AJR Get Involved! Great Benefits! Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dionigi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dionigi, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2319
AJR 2007; 189:876-882
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Effect of Hyperbarism on Radiofrequency Ablation Outcome

Sandro Rossi1, Mario Gallati2, Laura Rosa1, Amedeo Marini3, Francesca Torello Viera1, Marcello Maestri4 and Paolo Dionigi4

1 VI Department of Internal Medicine, Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, IRCCS, Piazzale Golgi, no.1, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
2 Department of Hydraulics and Environmental Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
3 Department of Physics and Chemistry, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
4 Department of Surgical Sciences, Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, IRCCS, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Received November 30, 2006; revised April 23, 2007;

 
Address correspondence to S. Rossi (s.rossi{at}smatteo.pv.it).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to investigate whether increases in atmospheric or local tissue pressure would affect the outcome of radiofrequency ablation procedures and the size of the created thermal lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thermal lesions were produced in specimens of explanted bovine liver inside a hyperbaric chamber at 101 (atmospheric), 141, 202, 273, and 364 kPa using radiofrequency power settings of 20, 30, 40, and 50 W. In subsequent in vivo experiments, thermal lesions were produced in the livers of anesthetized pigs with or without occlusion of the hepatic vein draining the ablation site.

RESULTS. At each radiofrequency power setting, progressive increases in applied pressure were paralleled by decreases in minimum impedance and increases in maximum tissue temperatures at the electrode tip (reflecting tissue–fluid boiling points), delivery time, total energy delivered, and thermal lesion volumes. Similar increases were observed in radiofrequency ablation procedures performed in vivo under occlusion of the vein draining the ablation site.

CONCLUSION. By elevating the tissue–fluid boiling point, increased pressure delays the desiccation of tissue in contact with the radiofrequency electrode tip and the related sharp increase in impedance. The result is prolonged delivery of larger amounts of radiofrequency energy and larger thermal lesions.

Keywords: interventional procedures • liver neoplasms • radiofrequency ablation


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Radiofrequency ablation was first used to treat hepatic tumors in the mid 1990s [14], and more recently, it has also been proposed for treatment of other parenchymal neoplasms [58]. The procedure involves the imagingguided placement of the conductive tip of an electrode within the tumor mass [110] and the delivery of radiofrequency energy as an alternating electrical current. The result is frictional heating and, ultimately, coagulative necrosis of tissues around the electrode tip [1113].

The volume of the thermal lesion created depends on the amount of heat generated within the tissue minus that lost through blood flow–related convection. Heat generation is a function of the radiofrequency power setting, the duration of energy delivery, the surface area of the conductive tip, and tissue impedance [11, 12]. At frequencies of 460–500 kHz, the resistive component of impedance depends largely on the water content of the tissue, which decreases when tissue fluids undergo vaporization and boiling. When tissues that are in direct contact with the electrode tip are completely desiccated, impedance increases sharply to levels that preclude further energy delivery [1115].

In the beginning, the clinical applicability of radiofrequency ablation was limited by the small volume of tissue that could be ablated with a single electrode insertion [1]. Several approaches have been developed to overcome this problem including overlapping strategies [1, 2], the use of sophisticated electrodes [24, 1416] that increase the amount of radiofrequency energy that can be deposited in the tissue, and finally local vessel-occlusion techniques that reduce convectional heat loss within the ablation zone [1721].

In certain cases, the increases in thermal lesion volume produced with the latter approach have been larger than expected [19, 20]. For example, we performed radiofrequency ablation on the livers of anesthetized pigs during partial hepatic vein occlusion, which merely reduces tissue blood flow. Surprisingly, the thermal lesions produced were as large as or larger than those produced with the same equipment and power setting in explanted livers or in vivo swine livers subjected to the Pringle maneuver, conditions in which convectional heat loss is nonexistent [19]. A review of the data sets for these experiments revealed that the tissue temperatures recorded at the end of procedures performed during hepatic vein occlusion were also slightly higher than those observed during ex vivo procedures and during in vivo procedures performed under normal flow conditions or after reduction of inflow to the ablation zone.

These findings suggested that reduction of flow-related heat loss is not the only mechanism underlying the increases in thermal lesion volume achieved with hepatic vein occlusion. We hypothesized that, in addition to reducing convectional heat loss, this particular vessel occlusion maneuver also increases hydrostatic pressure in the ablation zone. The higher tissue temperatures recorded at the end of these procedures might thus reflect a pressure-induced increase in the boiling point of tissue fluids, which would delay tissue desiccation and increase the amount of energy that could be deposited within the tissue. To test this hypothesis, we first analyzed the effects of hyperbarism on the outcome of radiofrequency ablation procedures.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Experimental Design
In phase 1, we evaluated the effects of increased pressure on the outcome of radiofrequency procedures performed on samples of bovine liver inside a hyperbaric chamber. Five pressure levels were tested: 101 (atmospheric), 141, 202, 273, and 364 kPa. The choice of the latter four pressures was based on their capacity to produce progressive increments of 10°C in the boiling point of water [22]. At each pressure tested, seven thermal lesions were created at each of the following power settings: 20, 30, 40, and 50 W.

In phase 2, we investigated the hypothesis that effects similar to those achieved with hyperbarism could be reproduced by occluding the vein draining the ablation zone, thereby increasing the local hydrostatic tissue pressure. We produced thermal lesions in the livers of seven live pigs (two lesions per animal): the first lesion was created in the left hepatic lobe without any blood flow manipulation (control); the second in the right lobe after occlusion of the right hepatic vein.

Equipment
The system, described in detail elsewhere [8], included a commercially available radiofrequency generator (TAG 100, Invatec S.r.L.) and active and passive electrodes. The generator operates at a frequency of 480 kHz and has a nominal power output of 100 W within an impedance range of 20–200 {Omega}. Digital displays furnish real-time readings of delivered power, duration of energy delivery, temperatures, and impedance. The active electrode (external caliber: 1.6 mm) was a 25-cm-long stainless-steel needle, the shaft insulated with a 0.1-mm-thick layer of plastic. The exposed tip (2.0 cm long) contained a K-type thermocouple to monitor temperatures. It was precalibrated with a reference Hg thermometer and had an absolute precision of ± 1.0°C within the range of 30–160°C. The passive electrode was an 8.0 x 16.5 cm conductive grounding plate (Hospital Plate, GPS).

Explanted tissues were treated inside a cylindric, stainless-steel hyperbaric chamber (height, 30 cm; external diameter, 40 cm; wall thickness, 7.0 mm) custom-built by an autoclave manufacturer (Fedegari S.p.A). A circular airtight cover, 34 cm in diameter, allowed placement and removal of tissue samples. Electrodes were introduced and withdrawn through a 10-mm-diameter gas-tight port in the chamber wall. The chamber (maximum working pressure, 800 kPa) was pressurized with compressed air introduced through a valve in the wall. Pressure was monitored with an aneroid barometer connected to an external digital display.

Radiofrequency Ablation Procedures
Ex vivo experiments were performed on specimens of bovine liver (each weighing 270–320 g) containing no large vessels that might affect thermal homogeneity. The tissue block (temperature range, 22–24°C) was placed on a raised metal grid at the base of the hyperbaric chamber, and 0.9% saline solution was added until the lower surface of the tissue was immersed to a depth of about 1.0 mm. The grounding pad was attached to the outer chamber wall, and the tip of the electrode was inserted into the sample through the airtight port. The chamber was sealed and isothermally pressurized to the desired level. Radiofrequency energy was then delivered at a constant predetermined power setting until impedance exceeded the generator's upper limit. Each sample was used to produce a single thermal lesion.

In vivo experiments were performed on live pigs (each weighing 35–40 kg) in the laboratory of experimental surgery of the University of Pavia. The protocols were preapproved by our institutional animal research ethics commission. The procedures have been described in detail elsewhere [19]. Briefly, two grounding pads were attached to the animal's shaved back, and a midline laparotomy was performed under general anesthesia. The radiofrequency electrode tip was then inserted into the left hepatic lobe, and a control thermal lesion was created. Power was delivered at 20 W until impedance exceeded the generator's upper limits. At this point, a balloon catheter (external caliber, 2.3 mm) (C-FLEX TPE, William Cook Europe) was inserted into the right hepatic vein and advanced until its tip lay in the distal-most segment of the vein at its convergence with the inferior vena cava.

Next, an IV catheter (external caliber, 2.1 mm) (BD Angiocath, Becton Dickinson Infusion Therapy Systems) was threaded into the vein, and its tip was positioned 2.0 cm proximal to the balloon. The IV catheter was connected to a pressure monitor (Viridia M1165A, Hewlett Packard), and hepatic venous pressure monitoring was started with a standard method [23]. The balloon was then inflated with approximately 0.9 mL of saline to produce complete hepatic vein occlusion, which was confirmed by the absence of intraluminal signals on color Doppler sonography (ProSound SSD 5500, ALOKA).

When the pressure had stabilized (about 2–4 minutes after occlusion), the radiofrequency electrode tip was inserted into the right hepatic lobe, and the second thermal lesion was created with the same settings and method used for the control thermal lesion. Electrode insertions for both thermal lesions and the IV placement of the catheters were performed under sonographic guidance with the equipment cited previously and a 7.5-MHz linear probe. At the end of the procedure, the animal was sacrificed with a lethal dose of anesthetic and the liver removed for immediate examination.

Delivery time, impedance values, and tissue temperatures were recorded for each in vivo and ex vivo procedure. Voltage signals from the generator were stored in a VI Logger, USB 6008 (National Instruments) and converted into temperature and impedance signals.

Thermal Lesion Measurement
Tissue slices (4.0–5.0 mm thick), cut at right angles to the electrode insertion line [1, 19, 24], were scanned on a precalibrated flatbed scanner (1240U, Epson). Thermal lesions were treated as rotational ellipsoids in which volumes are calculated as Ve =4 /3 {pi} Ir2 (I = 1/2 the length of the exposed electrode tip and r = radius of the largest circular section of the thermal lesion). The radius was calculated from a circular area (A) representing the best-fit for the central section of the thermal lesion, so that r =(A /{pi})0.5. The area (A) itself was derived with the aid of the UTHSCSA ImageTool, version 3.0 (The University of Texas Health Science Center).

Statistical Analysis
The required sample size was calculated with nQuery Advisor software, version 4.0 (Statistical Solutions). The estimated means and SDs of the parameters necessary to establish the sample size were based on data from the literature [1519] and the results of our preliminary experiments. Seven measurements at each pressure (n = 5) and power setting (n = 4) were used to ensure a power of more than 90% to detect differences with a 5% risk of alpha error (analysis of variance).

Quantitative data are shown as means and standard errors [SE]. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate data distribution. The homogeneity of variances was assessed with the Levene test. Temperature, radiofrequency energy delivery time, total energy delivered, impedance, and thermal lesion volumes obtained at different pressures were compared by factorial analysis of variance and Scheffé post hoc tests. Correlations between parameters were analyzed with Pearson's coefficient. The thermal lesion volumes obtained at different pressures and with different amounts of energy were evaluated as means and 95% CI. Analyses were performed with Statistica for Windows (StatSoft).


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Phase 1: Effects of Hyperbarism on Radiofrequency Ablation Parameters
The four hyperbaric pressures tested produced effects on the boiling points of liver tissue fluids similar to the effects they exert on water (Figs. 1A and 1B). At a constant power setting of 20 W, pressure increases were accompanied by progressively higher maximum tissue temperatures (Fig. 1B), longer energy delivery times (Fig. 1C), and lower minimum impedance values (Fig. 1D). The increases in delivery time corresponded to increases in the amount of energy deposited within the tissue, which correlated with thermal lesion volume. Consequently, increasing pressures were associated with increases in the mean thermal lesion volume (Fig. 2).


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A On graphs of effects of hyperbarism on radiofrequency thermal ablation procedures performed on explanted bovine liver specimens at power setting of 20 W, raw curves depict single point measured. Graphs show results of procedures performed at five different pressures (n = 7). Within pressure and temperature ranges used, enthalpy of vaporization and thermal and electrical conductivity of tissue fluids are not expected to undergo variations capable of influencing framework being established [22]. Graph shows time curves for maximum tissue temperatures (T) and impedance values (IV) recorded during radiofrequency thermal ablation procedures performed at following pressures: 101 (atmospheric, continuous line), 141 ({square}), 202({triangleup}), 273 ({circ}), and 364 (•) kPa.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B On graphs of effects of hyperbarism on radiofrequency thermal ablation procedures performed on explanted bovine liver specimens at power setting of 20 W, raw curves depict single point measured. Graphs show results of procedures performed at five different pressures (n = 7). Within pressure and temperature ranges used, enthalpy of vaporization and thermal and electrical conductivity of tissue fluids are not expected to undergo variations capable of influencing framework being established [22]. Graph shows effects of test pressures on boiling points of distilled water ({blacksquare}) [22] and liver tissue fluid ({square}). Tissue–fluid boiling point is reflected in graph by maximum tissue temperatures recorded by thermocouple just before impedance-related interruption of radiofrequency energy delivery. Small differences between boiling points of water and of tissue fluids are due to presence of salts and other biologic elements in tissue fluids and to temperature gradient between tissue and electrode tip that houses thermocouple. Agreement between experimental data and ideal water boiling points underlines importance of tissue water content on radiofrequency thermal ablation outcome. Same results were observed at power settings of 30, 40, and 50 W. SE = standard error

 

Figure 3
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C On graphs of effects of hyperbarism on radiofrequency thermal ablation procedures performed on explanted bovine liver specimens at power setting of 20 W, raw curves depict single point measured. Graphs show results of procedures performed at five different pressures (n = 7). Within pressure and temperature ranges used, enthalpy of vaporization and thermal and electrical conductivity of tissue fluids are not expected to undergo variations capable of influencing framework being established [22]. Graph shows effect of hyperbarism on radiofrequency delivery time measured from initiation of power delivery to its abrupt impedance-related interruption. SE = standard error.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D On graphs of effects of hyperbarism on radiofrequency thermal ablation procedures performed on explanted bovine liver specimens at power setting of 20 W, raw curves depict single point measured. Graphs show results of procedures performed at five different pressures (n = 7). Within pressure and temperature ranges used, enthalpy of vaporization and thermal and electrical conductivity of tissue fluids are not expected to undergo variations capable of influencing framework being established [22]. Graph shows effect of hyperbarism on initial impedance values (IIV) and minimum impedance values (MIV) recorded during radiofrequency thermal ablation. SE = standard error.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Effects of hyperbarism on size of thermal lesions created in explanted bovine liver with radiofrequency power setting of 20 W. Graph in bottom right corner shows relationship between thermal lesion volume and applied pressure; photographs show diameters (in centimeters) of representative thermal lesions produced at each pressure tested. SE = standard error.

 
These pressure-related effects were observed at all power settings (Fig. 3A, 3B, 3C), but they were far more evident when a low power setting was used under high pressure. Thus, at 20 W, the application of 364 kPa prolonged energy delivery approximately sixfold compared with controls performed at atmospheric pressure (Figs. 1A, 1C, and 3A) and produced significant increases in the amount of energy delivered to the target tissue and in thermal lesion volume (10.42 ± 1.02 [SE] cm3 vs 2.02 ± 0.04 cm3; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2). Delivery of 50 W at 364 kPa was also associated with significant increases in delivery time (Fig. 3A) and consequently ablated in total energy delivered (p < 0.0001) versus those observed at atmospheric pressure. In this case, however, the gain in terms of thermal lesion volume was not statistically significant (2.85 ± 0.26 cm3 vs 0.83 ± 0.06 cm3; p = 0.454) (Fig. 3B). As shown in Figure 3C, at a given level of total energy deposition, the mean thermal lesion volume was inversely related to the power setting used. For instance, the thermal lesions observed after deposition of 2,000 J of radiofrequency energy delivered at 50 W were significantly smaller than those observed when the same amount of energy was delivered at 20 W (1.41 cm3 [95% CI, 1.29–1.54] vs 2.18 cm3 [1.73–2.64]; p = 0.007).


Figure 6
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A Graphs show effects of hyperbarism on radiofrequency thermal ablation performed in explanted bovine livers at constant power settings of 20 W ({square}), 30 W ({triangleup}), 40 W ({diamond}), and 50 W ({circ}). SE = standard error. Graph shows relationship between pressures and radiofrequency delivery time.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B Graphs show effects of hyperbarism on radiofrequency thermal ablation performed in explanted bovine livers at constant power settings of 20 W ({square}), 30 W ({triangleup}), 40 W ({diamond}), and 50 W ({circ}). SE = standard error. Graph shows relationship between pressures and thermal lesion volume.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C Graphs show effects of hyperbarism on radiofrequency thermal ablation performed in explanted bovine livers at constant power settings of 20 W ({square}), 30 W ({triangleup}), 40 W ({diamond}), and 50 W ({circ}). SE = standard error. Graph shows relationship between radiofrequency power setting, total amount of radiofrequency energy delivered to tissue, and thermal lesion size. For given amount of radiofrequency energy delivered, volumes of obtained thermal lesions with 20 W power setting ({diamond}) were larger than those with 50 W ({diamondsuit}).

 
Phase 2: Effect of Hydrostatic Pressure on Radiofrequency Ablation Parameters
Mean pressures recorded in the hepatic vein increased from 0.65 ± 0.01 kPa before occlusion to 2.58 ± 0.03 kPa after occlusion. Compared with control radiofrequency ablation procedures, those performed with identical settings during hepatic vein occlusion were characterized by higher final tissue temperatures (104.67 ± 0.18°C vs 99.60 ± 0.26°C; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4A) and lower minimum impedance values (p < 0.001) (Fig. 4B). Hepatic vein occlusion increased delivery time and total energy deposited (4,065.71 ± 125.71 vs 2,514.29 ± 85.60 J; p < 0.001) and allowed the creation of significantly larger thermal lesions than those produced without vessel manipulation (2.13 ± 0.07 vs 1.23 ± 0.05 cm3; p < 0.0001) (Figs. 4C and 4D).


Figure 9
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A Effects of hepatic vein occlusion on radiofrequency thermal ablation procedures performed in livers of live pigs (n = 7). All thermal lesions were produced with constant power setting of 20 W. Graph shows maximum tissue temperatures recorded at end of radiofrequency thermal ablation procedures with ({square}) and without ({diamondsuit}) hepatic vein occlusion.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B Effects of hepatic vein occlusion on radiofrequency thermal ablation procedures performed in livers of live pigs (n = 7). All thermal lesions were produced with constant power setting of 20 W. Graph shows impedance values recorded during radiofrequency thermal ablation procedures with ({square}) and without ({diamondsuit}) hepatic vein occlusion.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C Effects of hepatic vein occlusion on radiofrequency thermal ablation procedures performed in livers of live pigs (n = 7). All thermal lesions were produced with constant power setting of 20 W. Representative photograph of thermal lesions created in liver of one of pigs with hepatic vein occlusion. Measurement units are centimeters.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D Effects of hepatic vein occlusion on radiofrequency thermal ablation procedures performed in livers of live pigs (n = 7). All thermal lesions were produced with constant power setting of 20 W. Representative photograph of control thermal lesion created in liver of same pig under normal flow condition. Measurement units are centimeters.

 

Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Our findings show that hyperbarism applied to liver tissue during radiofrequency ablation procedures increases the thermal lesion volume that can be obtained. Each increment in applied pressure produced an increase in the maximum temperature reached in the tissue, in energy delivery times, and in total energy deposition compared with those observed at atmospheric pressure. These findings suggest that the pressure-induced effects are linked to an upward shift in the boiling point of tissue fluids. As a result, desiccation of tissue in direct contact with the electrode tip occurs later, the sharp rise in impedance that precludes further energy delivery is delayed, and larger amounts of energy can be deposited within the tissue. It is less clear why the increases in pressure were consistently associated with significant decreases in the minimum impedance values recorded during the procedure. This phenomenon may be related to a shift of water from the intracellular to the extracellular space caused by the pressure forces exerted on the tissue.

Our ex vivo experiments not only showed a clear relationship between pressure and radiofrequency ablation outcome, they also revealed that the rate of energy delivery plays a more important role in thermal lesion outcome than we originally thought. The volume of a thermal lesion produced by the deposition of a given amount of radiofrequency energy decreases as the power setting increases. In all probability, the rapid deposition of large amounts of energy that occurs when high power levels are used causes rapid tissue charring that interrupts the heat diffusion process. Occlusion of the hepatic vein draining the ablation site has a complex effect on radiofrequency ablation. Thermal lesion volume increases achieved with this maneuver in previous in vivo experiments [19] and in human hepatic tumors [21] can be partially attributed to a reduction in convectional heat loss. Our findings suggest that hydrostatic tissue pressure also plays an important role, albeit one that is somewhat less straightforward than originally hypothesized. In fact, a post-occlusion pressure of ~ 2.5 kPa in the hepatic vein increased the tissue–fluid boiling point by approximately 5°C, which is consistent with the results of our phase 1 experiments (Fig. 1B). This increase alone is not sufficient to justify the significant changes provoked by vein occlusion in delivery time and minimal impedance (Fig. 4B). However, an increased venous pressure of ~ 2.5 kPa would exceed interstitial pressures (hydrostatic plus colloid osmotic pressures), reversing the pressure gradient across the capillary wall and allowing transfer of water from the intravascular to the interstitial space [24].

The resulting increase in tissue water content would contribute substantially to the decreases in impedance and the increases in delivery time observed in these experiments. Occlusion of veins draining the ablation site therefore appears to increase thermal lesion volume by eliminating convectional heat loss, raising the boiling point of tissue fluids, and—above all—increasing tissue water in the form of interstitial edema. Whereas the first mechanism is operative during occlusion of vessels that either supply (i.e., hepatic artery, portal vein, and Pringle maneuver) or drain the ablation zone, the latter two mechanisms are dependent on increases in local hydrostatic pressure, which would be expected only with obstructed venous drainage. The three-pronged effect of hepatic vein occlusion hypothesized here is thus fully consistent with the relative increases in thermal lesion volume that have been observed with the different vessel-occlusion techniques [19].

The influence of pressure on thermal lesion volume has several clinical implications. One of the most striking is that atmospheric pressure can influence the outcome of a radiofrequency ablation procedure. Thermal lesions produced in a sea-level city such as Venice, Italy (pressure ~ 101 kPa), will be larger than those created with identical equipment and settings in a high-altitude city such as La Paz, Bolivia (pressure ~ 64 kPa) [22]. Intraperitoneal pressures will also have to be considered. Pneumoperitoneum has been shown to produce significant volume increases in thermal lesions created in pig livers with laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation [25]. This effect has been attributed to decreased convectional heat loss linked to pressure-related reduction of portal blood flow.

Our phase 1 experiments show that pressure influences thermal lesion volume even in the complete absence of blood flow and suggest that pneumoperitoneum functions like hyperbarism to increase the tissue–fluid boiling points. Pressure-related effects might also explain the larger than expected thermal lesions reported after radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma nodules [4], which have been attributed to a hypothetical "oven" effect related to the insulating properties of cirrhotic tissue surrounding the tumor [26]. Our findings suggest that this phenomenon could be better described as a "pressure-cooker" effect. Small hepatocellular carcinomas are generally encapsulated [27] and have intratumoral pressures that are already higher than nonencapsulated tumors [28]. During radiofrequency ablation, the capsule would impede diffusion of gases generated by tissue heating, leading to additional increases in intratumoral pressures that could elevate the boiling point of tissue fluids.

The importance of tissue–fluid boiling points on radiofrequency ablation outcome also suggests an intriguing variety of new strategies for maximizing the volume of the thermal lesions, including those produced with microwave energy and other techniques that require the presence of water in the tissue to generate heat [29]. Thermal ablation procedures might be performed on patients inside a hyperbaric chamber, or local tissue pressures could be temporarily increased during the procedure by inflation of a balloon incorporated into the electrode, just proximal to its tip.

The pressure-induced effects on tissue–fluid boiling points could also be mimicked by physicochemical modification of tumor-tissue fluids (e.g., via intratumoral injection of a hypertonic saline solution). Indeed, we have already noted remarkably large thermal lesions when radiofrequency ablation was performed on large hepatocellular carcinomas in which arterial feeders had been embolized with gelatin sponges [20]. This phenomenon cannot be explained by the lack of convectional heat loss alone. We hypothesized that it is at least partially related to the chemical and physical characteristics of the gelatin sponges. Thanks to its water-binding proprieties [30], the presence of hydrogel in the ablation zone would promote water retention, enhance local hydration, and render tissues more resistant to desiccation, thereby increasing the amount of energy that can be delivered to the tissue.


Acknowledgments
 
The authors are grateful to Valentina Ravetta, Giorgia Ghittoni, Carmine Tinelli, and Annalisa Gaspari whose important contributions to this study were indispensable to its success. The authors also thank Fortunato Fedegari for generously providing the hyperbaric chamber used in this study, Walter Corsiglia and Monica Cattaneo for assistance in carrying out the experiments, and Marian Everett Kent for valuable contributions in editing this article.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Rossi S, Fornari F, Buscarini L. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided radiofrequency electrocautery for the treatment of the small hepatocellular carcinoma. J Interv Radiol 1993;8 : 97–103
  2. Solbiati L, Golberg SN, Ierace T, et al. Hepatic metastases: percutaneous radio-frequency ablation with cooled-tip electrodes. Radiology 1997;205 : 367–373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Rossi S, Buscarini E, Garbagnati F, et al. Percutaneous treatment of small hepatic tumours by an expandable RF needle electrode. AJR 1998; 170:1015 –1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Curley SA, Izzo F, Delrio P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of unresectable primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies: results in 123 patients. Ann Surg 1999;230 : 1–8[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Dupuy DE, Zagoria RJ, Akerley W, Mayo-Smith WW, Kavanagh PV, Safran H. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of malignancies in lung. AJR 2000; 174:57 –59[Free Full Text]
  6. Rossi S, Dore R, Cascina A, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency thermal ablation of small unresectable lung tumors. Eur Respir J 2006;27 : 556–563[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Djavan B, Zlotta AR, Susani M, et al. Transperineal radiofrequency tumor ablation of the prostate: correlation of magnetic resonance with histopathologic examination. Urology1997; 50:986 –993[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. McAchran SE, Lesani OA, Resnick MI. Radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors: past, present and future. Urology2005; 66:15 –22[Medline]
  9. Siperstein A, Garland A, Engle K, et al. Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of primary and metastatic liver tumors: technical considerations. Surg Endosc 2000;14 : 400–405[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Machi F, Ukida S, Sumida K, et al. Ultrasoundguided radiofrequency thermal ablation of liver tumors: percutaneous, laparoscopic, and open surgical approaches. J Gastrointest Surg2001; 5:477 –489[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Organ LW. Electrophysiological principles of radiofrequency lesion making. Appl Neurophysiol 1976;39 : 69–76[Medline]
  12. Cosman ER, Nashold BS, Badenbaugh P. Stereotactic radiofrequency lesion making. Appl Neurophysiol 1983;46 : 160–166[Medline]
  13. Rossi S, Fornari F, Paties C, et al. Thermal lesions induced by 480 KHz localized current field in guinea pig and pig liver. Tumori 1990; 76:54 –57[Medline]
  14. Livraghi T, Golberg SN, Monti F, et al. Saline-enhanced radio-frequency tissue ablation in the treatment of liver metastases. Radiology 1997;202 : 205–210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Miao Y, Ni Y, Yu J, Guy M. A comparative study on validation of a novel cooled–wet electrode for radiofrequency liver ablation. Invest Radiol 2000;35 : 438–444[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Goldberg SN, Gazelle SN, Solbiati L, Rittman WJ, Mueller PR. Radiofrequency tissue ablation: increased lesion diameter with a perfusion electrode. Acad Radiol 1996;3 : 636–644[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Patterson EJ, Scudamore CH, Owen DA, Nagy AG, Buczkowski AK. Radiofrequency ablation of porcine liver in vivo: effects of blood flow and treatment time on lesion size. Ann Surg1998; 227:559 –565[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Goldberg SN, Hahn PF, Tanabe KK, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency tissue ablation: does perfusion-mediated tissue cooling limit coagulation necrosis? J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998;9 : 101–111[Medline]
  19. Rossi S, Garbagnati F De Francesco I, et al. Relationship between the shape and size of radiofrequency induced thermal lesions and hepatic vascularization. Tumori 1999;85 : 128–132[Medline]
  20. Rossi S. Garbagnati F, Lencioni R, et al. Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation after occlusion of tumor blood supply. Radiology2000; 217:119 –126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. de Baere T, Bessoud B, Dromain C, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors during temporary venous occlusion. AJR 2002; 178:53 –59[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lide DR, ed. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 82nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press,2001
  23. Groszmann JR, Wongcharatrawee S. The hepatic venous pressure gradient: anything worth doing should be done right. Hepatology 2004;39 : 280–282[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Kurbel S, Kurbel B, Belovari T, Mariæ S, Steiner R, Boziæ D. Model of interstitial pressure as a result of cyclical changes in the capillary wall fluid transport. Med Hypotheses 2001;57 : 161–166[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Smith MK, Mutter D, Forbes LE, Mulier S, Marescaux J. The physiologic effect of the pneumoperitoneum on radiofrequency ablation. Surg Endosc 2004;18 : 35–38[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Lazzaroni S, Meloni F, Solbiati L, Gazelle GS. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with radio-frequency ablation versus ethanol injection. Radiology 1999;210 : 655–661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Lim JH, Choi D, Park CK, Lee WJ, Lim HK. Encapsulated hepatocellular carcinoma: CT–pathologic correlations. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:2326 –2333[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Tanaka T, Yamanaka N, Oriyama T, Furukawa K, Okamoto E. Factors regulating tumor pressure in hepatocellular carcinoma and implications for tumor spread. Hepatology 1997;26 : 283–287[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Simon CJ, Dupuy DE, Mayo-Smith WW. Microwave ablation: principles and applications. RadioGraphics 2005;25 [suppl 1]:S69 –S83[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Podley DG, Tighe BJ. Water binding proprieties of hydrogel polymers for reverse osmosis and related applications. Br Polym J 1979; 11:130 –136[CrossRef]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dionigi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dionigi, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS