whom pelvic AHO most often occurs. For a patient with symptoms that are localized to a pelvic site, it seems reasonable to perform MRI. If MRI is negative and clinical suspicion warrants, skeletal scintigraphy could then be performed. Multifocality of AHO is uncommon and generally does not affect management.

A second drawback regarding the use of MRI is the need for sedation in younger children. The study to be performed in these younger patients should be chosen considering the confidence with which symptoms are localized and balancing the low risks related to sedation needed for MRI and ionizing radiation inherent to skeletal scintigraphy. In pelvic AHO, however, most patients are older than the age range in which sedation is necessary.

In patients with a suspected pelvic musculoskeletal infection, our data suggest that an ESR exceeding 55 mm/h is the only clinical parameter we evaluated that may be useful to predict the presence of an abscess.

Our study is limited because of its retrospective nature. The interval between presentation and the performance of the MRI examinations was variable. Furthermore, no consistent practice was used regarding scintigraphy or the drainage of the fluid collections.

In summary, the MRI evaluation of pelvic osteomyelitis in children shows that these infections almost always originate in metaphyseal equivalents and are associated with purulent collections in more than half the patients. Multiple bones are often affected. Children suspected of having pelvic osteomyelitis who have an elevated ESR, particularly when it is greater than 55 mm/h, should be evaluated with MRI for the presence of an abscess. The complexity of the lesions and of the anatomy of the pelvis and the frequent association of fluid collections suggest that gadolinium-enhanced MRI is the technique of choice in the workup of pelvic AHO.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Sherry L. Brec for her expertise in preparation of the manuscript.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Laor T, Jaramillo D, Oestreich AE. Skeletal system. In: Kirks DR, 3rd ed. Practical pediatric imaging: diagnostic radiology of infants and children. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven,1998 : 327–510
  2. Faden H, Grossi M. Acute osteomyelitis in children: reassessment of etiologic agents and their clinical characteristics. Am J Dis Child 1991; 145:65 –69[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Gilday DL, Paul DJ, Paterson J. Diagnosis of osteomyelitis in children by combined blood pool and bone imaging. Radiology 1975;117 : 331–335[Abstract]
  4. Treves S, Khettry J, Broker FH, Wilkinson RH, Watts H. Osteomyelitis: early scintigraphic detection in children. Pediatrics 1976;57 : 173–186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Majd M. Radionuclide imaging in early detection of childhood osteomyelitis and its differentiation from cellulitis and bone infarction. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1977;20 : 9–18[Medline]
  6. Jaramillo D, Treves ST, Kasser JR, Harper M, Sundel R, Laor T. Osteomyelitis and septic arthritis in children: appropriate use of imaging to guide treatment. AJR 1995;165 : 399–403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Dangman BC, Hoffer FA, Rand FF, O'Rourke EJ. Osteomyelitis in children: gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology1992; 182:743 –747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Nixon GW. Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis. Pediatr Ann 1976; 5:64 –81[Medline]
  9. Nixon GW. Hematogenous osteomyelitis of metaphyseal-equivalent locations. AJR 1978;130 : 123–129[Abstract]
  10. Connolly LP, Connolly SA, Drubach LA, Jaramillo D, Treves ST. Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis of children: assessment of skeletal scintigraphy-based diagnosis in the era of MRI. J Nucl Med 2002; 43:1310 –1316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Browner WS, Newman TB, Cummings SR, Hulley SB. Estimating sample size and power. In: Hulley SB, Browner WS, Cummings SR, Grady D, Hearst N, eds. Designing clinical research. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001:65 –91
  12. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143 : 29–36[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Vittinghoff E, Gliddon DV, Shiboski SC, McCulloch CE. Logistic regression. In: Gail M, Krickeberg K, Samet J, Tsiatis A, Wong W, eds. Regression methods in biostatistics. New York, NY: Springer, 2005:152 –209
  14. Davidson D, Letts M, Khoshhal K. Pelvic osteomyelitis in children: a comparison of decades from 1980–1989 with 1990–2001. J Pediatr Orthop 2003;23 : 514–521[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Edwards MS, Baker CJ, Granberry WM, Barrett FF. Pelvic osteomyelitis in children. Pediatrics1978; 61:62 –67[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Zvulunov A, Gal N, Segev Z. Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis of the pelvis in childhood: diagnostic clues and pitfalls. Pediatr Emerg Care 2003; 19:29 –31[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Beaupre A, Carroll N. The three syndromes of iliac osteomyelitis in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61 :1087 –1092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Karmazyn B, Kleiman MB, Buckwalter K, Loder RT, Siddiqui A, Applegate KE. Acute pyomyositis of the pelvis: the spectrum of clinical presentations and MR findings. Pediatr Radiol2006; 36:338 –343[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Mazur JM, Ross G, Cummings J, Hahn GA Jr, McCluskey WP. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of acute musculoskeletal infections in children. J Pediatr Orthop1995; 15:144 –147[Medline]
  20. Fletcher BD, Scoles PV, Nelson AD. Osteomyelitis in children: detection by magnetic resonance—work in progress. Radiology 1984;150 : 57–60[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kaiser S, Jorulf H, Hirsch G. Clinical value of imaging techniques in childhood osteomyelitis. Acta Radiol1998; 39:523 –531[Medline]
  22. Ogden JA. Pelvis. In: Wickland E, ed. Skeletal injury in the child. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1990:627 –659

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. W. Averill, A. Hernandez, L. Gonzalez, A. H. Pena, and D. Jaramillo
Diagnosis of Osteomyelitis in Children: Utility of Fat-Suppressed Contrast-Enhanced MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2009; 192(5): 1232 - 1238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Kan, M. A. Hilmes, J. E. Martus, C. Yu, and M. Hernanz-Schulman
Value of MRI After Recent Diagnostic or Surgical Intervention in Children with Suspected Osteomyelitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1595 - 1600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jaramillo, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jaramillo, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS